Parameter Estimation and Reporting in Noncompartmental Analysis of Clinical Pharmacokinetic Data.

The noncompartmental analysis (NCA) of pharmacokinetic (PK) data is important throughout all phases of clinical drug development. Although there are numerous regulatory guidances and articles in the literature concerned with best practices for the modeling of PK data, there are relatively few sources of information on how to conduct a high-quality NCA. This article provides a systematic review of issues related to the estimation of plasma and urine PK parameters with the intent of encouraging rigor in the performance of NCAs so as to provide reliable and informative analysis results.

Criteria for reporting noncompartmental estimates of half-life and area under the curve extrapolated to infinity.

Various criteria have been proposed for determining the reliability of noncompartmental pharmacokinetic estimates of the terminal disposition phase half-life (t1/2 ) and the extrapolated area under the curve (AUCextrap ). This simulation study assessed the performance of two frequently used reportability rules: the terminal disposition phase regression adjusted-r2 classification rule and the regression data point time span classification rule. Using simulated data, these rules were assessed in relation to the magnitude of the variability in the terminal disposition phase slope, the length of the terminal disposition phase captured in the concentration-time profile (data span), the number of data points present in the terminal disposition phase, and the type and level of variability in concentration measurement. The accuracy of estimating t1/2 was satisfactory for data spans of 1.5 and longer, given low measurement variability; and for spans of 2.5 and longer, given high measurement variability. Satisfactory accuracy in estimating AUCextrap was only achieved with low measurement variability and spans of 2.5 and longer. Neither of the classification rules improved the identification of accurate t1/2 and AUCextrap estimates. Based on the findings of this study, a strategy is proposed for determining the reportability of estimates of t1/2 and area under the curve extrapolated to infinity.

Performance characteristics of the adjusted r2 algorithm for determining the start of the terminal disposition phase and comparison with a simple r2 algorithm and a visual inspection method.

The adjusted r2 algorithm is a popular automated method for selecting the start time of the terminal disposition phase (tz ) when conducting a noncompartmental pharmacokinetic data analysis. Using simulated data, the performance of the algorithm was assessed in relation to the ratio of the slopes of the preterminal and terminal disposition phases, the point of intercept of the terminal disposition phase with the preterminal disposition phase, the length of the terminal disposition phase captured in the concentration-time profile, the number of data points present in the terminal disposition phase, and the level of variability in concentration measurement. The adjusted r2 algorithm was unable to identify tz accurately when there were more than three data points present in a profile's terminal disposition phase. The terminal disposition phase rate constant (λz ) calculated based on the value of tz selected by the algorithm had a positive bias in all simulation data conditions. Tolerable levels of bias (median bias less than 5%) were achieved under conditions of low measurement variability. When measurement variability was high, tolerable levels of bias were attained only when the terminal phase time span was 4 multiples of t1/2 or longer. A comparison of the performance of the adjusted r2 algorithm, a simple r2 algorithm, and tz selection by visual inspection was conducted using a subset of the simulation data. In the comparison, the simple r2 algorithm performed as well as the adjusted r2 algorithm and the visual inspection method outperformed both algorithms. Recommendations concerning the use of the various tz selection methods are presented.

Tremelimumab (CP-675,206), a cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4 blocking monoclonal antibody in clinical development for patients with cancer.

Tremelimumab (CP-675,206) is a fully human monoclonal antibody specific for human cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4, CD152) in clinical development for patients with cancer. Blocking the CTLA-4 negative costimulatory receptor with the antagonistic antibody tremelimumab results in immune activation. Administration of tremelimumab to patients with locally advanced and metastatic melanoma has resulted in a subset of patients with durable objective tumor regressions. Its IgG(2) isotype minimizes the possibility of cytotoxic effects on activated T lymphocytes and cytokine release syndrome. Preclinical testing in vitro and in large animal models predicted the target concentrations of circulating antibody in humans necessary for a pharmacodynamic effect. Phase I clinical trials provided evidence of dose- or exposure-related effects consistent with the anticipated mechanism of action. Further clinical development has led to two ongoing registration trials in patients with metastatic melanoma: a phase III randomized trial of tremelimumab versus dacarbazine or temozolomide in previously untreated patients with advanced melanoma and a phase II trial of tremelimumab in previously treated patients with advanced melanoma.

