Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Potential Role of Microbial Dysbiosis and Recommendations for Sampling Sites.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory condition that affects up to 12% of the human population in developed countries. Previous studies examining the potential role of the sinus bacterial microbiota within CRS infections have found inconsistent results, possibly because of inconsistencies in sampling strategies. The aim of this study was to determine whether the sinus microbiome is altered in CRS and additionally if the middle meatus is a suitable representative site for sampling the sinus microbiome. Swab samples were collected from 12 healthy controls and 21 CRS patients, including all eight sinuses for CRS patients and between one and five sinuses for control subjects. The left and right middle meatus and nostril swabs were also collected. Significant differences in the sinus microbiomes between CRS and control samples were revealed using high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The genus Escherichia was over-represented in CRS sinuses, and associations between control patients and Corynebacterium and Dolosigranulum were also identified. Comparisons of the middle meatuses between groups did not reflect these differences, and the abundance of the genus Escherichia was significantly lower at this location. Additionally, intra-patient variation was lower between sinuses than between sinus and middle meatus, which together with the above results suggests that the middle meatus is not an effective representative sampling site.

Outcomes of modified endoscopic Lothrop in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease with nasal polyposis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) are often reported to be recalcitrant to standard medical and surgical intervention. Failure rates of standard endoscopic sinus surgery in these patients are reported to be as high as 90%. We review the outcomes for our cohort of AERD patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery and endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP). METHODS: Data was collected prospectively between January 2001 and December 2013. Information including demographics, asthma status, aspirin sensitivity, 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Lund-Mackay scores, and endoscopic ostium assessment were collected for up to 5 years. Minimum follow-up was 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 31 AERD patients underwent complete sphenoethmoidectomy, maxillary antrostomy and EMLP during the study period with an average follow-up of 36 months. Polyp recurrence was seen in a total of 18 patients (58%). Seven patients required revision EMLP following initial surgery demonstrating a failure rate of 22.5%. AERD patients had a statistically significant increased risk of both nasal polyps recurrence and need for revision surgery. Revision EMLP was needed due to recurrence of nasal polyps in 6 cases and frontal ostium stenosis in a single case. Time to revision EMLP was similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: Complete sphenoethmoidectomy, maxillary antrostomy, and EMLP is successful in a significant majority of patients with AERD and CRSwNP. It is well tolerated with a low complication rate and facilitates successful ongoing medical management of the condition in patients with AERD.

Outcomes of revision endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP) is used to treat patients who fail conventional sinus surgery. The failure rate of a primary EMLP is reported to be between 5% and 32%. The failure rate of revision EMLP has not been reported. We present our institutions data regarding the outcome of patients requiring revision EMLP. METHODS: Data was collected prospectively. Patients undergoing primary EMLP between January 2001 and December 2013 with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included. Information related to demographics, asthma status, aspirin sensitivity, 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score, Lund-Mackay scores, intraoperative findings, and endoscopic ostium assessment were collected. RESULTS: There were 213 primary EMLPs completed with average follow-up of 36 months. The failure rate of primary EMLP was 8.9% (19/213), whereas the failure rate of revision EMLP was 21% (4/19). Risk factors for failure of primary EMLP included the presence of intraoperative pus, more than 5 previous sinus operations and aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). Revision of EMLP was undertaken primarily due to recurrence of nasal polyps or ostium stenosis. Those patients who underwent revision EMLP experienced symptomatic improvement and no major complications following the procedure. CONCLUSION: The failure rate of revision EMLP is 21% in our series. The majority of revisions were for nasal polyp recurrence. Revision EMLP is a safe and well-tolerated procedure in the small group of patients that require further surgery. Patients with intraoperative pus present at their initial EMLP, more than 5 previous sinus operations, or AERD are at increased risk of failure.

Clinical significance of middle turbinate lateralization after endoscopic sinus surgery.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the clinical significance of middle turbinate lateralization (MTL) occurrence postendoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis, namely, association with postoperative symptoms and eventual need for undergoing revision surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of consecutive postoperative follow-up appointments (November 2009-May 2011) for patients who had had full-house ESS (post hoc analysis). METHODS: Endoscopic video recordings were reviewed by a blinded reviewer to determine occurrence of MTL (any portion of the middle turbinate touching the lateral nasal wall). Postoperative symptom questionnaires using the Adelaide scoring system were collected. Records were reviewed to determine the need for revision surgeries during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients had follow-up with video endoscopy from 2009 to 2011. No statistically significant association between MTL and symptoms was found (P > .05). Of the patients with MTL, 21% required revision versus 9% in those who had no MTL (P = .07). Log-rank test showed that there was a statistically significant difference between the revision surgery survival curves for the MTL and no-MTL groups (P = .03). Controlling for the inability to examine the frontal sinus, the difference between the two survival functions increased (P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: MTL was not associated with patient-reported symptoms, but may be associated with a more rapid need for future revision surgery. We hypothesize that this effect is related to interference with the frontal sinus.

Long-term outcomes for the endoscopic modified Lothrop/Draf III procedure: a 10-year review.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To detail the long-term outcomes of the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP) (also know as Draf III/frontal drillout) and identify key risk factors for failure. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study and chart review. METHODS: Endoscopic assessment of frontal ostium patency and patient-reported symptoms were prospectively collected on patients who underwent EMLP between January 2001 and December 2011 for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Risk factors for failing EMLP were identified. RESULTS: There were 229 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and underwent an EMLP. The average number of standard endoscopic sinus surgery procedures prior to an EMLP was 3.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4-4.2, standard deviation [SD]: 3.3).The average length of follow-up was 45.0 months (95% CI: 41.2-48.9 months, SD: 22.3 months). The EMLP was successful in 95% (217/229), with no further surgery being required. Postsurgical recurrence of disease with persistence of symptoms requiring revision EMLP occurred in 12 patients. No complications were identified. Allergic fungal sinusitis and recurrent Staphylococcus aureus infections were identified as potential risk factors for failure. CONCLUSIONS: This is the single largest study of EMLP in the literature with a long follow-up period. It illustrates the benefit of the EMLP for patients with CRS recalcitrant to medical and standard endoscopic sinus surgery.

Image-guided surgery influences perioperative morbidity from endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Although image-guided surgery (IGS) is considered a valuable tool, its impact on perioperative morbidity for endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) remains unclear. The evidence from reported literature is systematically reviewed with meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1946 to September 14, 2012, week 2) and EMBASE (1974 to September 14, 2012, week 37). REVIEW METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched using a search strategy for publications on IGS during ESS that reported original data on perioperative morbidity. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. Both comparative cohort studies with non-IGS cases and case series were included. Primary outcome was major and total complications. Secondary outcomes were specific orbital and intracranial injury, major hemorrhage, ability to complete the operation, and revision surgery. The incidence of these events was defined as dichotomous variables and expressed as a risk ratio (RR) in a fixed-effects model. RESULTS: In total, 2586 articles fulfilled the search, producing 55 included studies. Fourteen were comparative cohorts of IGS and non-IGS sinus surgical patient populations used for meta-analysis. Among the cohorts, major complications were more common in the non-IGS group (RR = 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.82; P = .007). Total complications were greater in the non-IGS group (RR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.94; P = .02). All other outcomes did not reach significance on meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: Contrary to current review articles on the topic of IGS use during ESS, there is evidence from published studies that the use of IGS for sinus surgery, within selected populations, is associated with a lower risk of major and total complications compared with non-IGS sinus surgery.

Risk factors and outcomes for primary, revision, and modified Lothrop (Draf III) frontal sinus surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this level 4, retrospective cohort study was to detail the outcomes of primary, revision, and endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP) (Draf III) frontal sinus surgery and evaluate whether risk factors would help determine which patients would benefit from which procedures. METHODS: The study used a retrospective chart review. Endoscopic assessment of frontal ostium patency and patient reported symptoms were prospectively collected on patients who underwent frontal sinusotomy between January 2003 and December 2009. High-risk cohorts were studied to assess their response to standard endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) compared with EMLP. RESULTS: A total of 339 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria underwent either primary or revision endoscopic frontal sinus surgery. The average ± standard deviation (SD) length of follow-up was 20.8 ± 18.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.0-22.9) months. Postsurgical recurrence of disease with persistence of symptoms requiring an EMLP occurred in 9 patients in the primary group and 38 in the revision group. The highest risk groups for failure of standard frontal sinusotomy were patients with nasal polyps, asthma, Lund-Mackay score >16, and frontal ostium size <4 mm (relative risk = 9.9, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Patients with underlying asthma and polyposis as well as narrow frontal ostia and extensive radiological disease have a high failure rate from standard endoscopic frontal sinusotomy. In this patient group consideration should be given to offering the patient a primary EMLP procedure, which has excellent success rates with low risks and low morbidity.

Endoscopic endonasal resection of anterior skull base meningiomas.

OBJECTIVE: Anterior cranial fossa (ACF) meningiomas are difficult to surgically manage. Endoscopic transnasal approaches have increasingly been used as a minimally invasive route and thus offer significant advantages. However, a paucity of literature describing the intraoperative challenges and postoperative outcomes of this technique still exists. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: The Royal Adelaide Hospital, Flinders Medical Centre, Wellington Hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifteen consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic resection of ACF meningiomas between 2004 and 2010 by the South Australian and Wellington Skull Base Units. Demographic and clinical information was compiled by reviewing patient charts and operation notes. Safety and efficacy of the procedure, role of a team approach, and areas for further improvement were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the patients, 87% were women. Tumor locations: 8 olfactory groove, 2 tuberculum sellae, 1 clinoidal, 1 jugum sphenoidale, 1 planum sphenoidale, 1 subfrontal, and 1 midline ACF floor. Commonest presenting symptom was visual change. Mean volume of tumor was 25.69 cm(3), with a size area of 7.28 cm(2). Five were revision cases. None had previous endonasal surgery. Average operating times decreased over time. Gross total removal was achieved in 14, with no deaths. Four patients had postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. Rate of CSF leak decreased over time. Sixty percent of patients reported visual improvement. Two patients had radiological evidence of recurrence. CONCLUSION: ACF meningiomas can be safely removed endonasally, offering significant advantages over the traditional transcranial approach for suitable tumors. Early audit of this approach shows results achieved by this unit are comparable with the published literature.

When FESS fails: the inflammatory load hypothesis in refractory chronic rhinosinusitis.

Through recent advances in research, our understanding of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has evolved to consider it as an inflammatory condition of the mucosa brought about by multiple factors. However, surgical management is still ruled by the classical concepts of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), which emphasizes the importance of ostial obstruction and sinus ventilation. These concepts fail to provide sufficient explanation for the presence of a subset of patients with refractory CRS who fail to respond to conventional FESS. Recent outcome studies have shown that high-grade mucosal inflammation often results in a poor outcome and that this patient group may show improved results with more radical surgery. This review examines the "inflammatory load hypothesis" as a possible explanation. We hypothesize that the grade of the inflammation is the most important predictor of long-term outcomes. Surgery, therefore, has a significant role not only in reestablishing ventilation, but also with removing the inflammatory load in the affected sinuses. We suspect that in these severely diseased patients, a more radical removal of local proinflammatory factors during surgery may improve patient outcomes.

Long-term results after primary frontal sinus surgery.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the long-term frontal ostium patency rate and symptom improvement in patients undergoing primary endoscopic frontal sinusotomy (Draf 2A) and to assess the impact of patient factors, disease factors, and frontal ostium size on surgical outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was used. Endoscopic assessment of frontal ostium patency and patient-reported symptoms were prospectively collected on patients who underwent primary frontal sinusotomy between January 2003 and December 2009. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients underwent primary endoscopic surgery on 210 frontal sinuses over the study period. The overall patency rate was 92%. Complete resolution of symptoms was noted in 85 patients (78%). Stenosis of the frontal sinus ostium correlated significantly with persistence of symptoms, infection, or polyp recurrence (p = 0.0066), and frontal ostium size (p < 0.03). No significant correlation could be found between the presence of eosinophilic mucin, asthma, polyposis, and smoking on patency or resolution of symptoms. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest study of primary endoscopic frontal sinus surgery in the literature. The technical and subjective measures of success are high. Frontal ostium size correlates with risk of stenosis of the frontal sinus. Patients with a stenosed frontal ostium and residual frontal sinus disease are more likely to be symptomatic or have endoscopic evidence of polyp recurrence or endoscopic evidence of persistent infection. Asthma, eosinophilic mucin chronic rhinosinusitis (EMCRS), allergy, and smoking do not appear to affect outcomes.

Does mucosal remodeling in chronic rhinosinusitis result in irreversible mucosal disease?

Mucosal remodeling in the sinuses is a recently described phenomenon in which the mucosa undergoes potentially irreversible changes as a result of ongoing underlying inflammatory processes. Research into remodeling that occurs in the bronchial airways in asthmatic patients has led to modification of asthma treatment guidelines. However, remodeling in the sinuses has still not led to changes in current medical or surgical management of chronic rhinosinusitis. Upper airway remodeling constitutes a new area of research that poses many unanswered clinical questions and may potentially alter the management of patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis.

Endoscopic surgery of skull base chordomas.

Objective To assess our clinical experience in treating midline intracranial pathology using minimally invasive surgical techniques. Design Retrospective chart review of patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal resection of clival chordomas. Setting Two tertiary referral centers in Australia and New Zealand. Main Outcome Measures Patients were assessed by intraoperative findings (macroscopic resection rate, tumor size, and operative complications) and clinical outcomes (residual disease, postoperative complications, recurrence rate, and mortality). Results Fourteen patients underwent endoscopic resection of clival chordomas (seven primary, seven revision) with a mean follow-up of 41.45 months (3 to 104 months). Macroscopic resection rates were 71% and 29%, respectively. Mean operative time was 386 minutes. Overall cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak rate was 3/14 (21%) and, using the nasoseptal flap, it was 0/5 (0%). Two patients developed late recurrence; one died of disease and one was treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy. Overall mortality was 2/14 (14%). Conclusion Endoscopic resection of clival chordomas is a safe and viable alternative to the traditional open approach. The nasoseptal flap is an excellent method of obtaining a watertight skull base closure. Furthermore, this series highlighted the fact that the primary attempt at surgery offers the best chance to achieve a total resection.

Quality of life in postoperative vestibular schwannoma patients.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To quantify the postoperative quality of life (QOL) in patients following vestibular schwannoma surgery in a new multidisciplinary skull base unit. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: The Australian Short Form 36 (SF-36) quality of life health questionnaire was administered to 121 consecutive patients surgically treated for vestibular schwannoma between 1999 and 2007 at Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia. QOL scores were calculated using a standardized process across the eight SF-36 health domains and compared to sex- and age- matched healthy Australian population. RESULTS: An 81% response rate (98 patients) was obtained. The postoperative QOL in vestibular schwannoma patients was significantly less than the appropriate matched healthy Australian population in one health domain of role physical limitation (P < .05). Analysis of preoperative patient factors (age, gender) and surgical factors such as tumor size (cutoff points of 15 mm or 25 mm) together with, surgical approach (translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid) showed no significant difference in QOL outcomes for each of these variables (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that patients following vestibular schwannoma surgery reported near equivalent QOL as the healthy population. Advances in surgical techniques and experiences have minimized morbidities associated with vestibular schwannoma surgery. Significant physical role limitation encountered postoperatively may relate to facial nerve dysfunction, vestibular dysfunction, tinnitus or hearing loss that may persist after surgery. Careful patient selection, as well as, appropriate preoperative counselling, multidisciplinary follow-up and rehabilitation should be offered to all surgical candidates. A measured approach should still be considered for patients with small, slow growing tumors with minimal symptoms.