How do stroke survivors and their caregivers manage post-stroke fatigue? A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to gain insight into the lived experiences of using day-to-day strategies to manage post-stroke fatigue. DESIGN: Qualitative, descriptive study. SETTING: Community telephone interviews. PARTICIPANTS: A purposive sample of 20 stroke survivors with current, or previous, post-stroke fatigue, and 8 caregivers, who provided informal care or support, were recruited. MAIN MEASURES: Semi-structured telephone interviews were undertaken. Data were analysed using a framework approach. RESULTS: Most participants had found their own ways of coping and their personal strategies included acceptance of having fatigue; 'pacing' (spreading activities out and interspersing with rest periods); keeping a diary in order to plan activities and to identify 'trigger' activities which induced fatigue; talking to (and educating) others about having fatigue; using relaxation; and accessing professional advice and support. The burden placed on caregivers was considerable and they often had to oversee the post-stroke fatigue management strategies used. CONCLUSIONS: Post-stroke fatigue is managed in different ways and there was not one particular strategy that seemed effective for everyone. Most people in our study had had to devise their own ways of coping practically. Given the scale of this problem, which profoundly impacts the lives of both stroke survivors and caregivers, the management of post-stroke fatigue merits more attention and evaluation. However, this must be directly informed by those with lived experience.

Management of urinary incontinence in athletic women: the POsITIve feasibility study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a future trial of physiotherapy to manage urinary incontinence (UI) in athletic women. DESIGN: Feasibility study with nested qualitative interviews. SETTING: Community clinics: university and private. PARTICIPANTS: Adult women who i) lived locally, ii) provided informed consent iii) self-reported UI iv) exercised at high/moderate intensity for over 150 minutes and over three times a week. INTERVENTIONS: Up to seven sessions of tailored physiotherapy delivered over 6-months. Despite some variation in prescription and progression, all programmes included elements of pelvic floor muscle training undertaken in clinic and at home. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recruitment, eligibility of those screened, consent, data completion and attendance rates: assessed to determine feasibility of progression to a definitive trial. The acceptability of specific outcome measures, the intervention and of randomisation within a future trial was also examined. RESULTS: Direct recruitment of athletic women from sporting venues was feasible and acceptable. Most women not only consented to an intimate examination as part of the assessment, but described this as an important part of the intervention. Attendance rates and data completion was generally high but the return of 3-day fluid charts was poor: this was also reflected in comments by participants that these were difficult to incorporate into daily life. The addition of a smartphone app to aid motivation and monitoring was welcomed but further education in its use may enhance compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Direct recruitment from sporting venues was acceptable and feasible. Women valued assessment and treatment for UI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03986411.

Total hip and knee replacement and return to work: clinicians' perspectives.

PURPOSE: An ageing workforce means that our understanding of return to work following total hip and knee replacement is of increasing importance. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the views and experiences of clinicians in treating working patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews in primary and secondary National Health Service care using framework methodology. A total of 40 interviews were conducted. Participants included 12 hospital-based Allied Health Professionals and nurses, 12 orthopedic surgeons, and 16 General Practitioners. Data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: A key theme concerned participants' perceptions and experiences around the process and practice of listing working patients for total hip or knee replacement. Four sub-themes were identified; the perceived likelihood of listing employed patients for surgery, expectations and outcomes of surgery, the impact of work issues, and referral procedures and waiting lists. CONCLUSIONS: Decisions around listing working patients for total hip and knee replacement are complex and difficult. Clinicians need to consistently consider patients' work issues, and to be supported in this by appropriate commissioning and service delivery decisions. Further research is indicated to better understand the work-related expectations and anticipated outcomes of both patients and clinicians, and the optimum timing of surgery to maintain and improve patients' work performance.Implications for rehabilitationClinicians need to consistently consider patients' work issues, and current evidence, in their consultations and decisions regarding total hip and knee replacement.Clinical practice should reflect the growing proportion of working patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement, and routinely measure work outcomes.Changes are required at commissioning and service levels to support clinicians in changing their practice with this patient population.

Using occupational therapists in vocational clinics in primary care: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: GPs are under considerable pressure providing routine care. However, they may not be the most appropriate professionals to manage getting patients back to work, and keeping them there. OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of delivering occupational therapy-led vocational clinics (OTVoc) to provide return to work advice and support for people with musculoskeletal conditions and mental health problems, in primary care. METHODS: Prospective mixed methods study in two primary care centres (eight GP surgeries). We collected anonymised service level data on all patients receiving OTVoc. Next, patient participants who met inclusion criteria and consented, undertook baseline and 3-month follow-up assessments. Interviews were also conducted to explore stakeholders' views- GPs, Nurse Practitioners, Front Desk Staff, Occupational Therapists, patients and their employers about OTVoc- and included study eligibility, referral, experiences and attitudes to return to work. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. RESULTS: The majority of standardized measures showed some improvement over the study period: the sickness absence rate dropped from 71 to 15% and use of GP 'fit' notes reduced from 76 to 6%. Interview data indicated positive attitudes to OTVoc, the use of the fit note and the Allied Health Professions Health and Work Reports (AHP H&WRs). GPs felt that OTVoc reduced their workload. CONCLUSION: Further research is feasible and warranted. OTVoc was positively received and stakeholders believed it was effective in getting patients back to work or preparing for their return. There was enthusiasm for extending service eligibility criteria, suggesting potential for further development and evaluation.

Occupational advice to help people return to work following lower limb arthroplasty: the OPAL intervention mapping study.

BACKGROUND: Hip and knee replacements are regularly carried out for patients who work. There is little evidence about these patients' needs and the factors influencing their return to work. There is a paucity of guidance to help patients return to work after surgery and a need for structured occupational advice to enable them to return to work safely and effectively. OBJECTIVES: To develop an occupational advice intervention to support early recovery to usual activities including work that is tailored to the requirements of patients undergoing hip or knee replacements. To test the acceptability, practicality and feasibility of this intervention within current care frameworks. DESIGN: An intervention mapping approach was used to develop the intervention. The research methods employed were rapid evidence synthesis, qualitative interviews with patients and stakeholders, a prospective cohort study, a survey of clinical practice and a modified Delphi consensus process. The developed intervention was implemented and assessed during the final feasibility stage of the intervention mapping process. SETTING: Orthopaedic departments in NHS secondary care. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who were in work and intending to return to work following primary elective hip or knee replacement surgery, health-care professionals and employers. INTERVENTIONS: Occupational advice intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Development of an occupational advice intervention, fidelity of the developed intervention when delivered in a clinical setting, patient and clinician perspectives of the intervention and preliminary assessments of intervention effectiveness and cost. RESULTS: A cohort study (154 patients), 110 stakeholder interviews, a survey of practice (152 respondents) and evidence synthesis provided the necessary information to develop the intervention. The intervention included information resources, a personalised return-to-work plan and co-ordination from the health-care team to support the delivery of 13 patient and 20 staff performance objectives. To support delivery, a range of tools (e.g. occupational checklists, patient workbooks and employer information), roles (e.g. return-to-work co-ordinator) and training resources were created. Feasibility was assessed for 21 of the 26 patients recruited from three NHS trusts. Adherence to the defined performance objectives was 75% for patient performance objectives and 74% for staff performance objectives. The intervention was generally well received, although the short time frame available for implementation and concurrent research evaluation led to some confusion among patients and those delivering the intervention regarding its purpose and the roles and responsibilities of key staff. LIMITATIONS: Implementation and uptake of the intervention was not standardised and was limited by the study time frame. Evaluation of the intervention involved a small number of patients, which limited the ability to assess it. CONCLUSIONS: The developed occupational advice intervention supports best practice. Evaluation demonstrated good rates of adherence against defined performance objectives. However, a number of operational and implementation issues require further attention. FUTURE WORK: The intervention warrants a randomised controlled trial to assess its clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to improve rates and timing of sustained return to work after surgery. This research should include the development of a robust implementation strategy to ensure that adoption is sustained. STUDY REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN27426982 and PROSPERO CRD42016045235. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 45. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Hip and knee replacements are regularly carried out for patients who work. There is a lack of evidence about these patients' needs and how they return to work. Guidance to enable return to work after surgery is limited. There is, therefore, a need for structured occupational advice to help these patients. The aim of this project was to develop a multidisciplinary occupational advice intervention for this patient population and assess if it could be delivered. The study also aimed to make recommendations about its further assessment in a clinical trial. The study combined different methods of research (quantitative and qualitative) to identify the population likely to benefit, their current care, and the outcomes important to patients and health-care professionals. All of the information gathered was mapped through a framework (intervention mapping), which included a consensus process with stakeholders to develop the intervention. The intervention delivery was assessed for a small number of patients across orthopaedic departments, employer organisations and primary care networks. The study involved 154 patients, 110 stakeholders (general practitioners, surgeons, employers and health professionals/nurses) and a survey of current care (152 respondents) to develop the intervention. The intervention included information resources, a personalised return-to-work plan and co-ordination from the health-care team to support the delivery of 33 patient and staff performance objectives. To support delivery, a range of tools (e.g. occupational checklists, patient workbooks and employer information), roles (e.g. return-to-work co-ordinator) and training resources were created. The intervention was assessed in 26 patients and staff, and showed high rates of adherence to the defined performance objectives. The overall results demonstrated that the occupational advice intervention developed for hip and knee replacement patients is deliverable. The intervention warrants further research to assess its clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness as a tool to improve rates and timing of sustained return to work after surgery.

