Antiviral Use and Health Care Use Among US Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Influenza in Three Influenza Seasons, 2016-2019.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are vulnerable to severe complications of influenza. We assessed whether health care resource use (HRU) and costs differed between patients with RA and influenza who received antiviral medication compared with matched patients with RA and influenza not receiving antiviral therapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective US health insurance claims analysis over three influenza seasons (each October to April) in 2016-2019. Adults with RA and a subsequent diagnosis of influenza were included. Treated patients (receiving antiviral influenza treatment within 2 days of diagnosis) and untreated patients were propensity score matched using baseline covariates. HRU and costs were assessed for inpatient, emergency department (ED), and outpatient visits and compared between cohorts using χ2 tests and t tests. RESULTS: After matching, 2638 treated and 1319 untreated patients were included. For treated versus untreated patients, the mean number of all-cause outpatient visits was 0.96 versus 1.21 during 14 days of follow-up (P < 0.001) and 1.94 versus 2.24 over 28 days (P = 0.001), respectively. Over 28 days, the mean number of all-cause ED visits was lower among treated (0.23) than untreated (0.30) patients (P = 0.042). The mean number of respiratory-related outpatient visits was significantly lower for treated versus untreated patients, and mean costs for these visits were $17.89 versus $35.27 over 14 days (P < 0.001) and $28.92 versus $48.77 over 28 days (P < 0.001) for treated versus untreated patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that prompt antiviral treatment after influenza diagnosis may reduce HRU and costs in patients with RA.

Work Productivity Outcomes Associated with Ocrelizumab Compared with Other Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated work and activity impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) treated with ocrelizumab (OCR) versus other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). METHODS: Data were obtained from the Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for Multiple Sclerosis. Patients with relapsing-remitting or secondary progressive MS who completed surveys in 2018 and 2019 and received ≥ 6 months of an eligible therapy, including OCR, injectable therapy, and oral therapy, were included. Outcomes were assessed using the patient-reported Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire. Doubly robust estimation, which combined propensity score weighting and regression modeling, was used to compare treatments, controlling for baseline clinical and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: This study included 630 patients (OCR, n = 90; injectable DMT, n = 224; oral DMT, n = 316) with a mean (standard deviation) age of 42 (11) years. A greater proportion of OCR-treated patients had an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of ≥ 3 at treatment initiation compared with those receiving oral and injectable DMTs (51 vs. 15% and 15%, respectively), and a smaller proportion of OCR-treated patients received treatment for ≥ 1 year (43 vs. 90% and 92%, respectively). OCR-treated patients had higher odds of employment [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 3.4 (1.5-7.7) vs. oral DMT, 5.6 (2.6-12.0) vs. injectable DMT], lower overall work productivity loss [difference (95% confidence interval) - 10.0% (- 6.1 to - 15.0%) vs. oral DMT, - 13.0% (- 8.5 to - 17.0%) vs. injectable DMT] and lower activity impairment [difference (95% confidence interval) - 11% (- 7.1 to - 16.0%) vs. oral DMT, - 9.7% (- 5.0 to - 14.0%) vs. injectable DMT]. CONCLUSION: This real-world evidence suggests that patients with MS treated with OCR experience lower work and activity impairment than patients treated with other DMTs.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common progressive neurological disease in young adults. It typically starts between the ages of 20 and 40 years­arguably some of the most productive years of an individual's life­and it has a large impact on many aspects of everyday life for the rest of a person's life. The reduction in the ability to do routine activities, including working, results in a large economic burden. Disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) available for MS, particularly high-efficacy DMTs, have been shown to improve work productivity. This study looked at work and activity impairment using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire in patients with MS who were treated with ocrelizumab (OCR) or other DMTs for ≥ 6 months. A total of 630 patients with relapsing­remitting MS (RRMS) or secondary progressive MS (SPMS) from the Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme for Multiple Sclerosis were included in the study, including 90, 316 and 224 patients who completed ≥ 6 months of treatment with OCR, oral or injectable therapy. Compared with patients receiving oral or injectable DMTs, those receiving OCR had higher odds of employment [odds ratio (OR) vs. oral DMT 3.4; OR vs. injectable DMT 5.6], lower overall work productivity impairment (difference vs. oral DMT − 10%; difference vs. injectable DMT − 13%) and lower activity impairment (difference vs. oral DMT − 11%; difference vs. injectable DMT − 9.7%). These findings in patients with RRMS or SPMS being treated in the real world suggest that OCR may reduce the impact of MS disease on work productivity more than other DMTs.

Cost-Effectiveness of Cannabidiol Adjunct Therapy versus Usual Care for the Treatment of Seizures in Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Cannabidiol (CBD) is a novel therapy for the treatment of Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS), a rare, treatment-refractory epileptic encephalopathy. Two pivotal trials found CBD 20 mg/kg/day conferred a reduction from baseline in median drop seizure frequency of 44% and 42%, respectively, compared with 22% and 17%, respectively, in the usual care arms. No economic evaluations have been published to date. This analysis assessed the cost effectiveness of CBD adjunct therapy compared with usual care alone in LGS from the US payer perspective. METHODS: We developed a lifetime horizon Markov decision analytic model. Efficacy, healthcare costs (2020 US$), and health state utilities were ascertained from published clinical trials, retrospective analyses, and time trade-off interviews conducted in the UK, respectively. Fifteen-year-old patients entering the model transitioned to states representing a percentage reduction in drop seizure frequency from baseline, where they remained until reverting back to baseline drop seizure frequency, or death. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate parameter uncertainty, and scenario analyses investigated the impact of various assumptions. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3%. RESULTS: Compared with usual care alone, CBD yielded 0.7 additional quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and $314,900 additional healthcare expenditure, resulting in $451,800 per QALY. Uncertainty in health state utilities were the largest contributor to uncertainty in the results. Results from the 5000-simulation probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a 0% chance of CBD being cost effective at a $150,000 per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, with a 95% credible range for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $325,300-$690,000 per QALY. CONCLUSION: CBD does not appear to be a cost-effective therapeutic option in LGS patients at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY.