The current state and future perspectives of radiotherapy for cervical cancer.

Radiotherapy is an effective treatment method for cervical cancer and is typically administered as external beam radiotherapy followed by intracavitary brachytherapy. In Japan, center shielding is used in external beam radiotherapy to shorten treatment time and reduce the doses delivered to the rectum or bladder. However, it has several challenges, such as uncertainties in calculating the cumulative dose. Recently, external beam radiotherapy has been increasingly performed with intensity-modulated radiotherapy, which reduces doses to the rectum or bladder without center shielding. In highly conformal radiotherapy, uncertainties in treatment delivery, such as inter-fractional anatomical structure movements, affect treatment outcomes; therefore, image-guided radiotherapy is essential for appropriate and safe performance. Regarding intracavitary brachytherapy, the use of magnetic resonance imaging-based image-guided adaptive brachytherapy is becoming increasingly widespread because it allows dose escalation to the tumor and accurately evaluates the dose delivered to the surrounding normal organs. According to current evidence, a minimal dose of D90% of the high-risk clinical target volume is significantly relevant to local control. Further improvements in target coverage have been achieved with combined interstitial and intracavity brachytherapy for massive tumors with extensive parametrical involvement. Introducing artificial intelligence will enable faster and more accurate generation of brachytherapy plans. Charged-particle therapies have biological and dosimetric advantages, and current evidence has proven their effectiveness and safety in cervical cancer treatment. Recently, radiotherapy-related technologies have advanced dramatically. This review provides an overview of technological innovations and future perspectives in radiotherapy for cervical cancer.

Impact of concurrent antibody-drug conjugates and radiotherapy on symptomatic radiation necrosis in breast cancer patients with brain metastases: a multicenter retrospective study.

AIM: We aimed to investigate the impact of concurrent antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) and radiotherapy on symptomatic radiation necrosis (SRN) in breast cancer patients with brain metastases (BM). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study uses four institutional data. Eligibility criteria were histologically proven breast cancer, diagnosed BM with gadolinium-enhanced MRI, a Karnofsky performance status of 60 or higher, and radiotherapy for all BM lesions between 2017 and 2022. Patients with leptomeningeal dissemination were excluded. Concurrent ADC was defined as using ADC within four weeks before or after radiotherapy. The cumulative incidence of SRN until December 2023 with death as a competing event was compared between the groups with and without concurrent ADC. Multivariable analysis was performed using the Fine-Gray model. RESULTS: Among the 168 patients enrolled, 48 (29%) received ADC, and 19 (11%) had concurrent ADC. Of all, 36% were HER2-positive, 62% had symptomatic BM, and 33% had previous BM radiation histories. In a median follow-up of 31 months, 18 SRNs (11%) were registered (11 in grade 2 and 7 in grade 3). The groups with and without concurrent ADC had 5 SRNs in 19 patients and 13 SRNs in 149, and the two-year cumulative incidence of SRN was 27% vs. 7% (P = 0.014). Concurrent ADC was associated with a higher risk of SRN on multivariable analysis (subdistribution hazard ratio, 3.0 [95% confidence interval: 1.1-8.3], P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that concurrent ADC and radiotherapy are associated with a higher risk of SRN in HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

Classification of Patients With Painful Tumors to Predict Response to Palliative Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify factors affecting pain response to develop a patient classification system for palliative radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Our prospective observational study (UMIN000044984) provided data on patients who received palliative RT for painful tumors. The eligibility criteria were having a numerical rating scale (NRS) score of 2 or more before treatment and receiving palliative RT between August 2021 and September 2022. Post-RT follow-up was scheduled prospectively at 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 52 weeks. Pain response was assessed using the International Consensus Pain Response Endpoints criteria, with the primary outcome being the response rate within 12 weeks. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors affecting pain response and develop the classification system. Each class evaluated the differences in response rate, time to response, and progression. RESULTS: Of the 488 registered lesions, 366 from 261 patients met the criteria. Most patients had bone metastases (75%), of whom 72% were using opioids and 22% underwent reirradiation. Conventional RT (eg, 8-Gy single fraction, 20 Gy in 5 fractions) was administered to 93% of patients. Over a median of 6.8 months of follow-up, the average NRS decreased from 6.1 to 3.4 at 12 weeks for 273 evaluable lesions, with a 60% response rate. Opioid use and reirradiation negatively affected the response rate in multivariate analysis (P < .01). Lesions were categorized into class 1 (no opioid use and no reirradiation; 89 lesions), class 2 (neither class 1 nor 3; 211 lesions), and class 3 (opioid use and reirradiation; 66 lesions), with respective response rates of 75%, 61%, and 36% (P < .001). Time to response was similar across the classes (P = .91), but the progression rates at 24 weeks differed (11%, 27%, and 63%, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid use and reirradiation are factors leading to significant variations in pain response rates and time to progression.

