[Photostimulation plates or conventional films for bedside chest x-ray in pediatric radiology? A comparative study of quality of image and the dose delivered to patients]. / Plaques photostimulables ou films conventionnels pour les clichés pulmonaires "au lit" en radiopédiatrie? Une étude comparative de la qualité de l'image et de la dose délivrée aux patients.

Image quality and patient doses received during chest bedside examinations performed with conventional (film-screen combination) and photostimulable phosphorus plate systems were compared in a study carried out in 1993 in a French pediatric radiology department. Seventy one children (36 males and 35 females) aged between 9 days and 18 years (average: 43 months) were included in the study. Technical performances of all radiological equipment used were permanently checked through a quality control program. One conventional and 3 "photostimulable" films were performed for each patient included (mAs product selected for "photostimulable" system was progressively reduced down to 60% of that of conventional technique). TLD Lithium Fluoride chips were used to measure entrance surface dose during the examination. Image quality of 284 films (213 "photostimulable" + 71 conventional) was assessed by three independent radiologists. Advantages and drawbacks of both studied imaging techniques are discussed in terms of patient dose reduction and image quality.