Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Neuroimaging ; 34(3): 308-319, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38192155

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is the second most common cause of presenile dementia. The clinical distinction between FTD, Alzheimer's disease (AD), and other dementias is a clinical challenge. Brain perfusion SPECT may contribute to the diagnosis of FTD, but its value is unclear. METHODS: We performed a systematic review to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the brain SPECT in (1) distinguishing FTD from AD and other dementias and (2) differentiating FTD variants. RESULTS: Overall, 391 studies were retrieved on the initial search and 35 studies composed the final selection, comprising a total number of 3142 participants of which 1029 had FTD. The sensitivity and the specificity for the differential diagnosis of FTD versus AD ranged from 56% to 88% and from 51% to 93%, respectively. SPECT is not superior to the clinical method of diagnosis, but the combination of SPECT with clinical data seems to improve the diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSION: Brain perfusion SPECT has a limited value in the diagnostic framework of FTD. SPECT can be performed when FDG-PET is not available. SPECT is recommended only for selected cases when the diagnosis is challenging using conventional methods.


Assuntos
Encéfalo , Demência Frontotemporal , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único , Feminino , Humanos , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Demência Frontotemporal/diagnóstico por imagem , Imagem de Perfusão/métodos , Prevalência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA