Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Crit Care Med ; 40(10): 2754-9, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22824939

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown that implementation of the Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing standard of dedicated intensivists providing 24-hr intensive care unit coverage reduces length of stay and in-hospital mortality. A theoretical model of the cost-effectiveness of intensive care unit physician staffing patterns has also been published, but no study has examined the actual cost vs. cost savings of such a program. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether improved outcomes in specific quality measures would result in an overall cost savings in patient care DESIGN: Retrospective, 1 yr before-after cohort study SETTING: A 15-bed mixed medical-surgical community intensive care unit PATIENTS: A total of 2,181 patients: 1,113 patients preimplementation and 1,068 patients postimplementation. INTERVENTION: Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing standard MEASUREMENTS: Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, rates for ventilator-associated pneumonia and central venous access device infection, and cost of care. RESULTS: Following institution of the intensive care unit physician staffing, the mean intensive care unit length of stay decreased significantly from 3.5±8.9 days to 2.7±4.7 days, (p<.002). The frequency of ventilator-associated pneumonia fell from 8.1% to 1.3% (p<.0002) after intervention. Ventilator-associated pneumonia rate per 100 ventilator days decreased from 1.03 to 0.38 (p<.0002). After intervention, the frequency of the central venous access device infection events fell from 9.4% to 1.1% (p<.0002). Central venous access device infection rate per 1000 line days decreased from 8.49 to 1.69. The net savings for the hospital were $744,001. The 1-yr institutional return on investment from intensive care unit physician staffing was 105%. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing standard significantly reduced intensive care unit length of stay and lowered the prevalence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and central venous access device infection. A cost analysis yielded a 1-yr institutional return on investment of 105%. Our study confirms that implementation of the Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing model in the community hospital setting improves quality measures and is economically feasible.


Assuntos
Redução de Custos/métodos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal/organização & administração , Médicos/organização & administração , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/economia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Hospitais com 300 a 499 Leitos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais Comunitários/organização & administração , Hospitais de Ensino/organização & administração , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/economia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/prevenção & controle , Melhoria de Qualidade/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA