RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The objective are to determine whether diphenhydramine coadministered with prochlorperazine versus prochlorperazine only is associated with a difference in the risk of migraine treatment failure, as measured by the need for additional therapy, hospitalization rates, and 72-hour return rates, and to compare extrapyramidal adverse effects between groups. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of patients aged 7 to 18 years treated in the emergency department for migraines using prochlorperazine with or without diphenhydramine between 2013 and 2019. Patients were included if they had International Classification of Diseases, Ninth or Tenth Revision, codes for migraine or unspecified headache and were treated with prochlorperazine as part of their initial migraine therapy. Data collected included demographics, medications administered, pain scores, neuroimaging, disposition, return visits, and documentation of extrapyramidal adverse effects. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between diphenhydramine coadministration and each of the outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1683 patients were included. Overall, 13% required additional therapy with a 16.7% admission rate and a 72-hour return rate of 5.3%. There was no association between initial treatment with diphenhydramine and the odds of additional therapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.74 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.53-1.03]), admission rates (aOR, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.89-1.67]), or return visit rates (aOR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.55-1.51]). Extrapyramidal adverse effects occurred in 2.4% of patients in the prochlorperazine group and 0% in the prochlorperazine with diphenhydramine group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no association between diphenhydramine coadministration and the need for additional therapy, 72-hour return visit rates or admission rates. Extrapyramidal effects did not occur in patients treated with diphenhydramine.
RESUMO
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a significant noncommunicable disease associated with high long-term mortality. In addition to more effective secondary therapies, the primary prevention of CVD has developed markedly in the past several years. This study aims to investigate the evidence and impact of reducing the threshold for primary CVD risk management to 10% over 10 years with "statin" therapy. To conduct research a systematic review utilizing 5 electronic database searches was completed for studies, analyzing the clinical effect of reducing the threshold of CVD risk to 10% over 10 years for primary prevention with statin therapy. The study included six (6) trials. Statin therapy was allocated to 31,018 participants. The mean age was 61 years and the mean follow-up was 4.6 years. The mean relative reduction in total cholesterol was 19% (from an average of), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 28.3% (from mmol/L to mmol/L) and triglycerides were 14.8% (from mmol/L to mmol/L). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol was observed to increase by a mean of 3.3% (from mmol/L to mmol/L). When examining all-cause mortality, statin therapy was associated with a 12% relative risk reduction compared with control, where overall rates were reduced from 1.4% to 1. % There is a 30% risk reduction in general major coronary events (from to %). There is a 19% risk reduction in general major cerebrovascular events with the statin group. While there is undoubtedly statistical evidence that supports the observation of the effectiveness of statin therapy for primary prevention, there is a risk that many hundreds of patients need to be treated to avoid a single adverse clinical outcome.