Useful Flaps for Plastic Surgeons to Know.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe different useful flaps. 2. Identify pitfalls of specific flaps. 3. Incorporate tips that facilitate flap use. SUMMARY: We have a wide selection of flaps to choose from for any given reconstruction. This article describes the use of different flaps that the author has found useful in his practice. Some of these flaps are mainstream, whereas others are not. The article does not suggest that these are the only flaps that one should use, nor does it go into great detail on the dissection of each flap except where the author has identified pitfalls or where he can offer tips and tricks that facilitate use of these flaps. Flaps are described from head to toe.

Delphi survey of intercontinental experts to identify areas of consensus on the use of indocyanine green angiography for tissue perfusion assessment during plastic and reconstructive surgery.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, indocyanine green angiography (ICG-A) has been used increasingly to assist tissue perfusion assessments during plastic and reconstructive surgery procedures, but no guidelines exist regarding its use. We sought to identify areas of consensus and non-consensus among international experts on the use of ICG-A for tissue-perfusion assessments during plastic and reconstructive surgery. METHODS: A two-round, online Delphi survey was conducted of 22 international experts from four continents asking them to vote on 79 statements divided into five modules: module 1 = patient preparation and contraindications (n = 11 statements); module 2 = ICG administration and camera settings (n = 17); module 3 = other factors impacting perfusion assessments (n = 10); module 4 = specific indications, including trauma debridement (n = 9), mastectomy skin flaps (n = 6), and free flap reconstruction (n = 8); and module 5 = general advantages and disadvantages, training, insurance coverage issues, and future directions (n = 18). Consensus was defined as ≥70% inter-voter agreement. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 73/79 statements, including the overall value, advantages, and limitations of ICG-A in numerous surgical settings; also, on the dose (0.05 mg/kg) and timing of ICG administration (∼20-60 seconds preassessment) and best camera angle (61-90o) and target-to-tissue distance (20-30 cm). However, consensus also was reached that camera angle and distance can vary, depending on the make of camera, and that further research is necessary to technically optimize this imaging tool. The experts also agreed that ambient light, patient body temperature, and vasopressor use impact perfusion assessments. CONCLUSION: ICG-A aids perfusion assessments during plastic and reconstructive surgery and should no longer be considered experimental. It has become an important surgical tool.

Anterior Neck Resurfacing Using Multiple Free Flaps in Patients With Burn Sequelae of the Anterior Neck and Chest.

BACKGROUND: It has been established that patients with burn sequelae of the anterior neck and chest have a significant degree of flap descent and deficit in neck extension when resurfaced with a single free flap. A protocol was developed to avoid flap descent in these patients by resurfacing the neck with multiple free flaps. The purpose of this article is to present our protocol for treatment and long-term results of this technique. METHODS: Twenty-five 25 patients with burn sequelae of the anterior neck and anterior thorax were retrospectively identified. Ten patients were treated with a single free flap (group 1), and 15 patients were treated with multiple free flaps (group 2). Patients were followed up for an average of 7 years after their definitive reconstructive procedure at which time measurements including flap descent from sternal notch, deficit of neck extension, and subjective reports of discomfort were obtained. RESULTS: Patients in group 1 demonstrated 8 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 1.75 cm) of flap descent, whereas patients in group 2 demonstrated 0.5 cm (IQR, 0 cm) of flap descent. Patients in group 1 demonstrated 12.5 degrees (IQR, 10 degrees) of deficit in neck extension, whereas patients in group 2 demonstrated 0 degrees (IQR, 0 degrees) of deficit in neck extension. Analysis demonstrated significantly greater descent and deficit in neck extension in group 1 compared with group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with burn sequelae of the neck and anterior chest experience less flap descent and deficits in neck extension when resurfaced with multiple free flaps.

Updates on Excisional Procedures for Lymphedema.

Significance: Excisional procedures for lymphedema have been used for over a century, and many surgeons have abandoned the old techniques as improvements in nonsurgical management and microsurgery have limited their clinical utility. Nonetheless, excisional procedures remain relevant as an important tool in the comprehensive surgical management of lymphedema. Recent Advances: Modifications to the Charles procedure and other direct excisional procedures have improved the complication profile and patient outcomes. Moreover, the use of liposuction techniques for minimally invasive tissue excision has expanded the scope of excisional surgery to benefit patients with less severe lymphedema. Recent operations combining excisional and physiologic procedures may prove to have superior results to stand-alone procedures. Critical Issues: No standard protocol exists for the comprehensive surgical management of lymphedema. Proper patient selection for any procedure requires robust outpatient assessment, cooperation with physiotherapy treatment teams, careful patient stratification, and a clear understanding of the procedure's goal. Future Directions: Larger, prospective trials will be needed to elucidate the ideal timing and combinations of techniques to optimize outcomes for patients with late-stage lymphedema.

Surgical Treatment of Lymphedema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials. Results of a Consensus Conference.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this consensus conference, sponsored by the American Association of Plastic Surgeons, was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials to examine both the benefits and risks of surgical treatment and surgical prevention of upper and lower extremity lymphedema. METHODS: The panel met in Boston for a 3-day, face-to-face meeting in July of 2017. After an exhaustive review of the existing literature, the authors created consensus recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. Important directions for future research were also identified. RESULTS: There is evidence to support that lymphovenous anastomosis can be effective in reducing severity of lymphedema (grade 1C). There is evidence to support that vascular lymph node transplantation can be effective in reducing severity of lymphedema (grade 1B). Currently, there is no consensus on which procedure (lymphovenous bypass versus vascular lymph node transplantation) is more effective (grade 2C). A few studies show that prophylactic lymphovenous bypass in patients undergoing extremity lymphadenectomy may reduce the incidence of lymphedema (grade 1B). More studies with longer follow-up are required to confirm this benefit. Debulking procedures such as liposuction are effective in addressing a nonfluid component such as fat involving lymphedema (grade 1C). There is a role for liposuction combined with physiologic procedures although the timing of each procedure is currently unresolved (grade 1C). CONCLUSIONS: Many studies seem to support some efficacy of lymphovenous bypass and vascular lymph node transplantation. Many studies show the important role of lymphedema therapy and other procedures such as liposuction and debulking. The management of lymphedema is a challenging field with many promising advances. However, many questions remain unanswered.

The New 2019 Institutional Review Board Common Rule Update: Implications for Plastic Surgery Research.

Clinical research remains at the forefront of academic practice and evidence-based medicine. Unfortunately, history has shown that human subjects are vulnerable to experimentation without regard for their own dignity and informed decision-making. Subsequently, it is vital for research institutes to uphold safeguards and ethical conscientiousness toward human subjects. The establishment of federal regulations and the development of institutional review boards have set guidance on these processes. On January 21, 2019, final revisions to the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (the "Common Rule") went into effect. The purpose of this article is to review changes to the Common Rule and discuss their impact on plastic surgery research.

Respiratory Failure following Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction are at increased risk of postoperative respiratory failure. Understanding the epidemiology of this complication may guide preventive efforts. METHODS: The authors performed a population-based retrospective cohort study of adults undergoing elective abdominal wall reconstruction (ventral hernia repair with component separation) in the United States from 2004 through 2011 using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. RESULTS: Of 2283 patients undergoing elective abdominal wall reconstruction, 57 percent were women, with a median age of 57 years, median hospital stay of 5 days, and mean total cost of $23,730. Postoperative respiratory failure occurred in 212 patients (9.3 percent), 164 patients (7.2 percent) were discharged to a skilled nursing facility, and 18 patients (0.8 percent) died. On multivariate analysis, age, male sex, congestive heart failure, lung disease, obesity, and obstructive sleep apnea were independently associated with increased risk of respiratory failure. Respiratory failure was associated with significantly increased risk of death and discharge to a skilled nursing facility as well as significantly increased total cost and hospital length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory failure is an uncommon but devastating complication of abdominal wall reconstruction. The authors report clinical risk factors that may facilitate perioperative risk-reduction strategies to improve outcomes of elective abdominal wall reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Bilateral Anatomic Variation of Anterolateral Thigh Flap in the Same Individual.

BACKGROUND: Anterolateral thigh flap has gained popularity for its use as a soft-tissue flap for reconstruction of regional and distal defects. There is discrepancy between the predominant skin vessels-musculocutaneous or septocutaneous. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate anatomic variation of bilateral anterolateral thigh flap vasculature in the same individual. METHODS: We performed an observational retrospective case series study in 11 patients and an observational prospective study in 7 cadavers to confirm our findings. RESULTS: We found bilateral anatomic variation in the main cutaneous branch of the descendent branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery between both thighs in the same individual. In 72.2% of cases, we observed that the main cutaneous branch was septocutaneous in 1 thigh and musculocutaneous in the contralateral thigh; in 16.7%, the main cutaneous branches were musculocutaneous in both thighs, and in 11.1%, the main cutaneous branches were septocutaneous in both thighs. CONCLUSIONS: Significant anatomic variation exists between the right and the left cutaneous branches of deep circumflex femoral arteries. Hence, preoperative imaging by computed tomography angiography (CTA) aids in determination of the vascular anatomy of the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery and in selection of septocutaneous branches, thereby reducing operative time.

Initial Clinical Experience with Dual-Agent Relaxation Contrast for Isolated Lymphatic Channel Mapping.

Purpose To evaluate the clinical performance of dual-agent relaxation contrast (DARC) magnetic resonance (MR) lymphangiography compared with that of conventional MR lymphangiography in the creation of isolated lymphatic maps in patients with secondary lymphedema. Materials and Methods This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board. The diagnostic quality of 42 DARC MR lymphangiographic studies was compared with that of 42 conventional MR lymphangiographic studies. Two independent readers rated venous contamination as absent, mild, or moderate to severe. Interreader agreement on venous contamination grades was assessed by using the linearly weighted Cohen κ statistic. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the distribution of grades at each station between conventional MR lymphangiography and DARC MR lymphangiography for each reader separately. Results DARC MR lymphangiography had significantly less venous contamination than did conventional MR lymphangiography (P < .001). The two radiologists rated venous contamination as moderate to severe in 64% (27 of 42) and 69% (29 of 42) of distal limbs, 23% (10 of 42) of midlimbs, and 2% (one of 42) and 9% (four of 42) of proximal limbs at conventional MR lymphangiography compared with 0% (0 of 42) of distal limbs, 2% (one of 42) of midlimbs, and 0% (0 of 42) of proximal limbs at DARC MR lymphangiography. Lymphatic signal was partially attenuated (median 45% decrease) when longer echo times were used for venous suppression, but it did not subjectively degrade diagnostic quality. Conclusion DARC MR lymphangiography yields isolated lymphatic maps through nulling of venous contamination, thereby simplifying diagnostic interpretation and communication with surgical colleagues. © RSNA, 2017.

Current Concepts in the Surgical Management of Lymphedema.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Discuss the key points in diagnosing lymphedema. 2. Understand the imaging modalities that facilitate diagnosis and surgical planning. 3. Appreciate the indications for both physiologic and ablative procedures. 4. Recognize the potential role of lymphaticovenular anastomosis and vascularized lymph node transfer in the treatment of patients with lymphedema. SUMMARY: Lymphedema is an incurable disease caused by insufficient lymphatic drainage leading to abnormal accumulation of interstitial fluid within the soft tissues. Although this condition may result from a primary structural defect of the lymphatic system, most cases in developed countries are secondary to iatrogenic causes. The diagnosis of lymphedema can be made readily by performing a clinical history and physical examination and may be confirmed by imaging studies such as lymphoscintigraphy, magnetic resonance lymphangiography, or indocyanine green lymphangiography. Nonsurgical treatment continues to be the mainstay of lymphedema management. However, advances in microsurgical techniques have revolutionized surgical options for treating lymphedema, and emerging evidence suggests that reconstructive methods may be performed to restore lymphatic flow. Procedures such as lymphaticovenular anastomosis and vascularized lymph node transfer can potentially offer a more permanent solution to chronic lymphedema, and initial studies have demonstrated promising results.

MR lymphangiography in the treatment of lymphedema.

Lymphedema is a common condition frequently seen in cancer patients who have had lymph node dissection +/- radiation treatment. Traditional management is mainly non-surgical and unsatisfactory. Surgical treatment has relied on excisional techniques in the past. Physiologic operations have more recently been devised to help improve this condition. Assessing patients and deciding which of the available operations to offer them can be challenging. MRI is an extremely useful tool in patient assessment and treatment planning. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017;115:18-22. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Peripheral Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography: Techniques and Applications.

Peripheral lymphedema is a chronic progressive and debilitating disorder that results from abnormal lymphatic drainage. Advances in microsurgical techniques have led to the development of new treatment options for lymphedema that benefit from preoperative imaging to select the most appropriate surgical repair. Magnetic resonance (MR) lymphangiography is a noninvasive imaging modality capable of providing high-resolution 3D images of the lower extremities to define the severity and extent of lymphedema and depict individual lymphatic channels. The MR examination consists of 2 primary sequences. The first is a 3D heavily T2-weighted sequence to depict the severity and extent of the lymphedema. The second is a fat-suppressed 3D spoiled gradient-echo sequence performed after the intracutaneous injection of an extracellular gadolinium-based MR contrast agent. As venous enhancement almost always occurs, one of the interpretative challenges is differentiating enhancing lymphatic channels from superficial veins. MR techniques that can help with venous contamination include the addition of a contrast-enhanced MR venogram to the examination protocol, or the use of an iron-based blood-pool contrast agent to selectively suppress venous enhancement.

