[Re-Administration of Anti-EGFR Antibody Drugs for Unresectable Colorectal Cancer-Focusing on Tumor Markers].

The 2022 edition of the Guidelines for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer described rechallenge therapy as a backward treatment for unresectable colorectal cancer, but currently, there is no evidence to support its benefit. We reviewed 6 cases of rechallenge therapy in which tumor marker trends could be followed in our department. Two cases had a rapid decline in tumor markers that was maintained for 7-8 months. In 3 cases, PR was also confirmed on imaging. In contrast, there was 1 case with no decrease in tumor markers at all. Our findings suggest that cases of wild-type RAS prior to rechallenge therapy and cases that are responsive to initial anti-EGFR antibody drugs may have been involved in the effect of rechallenge therapy.

Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in older patients with advanced gastric cancer: the Tokyo Cooperative Oncology Group (TCOG) GI-1601 study.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOX) is a standard treatment option for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We conducted a prospective multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CapeOX as a first-line therapy for AGC in older patients. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients aged ≥ 70 years with AGC were eligible. Initial treatment comprised capecitabine (2000 mg/m2 on days 1-14) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 on day 1) every 3 weeks. After the initial feasibility assessment, the dose was reduced considering toxicity (capecitabine, 1500 mg/m2 on days 1-14; and oxaliplatin, 100 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In total, 108 patients were enrolled, of whom 104 were evaluated. Thirty-nine patients received the original-dose treatment, whereas 65 received the reduced-dose treatment. The median OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and time to treatment failure (TTF) were 12.9 (95% CI 11.6-14.8), 5.7 (95% CI 5.0-7.0), and 4.3 (95% CI 3.9-5.7) months, respectively, for all patients; 13.4 (95% CI 9.5-16.0), 5.8 (95% CI 4.1-7.8), and 5.3 (95% CI 3.5-7.2) months in the original-dose group; and 12.8 (95% CI 11.3-15.3), 5.7 (95% CI 4.4-7.0), and 4.1 (95% CI 3.7-5.7) months in the reduced-dose group. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (17.9%), anemia (12.8%), and thrombocytopenia (12.8%) in the original-dose group and neutropenia (13.8%) and anorexia (12.3%) in the reduced-dose group. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate CapeOX's efficacy and safety in older AGC patients.

A Case Report of Primary Unresectable Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Causing Colonic Obstruction Due to Peritoneal Dissemination.

Although surgical resection is the only available treatment to achieve long-term survival in biliary tract cancer, many cases are often identified at an advanced stage at the time of diagnosis. Radiotherapy may be an alternative option to prolong survival in cases with locally advanced unresectable disease. While there are some reports of long-term survival after radiotherapy for unresectable biliary tract cancer, it is rare that clinical symptoms are exhibited by peritoneal dissemination more than 8 years after radiotherapy and that resection can be performed. Our case was a 55-year-old female who had visited with a complaint of jaundice and was diagnosed with primary unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. She received definitve chemoradiotherapy, and repeated receiving maintenance chemotherapy thereafter until clinical manifestation. During follow-up, she was diagnosed with stenosis of the sigmoid colon, which was attributed to peritoneal dissemination of cholangiocarcinoma. We herein report a rare case of primary unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma after chemoradiotherapy which was followed by chemotherapy that was controlled for more than 8 years but eventually caused colonic obstruction attributed to peritoneal dissemination.

Multicenter, single-arm, phase II study of the continuous use of panitumumab in combination with FOLFIRI after FOLFOX for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: Exploratory sequential examination of acquired mutations in circulating cell-free DNA.

