Sexually dimorphic DNA methylation and gene expression patterns in human first trimester placenta.

BACKGROUND: Fetal sex and placental development impact pregnancy outcomes and fetal-maternal health, but the critical timepoint of placenta establishment in first trimester is understudied in human pregnancies. METHODS: Pregnant subjects were recruited in late first trimester (weeks 10-14) at time of chorionic villus sampling, a prenatal diagnostic test. Leftover placenta tissue was collected and stored until birth outcomes were known, then DNA and RNA were isolated from singleton, normal karyotype pregnancies resulting in live births. DNA methylation was measured with the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip array (n = 56). Differential methylation analysis compared 25 females versus 31 males using a generalized linear model on 743,461 autosomal probes. Gene expression sex differences were analyzed with RNA-sequencing (n = 74). An integrated analysis was performed using linear regression to correlate gene expression and DNA methylation in 51 overlapping placentas. RESULTS: Methylation analysis identified 151 differentially methylated probes (DMPs) significant at false discovery rate < 0.05, including 89 (59%) hypermethylated in females. Probe cg17612569 (GABPA, ATP5J) was the most significant CpG site, hypermethylated in males. There were 11 differentially methylated regions affected by fetal sex, with transcription factors ZNF300 and ZNF311 most significantly hypermethylated in males and females, respectively. RNA-sequencing identified 152 genes significantly sexually dimorphic at false discovery rate < 0.05. The 151 DMPs were associated with 18 genes with gene downregulation (P < 0.05) in the direction of hypermethylation, including 2 genes significant at false discovery rate < 0.05 (ZNF300 and CUB and Sushi multiple domains 1, CSMD1). Both genes, as well as Family With Sequence Similarity 228 Member A (FAM228A), showed significant correlation between DNA methylation and sexually dimorphic gene expression, though FAM228A DNA methylation was less sexually dimorphic. Comparison with other sex differences studies found that cg17612569 is male-hypermethylated across gestation in placenta and in human blood up to adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, sex dimorphic differential methylation with associated differential gene expression in the first trimester placenta is small, but there remain significant genes that may be regulated through methylation leading to differences in the first trimester placenta.

Fetal sex and placenta development affect pregnancy outcomes for both the fetus and mother throughout pregnancy, including risk of miscarriages, preterm birth, preeclampsia, and other outcomes. Epigenetics, the "overlay" of regulatory signals on DNA which affects how DNA is read, is not well understood in early pregnancy when critical placenta developments are happening that affect the rest of pregnancy. Here, we use leftover placenta biopsy samples (n = 56) donated by Cedars-Sinai patients with informed consent to learn about first trimester human placenta DNA methylation differences due to fetal sex. Out of the total 743,461 sites analyzed, we identified 151 sites significantly affected by fetal sex after correcting p-values to reduce false positives (false discovery rate < 0.05). We also performed an analysis to look at multiple sites and identified 11 regions across the genome with significant DNA methylation changes due to fetal sex. Furthermore, because DNA methylation is a regulatory mark on DNA which typically dampens gene expression, we also compared the DNA methylation sex differences to placental RNA-sequencing gene expression analysis using the same tissue from a mostly overlapping patient group (n = 74 total sequenced, n = 51 overlap). We identify 18 genes which show both significant DNA methylation differences and gene expression changes. The most significant gene was transcription factor ZNF300 with higher DNA methylation in males and reduced gene expression in males (and thus higher gene expression in females). This study identifies some sex differences that continue until later pregnancy and others that are unique to first trimester.

Leveraging chorionic villus biopsies for the derivation of patient-specific trophoblast stem cells.

Human trophoblast stem (TS) cells are an informative in vitro model for the generation and testing of biologically meaningful hypotheses. The goal of this project was to derive patient-specific TS cell lines from clinically available chorionic villus sampling biopsies. Cell outgrowths were captured from human chorionic villus tissue specimens cultured in modified human TS cell medium. Cell colonies emerged early during the culture and cell lines were established and passaged for several generations. Karyotypes of the newly established chorionic villus-derived trophoblast stem (TS CV ) cell lines were determined and compared to initial genetic diagnoses from freshly isolated chorionic villi. Phenotypes of TSCV cells in the stem state and following differentiation were compared to cytotrophoblast-derived TS (TS CT ) cells. TSCV and TSCT cells uniformly exhibited similarities in the stem state and following differentiation into syncytiotrophoblast and extravillous trophoblast cells. Chorionic villus tissue specimens provide a valuable source for TS cell derivation. They expand the genetic diversity of available TS cells and are associated with defined clinical outcomes. TSCV cell lines provide a new set of experimental tools for investigating trophoblast cell lineage development.

High-throughput mRNA sequencing of human placenta shows sex differences across gestation.

INTRODUCTION: Fetal sex affects fetal and maternal health outcomes in pregnancy, but this connection remains poorly understood. As the placenta is the route of fetomaternal communication and derives from the fetal genome, placental gene expression sex differences may explain these outcomes. OBJECTIVES: We utilized next generation sequencing to study the normal human placenta in both sexes in first and third trimester to generate a normative transcriptome based on sex and gestation. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed 124 first trimester (T1, 59 female and 65 male) and 43 third trimester (T3, 18 female and 25 male) samples for sex differences within each trimester and sex-specific gestational differences. RESULTS: Placenta shows more significant sexual dimorphism in T1, with 94 T1 and 26 T3 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The sex chromosomes contributed 60.6% of DEGs in T1 and 80.8% of DEGs in T3, excluding X/Y pseudoautosomal regions. There were 6 DEGs from the pseudoautosomal regions, only significant in T1 and all upregulated in males. The distribution of DEGs on the X chromosome suggests genes on Xp (the short arm) may be particularly important in placental sex differences. Dosage compensation analysis of X/Y homolog genes shows expression is primarily contributed by the X chromosome. In sex-specific analyses of first versus third trimester, there were 2815 DEGs common to both sexes upregulated in T1, and 3263 common DEGs upregulated in T3. There were 7 female-exclusive DEGs upregulated in T1, 15 female-exclusive DEGs upregulated in T3, 10 male-exclusive DEGs upregulated in T1, and 20 male-exclusive DEGs upregulated in T3. DISCUSSION: This is the largest cohort of placentas across gestation from healthy pregnancies defining the normative sex dimorphic gene expression and sex common, sex specific and sex exclusive gene expression across gestation. The first trimester has the most sexually dimorphic transcripts, and the majority were upregulated in females compared to males in both trimesters. The short arm of the X chromosome and the pseudoautosomal region is particularly critical in defining sex differences in the first trimester placenta. As pregnancy is a dynamic state, sex specific DEGs across gestation may contribute to sex dimorphic changes in overall outcomes.

A systematic review of genome-wide analyses of methylation changes associated with assisted reproductive technologies in various tissues.

IMPORTANCE: Because analytic technologies improve, increasing amounts of data on methylation differences between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and unassisted conceptions are available. However, various studies use different tissue types and different populations in their analyses, making data comparison and integration difficult. OBJECTIVE: To compare and integrate data on genome-wide analyses of methylation differences due to ART, allowing exposure of overarching themes. EVIDENCE REVIEW: All studies undertaking genome-wide analysis of human methylation differences due to ART or infertility in any tissue type across the lifespan were assessed for inclusion. FINDINGS: Seventeen studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. One study assessed trophectoderm biopsies, 2 first-trimester placenta, 1 first-trimester fetal tissue, 2 term placenta, 7 cord blood, 3 newborn dried blood spots, 1 childhood buccal smears, 1 childhood peripheral blood, and 2 adult peripheral blood. Eleven studies compared tissues from in vitro fertilization (IVF) conceptions with those of unassisted conceptions, 4 compared intracytoplasmic sperm injection with unassisted conceptions, 4 compared non-IVF fertility treatment (NIFT) with unassisted conceptions, 4 compared NIFT with IVF, and 5 compared an infertile population (conceiving via various methods) with an unassisted presumably fertile population. In studies assessing placental tissue, 1 gene with potential methylation changes due to IVF when compared with unassisted conceptions was identified by 2 studies. In blood, 11 potential genes with methylation changes due to IVF compared with unassisted conceptions were identified by 2 studies, 1 of which was identified by 3 studies. Three potentially affected genes were identified by 2 studies involving blood between intracytoplasmic sperm injection and unassisted populations. There were no overlapping genes identified in any tissue type between NIFT and unassisted populations, between NIFT and IVF, or the infertility combined population when compared with the unassisted fertile population. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing studies is challenging due to differing variables between analyses. However, even in similar tissue types and populations, overlapping methylation changes are limited, suggesting that differences due to ART are minimal. RELEVANCE: Information from this systematic review is significant for providers and patients who provide and use ART to understand methylation risks that may be associated with the technology.