Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(9)2023 Aug 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37766090

RESUMO

Prevention of mpox has become an important public health interest. We aimed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vaccine. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MVA versus no intervention, placebo, or another vaccine. Outcomes included safety and immunogenicity outcomes. We also performed a systematic review of RCTs evaluating various MVA regimens. Fifteen publications were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. All but one (ACAM2000) compared MVA with placebo. We found that cardiovascular adverse events following two MVA doses were significantly more common compared to placebo (relative risk [RR] 4.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-15.10), though serious adverse events (SAEs) were not significantly different. Following a single MVA dose, no difference was demonstrated in any adverse event outcomes. Seroconversion rates were significantly higher compared with placebo after a single or two doses. None of the RCTs evaluated clinical effectiveness in preventing mpox. This meta-analysis provides reassuring results concerning the immunogenicity and safety of MVA. Further studies are needed to confirm the immunogenicity of a single dose and its clinical effectiveness. A single vaccine dose may be considered according to vaccine availability, with preference for two doses.

2.
Harefuah ; 160(11): 710-716, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Hebraico | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34817134

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: As the coronavirus pandemic emerged in late 2019, a task force was founded in the Sheba Medical Center and began preparing for the arrival of the pandemic to Israel. Several wards were put in charge of isolated COVID-19 patients. A new intensive care unit was formed for the most critical COVID-19 patients, requiring mechanical ventilation and multi-organ treatment. The Corona ICU began operating in March 2020, with a multi-disciplinary team, gathered from ICU units, an internal medicine ward, an anesthesiology department, social workers and psychologists. Simultaneously, the routine medical center functions in non-corona sections were maintained, as much as possible. The coronavirus pandemic entails challenges of many aspects: an unfamiliar pathogen causing an unknown illness, a necessity for social distancing, ambiguity regarding the risk factors for contamination and illness severity, and medical crews put at risk. Consequently, the pandemic involves ethical, social, economic and moral aspects, affecting the medical crew members and system, the patients and their families, and our society as a whole. In this article we review our joint experience in the Sheba Medical Center Corona ICU, of the medical, ethical and moral dilemmas that emerged from the first COVID-19 wave.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Princípios Morais , SARS-CoV-2
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA