Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Food Prot ; 70(3): 582-91, 2007 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17388045

RESUMO

The U.S. Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) tests for Salmonella in meat, poultry, and egg products through three regulatory testing programs: the Pathogen Reduction-Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (PR-HACCP) program, the ready-to-eat program for meat and poultry products, and the pasteurized egg products program. From 1998 through 2003, 293,938 samples collected for these testing programs were analyzed for the presence of Salmonella enterica serotypes. Of these samples, 12,699 (4.3%) were positive for Salmonella, and 167 (1.3%) of the positive samples (0.06% of all samples) contained Salmonella Enteritidis. The highest incidence of Salmonella Enteritidis was observed in ground chicken PR-HACCP samples (8 of 1,722 samples, 0.46%), and the lowest was found in steer-heifer PR-HACCP samples (0 of 12,835 samples). Salmonella Enteritidis isolates were characterized by phage type, pulsed-field gel electrophoretic pattern, and antimicrobial susceptibility. Phage typing of 94 Salmonella Enteritidis isolates identified PT13 (39 isolates) and PT8 (36 isolates) as the most common types. One isolate from a ready-to-eat ham product was characterized as PT4. Electrophoretic analysis of 148 Salmonella Enteritidis isolates indicated genetic diversity among the isolates, with 28 unique XbaI electrophoretic patterns identified. Of these 148 isolates, 136 (92%) were susceptible to each of 16 antimicrobials tested. Two isolates were resistant to ampicillin alone, and 10 isolates were resistant to two or more antimicrobials. Isolation of Salmonella Enteritidis from FSIS-regulated products emphasizes the need for continued consumer education on proper food handling and cooking practices and continued work to decrease the prevalence of Salmonella in meat, poultry, and pasteurized egg products.


Assuntos
Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Produtos da Carne/microbiologia , Produtos Avícolas/microbiologia , Salmonella enteritidis/classificação , Salmonella enteritidis/isolamento & purificação , Animais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Tipagem de Bacteriófagos , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/genética , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/genética , Ovos/microbiologia , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado , Inspeção de Alimentos , Microbiologia de Alimentos , Variação Genética , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Salmonella enteritidis/efeitos dos fármacos , Salmonella enteritidis/genética , Sorotipagem , Estados Unidos
2.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 220(7): 1053-7, 2002 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12420786

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sensitivities at the herd level of test strategies used in the Voluntary Johne's Disease Herd Status Program (VJDHSP) and alternative test strategies for detecting dairy cattle herds infected with Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. DESIGN: Nonrandom cross-sectional study. SAMPLE POPULATION: 64 dairy herds from Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Colorado, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Fifty-six herds had at least 1 cow shedding M. paratuberculosis in feces; the other 8 herds were free from paratuberculosis. PROCEDURE: For all adult cows in each herd, serum samples were tested for antibodies to M. paratuberculosis with an ELISA, and fecal samples were submitted for bacterial culture for M. paratuberculosis. Sensitivities at the herd level (probability of detecting infected herd) of various testing strategies were then evaluated. RESULTS: Sensitivity at the herd level of the testing strategy used in level 1 of the VJDHSP (use of the ELISA to test samples from 30 cows followed by confirmatory bacterial culture of feces from cows with positive ELISA result) ranged from 33 to 84% for infected herds, depending on percentage of cows in the herd with positive bacterial culture results. If follow-up bacterial culture was not used to confirm positive ELISA results, sensitivity ranged from 70 to 93%, but probability of identifying uninfected herds as infected was 89%. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggest that the testing strategy used in the VJDHSP will fail to identify as infected most dairy herds with a low prevalence of paratuberculosis. A higher percentage of infected herds was detected if follow-up bacterial culture was not used, but this test strategy was associated with a high probability of misclassifying uninfected herds.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Doenças dos Bovinos/diagnóstico , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/veterinária , Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis/imunologia , Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Paratuberculose/diagnóstico , Animais , Bovinos , Doenças dos Bovinos/sangue , Doenças dos Bovinos/epidemiologia , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana/métodos , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana/veterinária , Estudos Transversais , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Fezes/microbiologia , Feminino , Paratuberculose/sangue , Paratuberculose/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Tamanho da Amostra , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA