The prognostic impact of peripheral blood eosinophil counts in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab.

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have gained approval for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), the response rate is still limited. Therefore, it is urgent to explore novel markers of responses to ICIs that can help assess clinical benefits. Recently, it has been noted that peripheral blood eosinophil counts are an independent factor correlated with clinical outcome of ICIs in some types of cancer. We investigated peripheral blood absolute eosinophil counts (AECs) at baseline and 4 weeks after the initiation of nivolumab for mRCC patients between February 2016 and May 2022. In addition, we examined clinicopathological features including irAEs and analyzed the correlation between AECs and clinical efficacy of nivolumab. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients were 5.7 and 25.5 months, respectively. The median AECs in patients with irAEs were significantly higher at baseline and 4 weeks after the treatment compared to those without irAEs (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001). With the cutoff value of AECs of 329 cells/µL at 4 weeks after the treatment for prediction of irAEs, high-AECs groups had significantly higher number of responders compared with that in low-AECs group (p < 0.001). Accordingly, the PFS and OS were significantly better in patients with high-AECs group than those in low-AECs group (p = 0.03 and p = 0.009). High-AECs at 4 weeks after the treatment serve as the prominent surrogate marker associated with the incidence of irAEs and better clinical outcome in mRCC patients receiving nivolumab.

Relapsing cytokine release syndrome in a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab and axitinib therapy.

As immune checkpoint inhibitors become more widely available, the optimal management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is becoming increasingly important. Although irAEs are diverse, reports on cytokine release syndrome are rare. Here, we report a case of a 48-year-old man with relapsing cytokine release syndrome after receiving pembrolizumab and axitinib combination therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. During dose reduction of prednisolone for immune-related hepatitis on day 33 after starting pembrolizumab plus axitinib, the patient suddenly developed abdominal pain, and a few hours later became hypotensive and poorly oxygenated. Despite the use of a ventilator and high doses of catecholamines, blood pressure and oxygenation could not be maintained. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-aortic balloon pumping were also administered. The cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was treated with tocilizumab, and his general condition improved. Lower-grade CRS relapsed four times despite a moderate dose of oral prednisolone with mycophenolate mofetil or tacrolimus. After gradual reduction in prednisolone over 5 months, the patient was discharged from the hospital. Partial remission of renal cell carcinoma continued for 21 months, and salvage radical nephrectomy was performed. The patient remained disease-free without the need for further treatment 9 months after surgery.

Outcomes in patients with high- and very high-risk localized prostate cancer treated with definitive IMRT and long-term hormone therapy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intensity-modulated radiation therapy in combination with long-term androgen deprivation therapy for high-risk and very high-risk localized prostate cancer while also investigating factors associated with the therapeutic effect. METHODS: Men who fulfilled criteria for the National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk or very high-risk localized prostate cancer and were treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiation therapy (74-78 Gy) of the prostate and the seminal vesicle combined with androgen deprivation therapy in our institution from 2007 to 2016 were identified (n = 197). In principle, patients received androgen deprivation therapy for 3-6 months before radiation, concurrently, and for 2 years after completion of intensity-modulated radiation therapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 96 months. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates in the overall population were 96.9% and 89.3%, respectively. The 5-year and 10-year cumulative incidence rates of biochemical failure were 2.5% and 16.3% in the high-risk group, and 8.6% and 32.0% in the very high-risk group, respectively, indicating a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.023). Grade Group 5 and younger age (cutoff: 70 years old) were independent predictors of recurrence (P = 0.016 and 0.017, respectively). Patients exhibiting biochemical failure within <18 months after completion of androgen deprivation therapy displayed an increased risk of cancer-specific mortality (P = 0.039) when contrasted with those who had a longer interval to biochemical failure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network very high-risk prostate cancer, particularly those with Grade Group 5 and younger age, showed worse outcomes following intensity-modulated radiation therapy and long-term androgen deprivation therapy.

Efficacy and safety of axitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Real-world data on patients with renal impairment.

OBJECTIVES: Limited information is currently available on the efficacy and safety of axitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients with renal impairment. Therefore, the present study investigated the efficacy and toxicity of axitinib in patients with chronic kidney disease. METHODS: Post-hoc analyses were performed on a Japanese multicenter cohort study of 477 mRCC patients who received axitinib followed by 1 or 2 regimens of systemic antiangiogenic therapy between January 2012 and December 2016. Differences in clinical characteristics and the efficacy and safety of axitinib were assessed based on pretreatment renal function. RESULTS: Patients were categorized into the following 5 renal function groups according to baseline renal function: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 ml/min (n = 133), 45 ml/min ≤eGFR <60 ml/min (n = 153), 30 ml/min ≤eGFR< 45 ml/min (n = 130), eGFR <30 ml/min (n = 45), and dialysis (n = 16). Median progression-free survival (PFS) (95% confidence interval [CI]) in the 5 groups was 11 (8-16), 14 (11-19), 14 (10-19), 12 (8-24), and 6 (3-NR) months, respectively (p = 0.781). After adjustments for treatment-related confounders, the renal function group was not a significant prognostic factor for PFS. Objective response rates in the 5 groups were 22%, 23%, 23%, 18%, 20%, and 38%, respectively (p = 0.468). Regarding adverse events of all grades, hypertension (p = 0.0006) and renal and urinary disorders (p < 0.0001) were more frequently observed in the eGFR <30 ml/min group than in the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Since renal function at the initiation of treatment with axitinib does not adversely affect the efficacy of VEGF-TKI therapy, clinicians do not need to avoid its administration to mRCC patients with impaired renal function in consideration of the risk of progression to end-stage renal disease.

Progressive Spreading of DNA Methylation in the GSTP1 Promoter CpG Island across Transitions from Precursors to Invasive Prostate Cancer.

Glutathione S-transferase pi 1 (GSTP1) is lowly expressed in normal prostate luminal cells and becomes induced in most proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA) lesions. GSTP1 becomes silenced in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and prostate adenocarcinoma (CaP) via cytosine-phospho-guanine (CpG) island promoter hypermethylation. However, GSTP1 methylation patterns in PIA and PIN, and their relationship to patterns in CaP are poorly understood. We used bisulfite genomic sequencing to examine patterns of GSTP1 promoter CpG island methylation in laser capture microdissected benign, PIA, PIN, and CaP regions from 32 subjects that underwent radical prostatectomy. We analyzed 908 sequence clones across 24 normal epithelium, 37 PIA, 18 PIN, and 23 CaP regions, allowing assessment of 34,863 CpG sites with allelic phasing. Normal and PIA lesions were mostly unmethylated with 0.52 and 1.3% of total CpG sites methylated, respectively. PIN and CaP lesions had greater methylation with 24% and 51% of total CpG sites methylated, respectively. The degree of GSTP1 methylation showed progression from PIA << PIN < CaP. PIN lesions showed more partial methylation compared with CaP lesions. Partially methylated lesions were enriched for methylation changes at AP1 and SP1 transcription factor binding sites. These results demonstrate that methylation density in the GSTP1 CpG island in PIN was intermediate relative to that in normal prostate epithelium/PIA and CaP lesions. These results are consistent with gradual spreading of DNA methylation centered at the SP1/AP1 transcription factor binding sites in precursor lesions, with subsequent spreading of methylation across the entire CpG island in transition to CaP. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: DNA hypermethylation at the GSTP1 promoter progressively spreads from being unmethylated in normal prostate to intermediate levels in precursor lesions to extensive methylation in cancer. This molecular progression of GSTP1 promoter methylation patterns in early prostate carcinogenesis could be useful for identification and interception of prostate cancer precursors.

[A Case of Primary Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder Showing Effectiveness of Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin].

A 55-year-old female presented to the hospital with a complaint of gross hematuria. Transurethral resection of bladder tumor was performed. The specimens pathologically showed signet ring cells and no urothelial carcinoma components. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomographic (CT) scan revealed bladder tumor, cervical metastasis, bilateral ovarian metastasis, and multiple lymph node metastasis. She was diagnosed with a primary signet ring cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder with cT3bN2M1, and was treated with chemotherapy of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination (GC). After 2 cycles of GC, the value of CEA which was elevated to 106 ng/ml before treatment, became negative. CT scan showed that her disease had successfully responded to the chemotherapy, and remained efficacious till the end of 6 cycles. The patient subsequently received 1 cycle of gemcitabine and nedaplatin and 3 cycles of avelumab due to renal insufficiency. Yet, 14 months after diagnosis, cerebellar metastases appeared and the patient died of meningeal carcinomatosis.

Real-world effectiveness of nivolumab and subsequent therapy in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (POST-NIVO study): 36-month follow-up results of a clinical chart review.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the long-term effectiveness of nivolumab monotherapy and following subsequent therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in Japanese real-world settings. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study, with a 36-month follow-up, and conducted in Japanese patients with mRCC who initiated nivolumab monotherapy between 1 Feb 2017 and 31 Oct 2017. Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Of the 208 patients, 36.5% received nivolumab monotherapy as second-line, 30.8% as third-line, and 31.7% as fourth- or later-line therapy. By 36 months, 12.0% of patients continued nivolumab monotherapy; 88.0% discontinued, mainly because of disease progression (66.7%). The median (m) OS was not reached irrespective of treatment line, with a 36-month OS rate of 54.3% (second-line, 57.4%; third-line, 52.6%; fourth- or later-line, 52.9%). The ORR was 24.2% and five patients achieved complete response. The OS from first-line therapy was 8.9 years. In the 95 patients receiving therapy after nivolumab, 87.4% received vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, with mOS and mPFS of 27.4 and 8.1 months, respectively. Irrespective of treatment line, the mOS was not reached in patients with International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) favorable or intermediate risk at mRCC diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: This 36-month real-world follow-up analysis showed a survival benefit of nivolumab monotherapy for patients with mRCC. The long-term effectiveness of sequential therapy from first-line therapy to therapy after nivolumab was also demonstrated. Additionally, nivolumab monotherapy was beneficial for patients with favorable IMDC risk at the time of mRCC diagnosis.

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in treating immune-related hepatitis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor use: A retrospective study.

Background and Aim: To investigate the outcomes in eight Japanese patients with cancer treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids for immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment-induced severe immune-related hepatitis (ir-hepatitis) and the efficacy and safety of MMF. Methods: We retrospectively examined patient background, treatment course, as well as examination and imaging data using electronic medical records. Results: The ratio of male to female patients was 7:1, and the median age was 60 years (27-72 years). There were five and two cases of kidney cancer and malignant melanoma, respectively, and one case of lung cancer. The median number of days until MMF administration in addition to systemic corticosteroid therapy after the onset of ir-hepatitis was 14.5 (2-42). The patients were categorized as four "good responders" who showed an improvement in the liver function tests following MMF treatment and four "poor responders" who did not. Furthermore, the time from the onset of ir-hepatitis to initial MMF administration was significantly shorter in good responders (median 3 days, range 2-15 days) than in poor responders (median 25.5 days, range 14-42 days) (P = 0.042). No significant intergroup difference was observed in other clinical factors. No serious adverse events caused by MMF were observed in any case. Conclusions: According to these findings, early recognition of corticosteroid refractoriness and the use of MMF may be beneficial in patients with ir-hepatitis.

A comparative study on nivolumab and axitinib as secondary treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A multi-institutional retrospective study in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: When primary treatment has been inadequate, nivolumab and axitinib are often used as a secondary treatments for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, there have been few reports comparing the efficacy and safety of these drugs. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 58 patients treated with nivolumab and 57 patients treated with axitinib as secondary treatment between April 2013 and December 2019. We then assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of the treatments in both groups. RESULTS: The most common primary therapy was sunitinib (61.7%). Both nivolumab and axitinib groups showed no significant differences in terms of the objective response rate and disease control rate (p = 0.280 and p = 0.518, respectively). Importantly, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) seemed to be similar in patients treated with nivolumab and axitinib (p = 0.527 and p = 0.266, respectively), irrespective of the objective response to primary therapy. Furthermore, a Cox proportional hazards model showed that pretreatment Karnofsky Performance Status was significantly associated with PFS and OS. Although the incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in the patients treated with axitinib, there was no significant difference in time to treatment failure between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab and axitinib showed similar clinical benefits as secondary treatment in patients with mRCC; thus, they should be an option in sequential therapy following treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Future studies and feasible therapeutic biomarkers would help predict the clinical response to TKIs or immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with mRCC.

Efficacy of cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A single-center study in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: Cabazitaxel is a next-generation taxane that can prolong overall survival after docetaxel treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, the efficacy of cabazitaxel varies among these patients. The clinical indicators of the prognosis after cabazitaxel treatment were analyzed. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who received cabazitaxel between February 2015 and June 2021 was performed. All patients had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prognostic factors for prostate-specific antigen progression-free and overall survival were analyzed by Cox proportional-hazards analysis and the log-rank test. RESULTS: The study comprised 57 patients who received cabazitaxel (median 4 cycles, range 1-27) at a starting dose of 15-25 mg/m2 . The median age and follow-up duration were 70 years and 9.2 months. The median prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.6 and 10.5 months, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that previous androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy before cabazitaxel treatment was the only significant risk factor (hazard ratio 2.784, p = 0.022) for prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival. Multivariate analysis for overall survival revealed that poor performance status (≥1) (hazard ratio 2.107, p = 0.039), low hemoglobin (hazard ratio 0.142, p = 0.010), and high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (hazard ratio 9.150, p = 0.032) at baseline were significantly associated with a poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Previous androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy was the only risk factor for biochemical progression. Poor performance status, anemia, and high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio were risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with cabazitaxel. These risk factors seem useful for identifying patients with survival benefit from cabazitaxel treatment.

Real-world efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and the impact of previous nephrectomy on clinical outcome: Japanese multi-institutional retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: In metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC), recent clinical trials have shown efficacy of first-line combination therapy, as evidenced by better clinical outcome over target therapy. However, there are insufficient real-world evidences in mRCC patients in Japan. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective study of 72 mRCC patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment between September 2018 and July 2021. Patient's characteristics, clinical outcomes and safety were retrospectively reviewed. We analyzed overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in patients treated with combination therapy. RESULTS: Of all patients, the median age was 70 years (range, 36-86) and the major type of histology was clear cell RCC (n = 55; 76.4%). Progressive disease (n = 25; 34.8%) and irAEs (n = 22; 30.6%) were the most common causes for discontinuing treatment. Median PFS and OS seemed similar between patients who discontinued treatment because of irAEs and for patients who did not (p = 0.360 and p = 0.069, respectively). Importantly, for patients with synchronous metastatic disease at diagnosis (n = 56), nephrectomy before initiating nivolumab plus ipilimumab had a significantly positive impact on better OS when compared to that in patients without nephrectomy (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: This study confirms efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab for mRCC patients in real-world settings. Furthermore, nivolumab plus ipilimumab was associated with a better outcome in patients who had undergone nephrectomy at diagnosis for synchronous mRCC.

[A Case of Pleural Empyema with Fistula Caused by Endobronchial Metastasis of Renal Cell Carcinoma].

A 52-year-old man complained of asymptomatic gross hematuria and cough. Chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a right renal tumor, mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and right endobronchial metastasis. The right endobronchial metastasis was causing obstructive atelectasis in the lower lobe of the right lung. After tumor biopsy, the pathological diagnosis was clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab was initiated, but CT showed enlargement of the metastatic lesion and lung abscess after two courses of treatment. The therapy was then switched to axitinib. Six days after initiation of axitinib, the lung abscess perforated into the pleural cavity, which resulted in the formation of pleural empyema with fistula. Ten days after initiation of axitinib, obstruction of the bronchus was relieved due to shrinkage of the right endobronchial metastasis, which resulted in development of a pneumothorax. Placement of a thoracic drainage tube and administration of an antimicrobial agent improved the pneumothorax and inflammatory response, but the drainage tube could not be removed. Long-term insertion of the thoracic drainage tube considerably diminished the patient's quality of life, and after 4 months, he was transferred to another hospital to receive the best supportive care.

