Opportunities and challenges of computer aided diagnosis in new millennium: A bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2023.

BACKGROUND: After entering the new millennium, computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) is rapidly developing as an emerging technology worldwide. Expanding the spectrum of CAD-related diseases is a possible future research trend. Nevertheless, bibliometric studies in this area have not yet been reported. This study aimed to explore the hotspots and frontiers of research on CAD from 2000 to 2023, which may provide a reference for researchers in this field. METHODS: In this paper, we use bibliometrics to analyze CAD-related literature in the Web of Science database between 2000 and 2023. The scientometric softwares VOSviewer and CiteSpace were used to visually analyze the countries, institutions, authors, journals, references and keywords involved in the literature. Keywords burst analysis were utilized to further explore the current state and development trends of research on CAD. RESULTS: A total of 13,970 publications were included in this study, with a noticeably rising annual publication trend. China and the United States are major contributors to the publication, with the United States being the dominant position in CAD research. The American research institutions, lead by the University of Chicago, are pioneers of CAD. Acharya UR, Zheng B and Chan HP are the most prolific authors. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Medical Imaging focuses on CAD and publishes the most articles. New computer technologies related to CAD are in the forefront of attention. Currently, CAD is used extensively in breast diseases, pulmonary diseases and brain diseases. CONCLUSION: Expanding the spectrum of CAD-related diseases is a possible future research trend. How to overcome the lack of large sample datasets and establish a universally accepted standard for the evaluation of CAD system performance are urgent issues for CAD development and validation. In conclusion, this paper provides valuable information on the current state of CAD research and future developments.

Time to change? Present and prospects of hemorrhoidal classification.

As a common benign anal condition, the high incidence and recurrence of hemorrhoids pose challenges for both patients and doctors. The classification of hemorrhoids plays a crucial role in assessing, diagnosing, and treating the condition. By using appropriate classification and corresponding treatment strategies, we can achieve higher cure rates and lower recurrence rates of hemorrhoids. Since the introduction of the Miles classification in 1919, various classifications have been developed, which include objective classifications based on anatomical or instrumental assessment and subjective classifications based on symptoms and patient sensations. These classifications aim to accurately evaluate the condition. In this study, we discuss the evaluation values of each classification in terms of their advantages, disadvantages, treatment relevance, reproducibility, practicality, and assessment value. We also analyze the significant and essential factors, principles of use, and components of assessment indicators of hemorrhoidal classification. This study proposes several strategies to address the limitations of current hemorrhoidal assessment methods. All these will provide a reference for the development regarding the assessment and classification of hemorrhoids and clinical diagnosis and management of hemorrhoids.