The Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Xerostomia Inventory Questionnaire.

Statement of the Problem: Reduced saliva production or changes in the quality of saliva are major causes of xerostomia as a perceptual disease. Purpose: This study aimed to measure validity and reliability of the Persian version of the xerostomia inventory (XI) questionnaire. Materials and Method: This cross-sectional study was performed in Kerman in 2021. The sample size for this study was 100 people. To test the discriminant validity of XI, 50 healthy people (control group) and 50 people undergoing or recovering from laryngeal radiation (xerostomia group) were chosen. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to determine internal consistency, and the intra-cluster correlation (ICC) coefficient was used to determine test-retest reliability after two weeks. To evaluate the concurrent validity, the relationship between the total score of the questionnaire and the golden question, which was defined as "How often do you have dry mouth?" was measured. Results: Cronbach's alpha and ICC coefficient for the total XI score were 0.84 and 0.95, respectively. The mean ages of patients in the radiotherapy group and the healthy participants were 59±7.5 and 41.1±6.6 years, respectively. Participants who were having or had had laryngeal radiotherapy had a significantly higher mean total XI score than healthy individuals (p< 0.001). Conclusion: The Persian version of the Xerostomia Inventory is a valid and reliable tool for assessing xerostomia.

Comparative Outcomes of Pulpotomy in Mature Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Non-Randomized Trial Evaluating Calcified and Non-Calcified Pulp Chambers.

Introduction: This non-randomized clinical trial investigated the outcomes of full pulpotomy in adult molars with irreversible pulpitis, comparing those with calcified and non-calcified pulp chambers over 6 and 12 months. Materials and Methods: A total of 101 adult permanent molars with irreversible pulpitis, in individuals over 12 years old, were categorized based on pulp chamber calcification observed in radiographic images by two endodontists. Subsequently, full pulpotomy procedures were performed, achieving hemostasis, and applying a 2 mm layer of calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement as a pulp covering agent. After 48 hours, the setting of the CEM cement was verified, followed by the application of a layer of resin-modified glass-ionomer. The tooth was then restored using amalgam. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were conducted at 6-month and 1-year follow-ups by blinded endodontists. Success rates were compared using Fisher's exact test and logistic regression tests with a significance level of 0.05. Results: Among the 97 patients with 6-month and 1-year follow-ups, all achieved clinical success. Radiographic success rates were 99% at 6 months and 96.9% at 1 year, regardless of pulp calcification. In the 6-month follow-up, success rates were 98.07% for non-calcified pulp chambers and 100% for calcified pulp chambers. At the 1-year follow-up, success rates were 96.1% and 97.8%, respectively. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in radiographic success rate between the two groups at both follow-ups (P>0.05). Conclusions: Full pulpotomy using CEM cement is a successful treatment for adult permanent teeth with calcified and non-calcified pulp chambers presenting signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis up to a 1-year follow-up. This study provides compelling evidence that vital pulp therapy can be effectively employed in the pulpotomy of calcified teeth, at least in the short term.

Comparative Efficacy of Analgesics for Pain Relief in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis Prior to Emergency Endodontic Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ibuprofen, Novafen, mefenamic acid (MA), and celecoxib for pain relief in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis prior to emergency endodontic treatment. Materials and Methods: This clinical trial was conducted on 120 patients with moderate to severe pain due to symptomatic irreversible pulpitis seeking emergency endodontic treatment. The patients were randomly divided into 4 groups to receive Novafen, MA, Celecoxib, and ibuprofen. The pain score of patients was measured before and 1 hour after analgesic intake using a visual analog scale (VAS). The success of analgesic treatment was analyzed by the binary logistic regression model. Results: A total of 117 patients including 76 females and 41 males with a mean age of 30.29 years completed the study and were statistically analyzed. Ibuprofen had the highest analgesic efficacy followed by Novafen, and caused a significantly greater reduction in pain score compared with MA and celecoxib [OR (Ibuprofen vs MA)=1.28, OR (Ibuprofen vs Celecoxib)=3.74, OR (Novafen vs MA)=2.94, OR (Novafen vs Celecoxib)=2.94, P<0.05]. Ibuprofen and Novafen had no significant difference in analgesic efficacy (P>0.05). Baseline pain score was a predictive factor for the success of analgesics (P<0.05). The success of analgesic treatment decreased by 0.68 times with each unit increase in pain score (P<0.05). Gender and age of patients had no significant effect on success of analgesics (P>0.05). Conclusion: Both ibuprofen and Novafen can serve as the analgesics of choice for pain relief in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with moderate to severe pain when emergency endodontic treatment cannot be immediately performed.

Does ultrasonic activation of irrigation during endodontic therapy improve the clinical and microbiological effects?

Data sources A comprehensive collection of databases were searched from inception to August 2020, such as Cochrane, MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of science. Also, references and citations of retrieved records, conference proceedings and leading journals were searched.Study selection All randomised clinical trials on root-canal-treated adult permanent teeth that compared the outcomes of ultrasonically activated irrigation (UAI) to syringe irrigation (SI) were eligible. The outcomes considered were post-operative pain, pain intensity, periapical healing after 12 months, the incidence of microbial presence, microbial quantification, lipopolysaccharides (LPS) quantification and lipoteichoic acid quantification. Studies with insufficient data for risk of bias assessment or other outcomes were excluded.Data extraction and synthesis The two independent reviewers did the screening process in title, abstract and full-text assessment steps. Also, the data extraction process and risk of bias assessment were done by two independent reviewers. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus or the opinion of a third reviewer. Any missing information was filled in by contacting the authors. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials was used to assess the risk of bias. The following domains were evaluated for risk of bias: randomisation process, deviation from the intended interventions, missing outcome data, outcome measurement and the selection of the reported results. If all domains were rated as 'low risk', judgements would be rated as 'low risk', otherwise, 'high risk'. The risk ratios and mean risk difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as measure effect. The random effects model was used to combine the effects. The heterogeneity is measured by I2 test (I2 test >50% and p <0.1 considered as substantial heterogeneity). The level of certainty of evidence for clinically important outcomes was determined using the guidelines of Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group.Results Four studies entered the meta-analysis stage based on pain outcomes. The overall risk of bias for three of them was assessed as high. All of them had examined pain incidence before 24 hours but only two studies have examined the occurrence of pain in the period of 24-72 hours and after 72 hours to 7 days. Considerable heterogeny was among the incidence of pain <24 hours between studies (I2= 83%). Therefore, the incidence of pain in two sub-groups of vital and non-vital pulp has been investigated. In the non-vital pulps, the incidence of pain by UAI was half of the incidence of SI pain (relative risk= 0.50; 95% CI 0.35-0.71; I2 = 0%; 308 teeth). But no significant difference was seen in vital pulps. Also, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of pain after 72 hours between the two methods. Two studies assessed the intensity of pain in three periods: <24 hours, 72-24 hours, more than 72 hours and less than 7 days. The combined results based on vital and non-vital groups resulted in no significant difference in any period. Pooled data of pain outcomes were assessed with very low or low confidence of evidence.Five studies with microbiology-related outcomes entered the final analysis stage. The overall risk of bias for two of them was high. Three studies evaluated the effect of the irrigation method on microbial presence as an outcome. High heterogeneity was among the results of the studies (I2= 72%). However, with and without subgroup analysis, meta-analysis results showed no significant difference between these two methods. A lower microbial count was found with UAI than SI in a meta-analysis of four studies (standardised mean difference-pooled - 0.40; 95% CI [-0.78, -0.02]; I2 = 0%; 126 teeth). Two studies measured LPs. The meta-analysis showed lower values of LPS with UAI compared to SI (34, 37) (mean difference pooled - 0.06; 95% CI [-0.11, -0.01]; 61 root canals; I2 = 29%). One study measured lipoteichoic acid and found no significant difference between the irrigation methods.Three studies with treatment-success-related outcomes entered the meta-analysis stage with an overall high risk of bias. Two studies' pooled data revealed no significant difference between the irrigation methods regarding treatment failure. One study assessed periapical-lesion volume after treatment and found no significant difference between the irrigation methods.Conclusions According to limited data, UAI may reduce the risk of post-operative pain during the first 24 hours and reduce microbial counts, particularly cultivable germs in cases of apical periodontitis. However, most meta-analyses are conducted on a small number of studies and have an overall 'very low' to 'low' certainty of evidence; as a result, the evidence is deemed insufficient to either support or disprove UAI efficacy when compared to SI.

α-Pinene Influence on Pulpal Pain-Induced Learning and Memory Impairment in Rats Via Modulation of the GABAA Receptor.

Background: This study investigated the effect of central administration of α-pinene and the interaction of α-pinene with GABAA receptor on pulpal nociception-induced changes in learning and memory performances in rats. Materials and Methods: Sixty-six adult male Wistar rats were used. Pulpal nociception was induced by intradental application of capsaicin (100 µg/rat). α-pinene (0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 µg/rat) was injected centrally 10 min before the administration of capsaicin. In addition, α-pinene (0.4 µg/rat) was co-injected with bicuculline (0.5 µg/rat). Spatial and passive avoidance learning and memory were assessed using Morris water maze (MWM) and shuttle box tasks, respectively. Results: Experimental results of the MWM test showed that capsaicin increases escape latency and distance traveled to the hidden platform (P < 0.01). The effect was prohibited by α-pinene at the dose of 0.4 µg/rat. Moreover, capsaicin-treated animals spent less time in the target zone than capsaicin + α-pinene (0.4 µg/rat)-treated rats (P < 0.05). In the shuttle box test, α-pinene (0.2 µg and 0.4 µg) prevented an increased number of acquisition trials and time spent in the dark chamber induced by capsaicin, whereas it increased step-through latency (P < 0.01). However, the effects of α-pinene (0.4 µg/rat) in both tests were prohibited by bicuculline (0.5 µg/rat). Conclusion: The data showed that central administration of α-pinene might reduce pulpalgia-induced learning and memory impairment, at least partially, via modulation of GABAA receptors.

Determinants of oral-health-related quality of life among adult people in Iran.

Background: Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) assesses the subjective perception of oral health and its impact on the quality of life. The aim of this study is to measure the OHRQoL and its determinants among adult people living in Kerman, Iran. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 5657 adult people (18-64 years) residing in the Kerman district, both in the rural and urban areas, were enrolled in the study between September 2014 and April 2018. The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and the oral health indices, such as the total decayed, missing, filled teeth (DMFT), community periodontal index (CPI), gingival index (GI), and xerostomia, were measured by an experienced dentist. The demographic variables of gender, age, educational status, and marital status were also recorded. The impact of the studied variables on OHRQoL was evaluated with multiple logistic regression. Results: Participants were 2239 (39.58%) men, and average age was 45.39. The mean scores for OHRQoL, DMFT, CPI and GI were respectively: 24.07 (7.76), 10.7 (6.86), 0.76 (0.96), 0.63 (0.8). The frequency of people with xerostomia was 37.4. 301 (53.3%) of people had poor quality of life related to oral health. In multivariable analysis, there was a statistically significant increase in OHRQoL with an increase in the DMFT (P < 0.001), xerostomia (P < 0.001), CPI, (P < 0.001). Men had a significantly higher OHIP score than women (P < 0.001). Conclusion: According to the results of this study, DMFT, xerostomia, and CPI scores are strongly related to OHIP scores. In addition, between CPI and GI scores, the CPI score is the better predictor.

What is the best effective postoperative medication in reducing pain after non-surgical root canal treatment?

Data sources Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Scopus databases were searched (until July 31 2019). They searched the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for completed and ongoing trials, as well as ProQuest, Google Scholar (first 100 hits) and the OpenGrey database for those unpublished. In addition, abstracts of annual meetings from the American Association of Endodontists, the International Federation of Endodontic Associations and the European Society of Endodontics were searched. A manual search of references in related papers and textbooks was carried out. Any missing information was filled in by contacting the authors.Study selection All randomised clinical trials (RCT) of nonsurgical endodontic therapy with pharmaceutical treatments provided postoperatively to alleviate pain on adult subjects were eligible. Two reviewers selected the studies and extracted the data and the results were examined by a third reviewer. Any differences were settled with the help of a fourth reviewer.Data extraction and synthesis Two authors independently evaluated and retrieved data from chosen trials found through searches. Another reviewer looked at the trial selection and data extraction. They also assessed the risk of bias in each of the research they chose.The mean and standard deviation of a 0-100 (mm) visual analogue pain scale were extracted or derived from study text, graphs and tables The postoperative medications were compared using network meta-analysis in a Bayesian model. Mean differences (MDs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) of post-operative pain were estimated at 6-8 hours and 12, 24 and 48 hours. Two authors utilised the CINeMA web application to assess the confidence in the main results by accounting for six domains: within- and across-study bias; indirectness; imprecision; heterogeneity; and incoherence. Each domain was assigned no concerns, major concerns, or minor concerns. Each result would be assigned a confidence level of high, moderate, low, or very low. To establish an agreement, a third reviewer was consulted.Results From the initial search of 969 records, 11 RCTs matched the inclusion criteria. Five studies were rated as having a low risk of bias, five as having a moderate risk and one as having a high risk. Moderate and major heterogeneity and some inconsistencies were detected, though not statistically significant.Oral medications were classified into placebo, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, acetaminophen, NSAIDs + acetaminophen, corticosteroids, NSAIDs + benzodiazepines and NSAIDs + opioids groups.With moderate confidence, NSAIDs + acetaminophen were shown to be more efficacious than placebo at 6-8 hours following nonsurgical root canal therapy (MD = 22; 95% CrI = [-38, -7.2]). With very low confidence, NSAIDs had a greater effect than placebo after 12 and 24 hours (MD = -28; 95% CrI = [-49, -7] and MD = -15; 95% CrI = [-27, -2.3], respectively). After 6 12 and 24 hours, other medications were no more effective than placebo in pain reduction. After 48 hours, no treatment was more effective than placebo. Subgroup analysis found that other medications, such as corticosteroids and acetaminophen, were no more beneficial than placebo for patients who could not use NSAIDs. Six trials provided safety data and concluded that the therapies were safe and posed no significant risks.Conclusions Very low to moderate-quality evidence suggests that postoperative administration of NSAIDs and acetaminophen, or NSAIDs alone, reduced discomfort after non-surgical root canal therapy in patients with irreversible pulpitis or pulpal necrosis. Trials have shown, however, that using these drugs does not result in major complications. We cannot, however, be confident that they are risk-free.

Evaluation of the Levels of Evidence in Three Clinical Chapters in Five Editions of the Textbook Pathways of the Pulp.

Introduction: The levels of evidence (LOE) of dental education texts is critical from the educational point of view. The present study aimed to evaluate the levels of evidence of references used in three clinical chapters in the textbook Pathways of the Pulp. Material & Method: The references of three clinical chapters in the text book Pathways of the Pulp were assessed in five of its editions. The levels of evidence were ranked according to study type and the Oxford scale from 0 to 5. The chi-square test was used to compare the level of evidence between different editions of the "Retreatment," "Trauma," and "Surgery" chapters. Results: A total of 3656 references were reviewed and analyzed from the "Trauma" (928 references), "Re-treatment" (1906 references), and "Surgery" (822 references) chapters in the 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, and 2016 editions. The percentage of the LOE 0 (no evidence) was high (>60%) in all three chapters in all editions (P<0.001). The levels of evidence had the same distribution in all editions (P=0.871). The LOE of the "Re-treatment" (P=0.044) and "Surgery" (P<0.001) chapters changed in some editions. Conclusion: The majority of references in the three clinical chapters of the book are low-level evidence. Encouragement policies for researchers to conduct studies with high LOE are necessary.

The effect of demographic characteristics on the relationship between smoking and dry mouth in Iran: a cross-sectional, case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: The effect of age, sex, and other demographic factors on the relationship between smoking and dry mouth remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of demographic characteristics on the relationship between dry mouth, also known as xerostomia, and smoking. METHODS: This case-control study included 5,640 randomly-selected subjects from the second phase of the Kerman Coronary Artery Disease Risk Factors Study, which observed 10,000 participants from 2014 to 2018. A checklist was used to record the participants' demographic characteristics and smoking frequency. Each participant completed a six-item Fox questionnaire to measure dry mouth as a dependent variable. The interaction terms of daily cigarette smoking with sex, age, educational level, and marital status were entered into the model. Non-significant terms were removed using hierarchical model selection. RESULTS: Of the sample, 3,429 (60.8%) did not have dry mouth and were analyzed as controls, whereas 2,211 (39.2%) had xerostomia and were deemed to be cases. Smokers were more likely to have dry mouth in all ages and both sexes (p < 0.001). As male became older, the chance of having dry mouth increased more rapidly than among female smokers (p < 0.001). In addition, female smokers were more likely to have dry mouth than male smokers (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of dry mouth among daily smokers depended on age and sex. Female smokers were more likely to have dry mouth, and its likelihood increased with age in daily smokers of both sexes, though more rapidly in males.

Oral Health Determinants among Opium Users in Kerman, Iran.

BACKGROUND: Promoting oral health is a complicated issue among drug abusers and opium is the most frequent drug abused in Iran. This study aims to find the oral health determinants of opium users in Kerman, Iran. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was a part of the second phase of Kerman coronary artery disease risk factors study (KERCADRS, 2014-2018). In this survey, the data of 1140 opium users were analyzed. The information about using a toothbrush, dental floss, number of dental visits at last year, age of first use of opium, duration, and opium consumption frequency was recorded. The total number of decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT) index and Community Periodontal Index (CPI) was recorded by an oral examination. Poisson and logistic regressions analyses were used for assessing the relationship among variables. FINDINGS: The mean age of participants was 52 ± 12 years. 74.4% were men and 24.6% were women. The average DMFT index was 15.7 ± 7.6 and the prevalence of a healthy CPI score was 18.5%. Educational level (P < 0.001), brushing (P < 0.001), flossing (P < 0.001), dental visit (P < 0.001), first age of using opium (P < 0.001), frequency of consumption (P < 0.001), and age (P < 0.001) were associated with DMFT index. Only using floss (P < 0.001), dental visit [odds ratio (OR) = 1.80, P = 0.030], frequency of consumption (OR = 2.92, P < 0.001), and age (P = 0.001) were associated with CPI score. CONCLUSION: The frequency of opium consumption has the same effect on caries incidence as oral hygiene habits. Moreover, using dental floss has a more significant effect on the periodontal health of participants.