Clinical outcomes and predictors of bleomycin polidocanol foam sclerotherapy treatment response in venous malformations.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bleomycin polidocanol foam (BPF) sclerotherapy for venous malformations (VMs) and analyze the associated clinical outcomes and predictors. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed BPF sclerotherapy outcomes in 138 patients with VMs. We analyzed pain levels, lesion volume reduction, and subjective perception of response. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential predictors of treatment outcome. Additionally, we carefully monitored and recorded complications. RESULTS: There was a notable average reduction in lesion volume by 78.50% ± 15.71%. The pain numerical rating scale (NRS) score decreased from 4.17 ± 2.63 prior to treatment to 1.05 ± 1.54 afterward, and 70.3% of the patients experienced effective relief after a single BPF treatment. Multivariate analysis revealed that a high baseline NRS (odds ratio [OR]: 4.026) and elevated activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT, OR: 1.200) were positive predictors of pain reduction. Additionally, a high baseline NRS score (OR: 1.992) and elevated thrombocytocrit (PCT, OR: 2.543) were positive predictors of incomplete postoperative pain relief. Minor complications occurred in 31 (22.46%) patients. CONCLUSION: BPF sclerotherapy is safe and effective for VMs, resulting in significant reduction in lesion volume, improved symptoms, and minimal complications. APTT and PCT levels are important predictors of pain outcomes following BPF treatment.

Comparison of bleomycin polidocanol foam vs electrochemotherapy combined with polidocanol foam for treatment of venous malformations.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the difference in safety and efficacy between two treatments for venous malformations (VMs), electrochemotherapy combined with polidocanol foam (ECP) and bleomycin polidocanol foam (BPF), providing alternative therapies for VMs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 152 patients with VMs treated with ECP and BPF. Pre- and post-treatment magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were collected, and clinical follow-up assessments were performed. Imaging results were used to calculate lesion volume changes. Clinical outcomes included changes in pain and improvements in perceived swelling. Patients were followed up at 1 week and 6 months after surgery. All emerging complications were documented in detail. RESULTS: Of the 152 patients, 87 (57.2%) received BPF treatment, and 65 (42.8%) received ECP treatment. The most common location of VMs was the lower extremities (92/152; 60.2%), and the most common symptom was pain (108/152; 71.1%). Forty-three patients had previously undergone therapy in the BPF group (43/87; 49.4%), whereas 30 patients had received prior treatment in the ECP group (30/65; 46.2%). The study found that the percentage of lesion volume reduction in the BPF group was not significantly different from that in the ECP group (75.00% ± 17.85% vs 74.69% ± 8.48%; P = .899). ECP was more effective when the initial lesion volume was greater than 30 mL (67.66% ± 12.34% vs 73.47% ± 8.00%; P = .048). Patients treated with BPF had significantly less posttreatment pain than those treated with ECP, in different baseline lesion size. In the overall sample, pain relief was significantly higher in the BPF group than in the ECP group (4.21 ± 1.19 vs 3.57 ± 0.76; P = .002). However, there was no difference in pain relief between the two groups for the treatment of initially large VMs (4.20 ± 0.94 vs 3.70 ± 0.87; P = .113). The ECP group was significantly more likely to develop hyperpigmentation (5/87; 5.75% vs 11/65; 16.92%; P = .026) and swelling (9/87; 10.34% vs 16/65; 24.62%; P = .019) 1 week after surgery than the BPF group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that both BPF and ECP are effective treatments for VMs, with BPF being a safer option. ECP is a better choice for patients with the initial lesion volume greater than 30 mL, but it is more likely to lead to early swelling and hyperpigmentation.

