Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Access Microbiol ; 5(1): acmi000406, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36860506

RESUMO

Background. Concurrent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) has been described in various reports, with a recent study describing a 9.3 % P. jirovecii detection rate in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Methods. Patients with PCR-confirmed PJP following COVID-19 infection who were admitted to Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan from March 2020-June 2021 were identified through a laboratory database. Detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus was performed by RT-PCR Cobas SARS-CoV-2 qualitative assay. P. jirovecii PCR was performed using the RealStar Pneumocystis jirovecii PCR kit. Clinical, radiological and laboratory data for PJP patients were recorded. Results. During the study period, 3707 patients were admitted with COVID-19 at our hospital. P. jirovecii PCR was requested for 90 patients and was positive in 10 (11 %). Five out of 10 patients were discharged from the hospital and later developed cough and dyspnoea. Five patients remained hospitalized with severe COVID-19 and developed PJP. Eight patients in our study received systemic steroids. The trends of lymphocyte counts of all patients showed a lymphocyte count of <1000 mm-3 (<1.0×106 cells µl-1) in the week of PJP diagnosis. Four patients did not survive; one of these patients did not receive co-trimoxazole due to late diagnosis, one patient had concomitant nosocomial pneumonia and bacteraemia with multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter species, and two patients had concomitant aspergillosis. Conclusion. In summary, invasive fungal infections such as PJP should be considered as a complication in COVID-19 patients, with prompt evaluation and management.

2.
PLoS One ; 17(1): e0262608, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35085312

RESUMO

The pharmacological management of COVID-19 has evolved significantly and various immunomodulatory agents have been repurposed. However, the clinical efficacy has been variable and a search for cure for COVID-19 continues. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 916 patients hospitalized with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 between February 2020 and October 2020 at a tertiary care academic medical center in Karachi, Pakistan. The median age was 57 years (interquartile range (IQR) 46-66 years). The most common medications administered were Methylprednisolone (65.83%), Azithromycin (50.66%), and Dexamethasone (46.6%). Majority of the patients (70%) had at least two or more medications used in combination and the most frequent combination was methylprednisolone with azithromycin. Overall in-hospital mortality was 13.65% of patients. Mortality was found to be independently associated with age greater than or equal to 60 years (OR = 4.98; 95%CI: 2.78-8.91), critical illness on admission (OR = 13.75; 95%CI: 7.27-25.99), use of hydrocortisone (OR = 12.56; 95%CI: 6.93-22.7), Ferritin> = 1500(OR = 2.07; 95%CI: 1.18-3.62), Creatinine(OR = 2.33; 95%CI: 1.31-4.14) and D-Dimer> = 1.5 (OR = 2.27; 95%CI: 1.26-4.07). None of the medications whether used as monotherapy or in combination were found to have a mortality benefit. Our study highlights the desperate need for an effective drug for the management of critical COVID-19 which necessitates usage of multiple drug combinations in patients particularly Azithromycin which has long term implications for antibiotic resistance particularly in low-middle income countries.


Assuntos
COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/terapia , Imunomodulação/fisiologia , Idoso , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Humanos , Agentes de Imunomodulação/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paquistão/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Atenção Terciária à Saúde/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Curr Med Mycol ; 8(2): 16-24, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36654789

RESUMO

Background and Purpose: Influenza A and SARS-CoV-2 are risk factors for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Both influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis and COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis result in high mortality and poor clinical outcomes. No prospective study has so far compared the features, treatment, and outcomes of influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis and COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis within a similar time frame. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the frequency, risk factors, and outcomes of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients with influenza, COVID-19, and community-acquired pneumonia. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included adult patients with pneumonia and was conducted at The Aga Khan University Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Patients were divided into three groups, including community-acquired pneumonia, influenza pneumonia, and COVID-19 pneumonia. The data collected included information on demographic characteristics, comorbidities, clinical features, laboratory results, treatment, and outcomes. Results: A total of 140 patients were included in this study. These included 35 (25%), 70 (50%), and 35 (25%) patients with community-acquired pneumonia, influenza pneumonia, and COVID-19 pneumonia, respectively. In addition, 20 (14.2%) patients were found to have invasive aspergillosis, of whom 10/35 (28.5%), 9/70 (12.8%), and 1/35 (2.8%) patients were in the COVID-19, influenza, and community-acquired pneumonia groups, respectively. Moreover, nine (90%) COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis patients required vasopressors, compared to three (33%) patients with influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (P=0.020). In total, seven (70%) COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis patients required invasive mechanical ventilation compared to four (44%) influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis patients (P=0.37). The mean±SD length of hospital stay was highest in the COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis patients (18.3±7.28 days) compared to influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis patients (11.7±5.34 days) (P=0.036). The number of deaths in influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis and COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis patients was three (33.3%) and five (50%), respectively (P=0.526). Conclusion: A higher proportion of patients with COVID-19 developed invasive aspergillosis compared to those with influenza. Although the mortality rate in COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis was comparable to that in influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis patients, COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis patients had a significantly longer stay in the hospital.

4.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 27(10): 1519.e1-1519.e5, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34111581

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare serum ß-D-glucan (BDG) levels in candidaemia with different Candida species, especially C. auris. METHODS: Aga Khan University clinical laboratory database was retrospectively reviewed from January 2015 to December 2019. Blood culture positive cases with any Candida species and concomitant BDG level were included. RESULTS: Among the 192 cases included in our study, 48 were C. albicans, 54 C. auris, eight C. glabrata, 32 C. parapsilosis, 43 C. tropicalis and seven other Candida species. The level of BDG was significantly lower in C. auris (median 62.43, interquartile range (IQR) 12.80-182.94 pg/mL) compared to C. albicans (median 266.83, IQR 66.29-523.43 pg/mL) and C. tropicalis (median 324.41, IQR 105.20-523.44 pg/mL). The sensitivity of serum BDG was significantly lower for C. auris (43.75%, 95% CI 29.5-58.8%) than C. tropicalis (79.07%, 95% CI 64.0-90.0%). DISCUSSION: Serum BDG has lower sensitivity in patients with suspected C. auris candidaemia in our setting. Considering that C. auris has higher morbidity and mortality than other species, a more sensitive test is required.


Assuntos
Candidemia , beta-Glucanas , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Candida , Candida albicans , Candida auris , Candida tropicalis , Candidemia/diagnóstico , Candidemia/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Laboratórios Clínicos , Paquistão , Estudos Retrospectivos , beta-Glucanas/sangue
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA