Identification of the genetic determinants responsible for retinal degeneration in families of Mexican descent.

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical characteristics and genetic basis of inherited retinal degeneration (IRD) in six unrelated pedigrees from Mexico. METHODS: A complete ophthalmic evaluation including measurement of visual acuities, Goldman kinetic or Humphrey dynamic perimetry, Amsler test, fundus photography, and color vision testing was performed. Family history and blood samples were collected from available family members. DNA from members of two pedigrees was examined for known mutations using the APEX ARRP genotyping microarray and one pedigree using the APEX LCA genotyping microarray. The remaining three pedigrees were analyzed using a custom-designed targeted capture array covering the exons of 233 known retinal degeneration genes. Sequencing was performed on Illumina HiSeq. Reads were mapped against hg19, and variants were annotated using GATK and filtered by exomeSuite. Segregation and ethnicity-matched control sample analyses were performed by dideoxy sequencing. RESULTS: Six pedigrees with IRD were analyzed. Nine rare or novel, potentially pathogenic variants segregating with the phenotype were detected in IMPDH1, USH2A, RPE65, ABCA4, and FAM161A genes. Among these, six were known mutations while the remaining three changes in USH2A, RPE65, and FAM161A genes have not been previously reported to be associated with IRD. Analysis of 100 ethnicity-matched controls did not detect the presence of these three novel variants indicating, these are rare variants in the Mexican population. CONCLUSIONS: Screening patients diagnosed with IRD from Mexico identified six known mutations and three rare or novel potentially damaging variants in IMPDH1, USH2A, RPE65, ABCA4, and FAM161A genes that segregated with disease.

Pediatric anogenital warts: a 7-year review of children referred to a tertiary-care hospital in Montreal, Canada.

The objectives of this study were to delineate the clinical characteristics of a hospital-referred pediatric population infected with anogenital warts and to investigate the possible relationships between human papillomavirus types and the identified clinical characteristics. Over a 7-year period, 72 patients under the age of 12 years were seen at our dermatology clinic for anogenital warts, corresponding to a prevalence of 1.7/1000 in our patient population. Sixty-four percent (46/72) were girls. Congenital, prenatal, ascending infections occurred in two subjects. The onset of anogenital warts occurred before age 2 in 28% and between 2 and 6 years of age in 62% of children and tended to be younger in boys. We identified unusual cutaneomucosal serotypes human papillomavirus 7 and 57 (three and eight instances, respectively). The modes of transmission of anogenital warts in children cannot be identified either by the clinical appearance of the lesions or by human papillomavirus typing. We conclude that the best way to identify possible sexual abuse is still by history taking, careful assessment of the socio-clinical context, and physical examination.