Palliative radiotherapy for painful non-bone lesions in patients with advanced cancer: a single center retrospective study.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of palliative radiotherapy for painful non-bone lesions in patients with advanced cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled patients with painful non-bone lesions who underwent conventional palliative radiotherapy between September 2018 and September 2022. The treatment targets included primary tumor lesions, lymph node metastases, non-bone hematogenous metastases, and other lesions. The primary endpoint was the overall pain response rate in evaluable patients, determined based on the International Consensus Pain Response Endpoint criteria. The secondary endpoints included overall survival, pain recurrence, and adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 420 screened patients, 142 received palliative radiotherapy for painful non-bone lesions, and 112 were evaluable. A pain response was achieved in 67 patients (60%) of the 112 evaluable patients within a median of 1.2 months. Among these patients, 25 exhibited complete response, 42 partial response, 18 indeterminate response, and 27 pain progression. The median survival time was 5.5 months, recorded at a median follow-up of 6.0 months, during which 67 patients died. Multivariate analysis identified poor performance status scores of 2-4, opioid use, and re-irradiation as independent factors associated with a reduced likelihood of achieving a pain response. Pain recurrence occurred in 18 patients over a median of 4.1 months. Seventeen patients had grade 1-2 adverse events, while none experienced grade 3 or higher toxicity. CONCLUSION: Palliative radiotherapy can potentially be a safe and well-tolerated modality for managing painful non-bone lesions, with a low rate of adverse events.

Re-irradiation spine stereotactic body radiotherapy following high-dose conventional radiotherapy for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE:  We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of re-irradiation stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) following high-dose conventional radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS:  Twenty-one patients met the following eligibility criteria: with an irradiation history of 50 Gy2 equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) or more, diagnosed MESCC in the cervical or thoracic spines, and treated with re-irradiation SBRT of 24 Gy in 2 fractions between April 2018 and March 2023. Prior treatment was radiotherapy alone, not including surgery. The primary endpoint was a 1-year local failure rate. Overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events were assessed as the secondary endpoints. Since our cohort includes one treatment-related death (TRD) of esophageal perforation, the cumulative esophageal dose was evaluated to find the dose constraints related to severe toxicities. RESULTS:  The median age was 68, and 14 males were included. The primary tumor sites (esophagus/lung/head and neck/others) were 6/6/7/2, and the median initial radiotherapy dose was 60 Gy2 EQD2 (range: 50-105 Gy2, 60-70/ > 70 Gy2 were 11/4). Ten patients underwent surgery followed by SBRT and 11 SBRT alone. At the median follow-up time of 10.4 months, 17 patients died of systemic disease progression including one TRD. No radiation-induced myelopathy or nerve root injuries occurred. Local failure occurred in six patients, with a 1-year local failure rate of 29.3% and a 1-year OS of 55.0%. Other toxicities included five cases of vertebral compression fractures (23.8%) and one radiation pneumonitis. The cumulative esophageal dose was recommended as follows: Dmax < 203, D0.035 cc < 187, and D1cc < 167 (Gy3 in biological effective dose). CONCLUSION:  Re-irradiation spine SBRT may be effective for selected patients with cervical or thoracic MESCC, even with high-dose irradiation histories. The cumulative dose assessment across the original and re-irradiated esophagus was recommended to decrease the risk of severe esophageal toxicities.

