Neuronal Toll-like receptor 4 signaling induces brain endothelial activation and neutrophil transmigration in vitro.

BACKGROUND: The innate immune response in the brain is initiated by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPS) or danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPS) produced in response to central nervous system (CNS) infection or injury. These molecules activate members of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family, of which TLR4 is the receptor for bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Although neurons have been reported to express TLR4, the function of TLR4 activation in neurons remains unknown. METHODS: TLR4 mRNA expression in primary mouse glial and neuronal cultures was assessed by RT-PCR. Mouse mixed glial, neuronal or endothelial cell cultures were treated with LPS in the absence or the presence of a TLR4 specific antagonist (VIPER) or a specific JNK inhibitor (SP600125). Expression of inflammatory mediators was assayed by cytometric bead array (CBA) and ELISA. Activation of extracellular-signal regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), p38, c-Jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK) and c-Jun was assessed by Western blot. The effect of conditioned media of untreated- versus LPS-treated glial or neuronal cultures on endothelial activation was assessed by neutrophil transmigration assay, and immunocytochemistry and ELISA were used to measure expression of intercellular cell adhesion molecule (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM-1). RESULTS: LPS induces strong release of the chemokines RANTES and CXCL1 (KC), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) and IL-6 in primary mouse neuronal cultures. In contrast, LPS induced release of IL-1α, IL-1ß and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in mixed glial, but not in neuronal cultures. LPS-induced neuronal KC expression and release were completely blocked by VIPER. In glial cultures, LPS induced activation of ERK1/2, p38 and JNK. In contrast, in neuronal cultures, LPS activated JNK but not ERK1/2 or p38, and the specific JNK inhibitor SP600125 significantly blocked LPS-induced KC expression and release. Finally, conditioned medium of LPS-treated neuronal cultures induced strong expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 on endothelial cells, and induced infiltration of neutrophils across the endothelial monolayer, which was inhibited by VIPER. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate for the first time that neurons can play a role as key sensors of infection to initiate CNS inflammation.

The cannabinoid agonist WIN 55,212-2 inhibits TNF-alpha-induced neutrophil transmigration across ECV304 cells.

Cannabinoids are known to possess both anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects. In the present study, we have investigated the ability of cannabinoids to inhibit the transmigration of neutrophils in response to chemotaxic stimuli. The cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 ((R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)-pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenylmethanone mesylate) significantly decreased the number of migrating neutrophils across a monolayer of tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) activated ECV304 cells at concentrations >or=1 microM. In contrast, the agonists HU210 and CP 55,940 (0.01-1 microM) and the endocannabinoid anandamide (0.1-10 microM) were without significant effect on the response to TNF-alpha. The ability of WIN 55,212-2 to reduce the neutrophil transmigration was still seen in the presence of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist/inverse agonist AM251 (0.1-1 microM) and the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor antagonist/inverse agonist AM630 (0.1-1 microM). TNF-alpha treatment of ECV304 cells caused release of interleukin-8 (IL-8), but WIN 55,212-2 did not affect either the ability of neutrophils to migrate across chemotaxis plates in response to an IL-8 stimulus, or to change the percentage of CXC 1 and CXC 2 receptors expressed by the neutrophils. WIN 55,212-2 at a concentration of 1 microM, but not at lower concentrations, produced a significant inhibition of IL-8 release from ECV304 cells in response to TNF-alpha-stimulation. Thus WIN 55,212-2 reduces the transmigration of neutrophils across a monolayer of TNF-alpha-activated ECV304 cells by an indirect action upon the release of IL-8 and/or other chemokine release from the ECV304 cells, and that this effect is brought about mainly by a cannabinoid CB receptor-independent mechanism.

The endocannabinoid signaling system: pharmacological and therapeutic aspects.

Since the discovery of anandamide in 1992, our knowledge of the endocannabinoid system and its physiological effects has increased greatly, not the least as a result of the availability of compounds affecting endocannabinoid function. In the present review, the pharmacology of the endocannabinoid system is discussed. At present, there are no compounds selectively inhibiting the synthesis of anandamide, and the mechanisms by which anandamide release and reuptake are blocked are a matter for current debate. In contrast, selective agonists and inverse agonists at the CB1 and CB2 receptors have been well characterised, as have inhibitors of the metabolism of anandamide by fatty acid amide hydrolase. Accumulating evidence has suggested that such compounds may be useful for the treatment of a number of disorders. With respect to the treatment of pain, topical CB1 agonists and CB2 agonists may prove therapeutically useful, and there is evidence that the non-steroidal inflammatory agent indomethacin produces effects secondary to activation of the endocannabinoid system. Modulation of the endocannabionid system may also produce neuroprotective effects, although present data would suggest that the observed effects are highly dependent upon the nature of the neurotoxic insult.

Cannabinoid CB1 receptor activation does not prevent the toxicity of glutamate towards embryonic chick telencephalon primary cultures.

Cannabinoids, as a result of their ability to activate cannabinoid CB1 receptors, have been shown to possess neuroprotective properties in vivo. In vitro studies into neuroprotective effects mediated by CB1 receptors have in general used primary neuronal cultures derived from embryonic rodents. In the present study, we have investigated whether embryonic chick telencephalon primary cultures in serum-free medium are a useful alternative for such in vitro studies. The CB agonist CP 55940 reduced the cAMP response to 5 microM forskolin by 40 and 50% at concentrations of 3 nM and 30 nM, respectively. This reduction was blocked by the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251, indicating the presence of functional CB1 receptors in the cultures. Incubation of the cultures with glutamate (100 microM or 1 mM) for 1 h followed by medium change and incubation for 24 h produced a release of the cytoplasmic enzyme lactate dehydrogenase into the medium. This release was prevented by MK-801 confirming the central role of NMDA receptors in the glutamate toxicity. However, 3-30 nM CP 55940 did not produce any neuroprotection in this model regardless as to whether dibutyryl cyclic AMP was added to the culture medium. The endocannabinoid anandamide was also without effect when added either per se or together with the related N-acyl ethanolamines palmitoylethanolamide, oleoylethanolamide and stearoylethanolamide (at relative concentrations matching those seen in rat brain after excitotoxic insult). It is concluded that embryonic chick neurons in primary serum-free culture are not a useful model for the study of neuroprotective effects mediated by CB1 receptors in vitro.