Association of Retinal Thickness at Month 1 Post-Treatment with Later Thickness and Visual Acuity in Central Vein Occlusion.

PURPOSE: To investigate the association of retinal thickness 1 month post-randomization (1 month after first study injection with aflibercept or bevacizumab) with later retinal thickness, visual acuity, and number of treatments in eyes with central or hemiretinal vein occlusion enrolled in the SCORE2 trial. DESIGN: Cohort study using data from a randomized multicenter clinical trial. METHODS: Analysis included 350 SCORE2 participants through 2 years of follow-up. Main outcome measures are central subfield thickness (CST) on spectral domain optical coherence tomography, best-corrected visual acuity letter score (VALS), and number of treatments for macular edema. CST was classified as thin (≤216µm), medium (>216µm and ≤300µm), or thick (>300µm). RESULTS: At Month 1, 15% (51/350) of study eyes were in the thin CST class, 57% (199/350) in the medium CST class, and 29% (100/350) in the thick CST class. Of eyes with thin CST at Month 1, 89-96% were also thin during Months 2-12. Over all visits studied, the VALS of eyes in the medium Month 1 CST class was significantly greater than the Month 1 thin class. During Months 6-12 (p<0.001) and 12-24 (p <0.001), but not during Months 0-6 (p=0.36) when monthly treatment was protocol-specified, the mean number of treatments for macular edema per study eye was highest in the thick CST class and lowest in the thin CST class. The thin CST class is significantly more likely to have disorganization of the retinal inner layers inside the central subfield, more paracentral acute middle maculopathy at Month 1, and a history of anti-VEGF treatment prior to trial enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Eyes with a thin CST at Month 1 were more likely to be in their Month 1 CST class during Months 2-12 than eyes in the thick or medium Month 1 CST classes. Eyes in the medium CST class had the best VALS, with fewest treatments in the thin class after Month 6. These findings suggest that having a post-treatment thin CST can be as detrimental to visual acuity as having a post-treatment thick CST.

Month 60 Imaging Findings and Relationship to Treatment Outcomes Following Anti-VEGF Therapy for Macular Edema Due to Central or Hemi-Retinal Vein Occlusion.

PURPOSE: To evaluate imaging findings from SCORE2 participants through 60 months, to describe the degree of resolution or progression of these variables, and to correlate changes in these imaging findings to treatment outcomes such as visual acuity and the number of treatments administered. METHODS: SCORE2 participants were followed for up to 60 months. Visual acuity, injection frequency and imaging tests color fundus photography (CFP), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography [UWFA]) were performed throughout this period. RESULTS: Less than 6% of eyes had subretinal fluid at month 60. Disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL) was the most likely finding to persist, present in 96% of eyes at baseline and unchanged at 95% at month 60. For UWFA, at baseline, there was a mean of 5.0% non-perfusion area (95% CI: 3.3%-6.8%) in the NETWORC grid with little change to month 60. For the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid, at baseline, there was a mean of 2.3% non-perfusion area (95% CI: 0.7%-3.9%) with little change to month 60. There was no correlation between any of the imaging variables at baseline and change in visual acuity to month 60 or in the number of injections following the variable treatment timeframe (month 12 to month 60). CONCLUSIONS: These analyses provide an anatomic explanation for persistent functional deficits many years following initial treatment. Clinical practice patterns should consider evaluation with these imaging tests to help explain persistent functional deficits in many eyes. Additionally, these 8 baseline imaging variables generally should not be relied on to predict visual acuity or intensity of treatment. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.

Intraocular Pressure in Eyes With Retinal Vein Occlusion Compared With Fellow Eyes: Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2) Report 27.

This cohort study investigates intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) compared with fellow, unaffected eyes.

OCT Grading System of Macular Infarction Predicts Vision in Participants With Central Retinal or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion: A Secondary Analysis of SCORE2.

PURPOSE: To determine whether macular infarction measured as hyper-reflectivity of the middle and inner retinal layers predicts long-term visual acuity outcomes in participants with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or hemi-retinal vein occlusion (HRVO). DESIGN: Clinical cohort study using post hoc secondary analysis of phase 3 clinical trial data. METHODS: This post hoc secondary analysis of the phase 3 Study of COmparative Treatments for REtinal Vein Occlusions 2 (SCORE2) clinical trial included 310 of the 362 participants with macular edema secondary to CRVO/HRVO who were randomized to injections of aflibercept or bevacizumab. Month 01 (M01) optical coherence tomography (OCT) images were analyzed using the following grading scheme: no infarction (grade 0), only middle retinal infarction (grade 1), diffuse middle and patchy inner retinal infarction (grade 2), and diffuse middle and inner retinal infarction (grade 3). Visual acuity letter score (VALS), central subfield thickness (CST), and number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections were correlated with the infarction severity grade at month 01. RESULTS: More severe macular infarction, with both middle and inner retinal layer hyper-reflectivity (ie, grades 2 and 3), was associated with worse M00 VALS and was predictive of VALS at M01 to M60 (P < .001). More severe infarction was associated with greater CST at presentation; however, after the first anti-VEGF injection, CST decreased and was similar across all grades at all time points (P > .05) with similar number of injections. CONCLUSIONS: Participants with more severe macular infarction at M01, as graded with OCT, exhibited worse visual outcomes despite significantly improved macular edema from month 6 to 5 years. This suggests that macular infarction may drive visual acuity after retinal fluid is treated with anti-VEGF.

High Variation in Inner Retinal Reflectivity Predicts Poor Visual Outcome in Patients With Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: SCORE2 Report 21.

Purpose: To assess the association of a novel spectral domain optical coherence tomography biomarker with 6-month visual acuity in in the Study of COmparative Treatments for REtinal Vein Occlusion 2. Methods: Spectral domain optical coherence tomography volume scans were evaluated for inner retinal hyperreflectivity, quantified by optical intensity ratio (OIR) and OIR variation. Baseline visual acuity letter score (VALS), baseline OCT biomarkers, and month 1 OIR were correlated with VALS at month 6. Regression trees, a machine learning technique yielding readily interpretable models, were used to assess for variable interaction. Results: Only baseline VALS correlated positively with month 6 VALS in multivariate regression. Regression trees detected a novel functional and anatomical interaction in a subgroup. Among patients with a baseline VALS worse than 43, those with an OIR variation at month 1 of more than 0.09 had a mean of 13 fewer letters of vision at 6 months compared with patients with an OIR variation of 0.09 or less. Conclusions: Baseline VALS was the strongest predictor of month 6 VALS. Regression tree analysis detected an interaction effect, in which higher OIR variation at month 1 predicted worse 6-month VALS in patients with low VALS at baseline. OIR variation may serve as a predictor for poor visual outcome despite treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in patients with poor vision at baseline. Translational Relevance: Pixel heterogeneity in three-dimensional OCT data may serve as measure of disruption of the retinal laminations, and this factor may carry visually prognostic value.

Cost-Utility Comparison of Bevacizumab and Aflibercept in the Treatment of Central or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion in the SCORE2 Trial.

Importance: Retinal vein occlusion is the second most common retinal vascular disease. Bevacizumab was demonstrated in the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2) to be noninferior to aflibercept with respect to visual acuity in study participants with macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO) following 6 months of therapy. In this study, the cost-utility of bevacizumab vs aflibercept for treatment of CRVO is evaluated. Objective: To investigate the relative cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab vs aflibercept for treatment of macular edema associated with CRVO or HRVO. Design, Setting, and Participants: This economic evaluation study used a microsimulation cohort of patients with clinical and demographic characteristics similar to those of SCORE2 participants and a Markov process. Parameters were estimated and validated using a split-sample approach of the SCORE2 population. The simulated cohort included 5000 patients who were evaluated 100 times, each with a different set of characteristics randomly selected based on the SCORE2 trial. SCORE2 data were collected from September 2014 October 2019, and data were analyzed from October 2019 to July 2021. Interventions: Bevacizumab (followed by aflibercept among patients with a protocol-defined poor or marginal response to bevacizumab at month 6) vs aflibercept (followed by a dexamethasone implant among patients with a protocol-defined poor or marginal response to aflibercept at month 6). Main Outcomes and Measures: Incremental cost-utility ratio. Results: The simulation demonstrated that patients treated with aflibercept will have an expected cost $18 127 greater than those treated with bevacizumab in the year following initiation. When coupled with the lack of clinical superiority over bevacizumab (ie, patients treated with bevacizumab had a gain over aflibercept in visual acuity letter score of 4 in the treated eye and 2 in the fellow eye), these results demonstrate that first-line treatment with bevacizumab dominated aflibercept in the simulated cohort of SCORE2 participants. At current price levels, aflibercept would be considered the preferred cost-effective option only if treatment restored the patient to nearly perfect health. Conclusions and Relevance: While there will be some patients with CRVO-associated or HRVO-associated macular edema who will benefit from first-line treatment with aflibercept rather than bevacizumab, given the minimal differences in visual acuity outcomes and large cost differences for bevacizumab vs aflibercept, first-line treatment with bevacizumab is cost-effective for this condition.