Comparison of polidocanol foam versus bleomycin polidocanol foam for treatment of venous malformations.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research was to retrospectively investigate the difference of safety and efficacy between polidocanol foam and bleomycin polidocanol foam (BPF) in the treatment of venous malformations (VMs), and provide clinical evidence for the application of BPF for VMs. METHODS: Patients with VMs treated with polidocanol foam and BPF were included between July 2018 and July 2020. The VM tissue involvements and symptoms were collected. The treatment outcomes were evaluated by the clinical improvement of symptoms and the degree of devascularization on ultrasound examination or magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were followed up for 1, 3, and 6 months after the sclerotherapy. Immediate and delayed complications were closely followed and recorded. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were included, including 34 females and 17 males with a mean age of 26.8 years (range, 5-65 years). The most commonly involved sites were lower extremities (31/60 [51.7%]) and the most common symptom was pain (33/51 [64.7%]). Fifty-four sclerotherapies were performed with a mean of 1.06 ± 0.24 sessions (range, 1-2 sessions) per patient. The reduction percentage of lesion volume in the BPF group was significantly higher than the polidocanol foam group (79.4 ± 1.6% vs 55.7 ± 6.1%; P < .001). Patient satisfaction scores in the BPF group were significantly higher than the polidocanol foam group (7.2 ± 1.1 vs 5.7 ± 0.8; P < .001). No major complication was observed in either group. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) grade 1 complications occurred in 5 of 21 patients in the BPF group and 7 of 30 patients in the polidocanol foam group, CIRSE grade 2 complications occurred in 5 of 21 patients in the BPF group and 4 of 30 patients in the polidocanol foam group; there were no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: BPF is a safe and effective sclerosant for VMs, showing better efficacy and similar safety as commonly used mild sclerosants. It could be a promising agent to treat VMs or other slow-flow vascular malformations.

Major Limb Amputation in Parkes-Weber Syndrome With Refractory Ulceration: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Parkes-Weber syndrome (PWS) is a rare congenital vascular syndrome consisting of capillary, venous, lymphatic, and arteriovenous malformation. There are many complications of PWS, such as ulceration, bleeding, infection, and cardiac failure. Among them, skin ulceration is one of the thorniest problems in PWS, requiring multidisciplinary approaches for the management. In this article, we presented the case of an elderly patient with refractory ulceration who received numerous treatments with no effect and finally underwent a major amputation to improve the quality of life. Moreover, we reviewed 23 previously reported cases to improve our understanding of the management for PWS patients with ulceration.

Histopathological analysis of incompetent great saphenous veins after mechanochemical ablation treatment - An ex-vivo experiment.

BACKGROUND: The endovascular technique of mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) has become popular in treating patients with saphenous reflux. We reported the histopathological findings in human ex-vivo incompetent great saphenous veins following treatment with saline, polidocanol, mechanical ablation and MOCA using ClariVein device. METHODS: Twenty-four vein GSV specimens were obtained via traditional surgery and treated with four methods: Group A: 0.9% normal saline (NS); Group B: 3% polidocanol; Group C: mechanical ablation + 0.9% NS; Group D: mechanical ablation + 3% polidocanol (MOCA). Hematoxylin and eosin (HE), Masson's trichrome and immunohistochemical staining were performed on each specimen and integrated optical densities were measured with vWF and a-SMA stains and statistically evaluated. vWF staining was used to assess endothelial damage and a a-SMA staining was used to assess media injury. RESULTS: HE and Masson's trichrome staining of Groups C and D revealed severe damage to the endothelium and media compared to Groups A and B. The statistical result of vWF staining showed the damage of endothelium was significantly increased by Group D compared to Groups A, B and C. The statistical result of a-SMA staining showed the damage of media was significantly increased by Groups C and D compared to Groups A and B. CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism of MOCA was caused by both endothelium damage and media tearing. The damage of endothelium was significantly increased by MOCA when compared with mechanical ablation alone.

Hybrid and Endovascular Treatment of Pulmonary Sequestration: Two Case Reports and Literature Review.

Pulmonary sequestration is an uncommon congenital pulmonary anomaly associated with aberrant systemic arteries which usually originate from the thoracic aorta or abdominal aorta. Traditionally, surgical resection and ligation of the feeding vessels are the gold standard treatments of the disease. Endovascular intervention and hybrid operation are promising treatment options. However, the case reports with endovascular and hybrid treatment are sparse to our knowledge. We presented 2 symptomatic adult patients with pulmonary sequestration successfully treated by hybrid operation and transcatheter embolization, respectively. Besides, we reviewed 37 previously reported cases of pulmonary sequestration treated by endovascular or hybrid treatment.