Managing Employees Undergoing Total Hip and Knee Replacement: Experiences of Workplace Representatives.

Introduction There is little research on return to work (RTW) from a workplace perspective following hip and knee replacement (THR/TKR) despite employers and other workplace personnel having a key role. Our aim was to explore the experiences of individuals in the workplace in managing employees undergoing THR/TKR. Methods Employers and other workplace representatives from a cross-section of employment sectors and sizes, with experience of managing employees undergoing THR/TKR in the previous 12 months, were recruited. Interviewees included small business owners, line managers, colleagues, human resources managers and occupational health advisers. Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted and data were analysed thematically. Results Twenty-five individuals were interviewed. The main themes identified were accommodating the employee, and barriers and facilitators to RTW. Accommodations included changes to the work environment, amended duties, altered hours, changed roles and colleague support. Perceived barriers and facilitators to RTW included the role of GPs and occupational health, surgical issues, characteristics of the work environment and of employees. Conclusions Employers are motivated to effect supported RTW for employees undergoing THR/TKR but have insufficient guidance. Strategies are required to signpost employers to existing RTW advice, and to develop recommendations specific to lower limb arthroplasty. Communication between medical practitioners and employers should be facilitated in order to enhance the RTW experience of individuals undergoing THR/TKR.

Is Stroke Early Supported Discharge still effective in practice? A prospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: Randomised controlled trials have shown the benefits of Early Supported Discharge (ESD) of stroke survivors. Our aim was to evaluate whether ESD is still beneficial when operating in the complex context of frontline healthcare provision. DESIGN: We conducted a cohort study with quasi experimental design. A total of 293 stroke survivors (transfer independently or with assistance of one, identified rehabilitation goals) within two naturally formed groups were recruited from two acute stroke units: 'ESD' n=135 and 'Non ESD' n=158 and 84 caregivers. The 'ESD' group accessed either of two ESD services operating in Nottinghamshire, UK. The 'Non ESD' group experienced standard practices for discharge and onward referral. Outcome measures (primary: Barthel Index) were administered at baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months. RESULTS: The ESD group had a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (P=0.029) and reported significantly higher levels of satisfaction with services received (P<0.001). Following adjustment for age differences at baseline, participants in the ESD group (n=71) had significantly higher odds (compared to the Non ESD group, n=85) of being in the ⩾90 Barthel Index category at 6 weeks (OR = 1.557, 95% CI 2.579 to 8.733), 6 months (OR = 1.541, 95% CI 2.617 to 8.340) and 12 months (OR 0.837, 95% CI 1.306 to 4.087) respectively in relation to baseline. Carers of patients accessing ESD services showed significant improvement in mental health scores (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The health benefits of ESD are still evident when evidence based models of these services are implemented in practice.

Recommendations to facilitate the ideal fit note: are they achievable in practice?

BACKGROUND: Although the UK fit note has been broadly welcomed as a tool to facilitate return to work, difficulties and uncertainties have resulted in wide variation in its use. Agreement on what constitutes the 'ideal' fit note from the perspective of all stakeholders is needed to inform best practice. A recent Delphi study conducted by the authors reached consensus on 67 recommendations for best practice in fit note use for employed patients. However, such recommendations are not necessarily followed in practice. The purpose of this study was therefore to investigate the perceived achievability of implementing these Delphi recommendations with a further reference panel of stakeholders. METHODS: Potential participants were identified by the research team and study steering group. These included representatives of employers, government departments, trades unions, patient organisations, general and medical practitioners and occupational health organisations who were believed to have the knowledge and experience to comment on the recommendations. The consensus Delphi statements were presented to the participants on-line. Participants were invited to comment on whether the recommendations were achievable, and what might hinder or facilitate their use in practice. Free text comments were combined with comments made in the Delphi study that referred to issues of feasibility or practicality. These were synthesised and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Twelve individuals representing a range of stakeholder groups participated. Many of the recommendations were considered achievable, such as improved format and use of the electronic fit note, completion of all fields, better application and revision of guidance and education in fit note use. However a number of obstacles to implementation were identified. These included: legislation governing the fit note and GP contracts; the costs and complexity of IT systems and software; the limitations of the GP consultation; unclear roles and responsibilities for the funding and delivery of education, guidance and training for all stakeholders, and the evaluation of practice. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that although many recommendations for the ideal fit note are considered achievable, there are considerable financial, legal, organisational and professional obstacles to be overcome in order for the recommendations to be implemented successfully.

Completion of fit notes by GPs: a mixed methods study.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the completion of fit notes by UK general practitioners (GPs). A series of actual fit notes issued to employed patients were examined, and their GPs' reflections and experiences of fit note completion explored. METHODS: A mixed-methods design was used. Data were collected from copies of 94 fit notes issued to employed patients by 11 GPs, and from 86 questionnaires completed by these GPs reflecting on the fit notes they had issued. Face-to-face interviews were then conducted with each GP. RESULTS: Fit note completion is not meeting expectations for a number of reasons. These include the following: limited knowledge and awareness of the guidance in fit note completion; problems with the fit note format; lack of mandatory training in completing fit notes; lack of incentive to change practice; incomplete implementation of the electronic fit note; GPs' lack of confidence in, and doubts about the appropriateness of performing this role. CONCLUSION: If UK GPs are to continue their contractual responsibility for completing fit notes, further consideration of their education and training needs is urgently required. Weaknesses in the design and format of the fit note and the availability of the electronic version also need to be addressed.

Return-to-work outcomes and usefulness of actual fit notes received by employers.

BACKGROUND: GPs can use the fit note to advise that a patient 'may be fit' or is 'not fit' for work. Previous employer-based research on the fit note is largely qualitative and based on general perceptions and past experience. Knowledge of the return-to-work outcomes and usefulness of actual fit notes is needed to strengthen the evidence-base and inform practice. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the return-to-work outcomes of fit notes issued to employed patients, and their employers' opinions as to the usefulness of each note. METHODS: Participating organizations collecting fit notes were asked to rate the outcome and usefulness of each fit note via postal questionnaires. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively; qualitative data were analysed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Five hundred and sixteen questionnaires were posted, with a 97% return rate (n=498). More than 80% of employees (n=44) returned to work after the expiry date of a 'may be fit' note compared with 43% (n=167) of those issued with a 'not fit' note. Fit notes were considered more useful if they provided information on the condition and its effect on the employee's ability to work, if they stated whether or not the employee needed reassessment and if clear advice regarding return-to-work had been provided. CONCLUSIONS: 'May be fit' notes are useful in helping employees return to work. However, this option is infrequently used, and the completion and content of many fit notes does not meet employers' needs. These factors need to be urgently addressed if the fit note is to reach its full potential.