Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cent European J Urol ; 74(1): 109-115, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33976925

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the most common sexual disorders worldwide affecting about 30 million men in the United States, and an estimated 100 million men worldwide. Penile duplex doppler ultrasound (PDDU) is performed using an intracavernosal injection (ICI) of a vasoactive agent to demonstrate both arterial insufficiency and veno-occlusive dysfunction. This article aims to evaluate the sensitivity of different doses of different vasoactive agents used to diagnose ED in impotent patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study recruited 90 subjects with ED and 100 healthy subjects as controls. All of the subjects were assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function score (IIEF-5) while degree of erection was assessed by the Erection Hardness Score (EHS). Two penile duplex tests were done for each candidate two weeks apart. RESULTS: None of the sample population achieved a normal clinical response (EHS >2) to 10 ug PGE1. In contrast, 60 controls (60%) had a normal response (EHS >2) to 10 ug PGE1. This difference in response between the sample and control populations to 10 ug PGE1 was of high statistical significance 11 (p <0.001). In contrast, 54 (60%) out of the 90 cases had normal clinical response (EHS >2) to 0.25cc Trimix (everywhere). Interestingly, 96 controls (96%) demonstrated normal response (EHS >2) to 0.25cc Trimix. This difference in response between the sample and control populations to 0.25 cc Trimix was also of high statistical significance (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated a statistically significant association between the response to Trimix over PGE1 and peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity (EDV). Thus, we conclude that 0.25 cc Trimix is more sensitive than 20 ug PGE1 in diagnosing ED for impotent patients and also provides a more potent response.

2.
J Sex Med ; 5(10): 2464-9, 2008 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18507715

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Penile fracture is a traumatic rupture of the tunica albuginea because of blunt injury of an erect penis. AIM: To assess the efficacy of a simple delayed surgical repair of penile fracture after a conservative treatment under local anesthesia in patients presented after 24 hours. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with penile fracture presented after 24 hours were subjected to history taking, clinical examination, urine analysis, and penile ultrasound. They underwent conservative treatment for 7-12 days, and then a surgical repair under local anesthesia was carried out. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A follow-up for 6 months for sexual activity and any associated complaints in addition to local examination. RESULTS: All cases were presented with unilateral single tear, and the main cause of penile fracture was sexual intercourse. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were encountered. They regained their sexual activity 4-6 weeks after the repair. One case developed a mild penile deviation that did not interfere with sexual relation after the 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Surgical repair of penile fracture after a conservative treatment is an effective method for patients with delayed presentation devoid of urethral involvement.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local , Pênis/lesões , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ereção Peniana , Pênis/cirurgia , Ruptura/cirurgia , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Sex Med ; 5(6): 1496-502, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18266649

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Penile fracture is described as a traumatic rupture of the tunica albuginea because of blunt injury of an erect penis. AIM: To assess the etiology, treatment maneuvers, and late effects of penile fractures treated by surgical repair. METHODS: Thirty-three patients diagnosed provisionally as having fractured penises. Thirty patients were managed by immediate surgical repair and three by delayed repair. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: International Index of Erectile Function-5 for married cases and Single-question Self-report of Erectile Dysfunction questionnaires and recording complications after 2, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: The most common cause of fracture penis is self-inflicted acute bending (54.5%). The tear was visualized by ultrasound in 20/30 patients (66.7%) mostly on the right proximal third of the penis. All tears were unilateral with mean length 2.0 +/- 0.9 cm (range 0.5-4 cm). All patients who completed their follow-up after 6 months (N = 24) were able to achieve an adequate erection except two married cases who felt mild erectile dysfunction. Penile nodules were the most common postoperative complication (41.7%) after 6 months' follow-up. Patients treated with immediate or delayed repair had comparable complications. CONCLUSIONS: Fracture penis is not uncommon as an emergency that must be repaired either immediately or delayed. Clinical diagnosis is more predictive than ultrasound in diagnosis and determining the site of the tear. Ultrasound may be of value in patients where there is clinical doubt.


Assuntos
Pênis/lesões , Pênis/cirurgia , Adulto , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ereção Peniana , Pênis/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Prospectivos , Ruptura/cirurgia , Ultrassonografia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA