Empirical selection between least-cost and current-flow designs for establishing wildlife corridors in Gabon.

Corridors are intended to increase species survival by abating landscape fragmentation resulting from the conversion of natural habitats into human-dominated matrices. Conservation scientists often rely on 1 type of corridor model, typically the least-cost model or current-flow model, to construct a linkage design, and their choice is not usually based on theory or empirical evidence. We developed a method to empirically confirm whether corridors produced by these 2 models are used by target species under current landscape conditions. We applied this method in the Gamba landscape between 2 national parks in southwestern Gabon. We collected signs of presence of African forest elephant (Loxodonta cyclotis), forest buffalo (Syncerus caffer nanus), and 2 apes, western lowland gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and central chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes troglodytes), on transects. We used patch-occupancy models to identify least-cost and current-flow corridors for these 4 species. On average, 28.7% of current-flow corridors overlapped with least-cost corridors, confirming that the choice of corridor model can affect the location of the resulting linkage design. We validated these corridors by monitoring signs and examining camera detections on new transects within and outside modeled corridors. Current-flow corridors performed better than least-cost corridors for elephants, whereas the opposite was found for buffalo and apes. Locations of the highest priority corridors for the 3 taxa did not overlap, and only 18.3% of their combined surface was common among 2 species. We used centrality metrics to calculate the average contribution of corridor pixels to landscape connectivity and derived an index that can be used to prioritize corridors. As a result, we recommend protecting at least 17.4% of the land surface area around Gamba town to preserve the preferred travel routes of the target species.

Selección Empírica entre Diseños de Menor Costo y de Flujo de Corriente para Establecer Corredores de Fauna en Gabón Resumen La intención de los corredores es incrementar la supervivencia de las especies abatiendo la fragmentación del paisaje que resulta de la conversión de los hábitats naturales en matrices dominadas por humanos. Los científicos de la conservación con frecuencia dependen de un tipo de modelo de corredor, comúnmente el modelo de menor costo o el de flujo de corriente para construir un diseño de conexiones y su elección no suele estar basada en evidencia teórica o empírica. Desarrollamos un método para confirmar empíricamente si los corredores producidos por estos dos modelos son usados por las especies diana bajo las condiciones actuales del paisaje. Aplicamos este método en el paisaje de Gamba entre dos parques nacionales al suroeste de Gabón. Recolectamos señales de la presencia del elefante de bosque africano (Loxodonta cyclotis), el búfalo de bosque (Syncerus caffer nanus), y dos primates: el gorila occidental de tierras bajas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) y el chimpancé central (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) a lo largo de transectos en esta zona. Usamos modelos de ocupación de fragmentos para identificar los corredores de menor costo y los de flujo de corriente para estas cuatro especies. En promedio, el 28.7% de los corredores de flujo de corriente se traslaparon con los corredores de menor costo, lo que confirmó que la elección de modelo de corredor puede afectar la ubicación del diseño de conexiones resultante. Validamos estos corredores por medio del monitoreo de señales y la examinación de detecciones con cámaras en transectos nuevos dentro y fuera de los corredores modelados. Los corredores de flujo de corriente tuvieron un mejor desempeño que los corredores de menor costo para los elefantes, mientras que fue el caso contrario para los búfalos y los primates. La ubicación de los corredores con mayor prioridad para los tres taxones no se traslapó y sólo el 18.3% de las superficies combinadas fue común para dos especies. Usamos medidas de centralidad para calcular la contribución promedio de los pixeles del corredor hacia la conectividad del paisaje y derivamos un índice que puede usarse para priorizar los corredores. Como resultado de nuestro estudio recomendamos proteger al menos el 17.4% del área de superficie terrestre alrededor del poblado de Gamba para preservar las rutas de viaje de las especies diana.

Hypothesis-driven and field-validated method to prioritize fragmentation mitigation efforts in road projects.

The active field of connectivity conservation has provided numerous methods to identify wildlife corridors with the aim of reducing the ecological effect of fragmentation. Nevertheless, these methods often rely on untested hypotheses of animal movements, usually fail to generate fine-scale predictions of road crossing sites, and do not allow managers to prioritize crossing sites for implementing road fragmentation mitigation measures. We propose a new method that addresses these limitations. We illustrate this method with data from southwestern Gabon (central Africa). We used stratified random transect surveys conducted in two seasons to model the distribution of African forest elephant (Loxodonta cyclotis), forest buffalo (Syncerus caffer nanus), and sitatunga (Tragelaphus spekii) in a mosaic landscape along a 38.5 km unpaved road scheduled for paving. Using a validation data set of recorded crossing locations, we evaluated the performance of three types of models (local suitability, local least-cost movement, and regional least-cost movement) in predicting actual road crossings for each species, and developed a unique and flexible scoring method for prioritizing road sections for the implementation of road fragmentation mitigation measures. With a data set collected in <10 weeks of fieldwork, the method was able to identify seasonal changes in animal movements for buffalo and sitatunga that shift from a local exploitation of the site in the wet season to movements through the study site in the dry season, whereas elephants use the entire study area in both seasons. These three species highlighted the need to use species- and season-specific modeling of movement. From these movement models, the method ranked road sections for their suitability for implementing fragmentation mitigation efforts, allowing managers to adjust priority thresholds based on budgets and management goals. The method relies on data that can be obtained in a period compatible with environmental impact assessment constraints, and is flexible enough to incorporate other potential movement models and scoring criteria. This approach improves upon available methods and can help inform prioritization of road and other linear infrastructure segments that require impact mitigation methods to ensure long-term landscape connectivity.