Overview of clinical management for older patients with renal cell carcinoma.

The rapidly increasing pool of older patients being diagnosed with and surviving their cancer is creating many challenges. Regarding localized renal cell carcinoma, surgery is considered as gold standard treatment options even in older men, whereas active surveillance and ablation therapy are alternative options for a proportion of these patients. With regard to advanced disease, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKI) and immune check point inhibitor are standard treatment modalities, although treatment choice from multiple regimens and prevention of adverse events need to be considered. Better assessment techniques, such as comprehensive geriatric assessment to meet the unique needs of older patients, are a central focus in the delivery of high-quality geriatric oncology care. Through this process, shared decision-making should be adopted in clinical care to achieve optimal goals of care that reflect patient and caregiver hopes, needs and preferences. It is necessary to continue investigating oncological outcomes and complications associated with treatment in this population to ensure appropriate cancer care. In this narrative review, we completed a literature review of the various treatments for renal cell carcinoma in older patients that aimed to identify the current evidence related to the full range of the treatments including active surveillance, surgery, ablation therapy and systemic therapy. Prospectively designed studies and studies regarding geriatric assessment were preferentially added as references. Our goals were to summarize the real-world evidence and provide a decision framework that guides better cancer practices for older patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Real-world Outcomes of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Immediately After Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated a survival benefit for patients with cancer. However, the clinical outcomes of subsequent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) after ICI failure in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined 38 patients with mRCC who started TKIs immediately after nivolumab with (combination group) or without ipilimumab (nivolumab group) between September 2016 and July 2019. RESULTS: Of the 38 patients, 16 and 11 achieved partial response and stable disease, respectively, resulting in a 42.1% objective response rate and 71.1% disease control rate. The median progression-free survival (PFS) from TKI initiation was 8.8 and 12.9 months in the nivolumab and combination groups, respectively. PFS and overall survival were significantly longer in patients with long-term responses to previous ICI treatment (p=0.0152 and p=0.0155, respectively). CONCLUSION: TKIs demonstrate adequate anti-tumour activity after treatment with ICIs in real-world settings.

Two cases of delayed onset of immune-related adverse events after discontinuation of nivolumab in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Delayed onset of immune-related adverse events following immune-checkpoint inhibitor discontinuation is underrecognized because of little available evidence. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year-old man with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (Case 1) and 58-year-old woman with renal cell carcinoma and retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis (Case 2) underwent nivolumab therapy. Case 1: Progressive disease forced nivolumab discontinuance after 18 months, and he underwent two courses of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. immune-related adverse events of pneumonitis, hepatitis, and renal dysfunction were diagnosed 142 days after nivolumab discontinuation, and he recovered with immunosuppressive treatment. Case 2: The immune-related adverse event of pneumonitis forced nivolumab discontinuance after 14 months, and two courses of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy were administered. The immune-related adverse event of hepatitis was diagnosed 436 days after nivolumab discontinuation, and she recovered with immunosuppressive treatment. CONCLUSION: Two patients with delayed onset of immune-related adverse events after nivolumab discontinuation were recovered with immunosuppressive treatment.

Efficacy and safety of Infliximab for steroid-resistant immune-related adverse events: A retrospective study.