This multicenter single-arm, phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of uninterrupted panitumumab usage combined with cytotoxic doublets for unresectable/metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Additionally, clinical value of the RAS/BRAF mutation status in circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) was evaluated; this evaluation was measured independently of the protocol treatment. Eligible patients with RAS wild-type mCRC who had received the first-line panitumumab plus FOLFOX treatment were recruited and administered continuous panitumumab combined with FOLFIRI. Progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months was the primary endpoint, with threshold and expected values of 35% and 50%, respectively. In total, 54 patients were enrolled between October 2017 and October 2019. The crude 6-month PFS rate was 37.0%, with a 4.8-month median PFS. The response rate and disease control rate were 16.7% and 50.0%, respectively. Notably, of the 54 participants, 17 showed RAS/BRAF mutations until the end of the protocol treatment and of the 22 patients with progressive disease as their best response, 10 possessed RAS/BRAF mutations in their plasma ccfDNA at baseline. The median PFS significantly differed among patients harboring tumors with BRAF and RAS mutations and those with wild-type tumors. In conclusion, our study failed to show the expected efficacy of the continuous panitumumab use in the second-line treatment. Liquid biopsy discriminated the duration of PFS according to the mutation status. The effectiveness of continuous treatment with panitumumab should be evaluated in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC determined by liquid biopsy at the start of the second-line treatment.

[A Case of Ascending Colon Cancer with Skull Metastasis].

A 55-year-old woman became aware of a tumor on the left side of the head in July, 2020 and was referred to our hospital in September because of its rapid growth. A head CT showed a neoplastic lesion of the skull. A CT from the neck to the pelvis revealed an ascending colon tumor and multiple lesions in the liver, which was suspected as metastasis. A colonoscopy also showed a type 2 like lesion in the ascending colon, and a biopsy showed adenocarcinoma. A pedunculated polyp had been pointed out in the ascending colon at another hospital four years previously, and the pathological result was an adenoma, but endoscopic mucosal resection was not performed. It is considered that the adenoma became advanced colon cancer with metastasis through the mechanism of multistage carcinogenesis. Metastatic lesions of the ascending colon cancer was suspected with regard to the skull lesion. In addition to the rapid growth, surgical removal was desirable from the viewpoint of cosmetology, and surgery was performed in November. The postoperative pathological diagnosis was a metastatic skull tumor derived from ascending colon cancer. The diagnosis was Stage IVb according to the Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma (9th Edition). Although chemotherapy was started after surgery, the metastatic liver cancer increased rapidly and the patient passed away in April, 2021.

Invasive cribriform carcinoma of the breast detected incidentally on computed tomography: A case report.

Invasive cribriform carcinoma is a rare type of invasive breast carcinoma, and a few cases have been reported. Its features are a cribriform pattern resembling the histological structures of cribriform ductal carcinoma in situ and an excellent prognosis. However, the extent of progress for intraductal extension must be carefully evaluated.

[Two Cases of Synchronous Double Primary Prostate Cancer Accompanying Bone Metastasis and Colon Cancer].

We report two cases of synchronous double primary cancers, which were composed of prostate cancer accompanied by bone metastasis and colon cancer, within only five months of each other. The first was a 77-year-old man whose ECOG PS was 0. He was referred to our hospital in March 2020 because abdominal CT scan, which was performed at a clinic for the purpose of close examination of poor control of diabetes, showed wall thickening of the sigmoid colon. A further examination revealed prostate cancer accompanied by metastatic bone cancer and sigmoid colon cancer. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy was performed in April. Currently, six months after the surgery, both the prostate cancer and its accompanying metastatic bone cancer are well controlled by hormonal therapy. The second case was an 86-year-old man with an ECOG PS of 3 who was brought to our hospital by ambulance in August, 2020 because of fever and abdominal pain. A close examination revealed cecal cancer accompanying acute appendicitis. Prostate cancer accompanied by metastatic bone cancer was also diagnosed. Laparoscopic ileocecal resection was performed in the same month, but, unfortunately, the patient had repeated aspiration pneumonia and he finally passed away 43 days after surgery. We discuss the treatment strategy for colorectal cancer with synchronous or metachronous prostate cancer, which has been increasing in recent years, and include epidemiological considerations.

Phase II study of an oxaliplatin-based regimen for relapsed colon cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy (INSPIRE study).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line chemotherapy with re-introduction of oxaliplatin (OX) more than 6 months after adjuvant chemotherapy including OX. METHODS: Stage II/III colon cancer patients with neuropathies of grade ≤ 1 who relapsed more than 6 months after adjuvant chemotherapy including OX were considered eligible. Eligible patients were treated with 5-fluorouracil, l-leucovorin and OX plus molecularly targeted agents or capecitabine and OX plus bevacizumab (BV) or S-1 and OX plus BV. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were enrolled between September 2013 and May 2019. Twelve patients received 5-fluorouracil, l-leucovorin and OX (FOLFOX) plus BV, 21 patients received capecitabine and OX plus BV, 10 patients received S-1 and OX plus BV and 7 patients received FOLFOX plus cetuximab or panitumumab. The median PFS was 11.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.3-16.0), the median OS was 45.4 months (95% CI 37.4-NA), and the RR was 56.0% (95% CI 42.3-68.8). Adverse events of grade ≥ 3 that occurred in ≥ 5% of cases were neutropenia in 6 patients (12%), peripheral sensory neuropathy in 5 patients (10%), diarrhea in 4 patients (8%), hypertension in 4 patients (8%), anorexia in 3 patients (6%) and allergic reactions in 3 patients (6%). CONCLUSIONS: First-line chemotherapy with re-introduction of OX more than 6 months after adjuvant chemotherapy including OX can be used safely with expected efficacy for relapsed colon cancer patients.

A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study of recombinant thrombomodulin (ART-123) to prevent oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this clinical study was to be the first to explore whether ART-123, a recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin, prevents oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN). METHODS: This randomized, phase IIa trial enrolled stage II/III colon cancer patients who received adjuvant mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy. Participants were randomly allocated to 3 arms in a double-blind manner: placebo (placebo: days 1-3); 1-day ART (ART-123: day 1, placebo: days 2-3); and 3-day ART (ART-123: days 1-3). ART-123 (380 U/kg/day) or placebo was infused intravenously before each 2-week cycle of mFOLFOX6. OIPN was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecological Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity-12 (FACT/GOG-Ntx-12) score by participants and the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) by investigators. RESULTS: Seventy-nine participants (placebo n = 28, 1-day ART n = 27, 3-day ART n = 24) received study drugs. The least-squares mean FACT/GOG-Ntx-12 scores at cycle 12 from the mixed effect model for repeated measures were 28.9 with placebo, 36.3 with 1-day ART (vs. placebo: 7.3 [95% CI 1.9 to12.8, p = 0.009]), and 32.3 with 3-day ART (vs. placebo: 3.4 [95% CI -.1 to 9.0, p = 0.222]). The cumulative incidence of NCI-CTCAE grade ≥ 2 sensory neuropathy at cycle 12 was 64.3% with placebo, 40.7% with 1-day ART (vs. placebo: -23.5 [95% CI -48.4 to 4.0], p = 0.108), and 45.8% with 3-day ART (vs. placebo: -18.5 [95% CI -44.2 to 9.4], p = 0.264). Common adverse events were consistent with those reported with mFOLFOX6; no severe bleeding adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: ART-123 showed a potential preventive effect against OIPN with good tolerability. A larger study with 1-day ART is warranted. NCT02792842, registration date: June 8, 2016.

Phase Ib/II Study of Biweekly TAS-102 in Combination with Bevacizumab for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies (BiTS Study).

LESSONS LEARNED: A biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV schedule in patients with heavily pretreated mCRC showed equivalent efficacy with less toxicity compared with the current schedule of TAS-102 plus BEV combination. Biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV combination could reduce unnecessary dose reduction of TAS-102, maintain higher doses, and possibly be effective even in cases without chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN). The prespecified subgroup analysis of this study showed an obvious association between CIN within the first two cycles and prognosis of biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV. BACKGROUND: TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) plus bevacizumab (BEV) combination therapy has shown promising activity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the previously reported dose and schedule for the TAS-102 (70 mg/m2 /day on days 1-5 and 8-12, every 4 weeks) plus BEV (5 mg/kg on day 1, every 2 weeks) regimen is complicated by severe hematological toxicities and difficult administration schedules. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a more convenient biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV combination. METHODS: Patients with mCRC who were refractory or intolerant to standard chemotherapies were enrolled. Patients received biweekly TAS-102 (twice daily on days 1-5, every 2 weeks) with BEV (5mg/kg on day 1, every 2 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 16 weeks (16-w PFS rate). RESULTS: From October 2017 to January 2018, 46 patients were enrolled. The recommended phase II dose was determined to be TAS-102 (70 mg/m2 /day). Of the 44 eligible patients, the 16-w PFS rate was 40.9% (95% confidence interval, 26.3%-56.8%), and the null hypothesis was rejected (p < .0001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 4.29 months and 10.86 months, respectively. Disease control rate was 59.1%. Common grade 3 or higher adverse events were hypertension (40.9%), neutropenia (15.9%), and leucopenia (15.9%). CONCLUSION: Biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV showed promising antitumor activity with safety.

Association between polymorphisms in EGFR and tumor response during cetuximab and oxaliplatin-based combination therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: Analysis of data from two clinical trials.

Predicting tumor response prior to starting anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody therapy would benefit patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The present study investigated the association between efficacy of cetuximab treatment and gene polymorphisms of fragment C γ receptor (FcγR) 2A, FcγR3A and EGFR in patients with extended RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC. Clinical data and specimens were obtained from 90 patients who participated in either of two clinical studies evaluating the first-line, cetuximab plus oxaliplatin-based treatment. It was hypothesized that polymorphisms H/H of FcγR2A, V/V of FcγR3A, K/K of EGFR and <36 CA repeats in the EGFR gene may be associated with a favorable tumor response. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients with the H/H polymorphism tended to have an improved tumor response compared with the non-H/H population, although the result was not significant [odds ratio, 2.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.89-5.66; P=0.09]. Univariate analysis revealed increased tumor shrinkage in patients with the K/K polymorphism of EGFR compared with the other polymorphisms (mean ± standard deviation, -55.3±28.4 vs. -39.6±40.8%; P=0.04). Subsequent multivariate analysis confirmed that the K/K polymorphism of EGFR predicted greater tumor shrinkage (multiple linear regression analysis estimate, -19.3; 95% CI, -35.5 to 3.0; P=0.02), with the tendency toward a preferable response in patients with <36 CA EGFR gene repeats (estimate, -16.9; 95% CI; -34.4 to 0.6; P=0.06). However, other polymorphisms and clinical variables did not predict tumor shrinkage. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that polymorphisms of EGFR, FcγR2A and FcγR3A may differentiate the patients that obtain the maximum benefit from cetuximab treatment.

Multicenter open-label randomized phase II study of second-line panitumumab and irinotecan with or without fluoropyrimidines in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (PACIFIC study).

This phase II clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of second-line irinotecan and panitumumab treatment (IRI + Pmab) with that of irinotecan, fluoropyrimidines and panitumumab treatment (control) in patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. In addition, early predictive markers of treatment efficacy were explored. Eighty patients were planned to be recruited. Due to a slow accrual rate, only 48 patients were recruited from 2012 to 2016, of which 23 were allocated to the control group and 25 were allocated to the IRI + Pmab group. The median progression-free survival was 254 days (95% confidence interval, 159-306) for control, and 190 days (95% confidence interval, 159-213) for IRI + Pmab (log-rank test, P = 0.26). The response rate without confirmation was 21.7% (5/23) for control and 40.0% (10/25) for IRI + Pmab. Neutropenia, leukopenia, and anorexia were the most common Grade 3/4 adverse events, and several early drop-outs from the treatment protocol were observed in the control group. As for the biomarkers, carcinoembryonic antigen and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) smoothly declined immediately after the initial dosing in patients with a partial response or stable disease. After starting treatment, LDH-1 and - 2 increased, while LDH-4 and - 5 decreased, irrespective of tumor response. However, exceptions were frequent. In conclusion, this study failed to prove the safety and efficacy of irinotecan and panitumumab treatment due to insufficient patient accrual. Although LDH and its isozymes changed after initiation of treatment, their ability to predict the tumor response may not surpass that of carcinoembryonic antigen levels.The University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry: UMIN000007658.

A multicenter single-arm Phase II clinical trial of second-line FOLFIRI plus panitumumab after first-line treatment with FOLFOX plus panitumumab for initial RAS wild-type colorectal cancer with evaluation of circulating tumor DNA: A protocol study.

The efficacy and safety of the continuous use of panitumumab in first- and second-line treatments for colorectal cancer (CRC) have yet to be determined. Liquid biopsy of circulating tumor DNA is capable of assessing the gene mutation status at several time-points, and could predict the efficacy of ongoing panitumumab treatment. To address these two points, a multicenter single-arm Phase II clinical trial will be conducted by evaluating the effect of FOLFIRI with panitumumab as second-line chemotherapy in patients with CRC, after failure or intolerance of first-line treatment with FOLFOX with panitumumab. The primary endpoint is the 6-month progression-free survival rate. Gene mutation status using circulating tumor DNA will be assessed at multiple time-points during the study period as one of the secondary endpoints. The observed 6-month PFS rate will be compared with the threshold 6-month PFS rate of 35% with a one-sided significance level of 10% using the binomial exact test. The target number of cases in this study is 55 patients. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Epidemiological and Clinical Research Information Network (17-0601-1) and will be conducted after approval by the Institutional Review Board of each participating institute. This study is registered in UMIN (UMIN000026817, March 31, 2017). The results of the present study will be presented at related international congresses, and will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals.

The prognostic significance of the expression of monocarboxylate transporter 4 in patients with right- or left-sided colorectal cancer.

AIM: Monocarboxylate transporter 4 (MCT4) is a proton pump that exchanges lactate through the plasma membrane. The present study investigated the clinical significance of the expression of MCT4 in patients with right- or left-sided colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Surgical specimens from 237 CRC patients were immunohistochemically stained with polyclonal anti-MCT4 antibodies. The relationships among the MCT4 expression, the clinicopathological factors, and the prognosis were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-six (62.1%) of 58 patients with right-sided CRC and 95 (53.1%) of 179 patients with left-sided CRC showed the high expression of MCT4. The MCT4 expression was significantly correlated with gender and lymph node metastasis in patients with right-sided CRC, and size, depth of invasion, distant metastasis, and tumor-node-metastasis stage in patients with left-sided CRC. A univariate analysis demonstrated that the expression of MCT4 was a significant prognostic factor in both right- and left-sided CRC patients. A multivariate analysis demonstrated the expression of MCT4 was a significantly independent prognostic factor in patients with left-sided CRC, but not in those with right-sided CRC. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the high expression of MCT4 is a useful marker for tumor progression and a poor prognosis in CRC patients, especially those with left-sided CRC.

Efficacy of CapeOX plus Cetuximab Treatment as a First-Line Therapy for Patients with Extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Background: Oxaliplatin and capecitabine (CapeOX) combined with cetuximab is rarely used to treat advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The present study aimed to clarify the clinical benefits of this treatment regimen when used as a first-line therapy in patients with expanded RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC, using the data and tumor specimens from two previously published Phase II clinical trials. Methods: The gene mutation status and clinical data of 102 patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC, who received either of CapeOX + cetuximab or FOLFOX + cetuximab, were analyzed. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) of CapeOX + cetuximab treatment in patients with extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC. RR comparisons and maximum tumor size changes between different treatment regimens and gene mutation status were set as key secondary endpoints. Results: We identified 88 patients with extended RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC. Those treated with CapeOX + cetuximab (n = 52) had a 61.5% RR (95% CI, 47.0-74.7%), while those treated with FOLFOX + cetuximab (n = 36) had a 66.7% RR (95% CI, 49.0-81.4%). Patients with any mutation (n = 14) had a 42.9% RR (95% CI, 17.1-71.1%). There were no significant differences between these three groups (P = 0.298). The disease control rate was 86.5% (95% CI, 74.2-94.4%) in the CapeOX + cetuximab group, and 88.9% (95% CI, 73.9-96.9%) in the FOLFOX + cetuximab group. Maximum tumor size changes were largest in patients with wild-type mCRC treated with FOLFOX + cetuximab followed by patients with wild-type mCRC treated with CapeOX + cetuximab, and then by those with any mutation (-63.2%, -52.6%, and -27.3%, respectively; P = 0.035). Conclusions: Patients with RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA wild-type mCRC had a sufficient RR following first-line treatment with CapeOX + cetuximab. These results suggest that this combination therapy should be considered as a treatment option for patients with advanced mCRC.

The clinical impact of Hangeshashinto (TJ-14) in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in gastric cancer and colorectal cancer: Analyses of pooled data from two phase II randomized clinical trials (HANGESHA-G and HANGESHA-C).

Background: The current pooled analysis evaluated the efficacy of Hangeshashinto (TJ-14) in the prevention and/or treatment of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (COM) in gastric cancer and colorectal cancer using two prospective, multi-institutional, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trials. Patients and Methods: HANGESHA-G and HANGESHA-C randomly assigned patients with gastric cancer or colorectal cancer who developed moderate to severe COM (grade ≥1) during any cycle of chemotherapy to receive either TJ-14 or a placebo as a double-blind trial. The patients received a placebo or TJ-14 for four to six weeks, according to the chemotherapy regimen, from the start of their next course of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade ≥2 COM in the protocol treatment course, and the secondary endpoints were the time to disappearance of COM and the incidence of adverse events. Results: The pooled population included 181 patients. The incidence of grade ≥2 COM in the TJ-14 group was 55.7% (49 patients), while that in the placebo group was 53.8% (50 patients); there was no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.796). The median time to remission of grade ≥2 COM to grade <1 was 8 days in the TJ-14 group and 15 days in the placebo group (p= 0.072). The hazard ratio was 1.54 [1.02 to 2.31] in favor of TJ-14. Treatment with TJ-14 was associated with marginally significant reduction in the duration of severe grade ≥2 COM in comparison to patients receiving placebo indicating the effect of TJ-14 in reducing the severity of COM. Conclusion: The present-pooled analysis showed that TJ-14 had a treatment effect in gastric cancer and colorectal cancer patients with COM in comparison to a placebo. Further phase III studies with a larger sample size are needed to clarify the protective effects of TJ-14 against COM.

A phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of panitumumab combined with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: the PF trial.

