Induction of resistance to neurotrophic tropomyosin-receptor kinase inhibitors by HMGCS2 via a mevalonate pathway.

INTRODUCTION: A neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has shown dramatic efficacy against malignant tumors harboring an NTRK fusion gene. However, almost all tumors eventually acquire resistance to NTRK-TKIs. METHOD: To investigate the mechanism of resistance to NTRK-TKIs, we established cells resistant to three types of NTRK-TKIs (larotrectinib, entrectinib, and selitrectinib) using KM12 colon cancer cells with a TPM3-NTRK1 rearrangement. RESULT: Overexpression of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase 2 (HMGCS2) was observed in three resistant cells (KM12-LR, KM12-ER, and KM12-SR) by microarray analysis. Lower expression of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 (SREBP2) and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor α (PPARα) was found in two cells (KM12-ER and KM12-SR) in which HMGCS2 was overexpressed compared to the parental KM12 and KM12-LR cells. In resistant cells, knockdown of HMGCS2 using small interfering RNA improved the sensitivity to NTRK-TKI. Further treatment with mevalonolactone after HMGCS2 knockdown reintroduced the NTRK-TKI resistance. In addition, simvastatin and silibinin had a synergistic effect with NTRK-TKIs in resistant cells, and delayed tolerance was observed after sustained exposure to clinical concentrations of NTRK-TKI and simvastatin in KM12 cells. In xenograft mouse models, combination treatment with entrectinib and simvastatin reduced resistant tumor growth compared with entrectinib alone. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that HMGCS2 overexpression induces resistance to NTRK-TKIs via the mevalonate pathway in colon cancer cells. Statin inhibition of the mevalonate pathway may be useful for overcoming this mechanistic resistance.

Afatinib plus PEM and CBDCA overcome osimertinib resistance in EGFR-mutated NSCLC with high thrombospondin-1 expression.

Osimertinib induces a marked response in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations. However, acquired resistance to osimertinib remains an inevitable problem. In this study, we aimed to investigate osimertinib-resistant mechanisms and evaluate the combination therapy of afatinib and chemotherapy. We established osimertinib-resistant cell lines (PC-9-OR and H1975-OR) from EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma cell lines PC-9 and H1975 by high exposure and stepwise method. Combination therapy of afatinib plus carboplatin (CBDCA) and pemetrexed (PEM) was effective in both parental and osimertinib-resistant cells. We found that expression of thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) was upregulated in resistant cells using cDNA microarray analysis. We demonstrated that TSP-1 increases the expression of matrix metalloproteinases through integrin signaling and promotes tumor invasion in both PC-9-OR and H1975-OR, and that epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) was involved in H1975-OR. Afatinib plus CBDCA and PEM reversed TSP-1-induced invasion ability and EMT changes in resistant cells. In PC-9-OR xenograft mouse models (five female Balb/c-Nude mice in each group), combination therapy strongly inhibited tumor growth compared with afatinib monotherapy (5 mg/kg, orally, five times per week) or CBDCA (75 mg/kg, intraperitoneally, one time per week) + PEM (100 mg/kg, intraperitoneally, one time per week) over a 28-day period. These results suggest that the combination of afatinib plus CBDCA and PEM, which effectively suppresses TSP-1 expression, may be a promising option in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients after the acquisition of osimertinib resistance.

Phosphoproteomic Analysis Identified Mutual Phosphorylation of FAK and Src as a Mechanism of Osimertinib Resistance in EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer.

Introduction: Osimertinib is a standard treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Although some osimertinib resistance mechanisms have been identified, nearly 50% of the mechanisms remain to be elucidated. This study was aimed at identifying non-genetic mechanisms underlying osimertinib resistance. Methods: We established two osimertinib-resistant cell lines from EGFR mutation-positive PC-9 and HCC827 NSCLC cell lines (PC-9OR and HCC827OR, respectively) using a stepwise method. We compared the phosphoproteomic profiles of the osimertinib-resistant and parental cells using mass spectrometry. Upstream kinases were identified using the application Kinase Enrichment Analysis version 3. Results: Phosphoproteomic analysis revealed 80 phosphorylation sites that were mutually up-regulated in PC-9OR and HCC827OR cells. The Kinase Enrichment Analysis version 3 analysis identified focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src (Src) as upstream kinases of these up-regulated phosphoproteins. The small-interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of FAK reduced Src phosphorylation and that of Src reduced FAK phosphorylation in both cell lines. Furthermore, FAK- or Src-specific small-interfering RNA treatments restored EGFR phosphorylation in PC-9OR and HCC827OR cells. The combination of FAK and Src inhibitors inhibited PC-9OR and HCC827OR cell proliferation in vitro and suppressed tumor growth in a xenograft mouse model. Immunohistochemistry of tumors from patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC suggested that phosphorylated FAK and Src are involved in initial and acquired resistance to osimertinib. Conclusions: Phosphoproteomic analysis may help elucidate the mechanisms of resistance to molecular-targeted therapies in lung cancer. Mutual phosphorylation of FAK and Src is involved in osimertinib resistance. Thus, FAK and Src inhibition may be novel treatment strategies for osimertinib-resistant NSCLC.

Osimertinib plus local treatment for brain metastases versus osimertinib alone in patients with EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Osimertinib is a standard treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is highly effective for brain metastases (BMs). However, it is unclear whether local treatment (LT) for BMs prior to osimertinib administration improves survival in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. We aimed to reveal the survival benefit of upfront local treatment (LT) for BMs in patients treated with osimertinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included consecutive patients with EGFR mutation (19del or L858R)-positive NSCLC who had BMs before osimertinib initiation between August 2018 and October 2021. We compared overall survival (OS) and central nervous system progression-free survival (CNS-PFS) between patients who received upfront LT for BMs (the upfront LT group), and patients who received osimertinib only (the osimertinib-alone group). Inverse-probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed to adjust for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Of the 121 patients analyzed, 57 and 64 patients had 19del and L858R, respectively. Forty-five and 76 patients were included in the upfront LT group and the osimertinib-alone groups, respectively. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the OS of the upfront LT group was significantly longer than that of the osimertinib-alone group (median, 95 % confidence intervals [95 %CI]: Not reached [NR], NR-NR vs. 31.2, 21.7-33.2; p = 0.021). The hazard ratio (HR) for OS and CNS-PFS was 0.37 (95 %CI, 0.16-0.87) and 0.36 (95 %CI, 0.15-0.87), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The OS and CNS-PFS of patients who received upfront LT for BMs followed by osimertinib were significantly longer than those of patients who received osimertinib alone. Upfront LT for BMs may be beneficial in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with osimertinib.

Clinicopathological Characteristics of Everolimus-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Single-Center Consecutive Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor used as an antineoplastic drug, is associated with a remarkably high incidence of interstitial lung disease (ILD). The clinical and pathological characteristics of ILD caused by everolimus have not been thoroughly investigated; therefore, we aimed to elucidate the features of everolimus-associated ILD. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who received everolimus for cancer treatment at our hospital. Patient backgrounds were compared between the ILD and non-ILD groups. Chest computed tomography (CT), changes in biomarkers, and lung histopathological features were analyzed for ILD cases. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were reviewed, and ILD developed in 19. There were no differences in patient demographics between the ILD and non-ILD groups. The severity of ILD was grade 1 (G1) in 9 and grade 2 (G2) in 10 cases. Chest CT showed organizing pneumonia (OP) or a hypersensitive pneumonia pattern. The levels of lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, Krebs von den lungen-6, and surfactant protein-D (SP-D) at the onset of ILD were significantly higher than those at baseline. Analysis of G1 and G2 ILD subgroups showed a higher SP-D levels in the G2 subgroup. Five patients underwent lung biopsies; all specimens demonstrated alveolitis with lymphocytic infiltration and granulomatous lesions, and some had OP findings. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus-associated ILD is mild and has a favorable prognosis. Patients with symptomatic ILD were more likely to have higher SP-D levels than those with asymptomatic ILD. Granulomatous lesions are an important pathological feature of everolimus-associated ILD.