The present study investigated outcomes of infliximab (IFX) treatment among 8 Japanese patients with various types of cancer (4 with malignant melanoma, 3 with lung cancer and 1 with renal cancer) who developed severe steroid-resistant immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in association with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to determine its efficacy and safety. Information, including patient background, treatment progress, examination data and imaging data, was collected retrospectively from electronic medical records. Adverse reactions were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Specific ICIs used were anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibody preparations in 7, 2 and 5 patients, respectively. Specific irAEs included grade 3 diarrhea/colitis in 7 patients and disseminated intravascular coagulation and myocarditis attributed to autoimmune activation in 1 patient. The median duration between systemic steroid and IFX treatments was 9 (range, 2-39) days. A total of 3 patients responded to IFX, 1 of whom responded after one dose and 2 responded after two doses. Respective diseases improved to grade 0 after a median of 18 (range, 9-32) days. No AEs were attributable to IFX. Additionally, anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) and antibacterial agents were administered in parallel given the presence of CMV and Clostridium difficile (CD) infections in all patients, except in 1 exhibiting a marked IFX response after one dose. The combination of highly immunosuppressive IFX and high-dose systemic steroid administration over a long period presumably predisposed the patients to opportunistic enteric infections. Accordingly, early initiation of IFX treatment in conjunction with systemic steroid therapy should be considered for severe diarrhea/colitis and other irAEs. However, the possibility for CMV and CD infections should be recognized, and for these the treatment strategy may need to be modified at an early stage.

Partial nephrectomy for a Bosniak IV cystic renal mass mimicking a simple renal cyst adjacent to a solid renal tumor.

INTRODUCTION: Renal tumors are often associated with renal cysts. Meanwhile, in some cases there are challenging issues of how to diagnose renal cystic tumors and to decide surgical procedures. CASE PRESENTATION: A 75-year-old man was referred to our department for a 21-mm tumor by his left kidney. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed an intense contrast uptake the tumor, which was adjacent to a 64-mm unilocular renal cyst with no contrasting effects. It was clinically diagnosed as renal cell carcinoma, stage T1aN0M0, and treated with robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, for both the solid tumor and the adjacent cyst. Pathological findings revealed a tumor cell clump within the cyst wall, concurrent with the renal cell carcinoma. The patient has remained free of disease at 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSION: A partial nephrectomy that includes the entire cyst wall should be considered for renal tumor associated with unilocular renal cyst.

Renal cell carcinoma with central nervous system demyelination caused by nivolumab.

INTRODUCTION: Central nervous system demyelination caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors is a very rare condition. CASE PRESENTATION: A 65-year-old man who received nivolumab for renal cell carcinoma developed abnormal behavior, such as disagreeable speech and sudden anger. Brain-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple lesions with partial contrast effects in the cerebral white matter. We tentatively diagnosed demyelination caused by nivolumab, and performed steroid pulse therapy twice. After that, his symptoms improved. For the next 2 years, his symptoms did not recur, nor did his cancer progress. CONCLUSION: Demyelination caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors can be fatal and requires early diagnosis and treatment.

External validation of the albumin, C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase model in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving second-line axitinib therapy in a Japanese multi-center cohort.

PURPOSE: To externally validate the utility of the albumin, C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase model to predict the overall survival of previously treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The ability of the albumin, C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase model to predict overall survival was validated and compared with those of other prognostication models using data from 421 metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving second-line axitinib therapy at 36 hospitals belonging to the Japan Urologic Oncology Group. RESULTS: The following factors in this cohort were independently associated with poor overall survival in a multivariate analysis: a low Karnofsky performance status, <1 year from diagnosis to targeted therapy, a high neutrophil count, and low albumin, elevated C-reactive protein, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and the Japan Urologic Oncology Group model was newly developed based on the presence/absence of these independent factors. In this cohort, 151 (35.9%), 125 (27.7%) and 145 (34.4%) patients were classified into the favorable, intermediate and poor risk groups, respectively, according to the albumin, C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase model; however, the proportions of patients in the intermediate risk group stratified by the Japan Urologic Oncology Group, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium models were >50%. The superiority of the albumin, C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase model to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium models, but not the Japan Urologic Oncology Group model, was demonstrated by multiple statistical analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The utility of the albumin, C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase model as a simple and objective prognostication tool was successfully validated using data from 421 metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving second-line axitinib.