Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Front Psychol ; 14: 1207633, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37492451

RESUMO

Introduction: Recreational and adaptive sports programs may be beneficial therapeutic interventions for improving psychological outcomes among veterans and service members with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) because they provide opportunities for exercise, socialization, respite, and time outdoors. Although there are an increasing number of sports programs for veterans and service members with PTSD, data evaluating the outcomes of such programs are limited. Materials and methods: The sample included 74 U.S. veterans who participated in the National Veterans Summer Sports Clinic (NVSSC), an annual, week-long adaptive sports program in San Diego, California. Participants were categorized into two subgroups: those who met criteria for probable PTSD using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (n = 20) and those who did not (n = 54). Participants completed self-report assessments before and after each daily activity, before and after the program, and 3 months following program completion. Results: Over the course of NVSSC program participation, the diagnostic subgroups (probable PTSD vs. no PTSD) did not significantly differ on changes in depression, positive affect, negative affect, or insomnia. Compared to those without PTSD, veterans with PTSD experienced greater reduction in generalized anxiety during the program (MD = -3.07, p = 0.034). Veterans with PTSD also experienced significant improvements in PTSD symptoms at postprogram (MD = -23.76, p < 0.001). For both groups, significant benefits were shown during the program but rebounded by the 3-month follow-up. Over the course of each daily activity, positive affect (MD = 2.71, p < 0.001) and depression/anxiety scores significantly decreased (MD = -0.75, p < 0.001), with no differences between PTSD diagnostic groups across time (ps = 0.714 and 0.961, respectively). Conclusion: Veterans with and without PTSD benefited from participation in the NVSSC. Participants with probable PTSD experienced greater improvements in generalized anxiety at postprogram only; there were no other significant differences between the two groups at postprogram or at 3-month follow-up. In line with prior research, benefits for those with PTSD were lost by 3-month follow-up, suggesting that regular engagement in recreational and adaptive sports may be necessary to sustain psychological health improvements.

2.
Obes Res Clin Pract ; 11(3): 344-351, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27931766

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a leading contributor to disability. Treatment approaches incorporating telehealth technologies are becoming increasingly popular in treating obesity, but their benefits relative to established behavioural weight loss therapies are poorly understood. The objective of this study was to compare a new telehealth treatment (TeleMOVE) to an established behavioural treatment (MOVE!) among Veterans with obesity. METHODS: This was an observational study of Veterans in the TeleMOVE or MOVE! programs between October, 2011 and March, 2013. A total of 699 Veterans enrolled in these programs from 2011-2013. A secondary focus was on Veterans that were ≥90% adherent to their treatment. From this group, 72 (33.1%) TeleMOVE and 141 (29.3%) MOVE! participants met adherence criteria. The primary outcome criterion was changes in body weight. RESULTS: Both programs were associated with significant weight reductions, with MOVE! participants showing significantly less weight loss relative to those in TeleMOVE (MOVE! mean weight loss=4.5[7.1]lb/2.0[3.2]kg; 1.8% mean weight loss; 12.0% achieving ≥5% weight loss; TeleMOVE mean weight loss=8.6[9.9]lb/3.9[4.5]kg; 3.6% mean weight loss; 26.6% achieving ≥5% weight loss, p's<.01). Among highly adherent participants, patients in TeleMOVE versus MOVE! lost significantly more weight (TeleMOVE=11.1[9.9]lb/5.0[4.5]kg versus MOVE!=5.7[7.1]lb/2.6[3.2]kg; t=4.6, p<.001) and were significantly more likely to achieve clinically significant weight loss (% with ≥5% weight loss were 43.1% versus 13.5%, respectively, p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study, TeleMOVE was at least as effective for weight loss as the more established multidisciplinary MOVE!


Assuntos
Terapia Comportamental/métodos , Obesidade/terapia , Cooperação do Paciente , Telemedicina , Veteranos , Programas de Redução de Peso/métodos , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/psicologia , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Resultado do Tratamento , Redução de Peso
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA