Omentopexy versus no omentopexy in sleeve gastrectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with omentopexy (O-LSG) has been compared to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with no-omentopexy (NO-LSG) in terms of postoperative outcomes and one-year anthropometric results. This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to compare the utility of omentopexy in sleeve gastrectomy. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis according to PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR 2 guidelines. We included studies that systematically searched electronic databases and compared the O-LSG with the NO-LSG conducted through 1st March 2023. The bibliographic research yielded 13 eligible studies. These studies included 5514 patients. The O-LSG is associated with lower leakage (OR = 0.22; 95% CI [0.08, 0.55], p = 0.001), bleeding (OR = 0.33; 95% CI [0.19, 0.57], p < 0.0001), vomiting (OR = 0.50; 95% CI [0.28, 0.89], p = 0.02), twist (OR = 0.09; 95% CI [0.02, 0.39], p = 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (MD = - 0.33; 95% CI [- 0.61, - 0.05], p = 0.02) compared with NO-LSG. The O-LSG is associated with longer operative time (MD = 8.15; 95% CI [3.65, 12.64], p = 0.0004) than the NO-LSG. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative GERD (OR = 0.53; 95% CI [0.27, 1.02], p = 0.06), readmission (OR = 0.60; 95% CI [0.27, 1.37], p = 0.23), and one-year total weight loss (MD = 2.06; 95% CI [- 1.53, 5.65], p = 0.26). In the subgroup analysis including only RCTs, postoperative GERD was lower in the O-LSG (OR = 0.26; 95% CI [0.11, 0.63], p = 0.003). Our systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that omentopexy in sleeve gastrectomy is feasible and safe It reduced leakage, bleeding, and twist. It probably increased the operative time. It may reduce vomiting, GERD, and hospital stay. We don't know if it led to an additional readmission rate or one-year total weight loss.Registration The protocol was registered in PROSPERO with the ID CRD42022336790.

Biosimilar versus branded enoxaparin to prevent postoperative venous thromboembolism after surgery for digestive tract cancer: Randomized trial.

Cancer and/or major surgery are two factors that predispose to post-operative thrombosis. The annual incidence of venous thromboembolic disease (VTED) in cancer patients was estimated at 0.5%-20%. Surgery increases the risk of VTED by 29% in the absence of thromboprophylaxis. Enoxaparin is a low molecular weight heparin that is safe and effective. Branded Enoxaparin and biosimilar Enoxaparin are two enoxaparin treatments. This study aimed to compare Branded Enoxaparin with biosimilar Enoxaparin in patients operated on for digestive cancer regarding the prevention of postoperative thrombosis event, to compare the tolerance of the two treatments and to identify independent predictive factors of thromboembolic incident. A randomized controlled trial conducted in a single-centre, surgical department B of Charles Nicolle Hospital, over a 5-year period from October 12th, 2015, to July 08th, 2020. We included all patients over 18 who had cancer of the digestive tract newly diagnosed, operable and whatever its nature, site, or stage, operated on in emergency or elective surgery. The primary endpoint was any asymptomatic thromboembolic event, demonstrated by systematic US Doppler of the lower limbs on postoperative day 7 to day 10. The sonographer was unaware of the prescribed treatment (Branded Enoxaparin [BE] or biosimilar Enoxaparin [BSE]). Of one hundred sixty-eight enrolled patients, six patients (4.1%) had subclinical venous thrombosis. Among those who had subclinical thrombosis, four patients (5.6%) were in the Branded Enoxaparin group and two patients (2.7%) in the Biosimilar Enoxaparin group without statistically significant difference (p = 0.435). Analysis of the difference in means using Student's t test demonstrated the equivalence of the two treatments. Our study allowed us to conclude that there was no statistically significant difference between Branded Enoxaparin and Biosimilar Enoxaparin regarding the occurrence of thromboembolic accidents postoperatively. BE and BSE are equivalent. Trial registration. Trial registration: The trial was registered on CLINICALTRIALS.GOV under the number NCT02444572.

Necrotizing fasciitis of the thigh: An unexpected route to discover an infected colonic cancer.

Introduction: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare but potentially fatal soft tissue infection characterized by its aggressive nature. This case report highlights a unique and atypical presentation of NF associated with colorectal cancer. Case presentation: A 76-year-old male with no significant medical history presented with left knee pain and rapidly progressing septic shock. Clinical examination revealed skin necrosis, inflammation, and swelling in the left thigh and inguinal region. Laboratory investigations showed leukocytosis and elevated C-reactive protein levels. Computed tomography angiography revealed fluid and gas tracking along fascial planes in the left thigh. Surgical intervention revealed NF in the thigh and abdominal wall, with the underlying cause being a perforated sigmoid colon cancer. Conclusion: Recognizing the polymorphic clinical manifestations of NF and its potential association with underlying abdominal pathology can aid in early diagnosis and improve patient outcomes. This report serves as a reminder of the life-threatening nature of NF and the necessity for rapid and comprehensive management.

Ordinal disciplinary responsibility of the certifying physician.

NTRODUCTION: Writing medical certificates is part of the doctor's daily practice. AIM: To analyze the complaints related to medical certificates filed to the Regional Council of the Order of Doctors (RCOD) of Tunis and to identify the predictive factors of disciplinary sanctions. METHODS: We collected the complaints filed to the RCOD of Tunis between 01/01/2017 and 31/12/2017, in relation to a problem with the establishment and/or the issuance of medical certificates by registered certifying doctors at RCOD, Tunis. RESULTS: We collected 32 complaints, the reason for which was a certificate of convenience in 88% of cases, a drafting error in 9% of cases and a fee problem in 3% of cases. The decision of the RCOD was a closing of the file in 56% of cases, a call to order in 28% of cases and a temporary ban on practicing medicine in 16% of cases.The multivariate analysis with logistic regression identified one independent predictor of a call to order or a sanction from the RCOD, namely the fact that the doctor did not bring the file of the patient(s) having been the subject of the complaint, at the time of his invitation to RCOD Tunis (p=0.037, OR=22.66). CONCLUSION: The doctor must always keep a medical form or a patient file, which will allow him to justify himself in the event of a complaint against him, for the reason of a certificate of convenience.

Paraduodenal hernia: An exceptional cause of acute bowel obstruction.

Internal hernias represent only 0.2%-0.9% of all causes of bowel obstruction. A 59-year-old patient presented urgently with small bowel obstruction. Laparotomy revealed a left paraduodenal hernia with most of the small bowel herniating through a space between the inferior mesenteric vein and duodenojejunal junction.

Quality assessment of rectal cancer surgery: How are we doing?

INTRODUCTION: Surgery remains a cornerstone in the treatment of rectal cancer. Optimal surgical resection implies respect for carcinologic principles. The best way to evaluate a good quality of resection requires certainly an exhaustive evaluation of the surgical specimen by the surgeon and the pathologist. AIM: To assess the quality of resected rectal cancers. METHODS: This study included patients operated on for rectal malignant epithelial tumors, between January 1st, 2015 and December 31st, 2020, in the general surgery department B at Charles Nicolle's Hospital in Tunis. Data relevant to the pathologic examination were recorded. We performed a descriptive study and an analytic bivariate study comparing the two groups "number of lymph nodes harvested less than 12" versus "number of lymph nodes harvested higher than or equal to 12". RESULTS: Neoadjuvant therapy was performed in 39 patients (79%). Anterior resection (AR) was performed in 43 patients (43%) and abdominoperineal resection (APR) was performed in 11 patients (20%). There were no invaded margins. The mean distal surgical margin was 3±1.4 cm. Mesorectum was complete in 38 surgical specimens (70%). The median number of lymph nodes harvested was 14. Resection was considered R0 in 47 patients (87%). In bivariate analysis, there was no difference between the "number of harvested lymph nodes <12" and the "number of harvested lymph nodes ≥ 12"groups for the variables: laparotomy, laparoscopic approach, conversion to laparotomy and chemoradiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Quality of surgical resection of rectal cancer in our department was in accordance with recommendations.

Intestinal ischemia in patients with incarcerated groin hernia: proposal and validation of a score.

PURPOSE: Intestinal ischemia (II) is the most critical factor to determine in patients with incarcerated groin hernia (IGH) because II could be reversible, and it is considered as a "time sensitive condition." Although predictive factors of II were identified in several previous studies, preoperative diagnosis of II cannot be reliably made or excluded by any known parameter. The aims of this study were: to devise and to validate a clinic-biologic score, with a strong discriminatory power, for predicting the risk of II in patients with IGH. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective bicentric study including 335 patients with IGH. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictive factors of II. We assigned points for the score according to the regression coefficient. The area under the curve (AUC) was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The scoring system was then prospectively validated on a second independent population of 45 patients admitted for IGH in the same departments (internal validation). RESULTS: Four independent predictive factors of II were identified: heart rate, duration of symptoms before admission, prothrombin, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). A predictive score of II was established based on these independent predictive factors. Sensitivity was 94.50%; specificity was 92.70%. The AUC of this score was 0.97. The AUC was 0.96 when the score was applied on the second population of patients. CONCLUSIONS: We performed a score to predict the risk of intestinal II with a good accuracy (the AUC of our score was 0.97). This score is reliable and reproducible, so it can help a surgeon to prioritize patients with II for surgery (especially at this time of COVID-19 pandemic), because ischemia could be reversible, avoiding thus intestinal necrosis.

COVID-19 and gastrointestinal symptoms: A case report of a Mesenteric Large vessel obstruction.

COVID-19 cases are increasing daily worldwide. With such emerging disease, the medical community should be aware of atypical clinical presentations in order to help with correct diagnosis, and to take the proper measures to isolate and treat patients to avoid healthcare professionals being infected and to limit its spread (SARS-CoV-2). Thrombogenesis in COVID-19 has been described in few cases, but a thrombosis of a large digestive vessel has not been documented so far. Mesenteric ischemia due to an obstruction of a large vessel may be a new presentation of COVID-19 infection.

The complications of subtotal cholecystectomy: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Although the symptoms attributed to gall stones resolve in most patients after cholecystectomy, some may have symptoms that persist or recur. It is known as the post-cholecystectomy syndrome (PCS). The aim of this case was to describe the diagnostic difficulties encountered and to discuss the main etiologies of this entity. CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old man presented for a recurrent right upper quadrant pain despite laparoscopic cholecystectomy five years ago. Imaging showed cystic lesion at the gallbladder fossa with gallstones. We decided to reoperate the patient by laparoscopic approach. It turned to be a residual gallbladder with stones inside. It was confirmed by histopathology. He was asymptomatic after a follow-up of 2 years. DISCUSSION: The PCS should not be trivialized. Most of the causes are allocated to extra biliary etiologies. They must be ruled out first as most of them can be controlled with medication. There are etiologies for which re-operation can be necessary. CONCLUSION: The indication of cholecystectomy must be taken wisely otherwise surgery will not solve the problem. Even though patient may complain of persistence or recurrence of the pain. In this case, it can be a real challenge for both diagnosis and treatment.

A Systematic Review of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Situs Inversus.

Background: In case of situs inversus (SI), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is challenging. This systematic review aimed to assess the appropriate technique for LC in SI.Methods: An electronic search was carried out using the following keywords: "Situs inversus" and "Laparoscopic cholecystectomy". The main endpoints were surgical procedures, intra-operative cholangiography (IOC) use, common bile detection, operative time, bile duct injury, conversion, mortality, and morbidity.Results: We retained 93 cases. Essentially two types of laparoscopy port placement reported were reported: the "American mirror technique" and the "French mirror technique". One report of a left-handed surgeon was retained. Fourteen cases operated by a right-handed surgeon: "American mirror technique" used in 33 cases and "French mirror technique" used in 7 cases. The operative time was mentioned in 52 cases with a mean of 74 min without any statistical difference between the two techniques. No cases of postoperative death, major complications or bile duct injury were reported. IOC was performed in 16 cases (17.2%). An associated common bile duct stone was found in eight cases (8.6%). ERCP with endoscopic sphincterotomy was used to treat the associated CBD stones in 7 cases and a choledecoscopy was conducted in one case to extract stones. The conversion rate in this systematic review was 1.07%.Conclusions: LC in SI is easier for left-handed surgeons. The fastest technique for right-handed surgeons seems to be the "American mirror technique" and some modifications of the port placement can facilitate it.

Impact of sleeve gastrectomy on abnormalities in carbohydrate tolerance in obese adult.

INTRODUCTION: Facing the repeated failures of the medical management of obesity, bariatric surgery offers a promising therapeutic option in terms of achieving weight loss and metabolic benefits. AIM: To evaluate the impact of sleeve gastrectomy on the carbohydrate profile of a group of obese subjects. METHODS: It is a prospective study including 40 obese patients (7 Men and 33 Women) who underwent sleeve gastrectomy between 2016 and 2018. Clinical and biological parameters were collected before the intervention, at six months and one year after. Insulin resistance was defined by a HOMA-IR index ≥2.4. Remission of diabetes was determined using the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery's (ASMBS) criteria. RESULTS: The mean patients' age was 34.65 ± 8.17 years. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 50.23 ± 8.3 kg/m². One year after sleeve gastrectomy, the frequency of insulin resistance, decreased from 89% to 4% (p<0.05). The evolution of carbohydrate tolerance abnormalities was marked by the diabetes and prediabetes remission in 75% and 100% of cases, respectively. The mean excess weight loss was 55.8% at 12 months. CONCLUSION: These results have expanded our knowledge of the short-term sleeve gastrectomy's effectiveness on the carbohydrate profile of obese subjects. However, it would be interesting to check the durability of this metabolic benefit in the medium and long term.

A meta-analysis comparing hand-assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and open right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Mini-invasive colorectal cancer surgery was adopted widely in recent years. This meta-analysis aimed to compare hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) with open right hemicolectomy (OS) for malignant disease. METHODS: PRISMA guidelines with random effects model were adopted using Review Manager Version 5.3 for pooled estimates. RESULTS: Seven studies that involved 506 patients were included. Compared to OS, HALS improved results in terms of blood loss (MD = 53.67, 95% CI 10.67 to 96.67, p = 0.01), time to first flatus (MD = 21.11, 95% CI 14.99 to 27.23, p < 0.00001), postoperative pain score, and overall hospital stay (MD = 3.47, 95% CI 2.12 to 4.82, p < 0.00001). There was no difference as concerns post-operative mortality, morbidity (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 0.89 to 2.7, p = 0.12), wound infection (OR = 1.69, 95% CI 0.60 to 4.76, p = 0.32), operative time (MD = - 16.10, 95% CI [- 36.57 to 4.36], p = 0.12), harvested lymph nodes (MD = 0.59, 95% CI - 0.18 to 1.36, p = 0.13), and recurrence (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.30 to 3.15, p = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: HALS is an efficient alternative to OS in right colectomy which combines the advantages of OS with the mini-invasive surgery.

Recommandations of the Tunisian Association of Surgery for the practice of visceral surgery during COVID-19 pandemic.

The World Health Organization declared on March 11, 2020 that the COVID-19 epidemic has become a pandemic. In Tunisia, the Ministry of Health has recommended enhanced preventive hygiene measures to contain and limit the spread of the virus. Following the entry of Tunisia into phase 4 of the COVID-19 epidemic, the Tunisian Association of Surgery proposed recommendations related to surgical activity. Surgical emergencies must be treated urgently and without delay. Non-tumor pathologies which require surgery in an elective situation and for which the risk of aggravation or complication is considered low shoud be postponed. For digestive tumor pathology, and apart from complicated forms, neoadjuvant treatment is highly recommended in the context of multidisciplinary concertation staff.

Predictive factor of recurrence after curative resection for stage I-II colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colon cancer has become a common malignant neoplasm in Tunisia. Patients with negative lymph node have a 5 years recurrence rate of 21.1%. Studies reporting the prognostic factors of recurrence for patients with stage I-II colon cancer are limited. AIM: This study aimed to determine factors predicting recurrence for patients with stage I-II colon cancer after curative resection. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Were included patients who underwent curative surgery for stage I or II colon cancer. Enrolled variables were subdivided into: Pre-operative, Intraoperative and Post-operative variables. Main outcome measures were local recurrence and distant metastasis detected during follow-up. RESULTS: Eighteen men and 17 women with median age of 61 years, ranging from 33 to 89, were enrolled in this study. Twenty-eight patients out of 35 were classified T3 and T4 colon cancer. The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 16.23 (median= 17; range: 4-44). Ten patients (28%) had colloid component in the tumor. At a median follow-up of 23 months (range: 6-56 months), recurrence was observed in five cases (14%). Variables associated to recurrence were Carcinoembryonic antigen level (p= 0.03), serum albumin level (p=0.029) and the presence of colloid component (0.02). Multivariate logistic regression retained colloid component as the only predictive factor of recurrence (OR=1.2, 95%CI [1.019-1.412], p=0.028). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the percentage of mucinous component equal or greater than 25% was the only predictive factor of recurrence for curatively resected, stages I and II, colon cancer.

Daughter cyst sign in liver hydatid cyst.

Daughter cyst sign is one of the most characteristic imaging findings of liver hydatid cysts. It is schematically divided into two types according to the daughter cyst localization in regard to the hydatid cyst wall: endogenous daughter cysts and exogenous daughter cysts. The endogenous daughter cyst is presented by a small cyst that protrudes into the lumen of the cystic mass. The exogenous daughter cysts are enclosed in the laminated layer then gradually pushed outwards giving the hydatid a bumpy appearance that distorts the classic circular radiological image. Imaging findings could detect these daughter cysts and dictate some additional precautions during surgical procedures. This surgery is associated with a high recurrence rate essentially in case of exogenous daughter cysts. However, if we detect many exogenous daughter cysts, a radical treatment should be favored otherwise the post-operative recurrence will be certain.

Self-directed learning digital tool versus tutorials under the guidance of an educator: Randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: Self-directed learning digital tool aims to enable students to acquire skills in an autonomous way. The aim of this work was to compare a self-directed learning digital tool in non-traumatic abdominal emergencies with tutorials under the guidance of the educator in two parallel groups of second-year of second-cycle of medical students selected by means of a draw. METHODS: We performed a controlled trial with draw comparing the self-directed learning digital tool and tutorials under the guidance of a teacher. Second-year of second-cycle medical students under training in general surgery from February, 20, 2017 to May, 7, 017 were included. Main judgment criterion was the assessment of the skills gained by students by means of the total score got at the objective structured clinical examination. We have carried out a descriptive survey, kappa statistics to study agreement between examiners, followed by an ANOVA test. We have compared the total score for the self-directed learning digital tool group with the total score of the tutorials group by using the « t ¼ test of Student and the « U ¼ test of Mann-Whitney. We performed a ROC curve for the total score. We have also achieved a satisfaction survey. RESULTS: Twenty seven students were enrolled: 14 in the « self-directed learning digital tool ¼ group and 13 in the « tutorials ¼ group. The average total score for all the students was 230 ± 52 points [extremes: 71,5 - 318,5]. There was no difference between examiners (kappa test and ANOVA test). The univariate analysis showed a total score and a score by examiner higher in a statistically significant way for the « self-directed learning digital teaching tool ¼ group. The ROC curve allowed us to conclude that the self-directed learning digital tool had an important discriminating power[an area under the curve equal to 0,791, (CI95%: 0,616-0,966) with p=0,010]. CONCLUSION: Self-directed learning digital tool has allowed second-year of second-cycle medical students to acquire skills in matters of interpretation of medical imaging in non-traumatic abdominal emergency with a higher rate compared with tutorials.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Complete Mesocolon Excision in Right Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic complete mesocolon excision (LCME) for right colonic cancer improves oncological outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare intraoperative, postoperative, and oncological outcomes after LCME and open total mesocolon excision (OCME) for right-sided colonic cancers. METHODS: Literature searches of electronic databases and manual searches up to January 31, 2019, were performed. Random-effects meta-analysis model was used. Review Manager Version 5.3 was used for pooled estimates. RESULTS: After screening 1334 articles, 10 articles with a total of 2778 patients were eligible for inclusion. Compared to OCME, LCME improves results in terms of overall morbidity (OR = 1.48, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.80, p = 0.0001), blood loss (MD = 56.56, 95% CI 19.05 to 94.06, p = 0.003), hospital stay (MD = 2.18 day, 95% CI 0.54 to 3.83, p = 0.009), and local (OR = 2.12, 95% CI 1.09 to 4.12, p = 0.03) and distant recurrence (OR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.23-2.16, p = 0.0008). There was no significant difference regarding mortality, anastomosis leakage, number of harvested lymph nodes, and 3-year disease-free survival. Open approach was significantly better than laparoscopy in terms of operative time (MD = - 34.76 min, 95% CI - 46.01 to - 23.50, p < 0.00001) and chyle leakage (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.96, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that LCME in right colon cancer surgery is superior to OCME in terms of overall morbidity, blood loss, hospital stay, and local and distant recurrence with a moderate grade of recommendation due to the retrospective nature of the included studies.