Delayed peak antibody titers after the second dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in solid organ transplant recipients: Prospective cohort study.

Poor post-vaccination production of antibody against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a concern among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Furthermore, the timing and kinetics of antibody titers after the second vaccine dose are unknown. We conducted a multicenter prospective observational study that included 614 SOT recipients: 460 kidney, 53 heart, 50 liver, 20 lung, and 31 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK). The participants received two doses of the mRNA vaccine (Pfizer BNT162b2 or Moderna mRNA-1273), as indicated. Serum samples were collected before the first and second vaccinations and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the second vaccine dose, which were then assessed for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The overall seropositivity rate was 43% at 1 month after administration of the second vaccine dose; it gradually increased to 68% at 3 months after second dose administration and to 70% at 6 months. In addition, recipient of kidney, lung or SPK transplants had lower antibody titers at the 3- and 6-month time points than did the other recipients. SOT recipients acquired SARS-CoV-2 S-IgG antibodies slowly, and the peak titer differed significantly from that of the general population.

Consensus Definitions of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection and Disease in Transplant Patients Including Resistant and Refractory CMV for Use in Clinical Trials: 2024 Update From the Transplant Associated Virus Infections Forum.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease are important causes of morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. For the purpose of developing consistent reporting of CMV outcomes in clinical trials, definitions of CMV infection and disease were developed and most recently published in 2017. Since then, there have been major developments, including registration of new antiviral agents. Therefore, the Transplant Associated Virus Infections Forum, which consists of scientists, clinicians, regulators, and industry representatives, has produced an updated version of these definitions that incorporates recent knowledge with the aim of supporting clinical research and drug development. This also includes an update regarding the definition of resistant and refractory CMV infections previously published in 2019. As the field evolves, the need for updates of these definitions is clear, and collaborative efforts among clinicians, scientists, regulators, and industry representatives can provide a platform for this work.

Incidence and outcomes of cytomegalovirus reactivation after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.

ABSTRACT: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is a major complication among seropositive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients; however, data on CMV reactivation after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy are limited. We report the incidence and outcomes of 95 adult CMV-seropositive patients who received CAR T-cell therapy between February 2018 and February 2023. CMV outcomes were CMV reactivation (any viremia) and clinically significant CMV infection (cs-CMV). Thirty-one patients (33%) had evidence of CMV reactivation (any viremia), and 10 patients (11%) had cs-CMV. The median time from CAR T-cell infusion to CMV reactivation was 19 days (interquartile range [IQR], 9-31). The cumulative incidence of CMV (any viremia) was significantly higher among patients with grade 3 to 4 cytokine release syndrome (67 vs 28%; P = .01), and those who received corticosteroids (39 vs 21%; P = .03), anakinra (56 vs 28%; P = .02), or ≥2 immunosuppressants (41 vs 21%; P = .02). Receipt of corticosteroids (18 vs 0%; P = .004), tocilizumab (14 vs 0%; P = .04), anakinra (33 vs 7%; P = .008), and ≥2 immunosuppressants (20 vs 0%; P = .001) were all associated with cs-CMV. Receiving ≥2 immunosuppressants was associated with a twofold increase in CMV reactivation in multivariate analyses (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-4.8; P = .03). Overall, the 1-year mortality was significantly higher in those with CMV reactivation (57% vs 23%; P = .001). Immunosuppression, particularly with corticosteroids, for the management of CAR T-cell toxicities, is a major risk factor for CMV reactivation.

Invasive aspergillosis in liver transplant recipients in the current era.

