Complementary and alternative metrics for tracking population-level trends in child linear growth.

Stunting prevalence is commonly used to track population-level child nutritional status. However, other metrics derived from anthropometric datasets may be used as alternatives to stunting or provide complementary perspectives on the status of linear growth faltering in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Data from 156 Demographic and Health Surveys in 63 LMICs (years 2000 to 2020) were used to generate 2 types of linear growth metrics: (i) measures of location of height distributions (including stunting) for under-5 years (<5y) and 2 to 5 years (2-5y); (ii) model-derived metrics including predicted mean height-for-age z-score (HAZ) at 0, 2, and 5 years; interval slopes of HAZ, height-for-age difference (HAD), and growth delay (GD) from 1 month to 2 years (1mo-2y) and 2-5y; and the SITAR intensity parameter (SITAR-IP) for <5y. Using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r), metrics were considered alternatives to stunting if very strongly correlated with stunting (|r|≥0.95) and at least as strongly correlated as stunting with selected population indicators (under 5y mortality, gross domestic product, maternal education). Metrics were considered complementary if less strongly correlated with stunting (|r|<0.95) yet correlated with population indicators. We identified 6 of 15 candidate metrics (stunting 2-5y, mean HAZ <5y and 2-5y, p25 HAZ <5y and 2-5y, predicted HAZ at 2y) as potential alternatives to stunting and 6 as complementary metrics (SITAR-IP, predicted HAZ at 5y, HAZ slope 1m-2y, HAD slope 1m-2y, GD slopes 1m-2y and 2-5y). Three metrics (HAZ slope 2-5y, HAD slope 2-5y years and predicted HAZ at birth) had weak correlations with population indicators (|r| ≤ 0.43). In conclusion, several linear growth metrics could serve as alternatives to stunting prevalence and others may be complementary to stunting in tracking global progress in child health and nutrition. Further research is needed to explore the real-world utility of these alternative and complementary metrics.

Estimating the Fraction of Severe Malaria among Malaria-Positive Children: Analysis of Household Surveys in 19 Malaria-Endemic Countries in Africa.

To date, the only robust estimates of severe malaria cases include children who present to the formal healthcare system. It is a challenge to use these data because of varying age ranges of reporting, different diagnosis techniques, surveillance methods, and healthcare utilization. This analysis examined data from 37 Demographic and Health Surveys and Malaria Indicator Surveys across 19 countries in sub-Saharan Africa collected between 2011 and 2018. The outcome of interest is a proxy indicator for severe malaria, defined as a proportion of children aged 6-59 months with at least one self-reported symptom of severe illness including loss of consciousness, rapid breathing, seizures, or severe anemia (hemoglobin < 5 g/dL) among those who were positive for malaria. The study includes a weighted descriptive, country-level analysis and a multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression model to assess the determinants of severe malaria. Among children positive for malaria across all surveys, 4.5% (95% CI: 4.1-4.8) had at least one sign or symptom of severe malaria, which was significantly associated with age, residence, wealth, and year of survey fieldwork at a P-value less than 0.05. This analysis presents a novel and an alternative approach of estimating the fraction of severe malaria cases among malaria-positive children younger than 5 years in malaria-endemic countries. Estimating severe malaria cases through population-based surveys allows countries to estimate severe malaria across time and to compare with other countries. Having a population-level estimate of severe malaria cases helps further our understanding of the burden and epidemiology of severe malaria.

Variability in haemoglobin concentration by measurement tool and blood source: an analysis from seven countries.

OBJECTIVE: We explore factors such as the blood sampling site (capillary vs venous), the equipment (HemoCue vs automated haematology analyser) and the model of the HemoCue device (201+ vs 301) that may impact haemoglobin measurements in capillary and venous blood. METHODS: Eleven studies were identified, and bias, concordance and measures of diagnostic performance were assessed within each study. FINDINGS: Our analysis included 11 studies from seven countries (Cambodia, India, The Gambia, Ghana, Laos, Rwanda and USA). Samples came from children, men, non-pregnant women and pregnant women. Mean bias ranged from -8.7 to 2.5 g/L in Cambodian women, 6.2 g/L in Laotian children, 2.4 g/L in Ghanaian women, 0.8 g/L in Gambian children 6-23 months and 1.4 g/L in Rwandan children 6-59 months when comparing capillary blood on a HemoCue to venous blood on a haematology analyser. Bias was 8.3 g/L in Indian non-pregnant women and 2.6 g/L in Laotian children and women and 1.5 g/L in the US population when comparing capillary to venous blood using a HemoCue. For venous blood measured on the HemoCue compared with the automated haematology analyser, bias was 5.3 g/L in Gambian pregnant women 18-45 years and 11.3 g/L in Laotian children 6-59 months. CONCLUSION: Our analysis found large variability in haemoglobin concentration measured on capillary or venous blood and using HemoCue Hb 201+ or Hb 301 or automated haematology analyser. We cannot ascertain whether the variation is due to differences in the equipment, differences in capillary and venous blood, or factors affecting blood collection techniques.

