RESUMO
PURPOSE: Ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in suspicion of testicular torsion is still highly debated. In this investigation, we aimed to evaluate whether time spent on scrotal ultrasonography had a negative impact on testicular loss. METHODS: Patients' records containing a scrotal ultrasound and/or surgical procedure codes for testicular interventions on suspicion of testicular torsion were examined. Patients aged 0-15 years admitted during 2015-2019 at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet were included. RESULTS: In total, 1566 patients underwent an ultrasound and 142 of these proceeded to surgery while 13 patients proceeded directly to surgery without an ultrasound. The rate of testicular loss with a preceding ultrasound was 23% versus 42% without (p = 0.18). Four cases of testicular torsion were misdiagnosed by ultrasound resulting in a sensitivity of 95.4% and specificity of 95.6%. The mean diagnostic delay from ultrasound examination was 55 ± 39 min, and the mean time from ultrasound to surgery was at 169 ± 76 min versus 171 ± 72 min without ultrasound. CONCLUSION: In a clinical setting, ultrasound provided a reliable tool for the diagnosis of testicular torsion and did not seem to increase the orchiectomy rate.
Assuntos
Torção do Cordão Espermático , Criança , Masculino , Humanos , Torção do Cordão Espermático/diagnóstico por imagem , Torção do Cordão Espermático/cirurgia , Diagnóstico Tardio , Estudos Retrospectivos , Testículo/diagnóstico por imagem , Testículo/cirurgia , UltrassonografiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The mimetic compound OTR4120 may replace endogenous-degraded heparan sulfates that normally maintain the bioactivity of growth factors that are important for tissue repair. Herein, we investigated the effect of OTR4120 on the healing of normal colonic anastomoses. METHODS: We evaluated the following two treatment groups of male Sprague Dawley rats (220-256 g): control-treated colonic anastomoses (n = 25) and OTR4120-treated colonic anastomoses (n = 25). We resected 10 mm of the left colon and then applied either saline alone (control) or OTR4120 (100 µg/mL) in saline to the colonic ends before an end-to-end single-layer anastomosis was constructed and again on the anastomosis before the abdomen and skin were closed. RESULTS: On postoperative day 3, the anastomotic breaking strengths were 1.47 ± 0.32 N (mean ± SD) in the control group and 1.52 ± 0.27 N in the OTR4120-treated animals (P = 0.622). We also found that the hydroxyproline concentration (indicator of collagen) in the anastomotic wounds did not differ (P = 0.571) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that a single local application of OTR4120 intraoperatively did not increase the biomechanical strength of colonic anastomoses at the critical postoperative day 3 when the anastomoses are the weakest.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage (AL) after right hemicolectomy is a devastating complication, and risk factors for AL in this setting are rarely investigated exclusively. Recent reports suggest that anastomotic type may influence the rate of AL in ileocolic anastomoses. We investigated risk factors and short-term outcomes in patients subjected to right hemicolectomy. METHODS: Data from all patients undergoing right hemicolectomy at our institution between 2009 and 2013 were collected in a database. Risk factors for clinical AL, 30-day mortality, hospital and intensive care unit stay were investigated. Stepwise logistic regression was used to adjust for confounding. RESULTS: 22/445 (4.9 %) patients had AL. Median time to AL was 6 days (range 2-11 days). A stapled anastomosis was associated with an increased AL rate compared with the handsewn approach (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.84; 95 % CI 1.14-7.07; P = 0.025). Other risk factors for AL were tobacco use (aOR 2.70; 95 % CI 1.06-6.86; P = 0.037) and diabetes (aOR 5.95; 95 % CI 2.23-15.90; P < 0.001). Anastomotic ischemia was present in 6/13 stapled and 1/9 handsewn leaking anastomoses, P = 0.081, while generalized peritonitis was observed after 4/13 stapled and 7/9 handsewn leaking anastomoses, P = 0.030. Thirty-day mortality was 2/22 (9.1 %) in patients with AL and 23/423 (5.4 %) in patients without AL, P = 0.468, and 13/160 (8.1 %) and 12/285 (4.2 %), P = 0.085, in stapled and handsewn anastomoses, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for AL after right hemicolectomy were diabetes, tobacco use and stapled compared with handsewn anastomoses.
Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Colo/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Reoperação , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
AIM: To identify therapeutic agents for the prophylaxis of gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage (AL) under complicated conditions. METHODS: The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for English articles published between January 1975 and September 2014. Studies with the primary purpose of improving anastomotic healing in the colon or rectum under complicated preoperative and/or intraoperative conditions were included. We excluded studies investigating the adverse effects or risk assessment of an active intervention. Furthermore, investigations of biophysical materials, sealants, electrical stimulation and nutrients were excluded. The primary study outcome was biomechanical anastomotic strength or AL. The meta-analysis focused on therapeutic agents that were investigated in one animal model using the same outcome by at least three independent research groups. RESULTS: The 65 studies included were divided into 7 different complicated animal models: Bowel ischemia, ischemia/reperfusion, bowel obstruction, obstructive jaundice, peritonitis, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In total, 48 different therapeutic compounds were examined. The majority of investigated agents (65%) were reported as beneficial for anastomotic healing. Twelve of the agents (25%) were tested more than once in the same model, whereas 13 (27%) of the agents were tested in two or more models of complicated healing. Two therapeutic agents met our inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Postoperative hyperbaric oxygen therapy significantly increased anastomotic bursting pressure in ischemic colon anastomoses by a mean of 28 mmHg (95%CI: 17 to 39 mmHg, P < 0.00001). Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor failed to show a significant increase in anastomotic bursting pressure (95%CI: -20 to 21 mmHg, P = 0.97) vs controls in experimental chemotherapeutic models. CONCLUSION: This systematic review identified potential therapeutic agents, but more studies are needed before concluding that any of these are useful for AL prophylaxis.