Health Care Utilization and Costs in Patients With Migraine Who Have Failed Previous Preventive Treatments.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize health care utilization (HCU) and associated costs among patients with migraine categorized by the number of preventive treatment failures (TFs; 1 TF, 2 TFs, and 3+ TFs) using real-world data. METHODS: This retrospective analysis identified adults with incident migraine diagnosis in the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental database between January 1, 2011, and June 30, 2015. TF was defined in the 2 years after the first migraine diagnosis period. One TF, 2 TFs, and 3+ TFs were defined as patients who had received only 2 preventive treatments (PTs), 3 PTs, and 4+ PTs in the 2-year period, respectively. A negative binomial model was used to analyze HCU data, and a 2-part model was used for cost data controlling for the preindex Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index. RESULTS: Overall, 24,282 patients with incident migraine who had failed at least 1 PT were included in the analysis. Of these, 72.7% (n = 17,653) had 1 TF, 20.2% (n = 4,900) had 2 TFs, and 7.1% (n = 1,729) had 3+ TFs. Adjusted annualized rates of all-cause and migraine-specific HCU increased with an increase in the number of TFs (1.4-4 times higher; all p < 0.0001 vs 1 TF). The mean total all-cause health care costs were higher by $3,732 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $2,708-$4,588) in patients with 2 TFs and by $8,912 (95% CI: $7,141-$10,822) in patients with 3+ TFs vs those with 1 TF. Outpatient costs were the key drivers of differences in health care costs. CONCLUSIONS: TF in patients with migraine was associated with a substantial resource and cost burden, which increased with the number of TFs.

Hemicrania continua in a family: A report of two cases.

OBJECTIVE: To report two cases of hemicrania continua (HC) in a mother and daughter. BACKGROUND: HC is a rare primary headache disorder belonging to the family of trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs). Unlike migraine, familial cases of TACs are rare, and we know relatively little of their inheritance pattern and genetic mechanisms. METHODS: We present a mother and daughter with HC. We compare the similarities and differences between this family and the first report of familial HC and discuss the implications for future studies. RESULTS: Both the mother and daughter presented with a constant, side-locked headache of moderate intensity, with episodic exacerbations of more severe pain that are associated with ipsilateral cranial autonomic activation. After negative workup, both patients were started on indomethacin and achieved absolute response at different doses, confirming HC. CONCLUSIONS: Our report further corroborates other reports of familial TACs that TACs are primary headaches possibly attributable to genetic factors, albeit detailed mechanisms remain elusive. Nevertheless, whether clinical presentation and treatment responses would be substantially different between sporadic and familial HCs remain unclear.

Patient experience of telemedicine for headache care during the COVID-19 pandemic: An American Migraine Foundation survey study.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the patient experience of telemedicine for headache care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. BACKGROUND: The use of telemedicine has rapidly expanded and evolved since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine eliminates the physical and geographic barriers to health care, preserves personal protective equipment, and prevents the spread of COVID-19 by allowing encounters to happen in a socially distanced way. However, few studies have assessed the patient perspective of telemedicine for headache care. METHODS: The American Migraine Foundation (AMF) designed a standardized electronic questionnaire to assess the patient experience of telemedicine for headache care between March and September 2020 to help inform future quality improvement as part of its patient advocacy initiative. The date parameters were identified as the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 disease and the declaration of a national emergency in the United States. The questionnaire was distributed electronically to more than 100,000 members of the AMF community through social media platforms and the AMF email database. RESULTS: A total of 1172 patients responded to our electronic questionnaire, with 1098 complete responses. The majority, 1081/1153 (93.8%) patients, had a previous headache diagnosis prior to the telemedicine encounter. A total of 648/1127 (57.5%) patients reported that they had used telemedicine for headache care during the study period. Among those who participated in telehealth visits, 553/647 (85.5%) patients used it for follow-up visits; 94/647 (14.5%) patients used it for new patient visits. During the telemedicine encounters, 282/645 (43.7%) patients were evaluated by headache specialists, 222/645 (34.4%) patients by general neurologists, 198/645 (30.7%) patients by primary care providers, 73/645 (11.3%) patients by headache nurse practitioners, and 21/645 (3.2%) patients by headache nurses. Only 47/633 (7.4%) patients received a new headache diagnosis from telemedicine evaluation, whereas the other 586/633 (92.6%) patients did not have a change in their diagnoses. During these visits, a new treatment was prescribed for 358/636 (52.3%) patients, whereas 278/636 (43.7%) patients did not have changes made to their treatment plan. The number (%) of patients who rated the telemedicine headache care experience as "very good," "good," "fair," "poor," and "other" were 396/638 (62.1%), 132/638 (20.7%), 67/638 (10.5%), 23/638 (3.6%), and 20/638 (3.1%), respectively. Detailed reasons for "other" are listed in the manuscript. Most patients, 573/638 (89.8%), indicated that they would prefer to continue to use telemedicine for their headache care, 45/638 (7.1%) patients would not, and 20/638 (3.1%) patients were unsure. CONCLUSIONS: Our study evaluating the patient perspective demonstrated that telemedicine facilitated headache care for many patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in high patient satisfaction rates, and a desire to continue to use telemedicine for future headache care among those who completed the online survey.

Cystic Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Jaws: Twelve Cases Highlighting Histopathological Pitfalls.

Cystic squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) of the jaws, including carcinoma cuniculatum, are rare, slow growing, and relentlessly invasive. The aim of this article is to present 12 cases, 4 of which were designated as carcinoma cuniculatum on the basis of deeply endophytic, anastomosing channels of cystic stratified squamous epithelium and keratin microabscesses. The other 8 were also cystic, but more heterogeneous morphologically and were diagnosed as well differentiated SCCs. Six patients were female, 6 were male (mean age = 74.0 years, range = 50-94 years). Six tumors affected the mandible, 6 the maxillary alveolus with or without extension into the hard palate. All patients underwent primary resection with neck dissection and were staged as T4a N0 M0. In 4 patients, diagnosis was delayed as a result of superficial biopsies and/or confusing histopathology. Cystic SCCs of the jaws can be difficult to diagnose and clinicoradiological correlation is essential. Long-term follow-up is mandatory.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Headache Disorders in Older Adults.

OBJECTIVES: To provide a unique perspective on geriatric headache and a number of novel treatment options that are not well known outside of the headache literature. DESIGN: Review of the most current and relevant headache literature for practitioners specializing in geriatric care. RESULTS: Evaluation and management of headache disorders in older adults requires an understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and how it relates to age-related physiological changes. To treat headache disorders in general, the appropriate diagnosis must first be established, and treatment of headaches in elderly adults poses unique challenges, including potential polypharmacy, medical comorbidities, and physiological changes associated with aging. CONCLUSION: The purpose of this review is to provide a guide to and perspective on the challenges inherent in treating headaches in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 66:2408-2416, 2018.

Fremanezumab as Add-On Treatment for Patients Treated With Other Migraine Preventive Medicines.

BACKGROUND: Fremanezumab (formerly TEV-48125) is a monoclonal antibody directed against calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP), a validated target for migraine preventive therapy. In two previous phase 2 studies, fremanezumab administered once every 28 days for 12 weeks was found to be effective and safe as a preventive treatment for patients suffering from episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fremanezumab as an add-on preventive therapy in individuals with EM and CM who are on stable doses of preventive migraine medications. METHODS: Two randomized placebo-controlled studies tested once-monthly subcutaneous injections of various dosing regimens of fremanezumab versus placebo in EM and CM. Headache information was captured daily using an electronic headache diary. For these post hoc analyses, data were pooled from patients who were on stable preventive medications and taking fremanezumab doses of 225 mg or 675/225 mg, or placebo. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 133 patients, (67 fremanezumab and 66 placebo). Total reduction in migraine days for the duration of the study was 12.4 for fremanezumab and 7.4 for placebo (P = .0321). There were also decreases in moderate/severe headache days (12.5 vs 7.1, P = .0058), and days using acute medication for headaches relative to placebo (11.6 vs 7.5, P = .0414). Treatment emergent adverse events were generally mild and transient, and no serious adverse events were considered to be treatment-related by the site investigators. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from these post hoc analyses suggest that fremanezumab is a safe and effective add-on treatment for migraine patients being concomitantly treated with other migraine preventive medications. Trials are registered at Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02025556 and NCT02021773.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonism and cluster headache: an emerging new treatment.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a key signaling molecule involved in migraine pathophysiology. Efficacy of CGRP monoclonal antibodies and antagonists in migraine treatment has fueled an increasing interest in the prospect of treating cluster headache (CH) with CGRP antagonism. The exact role of CGRP and its mechanism of action in CH have not been fully clarified. A search for original studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English was performed in PubMed and in ClinicalTrials.gov . The search term used was "cluster headache and calcitonin gene related peptide" and "primary headaches and calcitonin gene related peptide." Reference lists of identified articles were also searched for additional relevant papers. Human experimental studies have reported elevated plasma CGRP levels during both spontaneous and glyceryl trinitrate-induced cluster attacks. CGRP may play an important role in cluster headache pathophysiology. More refined human studies are warranted with regard to assay validation and using larger sample sizes. The results from RCTs may reveal the therapeutic potential of CGRP monoclonal antibodies and antagonists for cluster headache treatment.

