Correction to: Robot-Assisted Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation-Current Status and Future Prospects.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s13193-020-01230-3.].

Surgical Management of Locoregional Recurrence in Breast Cancer.

Locoregional recurrences from breast cancer represent a heterogeneous group of disease that poses a therapeutic challenge and needs a multidisciplinary team management. The incidence of local recurrence after breast conservation surgery ranges from 10 to 22% and 5-15% after mastectomy at 10-year follow-up. Management of locoregional recurrence depends on tumor biology, stage at presentation, and prior local and systemic therapy. With improvements in diagnostic, pathological, and surgical techniques, radiation and systemic therapy approach, outcomes in these patients have improved. In this review, we discuss the risk factors, prognostic factors, surgical and reconstruction options, re-irradiation, and role of systemic therapy to define a reasonable treatment approach without compromising oncologic safety and achieve good cosmetic and survival outcomes.

Predictive Factors for Submandibular Gland Involvement in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma-a Prospective Study from a Tertiary Cancer Center.

The oncological necessity of submandibular gland removal during neck dissection for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma surgery has remained controversial. This study was aimed to determine the rate of SMG involvement and assess the feasibility of submandibular gland (SMG) preservation. We present a prospective study conducted at a tertiary cancer center from June 2017 to May 2019. All patients of oral squamous cell carcinoma who underwent primary surgery with neck dissection were included and analyzed for incidence and predictive factors for incidence of level IB nodal and SMG involvement as per CAP guidelines. A total of 60 patients were inducted in the study, wherein 63 neck dissections were performed including bilateral dissection in three cases. There was involvement of SMG in 6 patients with two cases each in floor of mouth cancer, gingivo-buccal, and alveolar lesions. The SMG was involved by direct contiguous spread from the primary lesion in two cases, extra-capsular extension from level IB lymph nodes in one and by both mode of spread in three glands. Perineural invasion was seen in 83.33% (n = 5) patients with SMG involvement (p- < 0.001), while 66.67% (4/6) patients had lympho vascular invasion (p-0.006) and all the cases with SMG involvement had extra-capsular extension (p < 0.001), suggesting PNI, LVI, and ECE as the strongest predictors of SMG involvement. This study demonstrates that oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma has low potential to metastasize to the SMG; however, high-risk factors include primary tumor site in floor of mouth or tongue, heavy level IB nodal burden, presence of LVI, PNI, and ECE. In the absence of these high-risk factors, SMG preservation with complete nodal clearance in level IB is a promising technique for reducing future complications.

Robot-Assisted Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation-Current Status and Future Prospects.

Multimodality treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery has become the standard of care for esophageal cancer. In the recent years, there has been a shift in focus of surgical approach from open esophagectomy to minimally invasive esophagectomy. Robot-assisted esophagectomy is being performed more often in centers across the world. However, there is limited data on role of robot-assisted esophagectomy in patients who have received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Initial reports have shown that integrating neoadjuvant therapy to robot-assisted esophagectomy is feasible and safe. With the growing popularity of robot-assisted surgery worldwide among both surgeons and patients, understanding the impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on the procedure and its oncological outcome seems worthwhile. In the present study, we present a review of available literature on the feasibility and safety of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Can Preoperative Ultrasonography and MRI Replace Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Management of Axilla in Early Breast Cancer-a Prospective Study from a Tertiary Cancer Center.

Although SLNB is a less invasive procedure in detecting axillary lymph node metastases(ALNM) in early breast cancer; still, it carries some complications like lymphedema and in addition, performing SLNB requires surgical skills, technical knowledge, presence of facility like preoperative sentinel lymphoscintigraphy, and availability of hand-held gamma probe for intraoperative assessment. We calculated the relative diagnostic strength of preoperative axillary USG and MRI and compared with of SLNB for detection of ALNM in early breast cancer and assessed whether MRI and USG could accurately predict axillary LN status, potentially replacing SLNB. We evaluated 40 cases of clinically node-negative early breast cancer with preoperative axillary USG and MRI and subsequently subjected to SLNB. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of axillary USG were 62.5%, 96.88%, 88.33%, 91.18%, and 90% respectively (p value < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of MRI in detection of ALNM were 75%, 93.75%, 75%, 93.75%, and 90% (p value < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of combined USG and MRI in detection of ALNM were 87.5%,90.63%, 70%, 96.67%, and 90% respectively (p value < 0.001), which are comparable to previous study series. The diagnostic performance of combined approach of axillary USG and MRI is promising, as the NPV of combined USG and MRI is approaching the NPV of the SLNB in detecting ALNM. Based on above findings, if axillary LNs are found nonsuspicious in preoperative axillary USG and MRI, further axillary dissection may be avoided, and if found suspicious, then ALND may be directly proceeded avoiding SLNB in between.

Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction in Breast Conservation Surgery: Improving the Oncological and Aesthetic Outcomes.

Breast conservation surgery (BCS) is now the standard of care for patients with early breast cancer. The main contraindications for BCS besides the presence of multicentricity and diffuse microcalcifications are inadequate tumour size to breast size ratio. With the advent of oncoplastic techniques, the indications of BCS may be further extended to patient with larger tumour size and or small volume breast. We prospectively assessed 42 patients undergoing oncoplastic breast conservation surgery for cosmetic and oncologic outcomes. Cosmetic outcome assessment was done by comparison of operated breast to contralateral breast by an independent surgeon, nurse and patient's attendant at 6 months post-surgery. Risk factors for compromised oncologic outcomes included grades II/III tumours and non-ductal histology. Intraoperative margin assessment with frozen section analysis proved to be important in order to achieve negative surgical margins on final histopathology. By univariate analysis, tumours located in central quadrant and medial half of the breast had similar cosmetic outcomes comparable to tumours located in other quadrants. Majority of our patients (90%) had overall good to excellent cosmetic outcomes on Harvard scale. Oncoplastic breast conservation surgery techniques allow for larger parenchymal resections without compromising oncologic and cosmetic results. It further allows extension of BCS to patients otherwise denied for the same based on earlier recommendations for mastectomy. Oncoplastic techniques and intraoperative margin assessment with frozen section are vital in attaining adequate margins and also decrease chance of local recurrence and revision surgery for positive margins.