Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Prog Community Health Partnersh ; 17(2): 287-294, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37462557

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Few clinic-based food insecurity interventions address transportation barriers to utilizing food resources. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the feasibility of using free rideshare-based transportation to reduce barriers to participating in an ongoing clinic-based food insecurity intervention. METHODS: Our multi-methods pilot study used patient surveys (n = 155), focus groups with clinic and program staff (n = 10), and rideshare usage data. RESULTS: Of the 95 (61.2%) survey respondents who reported transportation barriers, only 34 (21.9%) used rideshare. More than 80% of rideshare users rated their experience as good or excellent. Clinic and program staff reported that the service allowed patients a greater sense of control over their time and health and emphasized the need for staffing and program-level infrastructure. CONCLUSIONS: Free rideshare may address transportation barriers for some patients but multiple options for support and adjustments to how we offer transportation solutions are needed to successfully meet the needs of all program participants experiencing transportation barriers.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade , Insegurança Alimentar , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Estudos de Viabilidade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Meios de Transporte/métodos
2.
Transl Behav Med ; 10(6): 1277-1285, 2020 12 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33421087

RESUMO

Safety-net clinic patients are at risk for food insecurity, which is associated with poor diet quality and negative health outcomes. Research on the impact of interventions addressing food insecurity in health care settings is limited. The primary aim of this study was to determine the preliminary effectiveness of Community-Supported Agriculture (CSA) Partnerships for Health, a 23 week grant-subsidized CSA program, in improving dietary behaviors, self-efficacy to eat vegetables, food security, and overall health among safety-net clinic patients. This single-group pretest-posttest study used interviewer-administered surveys. Study participants were 48 safety-net clinic patients. Outcomes included fruit and vegetable intake, frequency of dark green and orange vegetable intake, self-efficacy to eat vegetables, eating habits, food security status and ability to afford to eat healthy meals, emotional health, social health, and general health status. Differences in values at postintervention versus preintervention were examined using two-sided paired t-tests, McNemar's tests, and generalized estimating equation models. The difference between postintervention versus preintervention values was statistically significant for a number of outcomes, including vegetable intake (p = .030), orange vegetable intake (p = .004), eating habits (p = .039), food security (p = .039), ability to afford to eat healthy meals (p = .003), and general health status (p = .039). Generalized estimating equation models showed similar associations. CSA Partnerships for Health may have the potential to improve dietary behaviors, reduce food insecurity, and improve overall health among safety-net clinic patients.


Assuntos
Segurança Alimentar , Provedores de Redes de Segurança , Agricultura , Dieta , Fazendas , Comportamento Alimentar , Abastecimento de Alimentos , Frutas , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Verduras
3.
J Nutr Educ Behav ; 50(3): 289-296.e1, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29173943

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the feasibility of using a 23-week subsidized community-supported agriculture program to increase access to and intake of vegetables among Federally Qualified Health Center patients. METHODS: Outcomes were measured using pre-post intervention surveys (n = 9). Process data were collected in post-intervention surveys and focus groups (n = 15). RESULTS: Most participants (77%) indicated that the program improved their health and all (100%) reported that they were eating a greater variety of vegetables because of their participation in the program. Three themes emerged from the focus groups: increased access to fresh and/or organic vegetables, improved diet quality, and the importance of social support during the program. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Linking subsided community-supported agriculture programs with Federally Qualified Health Centers has the potential to increase access to and intake of vegetables among low-income patients. However, further research is needed with a larger sample size and a more robust study design.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/métodos , Assistência Alimentar , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Verduras , Adolescente , Adulto , Dieta , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Abastecimento de Alimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA