Encouraging mid-term outcomes for arthroscopic autologous osteochondral transplant (OAT) in capitellum osteochondritis dissecans (OCD).

PURPOSE: The primary outcomes are the evaluation and quantification of pain relief and improvement in range of motion after OAT in OCD. The secondary outcomes are: resuming of sport activities, evaluation of the ADL recovery rate and subjective evaluation of the quality of life improvement. METHODS: Nine patients, affected by an unstable and non-acute OCD lesion of the capitulum humeri, have been treated by the same surgeon. The patient mean age was 22.4 (16-45 years). All subjects were treated with the same surgical technique (arthroscopic OAT from the same side knee, a single cylinder of 6.5-9 mm in diameter) and underwent the same rehabilitation. The mean follow-up was 48 months (30-52 months). The authors documented the clinical assessment of each patient and carried out a questionnaire which included the VAS scale, MEPS Score and Quick DASH score. Patients were asked for MRI and radiographs pre- and post-operatively at follow-up. RESULTS: The mean range of motion improvement was 17.9° in extension (range 13°-27°) and 10.6° in flexion (range 0°-20°) The VAS mean improvement was 7.1 (range 6-8) and the mean post-op value 0.6 (range 0-3). The MEPS score mean post-operative value was 98.3 (range 85-100). The Quick-DASH mean post-operative value was 2.5 (range 0-9.1) with a mean improvement of 41.4 points (range 36.4-47.7 points). All patients resumed sports in 6 months post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS: The autologous transplant of an osteochondral plug is a safe and promising procedure. Despite being more demanding, the arthroscopic approach is a valuable tool if the surgeon aims to reduce the invasiveness of the procedure, with all the consequent advantages. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Retrospective case series, therapeutic study.

Elbow arthroscopy in stiff elbow.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and review the functional outcomes after arthroscopic surgery in post-traumatic and degenerative elbow contractures. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2008, 243 patients with post-traumatic or degenerative elbow stiffness were treated with arthroscopic surgery. A total of 212 patients were reviewed at an average of 58 months follow-up (SD ± 17.3). The patients were divided into two groups: group A with post-traumatic stiffness, and group B with degenerative stiffness. Arthroscopic procedures performed included: synovectomy, debridement of osteophytes, removal of loose bodies, anterior and posterior capsulectomy, radial head excision. Ulnar nerve neurolysis was usually performed. The following data were recorded and analysed: sex, age, paraesthesia, previous surgical treatment and complications. Patient outcome was assessed pre- and post-operatively by a visual analogue scale and by the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI), which assesses pain, ROM, stability and function. RESULTS: The total average ROM improved by 33° in group A and 20° in Group B. The MEPI improved from 60 to 81 in group A, and from 65 to 91 in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic surgery in post-traumatic and degenerative elbow contractures can be considered a safe, useful, with a long learning curve procedure that offers important improvement of the ROM decreasing surgical morbidity.

Preliminary clinical experience with hyaluronan anti-adhesion gel in arthroscopic arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness.

BACKGROUND: Loss of motion of the elbow joint is a common finding after elbow trauma. It has been shown that arthroscopic treatment leads to excellent restoration of elbow motion, although it is still a demanding procedure. The aim of our cohort study was to assess clinical outcomes following treatment of posttraumatic elbow stiffness using arthroscopic arthrolysis with or without the associated use of a hyaluronan anti-adhesion gel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 36 consecutive patients undergoing elbow arthroscopic arthrolysis were enrolled: 17 patients in the hyaluronan gel group and 19 in the control group. The patients underwent prospective control visits 30 and 75 days after surgery. Functional outcome was measured by the range of motion and the Liverpool elbow score (LES), whereas pain and quality of life were evaluated using the visual analogue scale and the SF-36 questionnaire, respectively. RESULTS: The range of motion and the overall LES score increased over time in both groups. The mean increase over time was statistically significant (p < 0.001) in both groups and there was no difference between the groups. There was also no interaction between time and treatment. The percentage of patients who reported pain decreased significantly over time (p = 0.0419) in the hyaluronan-treated group (suggesting limited contractions and better comfort during rehabilitation), but not in the control group. The intensity of pain decreased significantly over time in both groups (p < 0.0001) without any significant difference between the groups. All the changes in patient quality of life as measured by the SF-36 questionnaire were similar for the two groups of patients. No adverse event or complication related to the application of hyaluronan gel occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary clinical experience showed promising results upon the use of hyaluronan gel, considering that it significantly reduced pain in the short term, facilitating a more comfortable rehabilitation. These findings should be confirmed by larger studies.