A Survey of the Regulatory Requirements for the Acceptance of Foreign Comparator Products by Participating Regulators and Organizations of the International Generic Drug Regulators Programme.

The acceptance of foreign comparator products is the most limiting factor for the development and regulatory assessment of generic medicines marketed globally. Bioequivalence studies have to be repeated with the local comparator products of each jurisdiction because it is unknown if the comparators of the different countries are the same product, with the consequent duplication of efforts by regulators and industry alike. The regulatory requirements on the acceptability of foreign comparator products of oral dosage forms differ between countries participating in the Bioequivalence Working Group for Generics of the International Pharmaceutical Regulators Programme. Brazil, Colombia, the European Union member States, Japan, Mexico, South Korea and the United States only accept bioequivalence studies with their local comparator. In contrast, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Singapore, South Africa, Switzerland and Taiwan accept studies with foreign comparators under certain conditions. Canada limits its use to highly soluble drugs with a wide therapeutic range in immediate release products. Australia requires a comparison of the quantitative composition. In contrast, there are fewer restrictions on the acceptance of foreign comparators in New Zealand, Singapore, South Africa, Switzerland and Taiwan. For the WHO Prequalification of Medicines and for developing generics of the essential medicines the WHO lists comparators from different countries. In conclusion, there is currently no consensus amongst regulators on the acceptability of foreign comparator products.

The Requirements for Additional Strength Biowaivers for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms in International Pharmaceutical Regulators Programme Participating Regulators and Organisations: Differences and Commonalities.

In relation to the registration of generic products, waivers of in vivo bioequivalence studies (biowaivers) are considered in three main cases: certain dosage forms for which bioequivalence is self-evident (e.g. intravenous solutions), biowaivers based on the Biopharmaceutics Classification System and biowaivers for additional strengths with respect to the strength for which in vivo bioequivalence has been shown. The objective of this article is to describe the differences and commonalities in biowaivers for additional strengths of immediate release solid oral dosage forms between the participating members of the International Pharmaceutical Regulators Program (IPRP). The requirements are based on five main aspects; the pharmacokinetics of the drug substance, the manufacturing process, the qualitative and quantitative composition of the different strengths, and the comparative dissolution profiles. For the pharmacokinetic aspects, many regulators/agencies have the same requirements. All strengths must be manufactured with the same process, although a few regulators/agencies accept small differences. In relation to the formulation aspects, the data required breaks down into three major approaches based initially on one of those of the EU, the USA or Japan, but there are some differences in these three major approaches with some country specific interpretations. Most regulators/agencies also have the same requirements for the dissolution data, though there are some notable exceptions.

A Survey of the Regulatory Requirements for BCS-Based Biowaivers for Solid Oral Dosage Forms by Participating Regulators and Organisations of the International Generic Drug Regulators Programme.

PURPOSE: The Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) based biowaiver is a scientific model which enables the substitution of in vivo bioequivalence studies with in vitro data as evidence of therapeutic equivalence subject to certain conditions. Despite being based on the same principles, BCS-based biowaivers are interpreted and regulated differently among international regulatory agencies. In this survey, the Bioequivalence Working Group (BEWG) of the International Generic Drug Regulators Programme (IGDRP) compared the criteria for BCS-based biowaivers applied by the participating regulators and organisations. METHODS: Differences and similarities regarding solubility, permeability, dissolution, excipients and fixed-dose combination products, were identified and compared in a detailed survey of each participant's criteria for BCS-based biowaivers. These criteria were determined based upon the participants' respective regulatory guidance documents, policies and practices. RESULTS: This review has, with the exception of two participants who do not accept BCS-based biowaivers, revealed that most IGDRP participants interpret the BCS principles and conditions similarly but notable differences exist in the application of these principles.  Conclusion: Although many similarities exist, this review identifies several opportunities for greater convergence of regulatory requirements amongst the surveyed jurisdictions. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see "For Readers") may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue's contents page.