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a rare but fatal disease among liver transplant recipients (LiTRs). We performed a multicenter 1:2 case-control study comparing LiTRs diagnosed with proven/probable IA and controls with no invasive fungal infection. We included 62 IA cases and 124 matched controls. Disseminated infection occurred only in 8 cases (13%). Twelve-week all-cause mortality of IA was 37%. In multivariate analyses, systemic antibiotic usage (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.74; P = .03) and history of pneumonia (aOR, 48.7; P = .01) were identified as independent risk factors associated with the occurrence of IA. Moreover, reoperation (aOR, 5.99; P = .01), systemic antibiotic usage (aOR, 5.03; P = .04), and antimold prophylaxis (aOR, 11.9; P = .02) were identified as independent risk factors associated with the occurrence of early IA. Among IA cases, Aspergillus colonization (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 86.9; P < .001), intensive care unit stay (aHR, 3.67; P = .02), disseminated IA (aHR, 8.98; P < .001), and dialysis (aHR, 2.93; P = .001) were identified as independent risk factors associated with 12-week all-cause mortality, while recent receipt of tacrolimus (aHR, 0.11; P = .001) was protective. Mortality among LiTRs with IA remains high in the current era. The identified risk factors and protective factors may be useful for establishing robust targeted antimold prophylactic and appropriate treatment strategies against IA.

Excess mortality in COVID-19-affected solid organ transplant recipients across the pandemic.

The excess mortality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) throughout the pandemic remains unclear. This prospective cohort study based on the Japanese nationwide registry included 1632 SOTRs diagnosed with COVID-19 between February 1, 2020, and July 31, 2022, categorized based on dominant phases of variants of concern (VOCs): Waves 1 to 3 (Beta), 4 (Alpha), 5 (Delta), 6 (Omicron BA.1/BA.2), and 7 (Omicron BA.5). Excess mortality of COVID-19-affected SOTRs was analyzed by calculating standardized mortality ratios (SMRs). Overall, 1632 COVID-19-confirmed SOTRs included 1170 kidney, 408 liver, 25 lung, 20 heart, 1 small intestine, and 8 multiorgan recipients. Although disease severity and all-cause mortality decreased as VOCs transitioned, SMRs of SOTRs were consistently higher than those of the general population throughout the pandemic, showing a U-shaped gap that peaked toward the Omicron BA.5 phase; SMR (95% CI): 6.2 (3.1-12.5), 4.0 (1.5-10.6), 3.0 (1.3-6.7), 8.8 (5.3-14.5), and 21.9 (5.5-87.6) for Waves 1 to 3 (Beta), Wave 4 (Alpha), Wave 5 (Delta), Wave 6 (Omicron BA.1/2), and Wave 7 (Omicron BA.5), respectively. In conclusion, COVID-19 SOTRs had greater SMRs than the general population across the pandemic. Vaccine boosters, immunosuppression optimization, and other protective measures, particularly for older SOTRs, are paramount.

Therapy of Mycobacterium abscessus Infections in Solid Organ Transplant Patients.

Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC), a rapidly growing Mycobacterium, is one of the most common causes of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections in the United States of America, and it has been associated with a wide spectrum of infections in immunocompetent and immunosuppressed individuals. Eradicating MABC is very challenging, even with prolonged combination therapies. The management of MABC infections in solid organ transplant (SOT) patients is usually complex given their net state of immunosuppression, associated comorbidities, and potential drug-drug interactions, among other things. In this manuscript, we discussed the antimicrobial management of pulmonary and extrapulmonary MABC infections. In addition, we reviewed promising novel therapies such as clofazimine, omadacycline, bedaquiline, and inhaled tigecycline that could join the existing antimicrobial armamentarium to fight this infection associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, further studies are needed, especially among the immunocompromised host.

Breakthrough invasive fungal infections on isavuconazole prophylaxis in hematologic malignancy & hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Isavuconazole (ISA) is a newer antifungal used in patients with history of hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic transplant and cellular therapies (HM/TCT). Although it has a more favorable side-effect profile, breakthrough invasive fungal infections (bIFIs) while on ISA have been reported. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study evaluating HM/TCT patients who received prophylactic ISA for ≥7 days, we evaluated the incidence and potential risk factors for bIFIs. RESULTS: We evaluated 106 patients who received prophylactic ISA. The patients were predominantly male (60.4%) with median age of 65 (range: 21-91) years. Acute myeloid leukemia (48/106, 45.3%) was the most common HM, with majority having relapsed and/or refractory disease (43/106, 40.6%) or receiving ongoing therapy (38/106, 35.8%). Nineteen patients (17.9%) developed bIFIs-nine proven [Fusarium (3), Candida (2), Mucorales plus Aspergillus (2), Mucorales (1), Colletotrichum (1)], four probable invasive pulmonary Aspergillus, and six possible infections. Twelve patients were neutropenic for a median of 28 (8-253) days prior to bIFI diagnosis. ISA levels checked within 7 days of bIFI diagnosis (median: 3.65 µg/mL) were comparable to industry-sponsored clinical trials. All-cause mortality among the bIFI cases was 47.4% (9/19).We also noted clinically significant cytomegalovirus co-infection in 5.3% (1/19). On univariate analysis, there were no significant differences in baseline comorbidities and potential risk factors between the two groups. CONCLUSION: ISA prophylaxis was associated with a significant cumulative incidence of bIFIs. Despite the appealing side-effect and drug-interaction profile of ISA, clinicians must be vigilant about the potential risk for bIFIs.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes in CMV infection in intestinal transplant recipients: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is one of the most common posttransplantation infections and has been associated with increased rejection and mortality. Data in intestinal transplants recipients are limited. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of all intestinal transplants performed between January 1, 2009, and August 31, 2020. We included recipients of all ages who were at risk of CMV infection. To identify the risk factors, we conducted at first univariate and multivariate analysis. For the multivariate analysis, we developed a logistic regression model based on the result of univariate analysis. RESULTS: Ninety five patients with a median age of 32 (interquartile range [IQR] 4, 50) were included. CMV donor seropositive/recipient seronegative were 17 (17.9%). Overall, 22.1% of the recipients developed CMV infection at a median time of 155 (IQR 28-254) days from transplant, including 4 CMV syndrome and 6 CMV end-organ disease. Overall, 90.4%, (19/21) developed DNAemia while on prophylaxis. Median peak viral load and time to negativity was 16 000 (IQR 1034-43 892) IU/mL and 56 (IQR 49-109) days, respectively. (Val)ganciclovir and foscarnet were utilized in 17 (80.9%) and 1 (4.76%) recipients, respectively. Recurrences of CMV DNAemia and graft rejection were observed in three and six recipients, respectively. Younger age was identified as a risk factor (p = .032, odds ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.95-0.99) to develop CMV DNAemia. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of intestinal transplant recipients developed CMV infection while on prophylaxis. Better methods such as CMV cell mediated immunity guided prophylaxis should be used to prevent infections in this population.

Impact of a real-time diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship workflow on time to appropriate therapy for infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms.

INTRODUCTION: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative organisms cause life-threatening infections, and the incidence is rising globally. Timely therapy for these infections has a direct impact on patient survival. This study aimed to determine the impact of a multidisciplinary diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) workflow on time to appropriate therapy (TAP) for these infections using novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors. METHODS: This was a retrospective quasi-experimental study of adult patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas (MDR PsA) infections at a 1500 bed university hospital. Included patients who received ≥ 72 hours of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) or ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) from December 2017 to December 2019. During the pre-intervention period (December 2017 to December 2018), additional susceptibilities (including CZA and C/T) were performed only upon providers' request. In 2019, reflex algorithms were implemented for faster identification and testing of all CRE/MDR PsA isolates. Results were communicated in real-time to the AMS team to tailor therapy. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were included, with no between-group differences at baseline. The median age was 60 years and 56 (56.7%) were in intensive care at the time of culture collection. Identified organisms included 71 (71.7%) MDR PsA and 26 CRE, of which 18 were carbapenemase producers (Klebsiella-producing carbapenemase = 12, New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase = 4, Verona integron-encoded metallo-ß-lactamase = 2). The most common infections were pneumonia (49.5%) and bacteraemia (30.3%). A decrease was found in median TAP (103 [IQR 76.0-156.0] vs. 75 [IQR 56-100] hours; P < 0.001). Median time from culture collection to final susceptibility results was shorter in the post-intervention group (123 vs. 93 hours; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study identified improvement in TAP in MDR PsA and CRE infections with implementation of a reflex microbiology workflow and multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.

A Pilot Single-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing BNT162b2 vs. JNJ-78436735 Vaccine as the Third Dose After Two Doses of BNT162b2 Vaccine in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Solid Organ Transplant (SOT) recipients are at significant higher risk for COVID-19 and due to immunosuppressive medication, the immunogenicity after vaccination is suboptimal. In the previous studies, booster method showed significant benefit in this population. In the current study, we compared using a mix-and-match method vs. same vaccine as a third dose in SOT recipients. This was a patient-blinded, single center, randomized controlled trial comparing BNT162b2 vs. JNJ-78436735 vaccine as the third dose after two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine. We included adult SOT recipients with functional graft who had received two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either BNT162b2 or JNJ-78436735 in one-to-one ratio. Primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 IgG positivity at 1 month after the third dose. Sixty SOT recipients, including 36 kidney, 12 liver, 2 lung, 3 heart, and 5 combined transplants, were enrolled, and 57 recipients were analyzed per protocol. There were no statistically significant differences between the two vaccine protocols for IgG positivity (83.3% vs. 85.2% for BNT162b2 and JNJ-78436735, respectively, p = 0.85, Odds Ratio 0.95, 95% Confidence Interval 0.23-4.00). Comparison of the geometric mean titer demonstrated a higher trend with BNT162b2 (p = 0.09). In this pilot randomized controlled trial comparing mix and match method vs. uniform vaccination in SOT recipients, both vaccines were safely used. Since this was a small sample sized study, there was no statistically significant difference in immunogenicity; though, the mix and match method showed relatively lower geometric mean titer, as compared to uniform vaccine. Further studies need to be conducted to determine duration of this immunogenicity. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05047640?term=20210641&draw=2&rank=1, identifier 20210641.

Pulmonary Infections in Intestinal Transplant Recipients With Preexisting Pulmonary Nodules.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary nodules in asymptomatic patients could represent latent pulmonary infections. Intestinal transplant (ITx) recipients with preexisting lung nodules might be at higher risk for pulmonary infections. However, data is scarce. METHODS: This retrospective study included adult patients who underwent ITx from May 2016 to May 2020. Chest computed tomography scans performed within 12 months before ITx were obtained to evaluate for preexisting pulmonary nodules. Screening for endemic mycoses, Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, and latent tuberculosis infection performed within 12 months before ITx was obtained. We assessed for worsening pulmonary nodules, and fungal and mycobacterial infections during the first year post-transplant. Survival and graft loss at 1-year post-transplant was also assessed. RESULTS: Forty-four patients underwent ITx. Thirty-one had preexisting lung nodules. No invasive fungi were recorded in the pretransplant period and one individual had latent tuberculosis infection. In the post-transplant period, one individual developed probable invasive aspergillosis and had worsening nodular opacities, whereas one had disseminated histoplasmosis with stable lung nodules in chest computed tomography. No mycobacterial infections were documented. The cohort survival was 84% at 12 months after transplant. CONCLUSION: Preexisting pulmonary nodules were common in the cohort (71%), yet latent and active pulmonary infections were rare. Appearance of new or worsening pulmonary nodules does not appear to directly correlate with pulmonary infections in the post-transplant period. Routine chest computed tomography is not recommended in the pretransplant period, but follow-up is favored in patients with confirmed nodular opacities. Clinical monitoring is essential.

Early administration of SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody reduces the risk of mortality in hematologic malignancy and hematopoietic cell transplant patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Data on severe acute respiratory distress syndrome coronavirus 2 monoclonal antibody (SARS-CoV-2-specific mAb) use in hematologic malignancy and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HM/HCT) patients are limited. Here, we describe our experience with the use of casirivimab-imdevimab or bamlanivimab for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in HM/HCT patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review at the University of Miami Hospital and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center for HM/HCT patients with COVID-19 who received casirivimab-imdevimab or bamlanivimab from November 21, 2020, to September 30, 2021. Outcomes measured were mortality, hospital admission, and infusion reaction to SARS-CoV-2-specific mAbs. RESULTS: We identified 59 HM/HCT patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 who received casirivimab-imdevimab or bamlanivimab. Median age was 57 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 45-65). Among the 59 patients, 25 (42%) received cellular therapy: 14 (24%) had undergone allogeneic HCT, nine (15%) autologous HCT, and two (3%) received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. The median time from COVID-19 symptom onset to SARS-CoV-2-specific mAb administration was 4 (IQR: 3-6) days. Forty-six (78%) patients received SARS-CoV-2-specific mAbs as outpatients and 13 (22%) patients received SARS-CoV-2-specific mAbs during hospitalization. Among patients who received SARS-CoV-2-specific mAbs as outpatients, only four (9%) visited the emergency department at days 10, 11, 15, and 35 after SARS-CoV-2-specific mAb administration. None of these four patients required hospital admission. Among the hospitalized patients, five (38%) were admitted to the hospital with neutropenic fever, four (31%) were already hospitalized for transplantation and cellular therapy, three (23%) were admitted for monitoring of COVID-19 symptoms, and one (8%) was admitted with acute kidney injury. Three hospitalized patients (23%) died at 14, 35, and 59 days after SARS-CoV-2-specific mAb administration; two of these three deaths were attributed to COVID-19 infection. One patient developed an immediate infusion reaction to bamlanivimab, and no infusion reactions were reported to casirivimab-imdevimab use. CONCLUSION: During the alpha and delta variant surges, early administration of bamlanivimab or casirivimab-imdevimab prevented hospitalization and death when given in the outpatient setting. Among patients who received mAbs at or after hospital admission, the risk of COVID-19 disease progression and death remains significant. Larger studies of the use of mAb therapy to treat COVID-19 in this population are needed.

Difference between SARS-CoV-2, seasonal coronavirus, influenza, and respiratory syncytial virus infection in solid organ transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has been raging since the end of 2019 and has shown worse outcomes in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. The clinical differences as well as outcomes between respiratory viruses have not been well defined in this population. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of adult SOT recipients with nasopharyngeal swab or bronchoalveolar lavage PCR positive for either SARS-CoV-2, seasonal coronavirus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) or influenza virus from January 2017 to October 2020. The follow up period was 3 months. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 377 recipients including 157 SARS-CoV-2, 70 seasonal coronavirus, 50 RSV and 100 influenza infections were identified. The most common transplanted organ was kidney 224/377 (59.4%). Lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) was found in 210/377 (55.7%) and the risk factors identified with multivariable analysis were SARS-CoV-2 infection, steroid use, and older age. Co- and secondary infections were seen in 77/377 (20.4%) recipients with bacterial pathogens as dominant. Hospital admission was seen in 266/377 (67.7%) recipients without significant statistical difference among viruses, however, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation and mortality were higher with SARS-CoV-2 infection. In the multivariable model, the risk factors for mortality were SARS-CoV-2 infection and older age. CONCLUSIONS: We found higher incidence of ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality among SARS-CoV-2 infected recipients. Older age was found to be the risk factor for lower respiratory tract infection and mortality for SARS-CoV-2, coronaviruses, RSV and influenza virus groups.

Prevention and Management of Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients.

Anti-rejection medications are essential in preventing organ rejection amongst solid organ transplant recipients; however, these agents also cause profound immunosuppression, predisposing lung transplant recipients (LTRs) to infectious complications. The timely management including prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of such infectious complications is vital to prevent significant morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients and allograft dysfunction. LTRs are inundated with microbes that may be recognized as commensals in hosts with intact immune systems. Bacterial infections are the most common ones, followed by viral pathogens. Indications of a brewing infectious process may be subtle. Hence, the importance of adapting vigilance around isolated hints through symptomatology and signs is pivotal. Signals to suggest an infectious process, such as fever and leukocytosis, may be dampened by immunosuppressive agents. One must also be vigilant about drug interactions of antibiotics and immunosuppressive agents. Treatment of infections can become challenging, as antimicrobials can interact with immunosuppressive agents, and antimicrobial resistance can surge under antimicrobial pressure. Transplant infectious disease physicians work in concert with transplant teams to obtain specimens for diagnostic testing and follow through with source control when possible. This heavily impacts medical decisions and fosters a multidisciplinary approach in management. Furthermore, the reduction of immunosuppression, although it augments the risk of allograft rejection, is as crucial as the initiation of appropriate antimicrobials when it comes to the management of infections.

Comparison of BNT162b2 and mRNA1273 vaccines in solid organ transplant recipients: Post-Hoc analysis of a Japanese national prospective study.

The coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) vaccine efficacy and immunogenicity in the immunocompetent population are well established. However, in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, because of their use of immunosuppressive medication, the immunogenicity of these severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines remains suboptimal. Both BNT162b2 and mRNA1273 have been used for some time, but their immunogenicity has not been directly compared in this immunocompromised patient group. We performed a post-hoc analysis of a previous prospective cohort study. The inclusion criteria were adult SOT recipients with active grafts at least 1 month after SOT. After giving consent, participants chose to receive either BNT162b2 or mRNA1273 vaccine. Anti-spike-protein-S antibody against SARS-CoV-2 was measured. Propensity scores were calculated via logistic regression to transform the probability of having received either BNT162b2 or mRNA1273 vaccine, and a model was developed. We enrolled 623 SOT recipients. In the propensity score-matched analysis, 100 recipients were selected for BNT162b2 and 100 for mRNA1273. SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike protein antibody positivity with BNT162b2 versus mRNA1273 at 3 weeks after the first dose, 1 month after the second dose, 3 months after the second dose, and 6 months after the second dose were 10% versus 19% (P = .07), 51% versus 58% (P = .30), 74% versus 88% (P = .01), and 78% versus 87% (P = .13), respectively. We conducted a propensity score-matched comparison of BNT162b2 and mRNA1273 vaccines as the primary series of COVID-19 vaccines in SOT recipients. We found significantly better immunogenicity with the mRNA1273 vaccine than with BNT162b2.

Is the Omicron variant truly less virulent in solid organ transplant recipients?

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at high risk for severe disease with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Emerging variants of concern have disproportionately affected this population. Data on severity and outcomes with the Omicron variant in SOT recipients are limited. Thus we conducted this single-center, retrospective cohort study of SOT recipients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection from December 18, 2021 to January 18, 2022, when prevalence of the Omicron variant was more than 80%-95% in the community. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for hospital admission. We identified 166 SOT patients: 112 (67.5%) kidney, 22 (13.3%) liver, 10 (6.0%) lung, seven (4.2%) heart, and 15 (9.0%) combined transplants. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine series was completed in 59 (35.5%) recipients. Ninety-nine (59.6%) and 13 (7.8%) recipients received casirivimab/imdevimab and sotrovimab, respectively. Fifty-three (32%) recipients required hospital admission, of which 19 (35.8%) required intensive care unit level of care. Median follow-up was 50 (interquartile range, 25-59) days, with mortality reported in six (3.6%) patients. Risk factors identified for hospital admission were African American race (p < .001, odds ratio [OR] 4.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.84-8.70), history of coronary artery disease (p = .031, OR 3.50, 95% CI 1.12-10.87), and maintenance immunosuppression with corticosteroids (p = .048, OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.01-4.00). In conclusion, contrary to that in the general population, we found a higher hospital admission rate in SOT recipients with omicron variant infection. Further studies to investigate the efficacy of newer treatments are necessary, even as outcomes continue to improve.