Lymphedema: Surgical and Medical Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Secondary lymphedema is a dreaded complication that sometimes occurs after treatment of malignancies. Management of lymphedema has historically focused on conservative measures, including physical therapy and compression garments. More recently, surgery has been used for the treatment of secondary lymphedema. METHODS: This article represents the experience and treatment approaches of 5 surgeons experienced in lymphatic surgery and includes a literature review in support of the techniques and algorithms presented. RESULTS: This review provides the reader with current thoughts and practices by experienced clinicians who routinely treat lymphedema patients. CONCLUSION: The medical and surgical treatments of lymphedema are safe and effective techniques to improve symptoms and improve quality of life in properly selected patients.

Antegrade Peroneal Flap through the Interosseous Membrane for Knee and Distal Femur Coverage.

BACKGROUND: Antegrade peroneal flaps can be rotated around the fibula to cover defects in the lower leg and lateral knee. However, these flaps cannot reliably cover the distal femur and anterior and medial knee. In the present article, the authors describe a novel technical modification that involves creating a tunnel through the interosseous membrane, through which the flap can be passed, circumventing the need to rotate around the fibula, allowing it to reach the entire knee and distal femur. METHODS: An anatomical study was performed in five cadaveric specimens to measure the gain in pedicle reaching distance when the flap is tunneled compared to transferred around the fibula. A clinical study in 12 patients was also performed to measure the gain in pedicle reaching distance and the long-term viability of the tunneled interosseous flap. RESULTS: In the anatomical study, the mean reaching distance was 7.4 ± 0.9 cm for the flaps rotated around the fibula and 17.0 ± 1.6 for the tunneled interosseous flaps (p < 0.001). In the clinical study, the mean reaching distance was 2.6 ± 1.4 cm for the flaps rotated around the fibula and 11.4 ± 2.4 for the tunneled interosseous flaps (p < 0.0000000001). Patients were followed for up to 4 years (mean, 2.5 years). All flaps survived completely, and there were no complications. CONCLUSION: By passing the antegrade peroneal flap through the interosseous membrane, instead of around the fibula, the flap reaching distance can be increased by approximately 8 cm, allowing for effective coverage of distal femur and knee defects. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Comparison of Synthetic and Biologic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair Using Components Separation Technique.

Ventral hernia repair (VHR) for large abdominal wall defects is challenging. Prior research established that the use of mesh is superior to suture closure alone and that component separation is an effective technique to combat loss of abdominal domain. Studies comparing component separation technique (CST) outcomes utilizing synthetic versus biologic mesh are limited. A retrospective review was conducted of 72 consecutive patients who underwent VHR with CST between 2006 and 2010 at our institution. Surgeon preference and the presence of contamination guided whether synthetic mesh (27 patients) or biologic mesh (45 patients) was used. Mean follow-up interval for all comers was 13.9 months and similar in both groups (P > 0.05). Degree of contamination and severity of premorbid medical conditions were significantly higher in the biologic mesh group, as reflected in the higher Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) score (2.04 versus 2.86). Clinical outcomes, as measured by both minor and major complication rates and recurrence rates, were not significantly different. Minor complication rates were 26% in the synthetic group and 37% in the biologic group and major complication rates 15% in the synthetic group and 22% in the biologic group. There was 1 recurrence (4%) in the synthetic mesh group versus 5 (11%) in the biologic mesh group. Multivariable analysis for major complications revealed no significant difference for either synthetic or biologic mesh while controlling for other variables. Subset analysis of uncontaminated cases revealed recurrence rates of 4% in the synthetic mesh group and 6% in the biologic mesh group. VHR using CST and either synthetic mesh or biologic mesh resulted in low recurrence rates with similar overall complication profiles, despite the higher average VHWG grading score in the biologic mesh group. Our results support the VHWG recommendation for biologic mesh utilization in higher VHWG grade patients. In VHWG grade 2 patients, our clinical outcomes were similar, supporting the use of either type of mesh.