Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy-A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Available data on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and pregnancy outcomes mostly refer to women contracting the infection during advanced pregnancy or close to delivery. There is limited information on the association between SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy and outcomes thereof. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We aimed to systematically review the maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy, defined as <20 weeks of gestation (PROSPERO Registration 2020 CRD42020177673). Searches were carried out in PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus databases from January 2020 until April 2023 and the WHO database of publications on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from December 2019 to April 2023. Cohort and case-control studies on COVID-19 occurring in early pregnancy that reported data on maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes were included. Case reports and studies reporting only exposure to SARS-CoV-2 or not stratifying outcomes based on gestational age were excluded. Data were extracted in duplicate. Meta-analyses were conducted when appropriate, using R meta (R version 4.0.5). RESULTS: A total of 18 studies, 12 retrospective and six prospective, were included in this review, reporting on 10 147 SARS-CoV-2-positive women infected in early pregnancy, 9533 neonates, and 180 882 SARS-CoV-2 negative women. The studies had low to moderate risk of bias according to the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment Scale. The studies showed significant clinical and methodological heterogeneity. A meta-analysis could be performed only on the outcome miscarriage rate, with a pooled random effect odds ratio of 1.44 (95% confidence interval 0.96-2.18), showing no statistical difference in miscarriage in SARS-CoV-2-infected women. Individual studies reported increased incidences of stillbirth, low birthweight and preterm birth among neonates born to mothers affected by COVID-19 in early pregnancy; however, these results were not consistent among all studies. CONCLUSIONS: In this comprehensive systematic review of available evidence, we identified no statistically significant adverse association between SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy (before 20 weeks of gestation) and fetal, neonatal, or maternal outcomes. However, a 44% increase in miscarriage rate is concerning and further studies of larger sample size are needed to confirm or refute our findings.

The Late Effects of Cancer Treatment on Female Fertility and the Current Status of Fertility Preservation-A Narrative Review.

Fertility counseling should be offered to all individuals of young reproductive age early in the patient's trajectory following a cancer diagnosis. Systemic cancer treatment and radiotherapy often have an inherent gonadotoxic effect with the potential to induce permanent infertility and premature ovarian failure. For the best chances to preserve a patient's fertility potential and to improve future quality of life, fertility preservation methods should be applied before cancer treatment initiation, thus multidisciplinary team-work and timely referral to reproductive medicine centers specialized in fertility preservation is recommended. We aim to review the current clinical possibilities for fertility preservation and summarize how infertility, as a late effect of gonadotoxic treatment, affects the growing population of young female cancer survivors.

Trends and outcomes of fertility preservation for girls, adolescents and young adults with Turner syndrome: A prospective cohort study.

Background: In Scandinavian countries, programs for fertility preservation (FP) are offered free of charge at tertiary-care university hospitals to all patients facing infertility risks due to malignant diagnoses or benign conditions. In this prospective study we aimed to investigate trends and outcomes of FP indicated by a diagnosis of Turner syndrome. Methods: Prospective cohort study of patients with Turner karyotype receiving fertility preservation counselling at the Karolinska University Hospital between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2021. Results: The cohort included 100 women and girls that received counselling, whereof 27% were prepubertal girls, 59% were adolescents and 14% of adult age. Before 2006 all patients were referred for fertility counselling at the time of Turner diagnosis. Based on updated guidelines, mainly patients who showed signs of puberty were referred after 2006. As a result, spontaneous menarche was more common in the later period. In total, 39% of the cohort had monosomal karyotype (45X), 20% had 45X/46XX or 45X/47XXX mosaicisms and 36% had an X-chromosomal structural anomaly. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation was planned for 73% of all patients, and oocyte cryopreservation following gonadotropin stimulation was planned for 10% of the patients. Follicles were present in 25% of all biopsies analyzed. Adolescents were more likely to have follicles present (30%) than prepubertal girls (16%) or adult women (17%). The ten patients that underwent gonadotropin stimulation for oocyte cryopreservation underwent a total of 15 cycles and eight patients successfully preserved oocytes. In total, 26% of the cohort has undergone fertility treatment or expressed further interest in fertility preservation. Six women have given birth using donated oocytes and three following spontaneous conception. Two women have undergone re-transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue, without regaining ovarian function, and none of the women that have cryopreserved oocytes has returned to use them. Conclusion: Fertility counselling for girls with Turner syndrome should ideally be offered at onset of spontaneous puberty to improve the chances of fertility preservation. Since the girls and women in this cohort are still young, the return rate and utilization of the preserved tissue and oocytes is expected to increase with time. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NTC04602962.

Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes of Singleton Births Following Single- vs Double-Embryo Transfer in Sweden.

Importance: Pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology are associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes compared with those following natural conception. Previous studies have shown an association of pregnancies resulting from transfer of multiple embryos with these negative findings. Objective: To determine the risk for adverse outcomes in singletons conceived through assisted reproduction using double-embryo transfer (DET) vs single-embryo transfer (SET). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from women who achieved singleton deliveries after SET or DET in Sweden between 2007 and 2017 as recorded in the National Quality Registry for Assisted Reproduction. All embryo transfers, at cleavage or blastocyst stage, replaced in fresh or frozen treatment cycles were included. Data on obstetric and neonatal outcomes were retrieved by linkage to the National Medical Birth Register. Naturally conceived singletons were included as a reference group. Data were analyzed between September 2021 and August 2022. Exposures: Double-embryo transfer leading to singleton birth. Main Outcomes and Measures: Relative risk ratios or odds ratios (ORs) and absolute risk differences (ARDs) in percentage points with 95% CIs were calculated for obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton births conceived using DET vs SET. Results: Among 1 115 863 singleton births, 30 713 singletons were born after SET and 5123 after DET. A higher risk of neonatal death was found in singletons after DET vs SET (OR, 2.67 [95% CI, 1.28-5.55]; ARD, 0.2 percentage points [95% CI, 0.0-0.4 percentage points]). In frozen embryo transfers, DET was associated with a higher risk of low birth weight (OR, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.19-2.25]; ARD, 2.0 percentage points [95% CI, 0.5-3.5 percentage points]). Among blastocyst transfers, DET was associated with very preterm birth (relative risk ratio, 2.64 [95% CI, 1.50-4.63]; ARD, 1.8 percentage points [95% CI, 0.3-3.4 percentage points]) and low birth weight (OR, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.29-2.60]; ARD, 3.2 percentage points [95% CI, 0.9-5.5 percentage points]). Conclusions and Relevance: These results indicate a higher risk of adverse outcomes following DET, even when the result is a singleton birth, vs singletons born after SET. Adverse outcomes were mainly observed in singletons following DET using frozen embryos and blastocysts.

Live birth and pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection in women with previous unilateral oophorectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effect of unilateral oophorectomy (UO) on the rates of live birth and pregnancy in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Search of databases of published articles. PATIENT(S): The final analytical cohort encompassed 1,057 IVF/ICSI cycles in women with previous UO and 45,813 IVF/ICSI cycles in control women. Eighteen studies were identified by database searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and cited references. The review encompassed studies published up to June 1, 2021. INTERVENTION(S): UO prior to IVF/ICSI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcomes were the rates of live birth and pregnancy following IVF/ICSI. The secondary outcomes included the amount of gonadotropins administered for ovarian stimulation and the number of retrieved oocytes. RESULT(S): The studies were rated from medium to high quality (from 5 to 8) according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. All studies were observational, with inherent bias, and heterogeneity was high. The primary outcome of live birth had a significantly lower odds ratio (OR) in women with previous UO compared with controls (OR = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57 to 0.91, z = -2.72). The OR for pregnancy rate per initiated treatment cycle was also significantly lower in women with previous UO compared with controls (OR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.86, z = -3.35). Additionally, the dose of administered gonadotropins was significantly higher and the number of retrieved oocytes was significantly lower in women with UO. CONCLUSION(S): The meta-analysis showed a significant detrimental effect of UO on the rates of live birth and pregnancy. The analysis further supports previous data showing a decreased sensitivity to gonadotropins and a lower number of recovered oocytes in women with previous UO. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO 2020, CRD42020160313.