RESUMO
Postoperative pneumonia is the most common complication in patients after lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The tolerable incidence of this complication ranges from 5 to 8 %. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of initial risk factors on the incidence of postoperative pneumonia in patients undergoing lung resection for NSCLC. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the University Hospital Ostrava between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022. All adult patients who underwent pulmonary lobectomy for primary NSCLC during the study period were included in the study. A total of 350 patients were included in the study. The incidence of postoperative pneumonia was 10.9%. Analysis of baseline risk factors did not show a statistically significant association with the incidence of this complication. The only statistically significant finding was a longer hospital stay in patients with postoperative pneumonia. The risk of postoperative pneumonia in patients undergoing lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer cannot be clearly explained by the initial risk factors examined alone. The complex nature of this risk also requires a comprehensive approach to prevention, including both patient-centred measures and improved postoperative care.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Pneumonectomia , Pneumonia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Feminino , Pneumonia/etiologia , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pneumonectomia/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos de Coortes , Incidência , Tempo de InternaçãoRESUMO
Introduction: The management of patients with COVID-19 infection has placed great pressure on the healthcare systems around the world. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment outcomes of patients with rectal cancer by comparing them to those of patients with the same diagnosis in the pre-pandemic period. Methods: Retrospective data analysis of patients undergoing multimodal treatment for rectal cancer at the four university hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021) and the 2-year pre-pandemic period (2018-2019). Results: A total of 693 patients (319 in the pre-pandemic period and 374 in the pandemic period) with rectal cancer were included in the study. The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients in both study periods were comparable, as was the spectrum of surgical procedures. Palliative surgery was more common in the pandemic period (18% vs 13%, p=0.084). The proportion of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic (p=0.025). There were no statistically significant differences between the study periods in the incidence/severity of post-operative complications, 30-day mortality and length of hospital stay. The number of positive resection margins was similar (5% vs 5%). Based on these results, COVID-19 had no effect on the postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer. Neoadjuvant treatment was more common in the pre-pandemic period (50% vs 45%). Long-course RT was predominantly offered in the pre-pandemic period, short-course RT during the pandemic. Significantly shorter "diagnosis-surgery" intervals were observed during the pandemic (23 days vs 33 days, p=0.0002). The "surgery-adjuvant therapy" interval was similar in both analysed study periods (p=0.219). Conclusion: Our study showed, that despite concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic, multimodal treatment of rectal cancer was associated with unchanged postoperative morbidity rates, increased frequency of short-course neoadjuvant RT administration and shorter "diagnosis-surgery" intervals.