A phase 1 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of danuglipron (PF-06882961), an oral small-molecule glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: This study investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of danuglipron (PF-06882961), which is a novel, oral small-molecule glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study enrolled adult Japanese participants with T2DM inadequately controlled on diet and exercise. Participants received twice-daily oral doses of placebo or multiple ascending doses of danuglipron titrated to 40, 80 or 120 mg twice daily over 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the safety and tolerability of danuglipron. Secondary and exploratory outcomes included plasma pharmacokinetics, glycaemic parameters and body weight. RESULTS: In the 37 participants randomized, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, diarrhoea and headache. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were of mild or moderate intensity. Dose-proportional increases in danuglipron exposure parameters were observed at steady state (Day 56). Significant reductions from baseline were observed with danuglipron on Day 56 for mean daily glucose [least squares mean (90% confidence interval) placebo-adjusted difference of up to -67.89 (-88.98, -46.79) mg/dl] and on Day 57 for fasting plasma glucose [up to -40.87 (-53.77, -27.98) mg/dl], glycated haemoglobin [up to -1.41% (-2.01%, -0.82%)] and body weight [up to -1.87 (-3.58, -0.17) kg]. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese adults with T2DM, danuglipron exhibited dose-proportional increases in plasma exposure at steady state and robustly reduced glycaemic parameters and body weight after 8 weeks of dosing, with a safety profile consistent with the mechanism of action.

Use of diagnostic likelihood ratio of outcome to evaluate misclassification bias in the planning of database studies.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) and its utility are well-known in the field of medical diagnostic testing. However, its use has been limited in the context of an outcome validation study. We considered that wider recognition of the utility of DLR would enhance the practices surrounding database studies. This is particularly timely and important since the use of healthcare-related databases for pharmacoepidemiology research has greatly expanded in recent years. In this paper, we aimed to advance the use of DLR, focusing on the planning of a new database study. METHODS: Theoretical frameworks were developed for an outcome validation study and a comparative cohort database study; these two were combined to form the overall relationship. Graphical presentations based on these relationships were used to examine the implications of validation study results on the planning of a database study. Additionally, novel uses of graphical presentations were explored using some examples. RESULTS: Positive DLR was identified as a pivotal parameter that connects the expected positive-predictive value (PPV) with the disease prevalence in the planned database study, where the positive DLR is equal to sensitivity/(1-specificity). Moreover, positive DLR emerged as a pivotal parameter that links the expected risk ratio with the disease risk of the control group in the planned database study. In one example, graphical presentations based on these relationships provided a transparent and informative summary of multiple validation study results. In another example, the potential use of a graphical presentation was demonstrated in selecting a range of positive DLR values that best represented the relevant validation studies. CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of the DLR in the results section of a validation study would benefit potential users of the study results. Furthermore, investigators planning a database study can utilize the DLR to their benefit. Wider recognition of the full utility of the DLR in the context of a validation study would contribute meaningfully to the promotion of good practice in planning, conducting, analyzing, and interpreting database studies.

[Efficacy and Safety of Lorazepam Intravenously Administered in Subjects with Status Epilepticus or Repetitive Seizures].

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of lorazepam (LZP) 4 mg for adults (age, 16 years old or older) or 0.05mg/kg for children (age, 3 months to less than 16 years) as a slow intravenous injection in 26 Japanese patients with status epilepticus or repetitive seizures. The proportion of patients whose initial seizure stopped within 10 minutes and who continued seizure-free for at least 30 minutes after the completion of initial dose as the primary endpoint was 48.0% (12/25, 95%CI: 27.8%-68.7%). However, the proportion of patients whose seizures stopped within 10 minutes and who continued seizure-free for at least 30 minutes after the completion of either initial or second dose (in 10 to 30 minutes from the initial dose) was 64.0% (16/25, 95%CI: 42.5%-82.0%) in total, and 77.8% and 56.3% in adults and children, respectively. The most common adverse events (AEs) were somnolence (7.7%) and insomnia (7.7%), and almost all AEs were mild or moderate in severity. No patient experienced serious or severe LZP-related AEs. No one discontinued the study due to AEs.

Efficacy and safety of a single oral 150 mg dose of fluconazole for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis in Japan.

Vulvovaginal candidiasis is the second most common cause of vaginal infections following bacterial vaginosis. For the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis, antifungal agents are used either as topical (vaginal tablets and cream) or oral formulations. A single oral 150 mg dose of fluconazole has been recommended as the standard therapy for uncomplicated, acute vulvovaginal candidiasis in global guidelines; however, in Japan oral fluconazole therapy has not been approved. We conducted a phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single oral 150 mg dose of fluconazole in Japanese subjects with vulvovaginal candidiasis for regulatory submission. A total of 157 subjects received a single oral 150 mg dose of fluconazole. Candida species (104 strains) were identified by fungal culture from 102 subjects at baseline, including Candida albicans (100 strains). The efficacy rate for the therapeutic outcome (assessed based on a comprehensive evaluation of the clinical and mycological efficacy in each subject) was 74.7% (74/99) on Day 28 in the modified Intent-To-Treat (m-ITT) population. Concerning the clinical and mycological efficacy on Day 28 in the m-ITT population, the cure, cure or improvement, and eradication rates were 81.6%, 95.9%, and 85.9%, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea and nausea (1.9% for each). No clinically significant safety issues were reported. A single oral 150 mg dose of fluconazole demonstrated excellent therapeutic efficacy and was well tolerated in Japanese subjects with vulvovaginal candidiasis. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01806623.

Efficacy and safety of metronidazole injection for the treatment of infectious peritonitis, abdominal abscess and pelvic inflammatory diseases in Japan.

Although metronidazole (MNZ) has been used worldwide for more than 4 decades as a standard therapy for trichomoniasis, anaerobic and amebic infections, resistance to MNZ is still low. MNZ is available as oral, intravenous, and vaginal formulations, but the intravenous formulation of MNZ has not been approved in Japan. We conducted a phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous MNZ combined with ceftriaxone (CTRX) in Japanese subjects with infectious peritonitis, abdominal abscess or pelvic inflammatory diseases (PIDs) to obtain regulatory approval. A combination of MNZ/CTRX at doses of 500 mg 3 or 4 times a day/1 or 2 g twice a day was administered intravenously to a total of 38 hospitalized subjects. MNZ/CTRX was well tolerated and exhibited excellent clinical and bacteriological efficacy with clinical efficacy rates of 100% (20/20) in infectious peritonitis or abdominal abscess subjects and 90.0% (9/10) in PID subjects, and the eradication rates in infectious peritonitis or abdominal abscess subjects and PID subjects were 100% (16/16) and 100% (4/4), respectively, at the test of cure. MNZ/CTRX was effective in 1 subject in whom a metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Bacteroides fragilis strain (MIC of MNZ, 2 µg/ml) was identified. The most common treatment-related adverse event was diarrhea (23.7%), followed by nausea (5.3%). No new safety signals were identified. MNZ/CTRX demonstrated excellent efficacy and was well tolerated in Japanese infectious peritonitis, abdominal abscess and PID subjects. This treatment regimen can be useful for anaerobic infections. Clinical registration number: NCT01473836.