A phase I escalating single-dose and weekly fixed-dose study of cetuximab pharmacokinetics in Japanese patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Cetuximab is a therapeutic immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody that recognizes the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). This phase I dose-escalation study was designed to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of cetuximab in Japanese patients with EGFR-expressing, advanced, solid tumors and also to look for evidence of antitumor efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were enrolled in the study; 29 with colorectal adenocarcinomas and one with an adenocarcinoma of the lung. Patients received an initial/weekly infusion of cetuximab at dose levels of 100/100 (dose level 1), 250/250 (dose level 2), 400/250 (dose level 3), 500/250 (dose level 4) or 400/250 (dose level 5) mg/m(2), for 7 or more weeks, with an interval between the initial and second infusion of 1 (dose level 5 representing the standard regimen) or 2 weeks (dose levels 1-4 of the non-standard regimens). RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed during the evaluation period. All patients had at least one adverse event (AE). The most common cetuximab-related AEs were skin toxicity (93% of patients), including acneiform dermatitis (83% of patients). Two patients experienced cetuximab-related grade 3 AEs of skin toxicity and diarrhea after DLT evaluation. C (max) and AUC(0-infinity) after the initial infusion showed dose-proportional increases. Mean total body clearance (CL) values decreased with dose at the lower dose levels. At doses of >or=400 mg/m(2), CL values appeared to level off. Mean trough concentrations for dose level 5 were constant from week 4 (day 29) onward. Two patients (8%) achieved partial response (at 100/100 mg/m(2)). The overall disease control rate (partial response + stable disease) was 58%. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrated that cetuximab PK and safety profiles are similar between Japanese and non-Japanese patient populations. It would appear that the standard dose of an initial 2-h infusion of 400 mg/m(2) followed thereafter by weekly 1-h infusions of 250 mg/m(2) for non-Japanese patients is feasible for future clinical studies in Japanese patients.

Changes in blood pressure after administration of hydroxocobalamin: relationship to changes in plasma cobalamins-(III) concentrations in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between blood pressure changes following infusion of antidotal doses of hydroxocobalamin and plasma concentrations of total and free cobalamins-(III). METHODS: Independent groups of healthy volunteers received single intravenous doses of 2.5, 5, 7.5, or 10 g hydroxocobalamin over 7.5 to 30 minutes. RESULTS: In the pharmacokinetic population (n = 41), hydroxocobalamin caused short-lived mean blood pressure increases. Blood pressure increased shortly after initiation of infusion and returned nearly to baseline by 4 hours post-infusion. The time course of blood pressure changes coincided with that of changes in plasma total and free cobalamins-(III). Change in mean arterial pressure (MAP) was strongly correlated with plasma area-under-the-concentration-time curves (AUCs) of total and free cobalamins-(III) during infusion (r > 0.7) but not through 24 hours post-infusion (r < or = 0.36). CONCLUSION: The short-lived increase in mean blood pressure during administration of antidotal doses of hydroxocobalamin is closely linked to initial exposure to total and free cobalamins-(III).

Population pharmacokinetics of cetuximab in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Cetuximab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the epidermal growth factor receptor and is indicated in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The population pharmacokinetics of cetuximab were characterized by nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM V) using a total of 912 concentrations from 143 patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck enrolled in 2 phase I/II studies. Cetuximab pharmacokinetics were best described by a 2-compartment model with Michaelis-Menten-type saturable elimination. Population estimates (between-subject variability, percent coefficient of variation) of the pharmacokinetic parameters were V(max) 4.38 mg/h (15.4%), K(m) 74 mug/mL, central compartment volume V(1) 2.83 L (18.6%), peripheral compartment volume 2.43 L (56.4%), and intercompartmental clearance 0.103 L/h (97.2%). Ideal body weight and white blood cell count were identified as predictors of V(max) and total body weight as a predictor of V(1). Clinical dose adjustments beyond the approved body surface area-based dosing of cetuximab may be warranted in patients with extreme deviations of their actual body weight from ideal body weight. Agreement between simulated and measured concentrations monitored for up to 43 weeks of therapy indicates that cetuximab pharmacokinetic parameters remained constant during prolonged therapy.

