Testing of symmetric biphasic stimulation in Vim-DBS ET patients: a randomized-controlled pilot study.

Introduction: Symmetric biphasic pulses have been shown to increase the therapeutic window compared to standard cathodic pulses in ET Vim-DBS patients. Furthermore, three hours of stimulation with biphasic pulses caused less stimulation-induced ataxia compared to cathodic pulses. Therefore, an investigation of the longer-term safety of biphasic pulses is warranted. Methods: Seven ET patients were included in a randomized double-blind, cross-over design of one week home-use of symmetric biphasic stimulation (anodic phase first) versus cathodic stimulation. Amplitude was set in a double-blinded way, at the tremor arrest threshold. The primary outcome was safety assessed by documenting the adverse events. Secondary outcome parameters were stimulation amplitude, tremor (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale) and ataxia (International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale) severity, quality of life (Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire) and cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment). Three patients continued in the open-label extension phase for 3 months, during which biphasic stimulation-only was further assessed by the same outcome parameters. Results: During the 1 week testing, no adverse effects were reported. To obtain equivalent tremor control, the amplitude of the biphasic pulse was significantly higher compared to that of the cathodic pulse (p = 0.003). The other outcome parameters were not significantly different. During the open-label study, one patient used the remote control to increase the amplitude, leading to two falls caused by stimulation-induced ataxia. No other adverse effects occurred. Discussion and conclusion: In a small cohort, when tested for one week, symmetric biphasic pulses suggest to be safe, but require higher stimulation amplitudes. Further follow-up studies are needed to investigate long-term effects and safety.

Electrophysiological sweet spot mapping in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease patients.

BACKGROUND: Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is a well-established therapy to treat Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the STN-DBS sub-target remains debated. Recently, a white matter tract termed the hyperdirect pathway (HDP), directly connecting the motor cortex to STN, has gained interest as HDP stimulation is hypothesized to drive DBS therapeutic effects. Previously, we have investigated EEG-based evoked potentials (EPs) to better understand the neuroanatomical origins of the DBS clinical effect. We found a 3-millisecond peak (P3) relating to clinical benefit, and a 10-millisecond peak (P10) suggesting nigral side effects. Here, we aimed to investigate the neuroanatomical origins of DBS EPs using probabilistic mapping. METHODS: EPs were recorded using EEG whilst low-frequency stimulation was delivered at all DBS-contacts individually. Next, EPs were mapped onto the patients' individual space and then transformed to MNI standard space. Using voxel-wise and fiber-wise probabilistic mapping, we determined hotspots/hottracts and coldspots/coldtracts for P3 and P10. Topography analysis was also performed to determine the spatial distribution of the DBS EPs. RESULTS: In all 13 patients (18 hemispheres), voxel- and fiber-wise probabilistic mapping resulted in a P3-hotspot/hottract centered on the posterodorsomedial STN border indicative of HDP stimulation, while the P10-hotspot/hottract covered large parts of the substantia nigra. CONCLUSION: This study investigated EP-based probabilistic mapping in PD patients during STN-DBS, revealing a P3-hotspot/hottract in line with HDP stimulation and P10-hotspot/hottract related to nigral stimulation. Results from this study provide key evidence for an electrophysiological measure of HDP and nigral stimulation.

Active and Passive Cycling Decrease Subthalamic ß Oscillations in Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Preserved cycling capabilities in patients with Parkinson's disease, especially in those with freezing of gait are still poorly understood. Previous research with invasive local field potential recordings in the subthalamic nucleus has shown that cycling causes a stronger suppression of ß oscillations compared to walking, which facilitates motor continuation. METHODS: We recorded local field potentials from 12 patients with Parkinson's disease (six without freezing of gait, six with freezing of gait) who were bilaterally implanted with deep brain stimulation electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus. We investigated ß (13-30 Hz) and high γ (60-100 Hz) power during both active and passive cycling with different cadences and compared patients with and without freezing of gait. The passive cycling experiment, where a motor provided a fixed cadence, allowed us to study the effect of isolated sensory inputs without physical exercise. RESULTS: We found similarly strong suppression of pathological ß activity for both active and passive cycling. In contrast, there was stronger high γ band activity for active cycling. Notably, the effects of active and passive cycling were all independent of cadence. Finally, ß suppression was stronger for patients with freezing of gait, especially during passive cycling. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide evidence for a link between proprioceptive input during cycling and ß suppression. These findings support the role of continuous external sensory input and proprioceptive feedback during rhythmic passive cycling movements and suggest that systematic passive mobilization might hold therapeutic potential. © 2023 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Deep Brain Stimulation for GNAO1-Associated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Guanine nucleotide-binding protein alpha-activating activity polypeptide O (GNAO1) syndrome, a rare congenital monogenetic disorder, is characterized by a neurodevelopmental syndrome and the presence of dystonia. Dystonia can be very pronounced and even lead to a life-threatening status dystonicus. In a small number of pharmaco-refractory cases, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been attempted to reduce dystonia. In this study, we summarize the current literature on outcome, safety, and outcome predictors of DBS for GNAO1-associated dystonia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on individual patient data. We included 18 studies describing 28 unique patients. RESULTS: The mean age of onset of symptoms was 2.4 years (SD 3.8); 16 of 28 patients were male, and dystonia was nearly always generalized (20/22 patients). Symptoms were present before DBS for a median duration of 19.5 months, although highly variable, occurring between 3 and 168 months. The exact phenotype, genotype, and radiologic abnormalities varied and seemed to be of little importance in terms of DBS outcome. All studies described an improvement in dystonia. Our meta-analysis focused on pallidal DBS and found an absolute and relative improvement in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) of 32.5 points (37.9%; motor part; p = 0.001) and 5.8 points (21.5%; disability part; p = 0.043) at last follow-up compared with preoperative state; 80% of patients were considered responders (BFMDRS-M reduction by ≥25%). Although worsening over time does occur, an improvement was still observed in patients after >10 years. All reported cases of status dystonicus resolved after DBS surgery. Skin erosion and infection were observed in 18% of patients. CONCLUSION: Pallidal DBS can be efficacious and safe in GNAO1-associated dystonia.

Deep brain stimulation with short versus conventional pulse width in Parkinson's disease and essential tremor: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To maximize clinical benefit and minimize stimulation-induced side effects, optimising deep brain stimulation (DBS) parameters is paramount. Recent literature suggests a potential benefit of short pulse width DBS (spDBS; ≤40 µs) over conventional pulse width DBS (cDBS; ≥60 µs) in movement disorders. OBJECTIVE: To compare therapeutic window (TW), therapeutic and side effects and energy consumption of spDBS and cDBS in movement disorders. METHODS: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Appropriate paired analyses were performed. RESULTS: Nine Parkinson's disease (PD) (143 patients), 4 essential tremor (ET) (26 patients) and no dystonia studies were included in the meta-analysis. TW defined as therapeutic amplitude range was larger with spDBS vs. cDBS in PD (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.04, p < 0.001) and ET (SMD = -0.71, p < 0.001), but the TW in terms of charge per pulse (CPP) did not differ. In PD, no differences were found in therapeutic and side effects (MDS-UPDRS-III, speech and gait, dyskinesia, non-motor symptoms and quality of life). In ET, Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale was lower with spDBS vs. cDBS (SMD = 0.36, p < 0.001). A qualitative analysis suggested fewer stimulation-induced side effects with spDBS. CPP was lower with spDBS vs. cDBS in PD (SMD = 0.79, p < 0.001) and ET (MD = 46.46 nC, p < 0.001), but real-world data on battery longevity are lacking. CONCLUSION: Although spDBS enlarges the TW as a wider amplitude range in both PD and ET, it does not alter TW defined by CPP. The therapeutic efficacy of spDBS is not different from cDBS in PD, but spDBS apparently induces more tremor reduction in ET.

EEG-based biomarkers for optimizing deep brain stimulation contact configuration in Parkinson's disease.

Objective: Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is a neurosurgical therapy to treat Parkinson's disease (PD). Optimal therapeutic outcomes are not achieved in all patients due to increased DBS technological complexity; programming time constraints; and delayed clinical response of some symptoms. To streamline the programming process, biomarkers could be used to accurately predict the most effective stimulation configuration. Therefore, we investigated if DBS-evoked potentials (EPs) combined with imaging to perform prediction analyses could predict the best contact configuration. Methods: In 10 patients, EPs were recorded in response to stimulation at 10 Hz for 50 s on each DBS-contact. In two patients, we recorded from both hemispheres, resulting in recordings from a total of 12 hemispheres. A monopolar review was performed by stimulating on each contact and measuring the therapeutic window. CT and MRI data were collected. Prediction models were created to assess how well the EPs and imaging could predict the best contact configuration. Results: EPs at 3 ms and at 10 ms were recorded. The prediction models showed that EPs can be combined with imaging data to predict the best contact configuration and hence, significantly outperformed random contact selection during a monopolar review. Conclusion: EPs can predict the best contact configuration. Ultimately, these prediction tools could be implemented into daily practice to ease the DBS programming of PD patients.

Effects of ventro-oral thalamic deep brain stimulation in a patient with musician's dystonia: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Musician's dystonia is a task-specific focal hand dystonia characterized by involuntary contraction of muscles while playing a musical instrument. Current treatment options are often insufficient. OBSERVATIONS: We present the effects of ventro-oral thalamic deep brain stimulation in a patient with musician's dystonia. The patient was a 67-year-old pianist with musician's dystonia who underwent deep brain stimulation with the ventralis oralis anterior and posterior nuclei of the thalamus as targets. The Tubiana and Chamagne rating scale was used to evaluate the effects of stimulation. The outcome was evaluated independently by four clinicians in a blinded manner at 3 months postoperatively. There was a distinct reduction of symptoms during stimulation. At 15 months postoperatively, the beneficial effect remained. No lasting side effects were observed. LESSONS: Further studies are warranted to evaluate the safety and long-term efficacy of this treatment modality.

Upper-extremity spasticity and functionality after selective dorsal rhizotomy for cerebral palsy: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Lumbosacral selective dorsal rhizotomy is a neurosurgical treatment option to reduce spasticity in the lower extremities in children with cerebral palsy. Surprisingly, concomitant improvement of spasticity in the upper extremities and functionality of the hands has been sporadically reported postoperatively. In this systematic review, the authors aimed to quantify the postoperative improvement in upper-extremity spasticity and functionality, identify predictors, and discuss underlying mechanisms. METHODS: The authors searched the MEDLINE and Embase databases for studies reporting upper-extremity outcomes in cerebral palsy patients after selective dorsal rhizotomy that reported one or more of the following clinical scales: the Ashworth Scale (AS), the Modified AS (MAS), the fine motor skills domain of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS), the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST), the self-care domain of the Functional Independence Measure for Children (WeeFIM), or the self-care domain of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). The authors arbitrarily divided postoperative follow-up into short-term (< 6 months), medium-term (6-24 months), and long-term (> 24 months) follow-up. A 1-point change in MAS score has been reported as clinically significant. To assess bias, the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and ROBINS-I tool were used. RESULTS: The authors included 24 articles describing 752 patients. Spasticity reduction of the upper extremities ranged from 0.30 to 0.55 (AS) and between 0 and 2.9 (MAS) at medium-term follow-up. This large variability may partially be attributed to a floor effect since patients with normal upper-extremity function would not be expected to have further improvement. QUEST improvement ranged from 2.7% to 4.5% at medium-term follow-up. The mean improvements in functional skills of the self-care domain of the PEDI were 4.3 at short-term and 7 at medium-term follow-ups and ranged from 10.8 to 34.7 at long-term follow-up. There are insufficient data to draw meaningful conclusions regarding the PDMS fine motor skills and the WeeFIM self-care domains. CONCLUSIONS: The literature suggests that a pronounced postoperative spasticity reduction in the lower extremities and a moderately severe preoperative upper-extremity spasticity may positively predict postoperative reduction in upper-extremity spasticity. There are at least 5 hypotheses that may explain the postoperative reduction in upper-extremity spasticity and functionality: 1) a somatosensory cortex reorganization favoring the hand region over the leg region, 2) a decrease in abnormal electrical transmission throughout the spinal cord, 3) an indirect result of improved posture due to improved truncal and leg stability, 4) an indirect consequence of occupational/physical therapy intensification, and 5) a maturation effect. However, all remain unproven to date.

Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: One of the experimental neuromodulation techniques being researched for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is deep brain stimulation (DBS). To evaluate the effectiveness of DBS in AD, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available evidence. Methods: From the inception through December 2021, the following databases were searched: Medline via PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The search phrases used were "Alzheimer's disease," "AD," "deep brain stimulation," and "DBS." The information from the included articles was gathered using a standardized data-collecting form. In the included papers, the Cochrane Collaboration methodology was used to evaluate the risk of bias. A fixed-effects model was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Results: Only five distinct publications and 6 different comparisons (one study consisted of two phases) were included out of the initial 524 papers that were recruited. DBS had no impact on the cognitive ability in patients with AD [0.116 SMD, 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.236 to 0.469, p = 0.518]. The studies' overall heterogeneity was not significant (κ2 = 6.23, T 2 = 0.053, df = 5, I 2 = 19.76%, p = 0.284). According to subgroup analysis, the fornix-DBS did not improve cognitive function in patients with AD (0.145 SMD, 95%CI, -0.246 to 0.537, p = 0.467). Unfavorable neurological and non-neurological outcomes were also reported. Conclusion: The inconsistencies and heterogeneity of the included publications in various target and age groups of a small number of AD patients were brought to light by this meta-analysis. To determine if DBS is useful in the treatment of AD, further studies with larger sample sizes and randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled designs are required.

Acute stimulation with symmetric biphasic pulses induces less ataxia compared to cathodic pulses in DBS for essential tremor.

BACKGROUND: Symmetric biphasic pulses have been shown to acutely increase the therapeutic window of ventralis intermedius deep brain stimulation (Vim-DBS) for essential tremor (ET) compared to cathodic pulses. Acute supratherapeutic stimulation can induce ataxic side effects in Vim-DBS. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect on tremor, ataxia and dysarthria of 3 h of biphasic stimulation in patients with DBS for ET. METHODS: A randomized, doubled-blind, cross-over design was used to compare standard cathodic pulses with symmetric biphasic pulses (anode-first) during a 3-h period per pulse shape. During each 3-h period, all stimulation parameters were identical, except for the pulse shape. Tremor (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale), ataxia (International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale) and speech (acoustic and perceptual measures) were assessed hourly during the 3-h periods. RESULTS: Twelve ET patients were included. During the 3-h stimulation period, tremor control was equivalent between the two pulse shapes. Biphasic pulses elicited significantly less ataxia than cathodic pulses (p = 0.006). Diadochokinesis rate of speech was better for the biphasic pulse (p = 0.048), but other measures for dysarthria were not significantly different between the pulses. CONCLUSION: Symmetric biphasic pulses induce less ataxia than conventional pulses after 3 h of stimulation DBS in ET patients.

Electrophysiologic Evidence That Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Activates Distinct Neural Circuits in Patients With Parkinson Disease.

OBJECTIVES: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) delivered via multicontact leads implanted in the basal ganglia is an established therapy to treat Parkinson disease (PD). However, the different neural circuits that can be modulated through stimulation on different DBS contacts are poorly understood. Evidence shows that electrically stimulating the subthalamic nucleus (STN) causes a therapeutic effect through antidromic activation of the hyperdirect pathway-a monosynaptic connection from the cortex to the STN. Recent studies suggest that stimulating the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) may improve gait. The advent of directional DBS leads now provides a spatially precise means to probe these neural circuits and better understand how DBS affects distinct neural networks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured cortical evoked potentials (EPs) using electroencephalography (EEG) in response to low-frequency DBS using the different directional DBS contacts in eight patients with PD. RESULTS: A short-latency EP at 3 milliseconds originating from the primary motor cortex appeared largest in amplitude when stimulating DBS contacts closest to the dorsolateral STN (p < 0.001). A long-latency EP at 10 milliseconds originating from the premotor cortex appeared strongest for DBS contacts closest to the SNr (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that at the individual patient level, electrical stimulation of different nuclei produces distinct EP signatures. Our approach could be used to identify the functional location of each DBS contact and thus help patient-specific DBS programming. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The ClinicalTrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT04658641.

Interphase Gaps in Symmetric Biphasic Pulses Reduce the Therapeutic Window in Ventral Intermediate Nucleus of the Thalamus-Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor.

INTRODUCTION: Symmetric biphasic pulses enlarge the therapeutic window in thalamic deep brain stimulation in patients with essential tremor. Adding an interphase gap to these symmetric biphasic pulses may further affect the therapeutic window. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine patients (16 hemispheres) were included in this study. Biphasic pulses (anodic phase first) with interphase gaps of 0, 10, 20, 50, and 100 µs were tested, in random order. The outcome parameters were the therapeutic threshold (TT) and side-effect threshold (SET), and thus also the therapeutic window (TW). RESULTS: Increasing interphase gaps lowered both SET and TT (linear mixed-effects model; p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Because SET decreased predominantly, increasing interphase gaps resulted in smaller TWs (linear mixed-effects model; p < 0.001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Introducing an interphase gap in a symmetric biphasic pulse may lead to less selectivity in fiber or neuronal activation. Our findings show that, in the context of anode-first biphasic pulses, the use of zero-interphase gaps results in the largest TW. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT05177900.

Aligning Dentato-Rubro-Thalamic Tract and Subthalamic Nucleus Targets in a Patient with Comorbid Essential Tremor and Parkinson's Disease: Case Report.

Deep brain stimulation is an established treatment option for both essential tremor (ET) and Parkinson's disease (PD), although typically targeting different brain structures. Some patients are diagnosed with comorbid ET and PD. Selecting the optimal stimulation target in these patients is challenging. We present a patient with comorbid ET and PD in whom we used bilaterally a single parietal trajectory to align the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract and the subthalamic nucleus. Although parietal trajectories are challenging, we reached satisfactory outcomes for both conditions without complications. Single-electrode deep brain stimulation of the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract and the subthalamic nucleus through a parietal approach may represent a feasible treatment option in this patient group.

Deep brain stimulation and spinal cord stimulation for orthostatic tremor: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Orthostatic tremor is a rare and debilitating movement disorder. Its first-line treatment is pharmacological. For pharmaco-refractory patients, surgical treatment options such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) have been investigated recently. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review of all published outcome and safety data on DBS and SCS for orthostatic tremor patients. METHODS: We searched Pubmed and Embase for studies describing orthostatic tremor patients treated with DBS or SCS. We collected all available outcome and safety data and our primary endpoint was the change in unsupported stance duration 1 year postoperatively (±6 months). RESULTS: We included 15 studies, reporting on 32 orthostatic tremor patients who underwent DBS, 4 patients SCS and 2 both. The ventral intermediate nucleus and the zona incerta were targeted in 25/34 and 9/34 DBS cases, respectively. The median stance time at 1 year follow-up was 240 s compared to 30 s pre-operatively (p < 0.001). Stimulation-induced side effects occurred in the majority of patients, but were often transient. Bilateral stimulation appeared more effective than unilateral and stimulation settings were comparable to thalamic DBS for essential tremor. There were insufficient data available to draw meaningful conclusions on the long-term effects of DBS. Due to insufficient data, no conclusions could be drawn on the effects of SCS on orthostatic tremor. CONCLUSION: DBS may be effective to increase stance time in orthostatic tremor patients in the first year, but further research is necessary to evaluate the long-term effects and the role of spinal cord stimulation.

Current Steering Using Multiple Independent Current Control Deep Brain Stimulation Technology Results in Distinct Neurophysiological Responses in Parkinson's Disease Patients.

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective neuromodulation therapy to treat people with medication-refractory Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the neural networks affected by DBS are not yet fully understood. Recent studies show that stimulating on different DBS-contacts using a single current source results in distinct EEG-based evoked potentials (EPs), with a peak at 3 ms (P3) associated with dorsolateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation and a peak at 10 ms associated with substantia nigra stimulation. Multiple independent current control (MICC) technology allows the center of the electric field to be moved in between two adjacent DBS-contacts, offering a potential advantage in spatial precision. Objective: Determine if MICC precision targeting results in distinct neurophysiological responses recorded via EEG. Materials and Methods: We recorded cortical EPs in five hemispheres (four PD patients) using EEG whilst employing MICC to move the electric field from the most dorsal DBS-contact to the most ventral in 15 incremental steps. Results: The center of the electric field location had a significant effect on both the P3 and P10 amplitude in all hemispheres where a peak was detected (P3, detected in 4 of 5 hemispheres, p < 0.0001; P10, detected in 5 of 5 hemispheres, p < 0.0001). Post hoc analysis indicated furthermore that MICC technology can significantly refine the resolution of steering. Conclusion: Using MICC to incrementally move the center of the electric field to locations between adjacent DBS-contacts resulted in significantly different neurophysiological responses that may allow further precision of the programming of individual patients.

Deep brain stimulation in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis: A symptom provocation study in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an emerging therapy for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and several targets for electrode implantation and contact selection have been proposed, including the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST). Selecting the active electrode contacts (patients typically have four to choose from in each hemisphere), and thus the main locus of stimulation, can be a taxing process. Here, we investigated whether contact selection based purely on their neuroanatomical position in the BST is a worthwhile approach. For the first time, we also compared the effects of uni- versus bilateral BST stimulation. METHODS: Nine OCD patients currently receiving DBS participated in a double-blind, randomized symptom provocation study to compare no versus BST stimulation. Primary outcomes were anxiety and mood ratings in response to disorder-relevant trigger images, as well as ratings of obsessions, compulsions, tendency to avoid and overall wellbeing. Furthermore, we asked whether patients preferred the electrode contacts in the BST over their regular stimulation contacts as a new treatment setting after the end of the task. RESULTS: We found no statistically significant group differences between the four conditions (no, left, right and bilateral BST stimulation). Exploratory analyses, as well as follow-up data, did indicate that (bilateral) bipolar stimulation in the BST was beneficial for some patients, particularly for those who had achieved unsatisfactory effects through the typical contact selection procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its limitations, this study suggests that selection of stimulation contacts in the BST is a viable option for DBS in treatment-resistant OCD patients.