Comparative Effects of Azithromycin and Probiotics for Treatment of Acne Vulgaris.

OBJECTIVES: To measure the efficacy of oral probiotics when combined with a topical agent, and to compare the efficacy of Azithromycin, Probiotics, and their combination for the treatment of acne vulgaris. STUDY DESIGN: A quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Pharmacology Department, IIMC in mutual collaboration with the Dermatology Department, Pak Emirates Military Hospital (PEMH), Rawalpindi, from September 2021 to August 2022. METHODOLOGY: Seventy-five patients were enrolled in the study and were divided into 3 groups. Group A received Azithromycin (250mg oral on alternate days), Group B received probiotics i.e. Hi-Flora sachet (1 sachet oral daily), and Group C received both azithromycin (250mg oral on alternate days) and probiotics (Hi-Flora 1 sachet oral daily). The efficacy of three treatment regimens was measured by checking the difference in mean lesion count at the baseline and after 3 months of treatment and the percentage was calculated. RESULTS: All patients demonstrated significant improvement in total lesion count after treatment. In group A, the mean lesion count was reduced by 83.3%, in group B by 84.4%, and in group C, the reduction in mean lesion count was 90.3%. CONCLUSION: Probiotics have equal efficacy to azithromycin, and their combination has shown synergistic effects for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Probiotics should be used in combination with azithromycin for the best results for the management of acne vulgaris. KEY WORDS: Acne vulgaris, Azithromycin, Probiotics, Efficacy.

Effects of body mass index on propofol-induced cardiovascular depression in the Pakistani population.

Objective: To determine the relationship between the patient's Body Mass Index (BMI) and the cardiovascular effects produced by propofol at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg in the Pakistani population. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the Holy Family Hospital Rawalpindi from August 2021 to January 2022. According to their BMI, one hundred twenty Pakistani individuals 18 to 60 years of age were equally divided into three groups. Group N (n = 40) with a BMI of 18 to 24.9, group OW (n=40) with a BMI of 25 to 29.5, and group O (n=40) with a BMI of 30 to 34.9 were randomized to receive propofol injections at a 1.5 mg/kg dose for induction of anesthesia. We measured mean blood pressure before the propofol and then at one, three, and ten minutes after the injection. Data were analyzed by using SPSS 22. Results: Mean blood pressure decreases significantly in all groups, as shown by p-values of <0.001 for the first two readings. In group N, blood pressure returned to near normal within ten minutes (p-value 0.061), but in groups, OW and O, mean blood pressure was significantly lower even after ten minutes (p-values 0.005 and 0.001, respectively). Individual variations in propofol response were also observed. Conclusion: In the Pakistani population, propofol at an induction dose of 1.5 mg/kg to patients with different body weights produces cardiovascular effects with marked standard deviations in each group, which indicate different individual responses. Clinical Trial Number: NCT05383534 https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/.