The influence of conventional T2 MRI indices in predicting who will walk outside one year after spinal cord injury.

Context/Objective: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indices of spinal cord damage are predictive of future motor function after spinal cord injury (SCI): hyperintensity length, midsagittal tissue bridges, and Brain and Spinal Injury Center (BASIC) scores. Whether these indices are predictive of outdoor walking after SCI is unknown. The primary purpose was to see if these MRI indices predict the ability to walk outdoors one-year after SCI. The secondary purpose was to determine if MRI indices provide additional predictive value if initial lower extremity motor scores are available.Design: Retrospective. Clinical T2-weighted MRIs were used to quantify spinal cord damage. Three MRI indices were calculated: midsagittal ventral tissue bridges, hyperintensity length, BASIC scores.Setting: Academic hospital.Participants: 129 participants with cervical SCI.Interventions: Inpatient rehabilitation.Outcomes Measures: One year after SCI, participants self-reported their outdoor walking ability.Results: Midsagittal ventral tissue bridges, hyperintensity length, and BASIC scores significantly correlated with outdoor walking ability (R = 0.34, P < 0.001; R = -0.25, P < 0.01; Rs = -0.35, P < 001, respectively). Using midsagittal ventral tissue bridges and hyperintensity length, the final adjusted R2 for model 1 = 0.19. For model 2, the adjusted R2 using motor scores alone = 0.81 and MRI variables were non-significant. All five participants with observable intramedullary hemorrhage reported they were unable to walk one block outdoors.Conclusions: The MRI indices were significant predictors of outdoor walking ability, but when motor scores were available, this was the strongest predictor and neither midsagittal tissue bridges nor hyperintensity length contributed additional value. MRI indices may be a quick and convenient supplement to physical examination when motor testing is unavailable.

Muscle adaptations in acute SCI following overground exoskeleton + FES training: A pilot study.

Objective: To evaluate the combined effects of robotic exoskeleton and functional electrical stimulation (FES) training on muscle composition during over-ground gait training in persons with acute spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Randomized crossover pilot study. Setting: Inpatient-rehabilitation Hospital. Participants: Six individuals with acute SCI. Intervention: Participants were randomized to either receive training with the Ekso® Bionics exoskeleton combined with FES in addition to standard-of-care or standard-of-care alone. Outcome measures: The main outcome measures for the study were quantified using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), specifically, lower extremity muscle volume and intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). Static balance and fall risk were assessed using the Berg Balance Scale. Results: Significant improvements were observed in muscle volume in the exoskeleton intervention group when compared to only standard-of-care (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in IMAT even though the intervention group saw a reduction in IMAT that trended towards statistical significance (p = 0.07). Static balance improved in both groups, with greater improvements seen in the intervention group. Conclusions: Early intervention with robotic exoskeleton may contribute to improved muscle function measured using MRI in individuals with acute SCI.

Spinal Cord Tissue Bridges Validation Study: Predictive Relationships With Sensory Scores Following Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Background: Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), widths of ventral tissue bridges demonstrated significant predictive relationships with future pinprick sensory scores, and widths of dorsal tissue bridges demonstrated significant predictive relationships with future light touch sensory scores, following spinal cord injury (SCI). These studies involved smaller participant numbers, and external validation of their findings is warranted. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to validate these previous findings using a larger independent data set. Methods: Widths of ventral and dorsal tissue bridges were quantified using MRI in persons post cervical level SCI (average 3.7 weeks post injury), and pinprick and light touch sensory scores were acquired at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation (average 14.3 weeks post injury). Pearson product-moments were calculated and linear regression models were created from these data. Results: Wider ventral tissue bridges were significantly correlated with pinprick scores (r = 0.31, p < 0.001, N = 136) and wider dorsal tissue bridges were significantly correlated with light touch scores (r = 0.31, p < 0.001, N = 136) at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Conclusion: This retrospective study's results provide external validation of previous findings, using a larger sample size. Following SCI, ventral tissue bridges hold significant predictive relationships with future pinprick sensory scores and dorsal tissue bridges hold significant predictive relationships with future light touch sensory scores.

Lateral Corticospinal Tract and Dorsal Column Damage: Predictive Relationships With Motor and Sensory Scores at Discharge From Acute Rehabilitation After Spinal Cord Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if lateral corticospinal tract (LCST) integrity demonstrates a significant predictive relationship with future ipsilateral lower extremity motor function (LEMS) and if dorsal column (DC) integrity demonstrates a significant predictive relationship with future light touch (LT) sensory function post spinal cord injury (SCI) at time of discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN: Retrospective analyses of imaging and clinical outcomes. SETTING: University and academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 151 participants (N=151) with SCI. INTERVENTIONS: Inpatient rehabilitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: LEMS and LT scores at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. RESULTS: In 151 participants, right LCST spared tissue demonstrated a significant predictive relationship with right LEMS percentage recovered (ß=0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.73; R=0.43; P<.001). Left LCST spared tissue demonstrated a significant predictive relationship with left LEMS percentage recovered (ß=0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.82; R=0.51; P<.001). DC spared tissue demonstrated a significant predictive relationship with LT percentage recovered (ß=0.69; 95% CI, 0.52-0.87; R=0.55; P<.001). When subgrouping the participants into motor complete vs incomplete SCI, motor relationships were no longer significant, but the sensory relationship remained significant. Those who had no voluntary motor function but recovered some also had significantly greater LCST spared tissue than those who did not recover motor function. CONCLUSIONS: LCST demonstrated significant moderate predictive relationships with lower extremity motor function at the time of discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, in an ipsilesional manner. DC integrity demonstrated a significant moderate predictive relationship with recovered function of LT. With further development, these neuroimaging methods might be used to predict potential deficits after SCI and to provide corresponding targeted interventions.

Axial MRI biomarkers of spinal cord damage to predict future walking and motor function: a retrospective study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. OBJECTIVES: Primary: to assess if axial damage ratios are predictors of future walking after spinal cord injury (SCI), and if they add any predictive value if initial neurological impairment grades are available. Secondary: to determine if lateral spinal cord regions are predictors of future lower extremity motor scores (LEMS). SETTING: University/hospital. METHODS: Axial T2-weighted MRIs were used. Axial damage ratios and non-damaged lateral cord volumes were calculated. Each participant answered at 1 year after SCI, "Are you able to walk for 150 feet? (45.72 meters)" For the secondary aim, right and left LEMS were used. RESULTS: In total, 145 participants were selected. Individuals that could walk had smaller ratios than those that were unable. Walking and axial damage ratios were negatively correlated. A 0.374 ratio cut-off showed optimal sensitivity/specificity. When initial neurological grades were used, axial damage ratios did not add predictive value. Forty-two participants had LEMS available and were included for the secondary aim. Right cord regions and right LEMS were positively correlated and left regions and left LEMS, but these variables were also correlated with each other. CONCLUSIONS: Axial damage ratios were significant predictors of walking ability 1 year after SCI. However, this measure did not add predictive value over initial neurological grades. Lateral cord regions correlated with same-side LEMS, but the opposite was also found, calling this biomarker's specificity into question. Axial damage ratios may be useful in predicting walking after SCI if initial neurological grades are unavailable. SPONSORSHIP: This research was funded by a National Institutes of Health award, National Institute of Child Health and Development-NIH R03HD094577.

Midsagittal tissue bridges are associated with walking ability in incomplete spinal cord injury: A magnetic resonance imaging case series.

Context: Following spinal cord injury (SCI), early prediction of future walking ability is difficult, due to factors such as spinal shock, sedation, impending surgery, and secondary long bone fracture. Accurate, objective biomarkers used in the acute stage of SCI would inform individualized patient management and enhance both patient/family expectations and treatment outcomes. Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and specifically a midsagittal T2-weighted image, the amount of tissue bridging (measured as spared spinal cord tissue) shows potential to serve as such a biomarker. Ten participants with incomplete SCI received MRI of the spinal cord. Using the midsagittal T2-weighted image, anterior and posterior tissue bridges were calculated as the distance from cerebrospinal fluid to the damage. Then, the midsagittal tissue bridge ratio was calculated as the sum of anterior and posterior tissue bridges divided by the spinal cord diameter. Each participant also performed a 6-minute walk test, where the total distance walked was measured within six minutes.Findings: The midsagittal tissue bridge ratio measure demonstrated a high level of inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.90). Midsagittal tissue bridge ratios were significantly related to distance walked in six minutes (R = 0.68, P = 0.03).Conclusion/clinical relevance: We uniquely demonstrated that midsagittal tissue bridge ratios were correlated walking ability. These preliminary findings suggest potential for this measure to be considered a prognostic biomarker of residual walking ability following SCI.

Establishing the inter-rater reliability of spinal cord damage manual measurement using magnetic resonance imaging.

Study design: Retrospective study. Objectives: To establish the inter-rater reliability in the quantitative evaluation of spinal cord damage following cervical incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) utilizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI was used to perform manual measurements of the cranial and caudal boundaries of edema, edema length, midsagittal tissue bridge ratio, axial damage ratio, and edema volume in 10 participants with cervical incomplete SCI. Setting: Academic university setting. Methods: Structural MRIs of 10 participants with SCI were collected from Northwestern University's Neuromuscular Imaging and Research Lab. All manual measures were performed using OsiriX (Pixmeo Sarl, Geneva, Switzerland). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to determine inter-rater reliability across seven raters of varying experience. Results: High-to-excellent inter-rater reliability was found for all measures. ICC values for cranial/caudal levels of involvement, edema length, midsagittal tissue bridge ratio, axial damage ratio, and edema volume were 0.99, 0.98, 0.90, 0.84, and 0.93, respectively. Conclusions: Manual MRI measures of spinal cord damage are reliable between raters. Researchers and clinicians may confidently utilize manual MRI measures to quantify cord damage. Future research to predict functional recovery following SCI and better inform clinical management is warranted.

Balance in chronic traumatic brain injury: correlations between clinical measures and a self-report measure.

OBJECTIVE: To assess associations among commonly used self-report and clinical measures of balance in chronic TBI. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of balance in a convenience sample of individuals at least one year post TBI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC) (self-reported balance impairment), Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CB&M) (clinical measure validated in TBI), and Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) (clinical measure not validated in TBI). METHODS: Fifty-nine individuals (64% male, mean age 48.2 years) ambulating independently within the home participated in testing. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to quantify the direction and magnitude of the relationships among the three balance impairment measures. RESULTS: A significant positive correlation was noted between the ABC and CB&M (r = 0.42, p = 0.0008), between the ABC and BESTest (r = 0.46, p = 0.0002), and between the CB&M and BESTest (r = 0.86, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study we are aware of in the chronic moderate to severe TBI population directly comparing patient's self-reported balance impairment with clinical measures. Positive correlations were found between the self-report measure and both clinical measures. Overall, individuals with chronic TBI tend to self-report less impaired balance than clinical measures indicate. These results provide preliminary evidence to support the need for validation of the BESTest in this population. ABBREVIATIONS: ABC: Activities-specific balance confidence scale; BESTest: balance evaluation systems test; BOS: base of support; COM: center of mass; CB&M: community balance and mobility scale; CI: confidence interval; IQR: interquartile range; PTs: physical therapists; SD: standard deviation; SE: standard error; TBI: traumatic brain injury.

Lateral Corticospinal Tract Damage Correlates With Motor Output in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between spinal cord damage and specific motor function in participants with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). DESIGN: Single-blinded, cross-sectional study design. SETTING: University setting research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with chronic cervical iSCI (N=14; 1 woman, 13 men; average age ± SD, 43±12y). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of spinal cord damage was performed in 14 participants with iSCI. Each participant's damage was processed for total damage quantification, lateral corticospinal tract (LCST) and gracile fasciculus (GF) analysis. Plantarflexion and knee extension were quantified using an isokinetic dynamometer. Walking ability was assessed using a 6-minute walk test. RESULTS: Total damage was correlated with plantarflexion, knee extension, and distance walked in 6 minutes. Right LCST damage was correlated with right plantarflexion and right knee extension, while left LCST damage was correlated with left-sided measures. Right and left GF damage was not correlated with the motor output measures. CONCLUSIONS: MRI measures of spinal cord damage were correlated to motor function, and this measure appears to have spatial specificity to descending tracts, which may offer prognostic value after SCI.