Update on New Daily Persistent Headache.

OPINION STATEMENT: New daily persistent headache (NDPH) is an uncommon and under-recognized primary headache disorder. Clinically, NDPH may resemble migraine or tension-type headache. Unlike migraine or tension-type headaches, however, a distinguishing feature of NDPH is that the majority of patients with NDPH can pinpoint the exact date of onset of symptoms. While cases can arise de novo, in multiple reports, a viral illness precedes the onset of headache. NDPH has two temporal profiles: a self-limited form that resolves spontaneously without treatment and a refractory, persistent form in which headaches continue unabated for years. Diagnosis is predicated on first eliminating secondary mimics via diagnostic imaging and hematological studies. Lumbar puncture should be considered in patients who are refractory to treatment to search for alterations in CSF pressure or for an infectious process. There have been no randomized clinical trials utilizing acute or preventive therapies for NDPH. In clinical practice, treatment is aimed at matching the predominant headache phenotype; nonetheless, most therapies are generally ineffective or only partially effective. Not surprisingly, medication overuse is very common among patients with this disorder and should be identified, although in most patients, eliminating medication overuse does not alter the course of the illness. There have been reports of successful treatment combining doxycycline 100 mg and montelukast 10 mg, dosed BID for 3 months. Anecdotally, in our practice, this combination has occasionally provided good results. Onabotulinum toxin injections are currently under investigation and may provide a potential new effective treatment regimen.

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TEV-48125 for preventive treatment of high-frequency episodic migraine: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study.

BACKGROUND: Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a validated target for the treatment of episodic migraine. Here we assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TEV-48125, a monoclonal anti-CGRP antibody, in the preventive treatment of high-frequency episodic migraine. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study, we enrolled men and women (aged 18-65 years) from 62 sites in the USA who had migraine headaches 8-14 days per month. Using a randomisation list generated by a central computerised system and an interactive web response system, we randomly assigned patients (1:1:1; stratified by sex and use of concomitant preventive drugs) after a 28 day run-in period to three 28 day treatment cycles of subcutaneous 225 mg TEV-48125, 675 mg TEV-48125, or placebo. Investigators, patients, and the funder were blinded to treatment allocation. Patients reported headache information daily using an electronic diary. Primary endpoints were change from baseline in migraine days during the third treatment cycle (weeks 9-12) and safety and tolerability. The secondary endpoint was change relative to baseline in headache-days during weeks 9-12. Efficacy endpoints were analysed for the intention-to-treat population. Safety and tolerability were analysed using descriptive statistics. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02025556. FINDINGS: Between Jan 8, 2014, and Oct 15, 2014, we enrolled 297 participants: 104 were randomly assigned to receive placebo, 95 to receive 225 mg TEV-48125, and 96 to receive 675 mg TEV-48125. The least square mean (LSM) change in number of migraine-days from baseline to weeks 9-12 was -3.46 days (SD 5.40) in the placebo group, -6.27 days (5.38) in the 225 mg dose group, and -6.09 days (5.22) in the 675 mg dose group. The LSM difference in the reduction of migraine-days between the placebo and 225 mg dose groups was -2.81 days (95% CI -4.07 to -1.55; p<0.0001), whereas the difference between the placebo and 675 mg dose group was -2.64 days (-3.90 to -1.38; p<0.0001). LSM differences in the reduction of headache-days were -2.63 days (-3.91 to -1.34; p<0.0001) between the placebo group and 225 mg dose group and -2.58 days (-3.87 to 1.30; p <0.0001) between the placebo group and the 675 mg dose group. Adverse events occurred in 58 (56%) patients in the placebo group, 44 (46%) patients in the 225 mg dose group, and 57 (59%) patients in the 675 mg dose group; moderate or severe adverse events were reported for 29 (27%) patients, 24 (25%) patients, and 26 (27%) patients, respectively. INTERPRETATION: TEV-48125, at doses of 225 mg and 675 mg given once every 28 days for 12 weeks, was safe, well tolerated, and effective as a preventive treatment of high-frequency episodic migraine, thus supporting advancement of the clinical development programme to phase 3 clinical trials. FUNDING: Teva Pharmaceuticals.

Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article reviews the clinical features of and treatment options for the trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs). RECENT FINDINGS: The TACs are a group of primary headache disorders characterized by short-lasting episodes of severe unilateral headaches that are associated with ipsilateral cranial autonomic symptoms. The best known and most commonly seen TAC in clinical practice is cluster headache. The other syndromes within this group include paroxysmal hemicrania, hemicrania continua, and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks. Although these disorders share a similar phenotype, they are distinguished by differences in attack frequency and duration. Recognition of these clinical differences is paramount because treatment options vary; paroxysmal hemicrania and hemicrania continua demonstrate an absolute response to treatment with indomethacin, while the other syndromes respond to other agents. SUMMARY: Although much less common than other headache disorders seen in clinical practice, recognition of the TACs is especially important as they are among the most severe and disabling syndromes in headache medicine.

Sumatriptan Iontophoretic Transdermal System Reduces Treatment-Emergent Nausea and Is Effective in Patients With and Without Nausea at Baseline - Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that sumatriptan iontophoretic transdermal system (TDS) is associated with lower rates of treatment-emergent nausea (TEN) relative to placebo, as well as to compare the efficacy of sumatriptan TDS in migraineurs with or without nausea at baseline. METHODS: Participants of a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, single-attack, placebo-controlled study conducted at 38 sites in the United States were analyzed. Participants who treated their migraine attacks while nausea-free were identified. The primary endpoint was TEN over 24 hours post-treatment contrasting both treatment groups and it was assessed by regression analyses using generalized estimating equations. Secondary endpoint was headache response as a function of presence of nausea, assessed by generalized linear model. RESULTS: A total of 130 participants free of nausea at baseline were treated with sumatriptan TDS, while 109 participants free of nausea at baseline were treated with placebo TDS. The occurrence of TEN over 24 hours post-treatment was significantly lower with the sumatriptan TDS than with placebo (P = .0011). These differences were statistically significant at 1 hour (13.8% vs 9.2%, P < .01), 2 hours (13.8% vs 4.6% P < .001) and 3 hours (13.8% vs 8.5% P < .01). The efficacy of sumatriptan TDS was similar regardless of the presence or absence of nausea at baseline for all clinical parameters. CONCLUSION: Sumatriptan TDS is not associated with the emergence of nausea in migraineurs without nausea. It is equally effective in participants with or without nausea at the time of treatment.

Why triptan treatment can fail: focus on gastrointestinal manifestations of migraine.

BACKGROUND: Results of randomized, double-blind, controlled studies establish the efficacy of triptans in the acute treatment of migraine, but triptan benefits demonstrated in clinical trials have not consistently been realized in clinical practice. This paper explores the contribution of gastrointestinal manifestations of migraine--namely nausea (with or without vomiting) and gastroparesis--to triptan treatment failure. SYNTHESIS: Migraine-related nausea and vomiting and migraine-associated gastroparesis appear to be prevalent and highly impactful and have been characterized as being among the greatest challenges affecting migraine care today. These gastrointestinal signs and symptoms have not been satisfactorily taken into account in the management of migraine, which is dominated by the use of oral therapies. Oral triptans are not the optimal therapy in the presence of migraine-related nausea because nausea predicts poor response to oral triptans and because nausea can cause patients to delay oral treatment, which can further compromise therapeutic efficacy. Oral triptans are not the optimal therapy in the presence of migraine-associated gastroparesis because these agents rely on gastric motility and gastrointestinal absorption and may be ineffective or slowly or inconsistently effective in the presence of gastroparesis. Health care providers need to work with their patients to address the still-all-too-frequent problem of treatment failure in migraine. First, health care providers need to have greater appreciation of the importance of nausea, vomiting, and gastroparesis as factors affecting migraine prognosis and treatment success. Second, health care providers need to systematically assess migraine patients for gastrointestinal signs and symptoms. Finally, patients and health care providers need to be willing to practice customized migraine care, in which patients tailor the treatment and formulation to the characteristics and context of the individual migraine episode.

Aberrant common carotid artery -- a surprise for the unwary.

An aberrant common carotid artery is a rare anatomical anomaly. We report a case of an aberrant carotid artery running across the trachea in a patient undergoing total thyroidectomy. This rare anomaly may make a tracheostomy, a particularly hazardous procedure.

Using a bicycle-pedestrian count to assess active living in downtown Wilkes-Barre.