PURPOSE: Fluorouracil monotherapy, instead of the FOLFOX or FOLFIRI regimen, is administered to patients intolerant to oxaliplatin or irinotecan because of their adverse effects. A prospective clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluorouracil monotherapy combined with panitumumab administered to patients with KRAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) intolerant to oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Screening for potential serum biomarkers to predict early therapeutic responses was conducted. METHODS: This single-arm, open-label multicenter phase II trial recruited patients with KRAS WT mCRC from 16 institutes between January 2012 and October 2014. Panitumumab (6 mg/kg) was intravenously administered every 2 weeks, combined with fluorouracil monotherapy, in 2-week cycles. The primary objective was overall response rate, and secondary endpoints included disease-control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, toxicity, and blood-test data. RESULTS: Forty patients (male, 65.0%; median age, 74 years; colon cancer, 72.5%) met eligibility criteria and received 7 cycles (median) of fluorouracil chemotherapy combined with panitumumab. There were no treatment-related deaths. Median time to treatment failure was 3.2 months. 23 (57.5%) patients experienced at least one adverse effect ≥ grade 3. The response rate was 10.0% (95% confidence interval 2.8-23.7%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.3 and 11.3 months, respectively. Total lactase dehydrogenase (LDH) levels and those of LDH-4 and LDH-5, quickly changed with disease reduction or progression. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorouracil monotherapy combined with panitumumab was safely administered to patients with KRAS WT mCRC intolerant to oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Serum LDH levels may predict early responses.

Multicenter phase II study of infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, and oxaliplatin, plus biweekly cetuximab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CELINE trial).

The current phase II study investigated the efficacy and safety of biweekly cetuximab combined with standard oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy [infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-6)] in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Sixty patients with a median age of 64 years (range, 38-82 syears) received a biweekly intravenous infusion of cetuximab (500 mg/m2 on day 1) followed by FOLFOX-6 (2-hour oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 infusion on day 1 in tandem with a 2-h leucovorin 200 mg/m2 infusion on days 1 and 2, and 5-FU as a 400 mg/m2 bolus followed by a 46-hour 2,400 mg/m2 infusion on days 1-3). Patient response rate was 70%, with 95% disease control rates. The median progression-free survival was 13.8 months. Thirteen patients (21.7%) were able to undergo resection of previously unresectable metastases, with the aim of curing them. The median follow-up was 22.7 months, and median overall survival was 31.0 months. Cetuximab did not increase FOLFOX-6 toxicity and was generally well tolerated. The results of the current study demonstrate that the combination of biweekly cetuximab with FOLFOX-6 was well tolerated and had a manageable safety profile for the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Efficacy was comparable to other treatment regimens. The results support the administration of biweekly cetuximab in combination with FOLFOX-6, which may be more convenient and provide treatment flexibility in this setting for patients with metastatic colorectal cancers.

mFOLFOX6 Plus Panitumumab Versus 5-FU/LV Plus Panitumumab After Six Cycles of Frontline mFOLFOX6 Plus Panitumumab: A Randomized Phase II Study of Patients With Unresectable or Advanced/Recurrent, RAS Wild-type Colorectal Carcinoma (SAPPHIRE)-Study Design and Rationale.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, oxaliplatin (OXA)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV)-the mFOLFOX6 regimen-is the most frequently used first-line chemotherapy backbone for metastatic colorectal cancer. However, peripheral nerve disorders caused by OXA during mFOLFOX6 therapy can decrease patients' quality of life. OXA can be safely discontinued from a FOLFOX regimen after 6 cycles during first-line therapy. Also, for patients who discontinue OXA without having experienced peripheral nerve disorders, reintroducing OXA in the later stages of treatment could remain an option. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study is a phase II, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized, controlled exploratory study comparing the efficacy and safety of mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab and 5-FU/LV plus panitumumab in patients with chemotherapy-naïve, unresectable, advanced or recurrent colorectal carcinoma of RAS wild-type (SAPPHIRE; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02337946). Eligible patients will receive 6 cycles of mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab combination therapy, followed by 1:1 randomization to either further treatment with mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab or discontinuation of OXA and treatment with 5-FU/LV plus panitumumab. Up to 100 randomized patients will receive treatment for approximately 12 months or until any of the criteria for treatment discontinuation have been met. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival rate at 9 months after the day of randomization. The secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, overall survival, response rate, and interval to treatment failure. Safety will be evaluated according to the incidence and severity of adverse events, including the incidence of peripheral nerve and skin disorders. Additional endpoints will include maintenance of performance status, continuation of OXA in the mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab group, and continuation of panitumumab in both groups.