Changing trends in gamma knife surgery to linear accelerator brain stereotactic radiotherapy in Japan: a survey based on the nationwide claims database.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the trends in the platform for stereotactic radiotherapy to the brain (SRT), utilizing the open data of the National Database published by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study analyzed data from FY2014 to FY2021. The practices included in the study were gamma knife surgery (GKS) and SRT with a linear accelerator (LINAC). The total number of outpatient and inpatient cases in each SRT system was evaluated annually. RESULTS: From April 2014 to March 2022, the study included 212,016 cases (102,691 GKS and 109,325 LINAC) of the registered 1,996,540 radiotherapy cases. In the first year, 13,117 (54.1%) cases were GKS, and 11,128 (45.9%) were LINAC; after that, GKS decreased, and LINAC increased, reaching the same rate in FY2017. Compared to the first year, the final year showed 11,702 GKS (- 1415 or - 10.8%) and 17,169 LINAC (+ 6041 or + 54.3%), with an increase of 4626 total SRT cases to 28,871 (+ 19.1%). The percentage of outpatient treatment also increased from 4.6 to 11.8% for GKS and from 44.7 to 57.9% for LINAC. CONCLUSION: The study found a gradual decrease in the selection of GKS, an increasing trend in the selection of LINAC, and an increase in the overall number of stereotactic irradiations. In particular, the proportion of outpatient treatment increased, indicating that more than half of LINAC was selected for outpatient treatment.

Optimized radiotherapy treatment strategy for early glottic carcinoma.

The local control rates of T1 bulky and T2 glottic carcinoma treated via radiation therapy alone are unsatisfactory; thus, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of our treatment protocol for early glottic carcinoma. Patients with early glottic squamous cell carcinoma treated via radiation therapy from January 2007 to November 2019 were reviewed. Patients were treated with: 63-67.5 Gy/28-30 fractions of radiation therapy alone for T1 non-bulky; concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 and 60 Gy/30 fractions for T1 bulky and T2 favorable; and concurrent chemoradiotherapy with high-dose cisplatin and 66-70 Gy/33-35 fractions for T2 unfavorable glottic carcinoma. Local failure rates were estimated using the cumulative incidence function, overall and disease specific survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and adverse events were evaluated. Eighty patients were analyzed; the median age was 69.5 (range, 26-90) years, the median follow-up time for survivors was 40.1 (range, 1.9-128.4) months, and the 3-year local failure, disease specific survival, and overall survival rates were 5.8%, 98.3%, and 94.4%, respectively. In T1 bulky and T2 cases, the local failure rate was significantly lower in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy than in the radiation therapy alone group. Grade 3 acute dermatitis and mucositis were noted in nine and four patients, respectively. There were no acute adverse events of Grade 4 or higher, or late adverse events of Grade 2 or higher. The treatment protocol was effective and well-tolerated; thus, the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy was suggested in T1 bulky and T2 cases.

Retrospective non-inferiority study of stereotactic radiosurgery for more than ten brain metastases.

AIM: This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with > 10 brain metastases (BM) compared to patients with 2-10 BM. METHODS: The study included multiple BM patients who underwent SRS between 2014 and 2022, excluding patients who underwent whole brain radiotherapy, had a Karnofsky Performance Status score < 60, suspected leptomeningeal disease, or a single BM lesion. Patients were divided into two groups (2-10 and > 10 BM groups) and matched 2:1 based on propensity scores. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the matched dataset, with intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) as the secondary endpoint. Non-inferiority was established if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the adjusted hazard ratio was below 1.3. RESULTS: Of the 1042 patients identified, 434 met eligibility criteria. After propensity score matching, 240 patients were analyzed (160 in the BM 2-10 group and 80 in the > 10 BM group). The median OS was 18.2 months in the 2-10 BM group and 19.4 months in the > 10 BM group (P = 0.60). The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.59-1.24), indicating non-inferiority. PFS was not significantly different between the groups (4.8 months vs. 4.8 months, P = 0.94). The number of BM did not significantly impact OS or PFS. CONCLUSIONS: SRS for selected patients with > 10 BM was non-inferior in terms of OS compared to those with 2-10 BM in a propensity score-matched dataset.

Recent trends of characteristics and treatments in adults with newly diagnosed brain metastases.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate recent trends in characteristics and treatments among patients with brain metastases in clinical practice. METHODS: All newly diagnosed patients with brain metastases during 2016-2021 at a single cancer center were enrolled. We collected the detailed features of each patient and estimated the number of candidates considered to meet the following criteria used in common clinical trials: Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70 and mutated non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer or melanoma. The brain metastases treatments were classified as follows: (i) stereotactic radiosurgery, (ii) stereotactic radiosurgery and systemic therapy, (iii) whole-brain radiotherapy, (iv) whole-brain radiotherapy and systemic therapy, (v) surgery, (vi) immune checkpoint inhibitor or targeted therapy, (vii) cytotoxic agents and (ix) palliative care. Overall survival and intracranial progression-free survival were estimated from brain metastases diagnosis to death or intracranial progression. RESULTS: A total of 800 brain metastases patients were analyzed; 597 (74.6%) underwent radiotherapy, and 422 (52.7%) underwent systemic therapy. In addition, 250 (31.3%) patients were considered candidates for common clinical trials. Compared to 2016, the later years tended to shift from whole-brain radiotherapy to stereotactic radiosurgery (whole-brain radiotherapy: 35.7-29.1% and stereotactic radiosurgery: 33.4-42.8%) and from cytotoxic agents to immune checkpoint inhibitor/targeted therapy (cytotoxic agents: 10.1-5.0 and immune checkpoint inhibitor/targeted therapy: 7.8-10.9%). There was also an increase in the proportion of systemic therapy combined with radiation therapy (from 26.4 to 36.5%). The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 12.7 and 5.3 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed the diversity of brain metastases patient characteristics, recent changes in treatment selection and the percentage of candidates in clinical trials.

Radiotherapy or systemic therapy versus combined therapy in patients with brain metastases: a propensity-score matched study.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefits of systemic therapy (ST) combined with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM). METHODS: The patient data were extracted from the institutional disease database from 2016 to 2021. Surgical and whole-brain radiotherapy cases and poor Karnofsky performance status (KPS < 70) were excluded. The eligible patients were divided into monotherapy (SRS alone or ST alone) and combined therapy (SRS and ST, combined within a month). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to examine factors associated with increased risk of death and intracranial progression. The propensity score for selecting treatment was calculated based on existing prognostic covariates. Two groups were matched 1:1 and compared for intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We identified 1605 patients and analyzed 928 (monotherapy: n = 494, combined therapy: n = 434). In a multivariable model, the combined therapy was independently associated with improved PFS and OS relative to the monotherapy. At the median follow-up of 383 days in the matched dataset, the combined therapy group showed significantly longer PFS (median, 7.4 vs. 5.0 months, P < 0.001) and OS (median, 23.1 vs. 17.2 months, P = 0.036) than the monotherapy group. The overall intracranial progression and mortality risk was reduced in the combined therapy group, with an estimated HR of 0.70 and 0.78. CONCLUSIONS: Combined therapy exhibited longer PFS and OS than monotherapy in BM patients. The results support the recent trend toward combining systemic and local therapies, encouraging future clinical trials.

A case of intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas originating from the branch duct: cast in the mold sign.

A 59-year-old man with jaundice and lower common bile duct stenosis was referred to our institution for diagnosis and treatment. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging showed a well-circumscribed smoothly marginated solid mass lesion in the pancreatic head. He underwent pyloric preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Histopathological specimen revealed that the mass was located in the dilated branch duct of the pancreatic head, and an intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm originating from the branch pancreatic duct was diagnosed. On magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, the mass within the dilated duct branch in the pancreatic head was similar to a "cast in the mold" image, which we retrospectively deemed, might be reflecting the nature of this tumor.