A phase I open label study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor CP-609,754 in patients with advanced malignant tumors.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this phase I clinical trial was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and toxicity of CP-609,754 in patients with solid tumors refractory to standard therapies, to determine the cellular effects of CP-609,754 on its molecular target (farnesyltransferase), and to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of this agent. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Consenting patients with adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function were enrolled with an accelerated dose strategy with single-patient parallel cohorts in whom the drug was given orally either once or twice daily. Once a dose-limiting toxicity was encountered or two patients developed Common Toxicity Criteria > or = grade 2 toxicities, a modified Fibonacci sequence was initiated. Blood samples were collected during cycle 1 for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses. RESULTS: A total of 68 cycles of CP-609,754 was administered to 21 patients enrolled in this study. The dose escalation was from 20 mg once daily to 640 mg twice per day, and at the highest dose level, one of six patients developed a dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 neuropathy. The drug was otherwise well tolerated, and the maximum-tolerated dose was not reached because of the large number of tablets that would have been required for additional dose escalation. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed a proportional increase in exposure with dose, rapid oral absorption, and a half-life of approximately 3 hours. Pharmacodynamic results predict a 95% maximal inhibition of peripheral blood mononuclear cell farnesyltransferase activity 2 hours postdose, on average, with a dose of 400 mg twice per day of CP-609,754. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the safety findings and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses, the RP2D of CP-609,754 is > or =640 mg twice per day.

A phase I and pharmacologic study of pyrazoloacridine and cisplatin in patients with advanced cancer.

Pyrazoloacridine (PZA, NSC366140, PD115934) is an acridine derivative currently undergoing clinical evaluation. In preclinical testing, PZA has shown selectivity for solid tumor cell lines, activity in hypoxic, noncycling, and multidrug-resistant cell lines, and synergy with cisplatin in a variety of lung cancer cell lines. In early phase I clinical studies PZA has shown modest activity in ovarian, cervical, and colon cancer. The purpose of the present study was threefold: to determine the maximally tolerated doses of the combination of PZA (3-h infusion) and cisplatin administered with and without Filgrastim (G-CSF) (Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) every 3 weeks in untreated or minimally pretreated patients, to describe and quantify the clinical toxicities of combination chemotherapy with PZA and cisplatin, and to evaluate the effects of drug sequencing on the toxicity profile and pharmacologic behavior of PZA. The starting doses in this dose-escalation trial were PZA 400 mg/m2 as a 3-h intravenous infusion and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 as a 1 mg/min intravenous infusion. The sequence of drugs was alternated with each successive course in each patient treated. Twenty-one patients with refractory solid tumors received 43 courses of therapy through four dose levels. Neutropenia was dose-limiting and defined the maximum tolerated dose of PZA 400 mg/m2 and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 without G-CSF support. With G-CSF support, nausea and vomiting were dose-limiting. The maximum tolerated and recommended doses for further study of this combination are PZA 600 mg/m2 over 3 h and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 followed by G-CSF support. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that sequence does not impact on the pharmacokinetics of PZA when given in combination with cisplatin.

A lupus-like syndrome develops in mice lacking the Ro 60-kDa protein, a major lupus autoantigen.

Antibodies against a conserved RNA-binding protein, the Ro 60-kDa autoantigen, occur in 24-60% of all patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Anti-Ro antibodies are correlated with photosensitivity and cutaneous lesions in these patients and with neonatal lupus, a syndrome in which mothers with anti-Ro antibodies give birth to children with complete congenital heart block and photosensitive skin lesions. In higher eukaryotes, the Ro protein binds small RNAs of unknown function known as Y RNAs. Because the Ro protein also binds misfolded 5S rRNA precursors, it is proposed to function in a quality-control pathway for ribosome biogenesis. Consistent with a role in the recognition or repair of intracellular damage, an orthologue of Ro in the radiation-resistant eubacterium Deinococcus radiodurans contributes to survival of this bacterium after UV irradiation. Here, we show that mice lacking the Ro protein develop an autoimmune syndrome characterized by anti-ribosome antibodies, anti-chromatin antibodies, and glomerulonephritis. Moreover, in one strain background, Ro-/- mice display increased sensitivity to irradiation with UV light. Thus, one function of this major human autoantigen may be to protect against autoantibody development, possibly by sequestering defective ribonucleoproteins from immune surveillance. Furthermore, the finding that mice lacking the Ro protein are photosensitive suggests that loss of Ro function could contribute to the photosensitivity associated with anti-Ro antibodies in humans.