Safety of hydroxocobalamin in healthy volunteers in a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

INTRODUCTION: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose study was conducted in healthy volunteers to evaluate the safety of the investigational cyanide antidote hydroxocobalamin. METHODS: Four ascending dosing groups received intravenous doses of 2.5, 5, 7.5 or 10 g hydroxocobalamin over 7.5 to 30 minutes at a constant infusion rate. Volunteers (n = 136) randomized 3:1 to receive hydroxocobalamin or placebo underwent a 4-day in-house observation after infusion on Day 1 and follow-up visits on Days 8, 15, and 28. RESULTS: The most common drug-related adverse events were asymptomatic and self-limiting chromaturia and reddening of the skin, which are attributed to the red color of hydroxocobalamin. Other adverse events included pustular/papular rash, headache, erythema at the injection site, decrease in lymphocyte percentage, nausea, pruritus, chest discomfort, and dysphagia. Hydroxocobalamin was associated with an increase in blood pressure in some volunteers. Blood pressure changes peaked toward the end of hydroxocobalamin infusion and typically returned to baseline levels by 4 hours postinfusion. Maximum mean changes from baseline in systolic blood pressure ranged from 22.6 to 27.0 mmHg across hydroxocobalamin doses compared with 0.2 to 6.7 mmHg in the corresponding placebo groups. Maximum mean change from baseline in diastolic blood pressure ranged from 14.3 to 25.4 mmHg across hydroxocobalamin doses compared with -3.0 to 3.8 mmHg in the corresponding placebo groups. Two allergic reactions that occurred within minutes after start of the 5- and 10-g hydroxocobalamin infusions were successfully managed with dexamethasone and/or dimethindene maleate. CONCLUSION: Timely intervention for acute cyanide poisoning could entail administration of an antidote in the prehospital setting based on a presumptive diagnosis. Results of this placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers corroborate previous studies and French postmarketing experience in cyanide-exposed patients in suggesting that the safety profile of hydroxocobalamin is consistent with prehospital or hospital use.

Pharmacokinetic profile of cetuximab (Erbitux) alone and in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced EGFR-positive adenocarcinoma.

This trial assessed pharmacokinetic interactions between cetuximab and irinotecan. Patients were placed in either in group A (irinotecan 350 mg/m2/3 weeks and 400 mg/m2 cetuximab at week 2 then 250 mg/m2/week) or group B (cetuximab weekly starting week 1 then irinotecan starting week 4). Patient plasma or serum samples from each treatment arm were analysed using HPLC and ELISA. Among 14 patients, compartmental model showed no significant differences in mean plasma AUC at week 1 versus week 4 for irinotecan (44,388 versus 39,800 microg/ml/h) and cetuximab (20,441 versus 23,363 microg/ml/h), respectively. Half-lifes (standard deviations) for irinotecan were 16.02 (+/-8.41) h at week 1 and 13.99 (+/-2.14) h at week 4, and for cetuximab 106 (+/-32) at week 3 and 111 (+/-30) h at week 4. Mean concentration-versus-time profiles either alone or in combination were superimposable for cetuximab and irinotecan. From this study, we conclude that there is no evidence of pharmacokinetic interaction between irinotecan and cetuximab.

Pharmacokinetic properties of combination oxycodone plus racemic ibuprofen: two randomized, open-label, crossover studies in healthy adult volunteers.

BACKGROUND: As part of ongoing studies to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and pharmacokinetic properties of combination oxycodone plus ibuprofen in the treatment of moderate to severe acute pain, 2 pharmacokinetic studies were conducted. OBJECTIVES: The goals of these studies were to compare the pharmacokinetic properties of monotherapy with oxycodone or ibuprofen with those of a tablet formulation of these 2 agents combined (study A), and to determine whether the absorption of the individual agents when given in the combination tablet was affected by the concomitant ingestion of food (study B). METHODS: Study A was a single-center, open-label, randomized, single-dose, 3-period, 3-way, crossover study. Healthy male subjects received oxycodone 5 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg, or a combination tablet containing both, after an overnight fast of > or =8 hours, on study days 1, 8, and 15. Study B was a single-center, open-label, randomized, single-dose, single-crossover study. Healthy volunteers received a tablet containing a combination of oxycodone 5 mg plus ibuprofen 400 mg after either an overnight fast of > or =8 hours or a standardized high-fat breakfast. Both studies included a washout period of > or =7 days between treatments. In both studies, the pharmacokinetic properties (C(max), T(max), t(1/2), AUC(0-4), AUC(0-1), and AUC(0-infinity)) of oxycodone and ibuprofen were derived from plasma drug concentrations. Analysis of variance was used to determine and compare pharmacokinetic properties. RESULTS: Twenty-four healthy, white, male subjects were included in study A (mean age, 26.0 years; mean body weight, 71.3 kg; mean height, 170.0 cm). Study B involved 12 subjects (11 men, 1 woman; mean age, 24.8 years; mean body weight, 77.2 kg; mean height, 181.4 cm). The pharmacokinetic properties of ibuprofen and oxycodone were not statistically different when administered alone or combined. Food intake did not affect the rate of oxycodone absorption (90% Cl of C(max) of fasted state vs fed state, 103-130), or the rate (90% Cl of C(max) of fasted state vs fed state, 72-95) or extent (90% Cl of AUC(0-infinity) of fasted state vs fed state, 88-102) of ibuprofen absorption. The extent of oxycodone absorption was slightly increased when the combination was given with food (90% Cl of AUC(0-infinity) of fasted state vs fed state, 115-127). CONCLUSIONS: The single-dose pharmacokinetic profiles of oxycodone and ibuprofen in these healthy volunteers were similar when these 2 drugs were given as monotherapy or in combination, suggesting bioequivalence. Food intake before administration of a single dose of the combination did not affect ibuprofen absorption but marginally increased the extent, but not the rate, of oxycodone absorption.

Multiple-dose proportionality study of flunisolide hydrofluoroalkane.

The hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulation of the inhaled corticosteroid flunisolide is a modification of the original chlorofluorocarbon formulation. HFA flunisolide substitutes an HFA for a chlorofluorocarbon propellant and uses a built-in spacer in its pressurized metered-dose inhaler. An open-label, randomized, three-way crossover, multiple-dose study evaluated the dose proportionality of three doses of flunisolide HFA. Twenty-one healthy volunteers received the following doses twice daily for 4.5 days: 85, 170, and 340 micrograms. Plasma levels of flunisolide and of the flunisolide metabolite 6 beta-OH flunisolide were measured after single- and multiple-dose administration. After a single dose, dose proportionality was observed across the three dose levels for peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) up to both the time corresponding to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-tau) and the time to infinity (AUC0-infinity). After multiple doses, dose proportionality was observed for both Cmax and AUC at the medium and high doses. Predose plasma levels of flunisolide measured on day 4 were below the limit of detection. The elimination half-life of flunisolide ranged from 0.95 to 1.34 hours. After both single and multiple doses, dose proportionality was observed in dose-adjusted Cmax and AUC0-infinity for the inactive 6 beta-OH metabolite. HFA flunisolide was well tolerated. The lack of accumulation after repeated administration of HFA flunisolide suggests that the systemic exposure of flunisolide is low, which is a safety goal for inhaled corticosteroids.

Single-dose study to compare the pharmacokinetics of HFA flunisolide and CFC flunisolide.

The hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulation of the inhaled corticosteroid flunisolide is a modification of the original chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) formulation. HFA flunisolide replaces CFC with an HFA propellant and uses a built-in spacer in its pressurized metered-dose inhaler. The average HFA flunisolide particle size is 1.2 microm compared with 3.8 microm for the CFC formulation. The smaller particle size improves lung targeting, allowing a reduction in the HFA flunisolide dose relative to CFC flunisolide while maintaining comparable efficacy. In a study of 12 healthy men, pharmacokinetic parameters were determined after single doses of 1000 microg CFC flunisolide delivered without a spacer, 340 microg HFA flunisolide delivered through a spacer, and 516 microg HFA flunisolide delivered without a spacer. A standard noncompartmental analysis of the concentration data was performed and mean (+/- S.D.) pharmacokinetic values were reported. Peak plasma concentrations (observed C(max)) were similar for the three treatments. Area under the curve up to the time corresponding to the last measurable concentration (AUC(0)(-)(tlast)) was similar for the CFC and HFA flunisolide, plus spacer groups (4.4 +/- 1.6 ng x h/mL and 5.0+/- 4.2 ng x h/mL, respectively); however, AUC(0)(-)(tlast) for the HFA flunisolide without spacer group was comparatively lower than for the CFC group (3.5 +/- 1.6 ng x h/mL). Observed C(max) and AUC(0)(-)(tlast) for 6 beta-OH flunisolide, the first-pass metabolite of flunisolide and an indicator of oropharyngeal deposition, were significantly higher in the CFC flunisolide group than in either HFA flunisolide group.