Facility- and community-based delivery of micronutrient powders in Uganda: Opening the black box of implementation using mixed methods.

Micronutrient powders (MNP) have the potential to increase micronutrient intake, yet documentation of implementation lessons remains a gap. This paper presents results of a pilot in Uganda comparing community- and facility-based delivery of MNP and documenting experiences of caregivers and distributors. The pilot's mixed method evaluation included a cross-sectional endline survey, monthly household visits, and midline and endline interviews. Primary outcomes were ever-covered (received ≥1 MNP packet), repeat-coverage (received ≥2 MNP packets), and adherence (consumed no more than 1 MNP sachet per day, consumed MNP with food, and consumed MNP 3+ days in past week). An adjusted Wald chi-square test compared differences in programme outcomes between arms, and logit regression identified predictors to adherence. Key informant interviews were coded thematically. Most programme outcomes in the endline survey were statistically significantly higher in the community arm, although in both arms, adherence was lower than other outcomes (adherence 31.4% in facility vs. 58.3% in community arm). Counselling, receipt of communication materials, perceived positive effects, MNP knowledge, and child liking MNP were consistent predictors of adherence in both arms. Qualitative findings corroborated survey results, revealing that social encouragement and advocacy facilitated use and that forgetting to give MNP was a barrier. Facility arm caregivers also cited distance, time, and transportation cost as barriers. Distributors had positive experiences with training and supervision but experienced increased workloads in both arms. MNP programme design is context-specific but could benefit from strengthened community sensitization, continued and more effective counselling for caregivers, and increased support for distributors.

Adjusting iron and vitamin A status in settings of inflammation: a sensitivity analysis of the Biomarkers Reflecting Inflammation and Nutritional Determinants of Anemia (BRINDA) approach.

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of iron and vitamin A status is needed to inform public health decisions, but most population-level iron and vitamin A biomarkers are independently influenced by inflammation. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the reproducibility of the Biomarkers Reflecting Inflammation and Nutritional Determinants of Anemia (BRINDA) regression approach to adjust iron [ferritin, soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR)] and vitamin A [retinol-binding protein (RBP), retinol] biomarkers for inflammation (α-1-acid glycoprotein and C-reactive protein). METHODS: We conducted a sensitivity analysis comparing unadjusted and adjusted estimates of iron and vitamin A deficiency using the internal-survey regression approach from BRINDA phase 1 (16 surveys in children, 10 surveys in women) and 13 additional surveys for children and women (BRINDA phase 2). RESULTS: The relations between inflammation and iron or vitamin A biomarkers were statistically significant except for vitamin A biomarkers in women. Heterogeneity of the regression coefficients across surveys was high. Among children, internal-survey adjustments increased the estimated prevalence of depleted iron stores (ferritin <12 µg/L) by a median of 11 percentage points (pp) (24 pp and 9 pp in BRINDA phase 1 and phase 2, respectively), whereas estimates of iron-deficient erythropoiesis (sTfR >8.3 mg/L) decreased by a median of 15 pp (15 pp and 20 pp in BRINDA phase 1 and phase 2, respectively). Vitamin A deficiency (RBP <0.7 µmol/L or retinol <0.7 µmol/L) decreased by a median of 14 pp (18 pp and 8 pp in BRINDA phase 1 and phase 2, respectively) in children. Adjustment for inflammation in women resulted in smaller differences in estimated iron deficiency than in children. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are consistent with previous BRINDA conclusions that not accounting for inflammation may result in an underestimation of iron deficiency and overestimation of vitamin A deficiency. Research is needed to understand the etiology of the heterogeneity in the regression coefficients before a meta-analyzed regression correction can be considered.

Intraindividual double burden of overweight or obesity and micronutrient deficiencies or anemia among women of reproductive age in 17 population-based surveys.

