Patient-centered outcomes at hospital discharge in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients in Kobe, Japan: A single-center retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Apart from saving the lives of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients on mechanical ventilation (MV), recovery from the sequelae of prolonged MV (PMV) is an emerging issue.c METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study among consecutive adult COVID-19 patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) in Kobe, Japan, between March 3, 2020, and January 31, 2021, and received invasive MV. Clinical outcomes included in-hospital mortality and recovery from COVID-19 in survivors regarding organ dysfunction, respiratory symptoms, and functional status at discharge. We compared survivors' outcomes with MV durations of >14 days and ≤14 days. RESULTS: We included 85 patients with a median age of 69 years (interquartile range, 64-75 years); 76 (89%) patients had at least 1 comorbidity, 72 (85%) were non-frail, and 79 (93%) were functionally independent before COVID-19 infection. Eighteen patients (21%) died during hospitalization. At discharge, 59/67 survivors (88%) no longer required respiratory support, 50 (75%) complained of dyspnea, and 40 (60%) were functionally independent. Of the survivors, 23 patients receiving MV for >14 days had a worse recovery from COVID-19 at discharge compared with those on MV for ≤14 days, as observed using the Barthel index (median: 35 [5-65] vs. 100 [85-100]), ICU mobility scale (8 [5-9] vs. 10 [10-10]), and functional oral intake scale (3 [1-7] vs. 7 [7-7]) (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Although four-fifths of the patients survived and >50% of survivors demonstrated clinically important recovery in organ function and functional status during hospitalization, PMV was related to poor recovery from COVID-19 at discharge.

Incidence of Adverse Events Associated With the In-Hospital Transport of Critically Ill Patients.

IMPORTANCE: Despite various reports on the incidence of adverse events related to the in-hospital transport of critically ill patients, there is little verification of the correlation between the occurrence of adverse events and the use of checklists. The risk factors for the occurrence of adverse events during transport based on the use of checklists have not been well studied. Understanding them can contribute to making patient transport safer. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the frequency of adverse events and risk factors related to the in-hospital transport of critically ill patients in a hospital that uses a checklist for transporting patients. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This single-center, prospective, observational study was conducted between February 1, 2020, and July 31, 2020, at Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Japan. Patients greater than or equal to 18 years old who were admitted to the ICU and were transported for examination or procedures were included. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The transport member recorded patient information and any adverse events that occurred and filled out an information collection form. We then applied multivariate analysis to identify risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 117 transports for 117 patients were evaluated in this study. Twenty-two adverse events occurred in 20 transports (17.1%). There were nine transports (7.7%) in which the patients required treatment, all of which were related to patient instability. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the use of sedative drugs was related to adverse events (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.0-8.5; p = 0.04). We were not able to show a relationship of either the severity of the illness or body mass index with the occurrence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study revealed that the frequency of adverse events related to the in-hospital transportation of critically ill patients based on the use of a checklist was 17.1% and that the use of sedatives was associated with adverse events.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Kobe, Japan: a single-center, retrospective, observational study.

PURPOSE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has placed a great burden on critical care services worldwide. Data regarding critically ill COVID-19 patients and their demand of critical care services outside of initial COVID-19 epicenters are lacking. This study described clinical characteristics and outcomes of critically ill COVID-19 patients and the capacity of a COVID-19-dedicated intensive care unit (ICU) in Kobe, Japan. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to a 14-bed COVID-19-dedicated ICU in Kobe between March 3, 2020 and June 21, 2020. Clinical and daily ICU occupancy data were obtained from electrical medical records. The last follow-up day was June 28, 2020. RESULTS: Of 32 patients included, the median hospital follow-up period was 27 (interquartile range 19-50) days. The median age was 68 (57-76) years; 23 (72%) were men and 25 (78%) had at least one comorbidity. Nineteen (59%) patients received invasive mechanical ventilation for a median duration of 14 (8-27) days. Until all patients were discharged from the ICU on June 5, 2020, the median daily ICU occupancy was 50% (36-71%). As of June 28, 2020, six (19%) died during hospitalization. Of 26 (81%) survivors, 23 (72%) were discharged from the hospital and three (9%) remained in the hospital. CONCLUSION: During the first months of the outbreak in Kobe, most critically ill patients were men aged ≥ 60 years with at least one comorbidity and on mechanical ventilation; the ICU capacity was not strained, and the case-fatality rate was 19%.

Characteristics and diagnostic pitfalls of spontaneous visceral artery dissection in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous visceral artery dissection (VAD) is a rare disease that mainly occurs in the superior mesenteric artery and celiac artery. However, VAD has been detected more frequently in the past several years because of the increasing use of computed tomography (CT) for the evaluation of abdominal symptoms. A prompt diagnosis and referral to a specialist should be made, because VAD occasionally causes critical bowel ischemia. However, there is no well-established management approach. We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate the characteristics and prognoses of patients diagnosed with VAD. METHODS: We retrospectively examined data on patients who visited the Emergency Department (ED) at Fukui Prefectural Hospital, and were diagnosed with VAD using enhanced CT scanning from April 2004 to March 2015. All data were collected from the hospital's electronic medical records. We analyzed the clinical characteristics, comorbidity, risk factors, imaging findings, and treatment of patients. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were identified (superior mesenteric artery: 40 patients, celiac artery: 16 patients). The median age of the patients was 54 years (range, 32-86 years) and 89.3% were men. The majority of the patients complained of abdominal pain (37 patients, 66%). Thirty-nine of the patients (69.6%) were hospitalized. All hospitalized patients received conservative treatment initially. Three patients received endovascular therapy, and 2 patients received surgery. No fatal cases were observed. Twenty-eight patients presented with ED at their initial visit, and 8 cases (29%) were undiagnosed on their initial visit by emergency physicians, though enhanced CT scans were obtained. CONCLUSION: Patients with VAD often present with sudden onset abdominal pain. Most patients were managed successfully with conservative treatment. No fatal cases were observed; however, some cases were missed, even with an enhanced CT scan. It is necessary to include VAD among the differential diagnoses of acute abdominal pain. Patients with VAD should be referred to a specialist, because this disease occasionally causes critical bowel ischemia, necessitating surgical intervention.