Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Sutureless Bioprosthetic Valve Tilting Resulting in Severe Paravalvular Leak.

Severe paravalvular leak (PVL) may be complicated by heart failure and haemolysis. PVL management is challenging, especially when the gap is large. We describe a case of PVL due to tilting of a sutureless biological prosthesis successfully treated by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAV-in-SAV).

Timing of aortic valve replacement in high-gradient severe aortic stenosis: impact of left ventricular ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Patients with high-gradient (HG) severe aortic stenosis (AS) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction are at high risk of death. The optimal timing for aortic valve replacement (AVR) is not defined by guidelines. The objective was to define the optimal timing to perform isolated AVR in patients with HG-AS and severe LV dysfunction. METHODS: We retrospectively included 233 consecutive patients admitted for severe HG-AS (aortic valve area <1cm2 and mean gradient ≥40mmHg). Severe LV dysfunction was defined by LV ejection fraction ≤35% (LVEF). All-cause mortality while waiting for AVR and after the intervention (30 days) was compared in patients with (n = 28) and without (n = 205) LVEF ≤35%. RESULTS: Patients with HG-AS and severe LV dysfunction had a higher risk profile than those with LVEF >35%. AVR was performed in 93% (218/233) of patients, 41% by surgery (SAVR) and 53% by transcatheter (TAVR). TAVR was the preferred method to treat HG-AS patients with LVEF ≤35%. All-cause mortality while waiting for AVR was higher in patients with severe LV dysfunction (22% vs. 2.0%, p < 0.001) and occurred within a shorter time (12 [8-26] days vs. 63 [58-152] days, p = 0.010) compared to those with LVEF >35%. All death in HG-AS patients with a severe LV dysfunction occurred within the first month. Postoperative mortality was low (1.3%), irrespective of LVEF. CONCLUSIONS: AVR should be performed promptly after Heart Team decision in patients with HG severe AS and LVEF ≤35% because of a very high and premature risk of death while waiting for intervention.

Reproducibility of reading echocardiographic parameters to assess severity of mitral regurgitation. Insights from a French multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Poor reproducibility in assessment of mitral regurgitation (MR) has been reported. AIM: To investigate the robustness of echocardiographic MR assessment in 2019, based on improvements in technology and the skill of echocardiographists regarding MR quantification. METHODS: Reproducibility in parameters of MR severity and global rating were tested using transthoracic echocardiography in 25 consecutive patients independently analysed by 16 junior and senior cardiologists specialized in echocardiography (400 analyses per parameter). RESULTS: Overall interobserver agreement for mechanism definition, effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) and regurgitant volume (RVol) was moderate, and was lower in secondary MR. Interobserver agreement was substantial for EROA [0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.75] and moderate for RVol with the PISA method (0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.56) in senior physicians and was fair in junior physicians (0.33, 95% CI 0.19-0.51 and 0.36, 95% CI 0.36-0.43, respectively). Using a multiparametric approach, overall interobserver agreement for grading MR severity was fair (0.30), was slightly better in senior than in junior physicians (0.31 vs. 0.28, respectively) with substantial or almost perfect agreement more frequently observed in senior versus junior physicians (52% vs. 36%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Reproducible transthoracic echocardiography MR quantification remains challenging in 2019, despite the expected high skills of echocardiographers regarding MR at the time of dedicated percutaneous intervention. The multiparametric approach does not entirely alleviate the substantial dispersion in measurement of MR severity parameters, whereas reader experience seems to partially address the issue. Our study emphasizes the continuing need for multimodality imaging and education in the evaluation of MR among cardiologists.

MitraClip Implantation for Functional Mitral Regurgitation With Coaptation Gap Facilitated by Levosimendan Treatment.

A patient with severe, symptomatic functional mitral regurgitation was initially considered not suitable for MitraClip (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Illinois) implantation because of non-coapting mitral leaflets. Repeated levosimendan infusions in combination with intensive diuresis induced sufficient valve coaptation, thus allowing MitraClip implantation to be performed. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Aortic Stenosis and Cardiac Amyloidosis: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

The prevalence of calcific aortic stenosis (AS) and of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) increases with age, and their association is not uncommon in the elderly. The identification of CA is particularly challenging in patients with AS because these 2 conditions share several features. It is estimated that ≤15% of the AS population and ≤30% of the subset with low-flow, low-gradient pattern may have CA. In patients with AS, CA is associated with increased risk of heart failure, mortality, and treatment futility with aortic valve replacement. In case of suspicion of CA, it is thus crucial to confirm the diagnosis to guide therapeutic management of AS and eventually implement recently developed pharmacological treatment dedicated to transthyretin amyloidosis. Given the high surgical risk of patients with AS and concomitant CA, transcatheter aortic valve replacement may be preferred to surgery in these patients.

Chronic Kidney Disease and the Pathophysiology of Valvular Heart Disease.

Valvular heart calcification is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially in those receiving hemodialysis therapy, and it is associated with poor prognosis. Furthermore, progression of valvular heart disease (VHD) and structural valve deterioration of bioprosthetic valves are faster in these patients. Mechanisms involved in the pathophysiology of VHD are similar between patients with and without impaired kidney function, but CKD is associated with a bone metabolism dysregulation, which might lead to a procalcifying phenotype within vessels and heart valves. CKD is also associated with left ventricular remodelling and dysfunction, which might contribute to increase the risk of heart failure and death in patients with VHD. Even if promising pharmacotherapeutic avenues are in development, no medical treatment can prevent or reduce the valvular calcific process. Patients with advanced CKD should undergo transthoracic echocardiography for detection of VHD, and if present, follow-up should be more frequent than what is recommended in the guidelines. Transcatheter valve replacement might be preferred over surgical replacement in patients with CKD and severe aortic valve stenosis.

Peridevice Leak After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Impact.

BACKGROUND: Limited studies reported the rate and clinical impact of peridevice leaks (PDL) after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). METHODS: All consecutive patients with a nonvalvular atrial fibrillation admitted for LAAC between November 2011 and October 2016 were prospectively enrolled. The follow-up included clinical, transesophageal echocardiography, and/or cardiac computed tomography angiogram (CCTA). PDL was defined by the presence of contrast within the left atrial appendage on CCTA, and Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) included stroke, device-related thrombosis, and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: Overall, 77 patients (mean CHA2DS2-VASc score = 4.4 ± 1.5 and mean HAS-BLED = 3.4 ± 1.1) were implanted using Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (n = 24), Amulet (n = 37), or Watchman devices (n = 16). Indications were stroke recurrence despite adequate oral anticoagulation (OAC, n = 6) or contraindication to long-term OAC (n = 71). From 3-month to 12-month CCTA follow-up, the PDL rate decreased from 68.5% to 56.7% (P = 0.02), without any difference between the various devices. Patients with PDL were more often in permanent atrial fibrillation, and had a larger landing zone diameter, a lower ratio of device compression, and a more frequent off-axis position of the device. A device compression ratio < 10% was the only parameter associated with PDL occurrence. During follow-up (median 236 days) the MACE rate was 9.1%, with no statistically significant difference between patients with vs without PDL (12% vs 4.3%, P = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: The PDL rate detected by CCTA after LAAC was high, especially in cases with a low device compression ratio (< 10%), but decreased over time. The incidence of MACE was quantitatively greater with PDL, but the difference was not statistically significant. Larger studies are needed to determine the clinical importance of PDL.

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Inferior Vena Cava Filters: A Case Series.

OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous procedures through femoral access in patients with inferior vena cava (IVC) filter may be at risk of complications. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of left atrial appendage (LAA) closure through femoral access in patients previously implanted with IVC filter. METHODS: From November 2011 to March 2018, a total of 5 patients with history of IVC filter implantation were referred to our center for percutaneous LAA closure, representing 3.6% of the 137 procedures performed during the study period. The IVC filter devices were placed from 2 to 26 months before the index procedure. RESULTS: LAA closure was successfully implanted in all cases using an Amulet device in 3 patients and a Watchman device in 2 patients. A femoral approach was performed in all patients using 12 or 14 Fr sheaths. Before crossing IVC filters, venographies did not detect any thrombus. All steps of IVC filter crossing were performed under fluoroscopic guidance. No immediate or late complications related to the procedure occurred after 10.1 ± 3.9 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: LAA closure in patients with previously implanted IVC filter is safe as long as careful x-ray monitoring is observed.

Usefulness of echocardiographic-fluoroscopic fusion imaging in adult structural heart disease.

Percutaneous approaches to treat structural heart diseases are growing in number and complexity. Multimodality imaging is essential for planning and monitoring such interventions. The combination of three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography with fluoroscopy is the cornerstone of interventional imaging. However, these two modalities are displayed on separate screens, and are handled by different physicians, which requires a complex mental reconstruction for the interventional team. To overcome this issue, echocardiographic-fluoroscopic fusion imaging has been introduced recently in clinical practice. This system combines, in a single view, the precise visualization of catheter and devices provided by fluoroscopy with the continuous soft tissue information provided by echocardiography. In addition, the procedure may be guided using a marker-tracking mode. However, there are few data on how this new technology can have an impact on our routine clinical practice and patient outcomes. In this review, we provide a user manual for the system, discuss its potential clinical applications in adult structural heart diseases and consider future perspectives.