BACKGROUND: Downtown Wilkes-Barre, a town of 40,000 residents in Northeast Pennsylvania, and the hub of a planned urban, suburban, and rural trail network, was the site of a number of changes to improve walkability during the Active Living by Design (ALbD) grant period. PURPOSE: The Wyoming Valley Wellness Trails Partnership and Greater Wilkes-Barre Chamber of Business and Industry initiated the Wilkes-Barre Downtown Bicycle and Pedestrian Count (Bike-Ped Count) in order to pilot bicycle and pedestrian counting methods and to evaluate downtown built environment and policy changes. METHODS: The Bike-Ped Count was conducted during nine 2-hour counting periods over 4 days in September using screen-line count methods at seven locations downtown and at River Common Park. RESULTS: During 18 hours of counting, staff noted 15,347 pedestrians and 773 bicyclists. The largest average number of pedestrians (512) was observed during lunch hours, whereas the largest numbers of bicyclists were observed during evening and weekend hours. CONCLUSIONS: The Bike-Ped Count illustrates patterns of bicycling and walking downtown and allows comparisons of bicycling and walking among locations, including different cities. In the future, counts will help show how ongoing changes to the downtown environment affect walking and bicycling.

Migraine and vestibular symptoms--identifying clinical features that predict "vestibular migraine".

BACKGROUND: Migraine and symptoms that may suggest a vestibular disorder (referred to herein broadly as vestibular symptoms-VS) often co-exist. In part due to a lack of standardized diagnostic criteria, this relationship remains unknown to many physicians. OBJECTIVE: To determine common clinical features that may be associated with "vestibular migraine" (VM). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients diagnosed with VM at a headache center. In this group we recorded certain demographic and clinical features related to their disorder, including the most common triggers of the VS and the specific characteristics of the symptoms that suggested VM. RESULTS: Our sample consisted of 147 patients (68% women, mean age = 45 years, 39% with aura). Migraine onset preceded the onset of VS by a mean of 8 years. A total of 62 patients (42%) had gradual onset of VS, while in 48 (33%) symptoms began suddenly. The most commonly reported symptoms that led to the diagnosis of VM were: unsteadiness (134; 91%), balance disturbance (120; 82%), "light-headedness" (113; 77%), and vertigo (84; 57%). VS and headache occurred concomitantly in 48% of patients. A total of 67 (47%) patients had VS that were chronic from onset, 29 (21%) had episodic symptoms, and in 46 (32%) the VS had evolved from episodic to chronic (with an average duration of 7.04 years required for this evolution to occur). CONCLUSIONS: Vestibular migraine is a heterogeneous condition with varying symptomatology. As with migraine itself, symptomatic expression varies along a spectrum that extends from episodic to chronic. As the histories of many of the patients we evaluated would not meet current International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria, we suggest that new criteria which account for the heterogeneity and natural history of the disorder may be required to adequately diagnose and treat those who suffer from VM.

Efficacy and tolerability of rizatriptan for the treatment of acute migraine in sumatriptan non-responders.

OBJECTIVE: The study was carried out to assess the efficacy and tolerability of rizatriptan orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) for treating acute migraine in patients who are non-responders to sumatriptan. BACKGROUND: Many migraineurs report dissatisfaction with sumatriptan efficacy. It is unclear whether sumatriptan 100 mg non-responders will respond to other triptans. METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in adults with >1-year history of ICHD-II (International Classification of Headache Disorders, second edition) migraine who reported that they generally do not respond to sumatriptan (≥50% unsatisfactory response). In the baseline phase, participants treated a single moderate/severe migraine attack with open-label generic sumatriptan 100 mg. Those who continued to experience moderate/severe pain at two hours post-dose were eligible to enter the double-blind treatment phase, during which participants treated three migraine attacks in crossover fashion (two with rizatriptan 10-mg ODT, one with placebo) after being randomly assigned to one of three treatment sequences (1 : 1 : 1 ratio). The primary endpoint was two-hour pain relief. RESULTS: A total of 102 (94%) participants treated at least one study migraine. Pain relief at two hours was significantly greater with rizatriptan compared with placebo (51% vs. 20%, p < .001). Response rates also favored rizatriptan on two-hour pain freedom (22% vs. 12%, p = .013) as well as 24-hour sustained pain relief (38% vs. 14%, p < .001) and sustained pain freedom (20% vs. 11%, p = .036). Treatment was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Rizatriptan 10-mg ODT was superior to placebo at providing two-hour pain relief and two-hour pain freedom in the treatment of acute migraine in those who do not respond to sumatriptan 100 mg. Rizatriptan was generally well tolerated in this population.

Hemicrania continua: a second case in which the remitting form evolved from the chronic form.

We report the case of a woman with a 15-year history of chronic hemicrania continua, which over time evolved to remitting hemicrania continua. This is the second reported case in the literature documenting this transition.