Transcriptomic profile comparison of monocytes from rheumatoid arthritis patients in treatment with methotrexate, anti-TNFa, abatacept or tocilizumab.

It is well documented that patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have distinct susceptibility to the different biologic DMARDs available on the market, probably because of the many facets of the disease. Monocytes are deeply involved in the pathogenesis of RA and we therefore evaluated and compared the transcriptomic profile of monocytes isolated from patients on treatment with methotrexate alone or in combination with tocilizumab, anti-TNFα or abatacept and from healthy donors. Whole-genome transcriptomics yielded a list of regulated genes by Rank Product statistics and DAVID was then used for functional annotation enrichment analysis. Last, data were validated by qRT-PCR. Abatacept, tocilizumab and anti-TNFa cohorts were separately compared with methotrexate, leading to the identification of 78, 6, and 436 differentially expressed genes, respectively. The upper-most ranked genes were related to inflammatory processes and immune responses. Such an approach draws the genomic profile of monocytes in treated RA patients and lays the basis for finding gene signature for tailored therapeutic choices.

Relation among anti-rheumatic drug therapy, CD14(+)CD16(+) blood monocytes and disease activity markers (DAS28 and US7 scores) in rheumatoid arthritis: A pilot study.

Circulating human monocytes, a functionally and phenotypically heterogeneous population, are emerging as fundamental cell types in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this pilot study was to assess the correlation, if any, among anti-rheumatic drug therapy, circulating CD14(+)CD16(+) monocytes and validated clinical scales (e.g., DAS28 score and ultrasonography US7 score) of disease severity in RA. Thirty consecutive RA patients, either naïve or under disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or biological therapy, and 10 age-matched healthy volunteers, were enrolled. Monocytes were prepared from heparinized blood samples; surface expression of CD14 and CD16 was determined by flow cytometry. RA patients presented a significantly higher percentage of CD14(+)CD16(+) monocytes, as compared to healthy subjects. There was a good correlation between DAS28 clinical score and the ultrasound composite score US7 (r=0.66), as well as between both scores and the percentage of CD14(+)CD16(+) monocytes (r=0.43 and 0.47, respectively). Naïve RA patients had the highest expression (19.2±3.2%) of CD14(+)CD16(+) monocytes and elevated DAS28 score; patients on DMARDs presented a 7-fold increased expression of CD14(+)CD16(+) monocytes, relatively to healthy volunteers (2.1±1.4%), and an intermediate disease severity. The RA patients treated with biological therapy had a low percentage of CD14(+)CD16(+) monocytes (5.1±3.6%; p<0.01 vs naïve and DMARDs groups), similar to the one detected in healthy controls, and reduced US7 and DAS28 scores. Interestingly, for the same DAS28 score, monocytes isolated from RA patients on biological therapy had a lower CD16 expression than patients on DMARDs. Therefore, CD14(+)CD16(+) circulating blood monocytes may represent an appropriate biomarker to assess RA disease activity along with DAS28 and US7 scores. Together, these three parameters may represent a better indicator for evaluating therapy efficacy.

Modulation of human monocyte/macrophage activity by tocilizumab, abatacept and etanercept: An in vitro study.

Tocilizumab, etanercept and abatacept are biological drugs used in the therapy of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Their mechanism of action is well documented but their direct effects on human monocytes/macrophages have not been fully investigated. The objective of this study was to evaluate in vitro the influence of these drugs on monocytes/macrophages from healthy volunteers. Human monocytes were isolated from healthy anonymous volunteers and cultured as such or differentiated to monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs). The effect of tocilizumab, etanercept and abatacept (at concentrations similar to those in plasma of patients) on superoxide anion production, matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) gene expression and activity, Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR)γ expression and cell phenotype was evaluated. Exposure of monocytes/macrophages to tocilizumab, etanercept or abatacept resulted in a significant decrease of the PMA-induced superoxide anion production. Interestingly, the expression of PPARγ was significantly increased only by tocilizumab, while etanercept was the only one able to significantly reduce MMP-9 gene expression and inhibit the LPS-induced MMP-9 activity in monocytes. When etanercept and abatacept were added to the differentiating medium, both significantly reduced the amount of CD206(+)MDM. This study demonstrates that etanercept, abatacept and tocilizumab affect differently human monocytes/macrophages. In particular, the IL-6 antagonist tocilizumab seems to be more effective in inducing an anti-inflammatory phenotype of monocytes/macrophages compared to etanercept and abatacept, also in light of the up-regulation of PPARγ whose anti-inflammatory effects are well recognised.