BACKGROUND: Rising prevalence of overweight/obesity (OWOB) alongside persistent micronutrient deficiencies suggests many women face concomitant OWOB and undernutrition. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to 1) describe the prevalence of the double burden of malnutrition (DBM) among nonpregnant women of reproductive age, defined as intraindividual OWOB and either ≥1 micronutrient deficiency [micronutrient deficiency index (MDI) > 0; DBM-MDI] or anemia (DBM-anemia); 2) test whether the components of the DBM were independent; and 3) identify factors associated with DBM-MDI and DBM-anemia. METHODS: With data from 17 national surveys spanning low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries from the Biomarkers Reflecting Inflammation and Nutritional Determinants of Anemia project (n = 419 to n = 9029), we tested independence of over- and undernutrition using the Rao-Scott chi-square test and examined predictors of the DBM and its components using logistic regression for each survey. RESULTS: Median DBM-MDI was 21.9% (range: 1.6%-39.2%); median DBM-anemia was 8.6% (range: 1.0%-18.6%). OWOB and micronutrient deficiencies or anemia were independent in most surveys. Where associations existed, OWOB was negatively associated with micronutrient deficiencies and anemia in LMICs. In 1 high-income country, OWOB women were more likely to experience micronutrient deficiencies and anemia. Age was consistently positively associated with OWOB and the DBM, whereas the associations with other sociodemographic characteristics varied. Higher socioeconomic status tended to be positively associated with OWOB and the DBM in LMICs, whereas in higher-income countries the association was reversed. CONCLUSIONS: The independence of OWOB and micronutrient deficiencies or anemia within individuals suggests that these forms of over- and undernutrition may have unique etiologies. Decision-makers should still consider the prevalence, consequences, and etiology of the individual components of the DBM as programs move towards double-duty interventions aimed at addressing OWOB and undernutrition simultaneously.

Understanding the process of strengthening multi-sectoral efforts for anemia reduction: Qualitative findings from Sierra Leone and Uganda.

Anemia is a significant global health problem, and progress to reduce it has been slow. A multi-sectoral, context-specific, and country-led approach is recommended to effectively address anemia, but there is limited documentation of how this has worked in practice. We present key findings and lessons learned from Sierra Leone and Uganda's experiences establishing national-level anemia coordination platforms. A longitudinal collective case study methodology was used, with in-depth interviews of National Anemia Working Group members in both countries; data was analyzed to distill the salient lessons learned across countries. Similar factors were identified in the 2 countries. Setting the agenda was an important first step, accomplished by using country-specific anemia-related data and obtaining multi-sectoral commitment. Establishment of a cohesive coordination structure provided an effective platform to prioritize and align anemia activities. Strong, committed leadership and representation of diverse stakeholders was essential to maintain the legitimacy of anemia efforts. The main barriers to the policy-making process included misalignment of sectoral mandates, differences in work cultures, as well as competing priorities and increased staff workload. Sierra Leone and Uganda's experiences contribute to the global evidence base for anemia coordination and planning at the national level, particularly around linking health and non-health sectors and developing multi-sectoral platforms. It remains to be seen how and to what extent resulting policies in Sierra Leone and Uganda will translate to implementation.

Overview of the Biomarkers Reflecting Inflammation and Nutritional Determinants of Anemia (BRINDA) Project.

Anemia remains a widespread public health problem. Although iron deficiency is considered the leading cause of anemia globally, the cause of anemia varies considerably by country. To achieve global targets to reduce anemia, reliable estimates of the contribution of nutritional and non-nutritional causes of anemia are needed to guide interventions. Inflammation is known to affect many biomarkers used to assess micronutrient status and can thus lead to incorrect diagnosis of individuals and to overestimation or underestimation of the prevalence of deficiency in a population. Reliable assessment of iron status is particularly needed in settings with high infectious disease burden, given the call to screen for iron deficiency to mitigate potential adverse effects of iron supplementation. To address these information gaps, in 2012 the CDC, National Institute for Child Health and Human Development, and Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition formed a collaborative research group called Biomarkers Reflecting Inflammation and Nutrition Determinants of Anemia (BRINDA). Data from nationally and regionally representative nutrition surveys conducted in the past 10 y that included preschool children and/or women of childbearing age were pooled. Of 25 data sets considered for inclusion, 17 were included, representing ∼30,000 preschool children, 26,000 women of reproductive age, and 21,000 school-aged children from all 6 WHO geographic regions. This article provides an overview of the BRINDA project and describes key research questions and programmatic and research implications. Findings from this project will inform global guidelines on the assessment of anemia and micronutrient status and will guide the development of a research agenda for future longitudinal studies.