SCORE2 Report 24: Nonlinear Relationship of Retinal Thickness and Visual Acuity in Central Retinal and Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether a nonlinear association between central subfield thickness (CST) on spectral-domain OCT and concurrent visual acuity letter score (VALS) exists in eyes treated initially with aflibercept or bevacizumab for macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO) in the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2). DESIGN: Long-term follow-up after a randomized clinical trial from 64 centers in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were followed up to 60 months and treated at investigator discretion after completing the 12-month treatment protocol. METHODS: Two-segment linear regression models were compared with simple linear regression models of VALS on CST. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to assess strength of CST and VALS associations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Central subfield thickness was measured by OCT and VALS by the electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study methodology. RESULTS: Estimated inflection points, reflecting turning points at which the CST and VALS association changes from positive to negative, calculated at 7 postbaseline visits, range from 217 to 256 µm. A strongly positive correlation exists to the left of each estimated inflection point, ranging from 0.29 (P < 0.01 at month 60) to 0.50 (P < 0.01 at month 12), and a strongly negative correlation exists to the right of each estimated inflection point, ranging from -0.43 (P < 0.01 at month 1) to -0.74 (P < 0.01 at month 24). Randomization statistical tests showed that 2-segment models are favored over 1-segment models for all postbaseline months (P < 0.001 for all tests performed). CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between CST and VALS in eyes with CRVO or HRVO after treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is not simply linear. The usually modest correlations between OCT-measured CST and visual acuity belie strong left and right correlations present in 2-segment models. Post-treatment CST close to the estimated inflection points showed the best expected VALS. The SCORE2 participants with a post-treatment CST after treatment close to the estimated inflection points of 217 to 256 µm showed the best VALS. In patients treated with anti-VEGF for macular edema associated with CRVO or HRVO, a thinner retina is not always associated with better VALS. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

SCORE2 Report 20: Relationship of Treatment Discontinuation With Visual Acuity and Central Subfield Thickness Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment discontinuation with baseline factors and outcomes in eyes treated initially with aflibercept or bevacizumab for macular edema from central or hemiretinal vein occlusion. DESIGN: Long-term follow-up after a randomized clinical trial from 64 US centers. METHODS: Analysis included 150 SCORE2 Month 60 completers classified into 3 groups: discontinued treatment early, treated intermittently, and treated continuously. Outcomes included visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST). RESULTS: Patients who discontinued treatment early were younger (60.9 years, vs 66.7 and 70.5 for the treated intermittently and treated continuously groups; P = .001), and 17.4% were Black, compared to 19.5% and 4.7% for the treated intermittently and treated continuously groups (P = .006). At Month 60, the discontinued treatment early group had a higher proportion with complete resolution of macular edema (69.6%) than those treated intermittently (15.0%) and treated continuously (15.7%) (P < .001). Least-squares means analyses over follow-up demonstrated that the discontinued treatment early group had a lower mean CST (257 µm) than the treated intermittently (CST = 303 µm, P = .02) and treated continuously (CST = 300 µm, P = .01) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to those treated continuously, those who discontinued treatment early were younger and more likely Black. The discontinued treatment early group had a higher proportion with complete resolution of macular edema at Month 60, and a lower mean CST over follow-up, but not better VA, than the treated continuously and treated intermittently groups. Results support the need for continued monitoring and individualized treatment for patients treated with anti-VEGF for macular edema from central or hemiretinal vein occlusion.

Month 60 Outcomes After Treatment Initiation With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Macular Edema Due to Central Retinal or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion.

PURPOSE: To investigate 5-year outcomes in eyes initially treated with aflibercept or bevacizumab for macular edema due to central retinal or hemiretinal vein occlusion. METHODS: Long-term follow-up (LTF) after a randomized clinical trial from 64 centers in the United States. Participants were followed up to 60 months and treated at investigator discretion after completing the 12-month treatment protocol. Main outcomes were visual acuity letter score (VALS) and central subfield thickness (CST) on optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent (248/330) of eligible participants completed at least 1 visit between months 24 and 60, and 45% completed the month 60 visit. Among participants completing month 60, overall mean VALS improvement over baseline was 13.5 (95% CI: 9.6, 17.5), less than the mean improvement of 20.6 (95% CI: 18.7, 22.4) observed at month 12, with no significant differences between originally assigned study groups. Further, 66% (99/150) had at least 1 treatment between months 48 and 60 with a mean (SD) of 3.41 (3.69) treatments over this period. Mean CST was 671 µm at baseline and 261 µm (95% CI: 241.2, 280.9) at month 60. CONCLUSIONS: Although VALS improved substantially when patients were treated per protocol through month 12, improvement lessened when treatment was at investigator discretion and fewer treatments were received although VALS remained markedly improved over baseline through year 5. Most patients continued to receive treatment in year 5. This suggests that continued monitoring and, if warranted, treatment with anti-VEGF therapy benefits patients with macular edema associated with central retinal or hemiretinal vein occlusion. Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.

Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes After Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Macular Edema in Participants With Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion Compared With Participants With Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2) Report 18.

Importance: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections are commonly used to treat eyes with macular edema secondary to hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO) or central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Information on whether differences exist in outcomes after anti-VEGF therapy can help guide treatment for each of the different disease types. Objective: To compare baseline characteristics, treatment burden, and outcomes of macular edema treatment in participants with HRVO with those of participants with CRVO. Design, Setting, and Participants: This post hoc outcome analysis from the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 randomized clinical trial included 362 participants with macular edema caused by HRVO or CRVO treated at 66 US sites. Randomization began in September 2014, and the last month 24 follow-up visit occurred in February 2018. Data were analyzed from April 2020 to May 2021. Interventions: Eyes were initially randomized to 6 monthly intravitreal injections of aflibercept or bevacizumab and were treated according to protocol between months 6 to 12 depending on 6-month outcome. After month 12, patients were treated per investigator discretion and observed through month 60. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mean visual acuity letter score (VALS). Results: Of 362 included patients, 157 (43.4%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 68.9 (12.0) years. Outcome data were analyzed up to month 24 owing to substantial missing data at later visits. A significantly greater proportion of participants with HRVO than those with CRVO were Black (37% vs 11%). Treatment rates between months 12 to 23 were 0.36 (95% CI, 0.32-0.40) injections per month for patients with CRVO and 0.28 (95% CI, 0.19-0.36) for patients with HRVO (P = .11). The mean VALS from months 1 to 24 of an HRVO study eye exceeded that of a CRVO study eye by 5.5 (95% CI, 1.5-9.5; P = .01), consistent with the magnitude of the VALS difference between eyes with CRVO and HRVO at baseline. Eyes with CRVO presented at baseline with more macular edema than eyes with HRVO (difference in central subfield thickness [CST], 86 µm; 95% CI, 48-124; P < .001), with no difference in CST between the groups throughout months 1 to 24. Conclusions and Relevance: Black race was more prevalent among participants with HRVO than CRVO, and no differences were observed in the frequency of treatments for macular edema between eyes with CRVO and HRVO. Although eyes with CRVO presented with worse visual acuity and more macular edema on average than did eyes with HRVO, the magnitude of VALS improvement, central retinal thickness in response to anti-VEGF therapy, and treatment burden were similar between the groups.

SCORE2 Report 17: Macular thickness fluctuations in anti-VEGF-treated patients with central or hemiretinal vein occlusion.

PURPOSE: To evaluate macular thickness fluctuations and their association with visual acuity outcome in eyes with macular edema (ME) secondary to central (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO) treated initially with intravitreal aflibercept or bevacizumab. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of 362 patients with ME secondary to CRVO or HRVO initially randomized to six monthly intravitreal injections of aflibercept or bevacizumab. Three spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) central subfield thickness (CST) fluctuation measures were investigated over Months 1-12: standard deviation (SD), number of turning points (T) for each participant, and a measure denoted as Zigzag reflecting the magnitude of alternating ups and downs in a participant's CST. Main outcome measure is Month 12 visual acuity letter score (VALS). RESULTS: More fluctuations occurred in eyes randomized to bevacizumab than aflibercept: SD (59.98 vs 32.12; p < 0.0001), T (4.03 vs 3.53; p = 0.02) and Zigzag (24.91 vs 11.60; p = 0.0003). Month 12 VALS is significantly lower for the 4th (highest) quartile of the CST fluctuation measure than for the 1st (lowest) quartile for both SD (mean difference in VALS of 7.87; 95% confidence interval: 3.03, 12.70) and Zigzag (mean difference in VALS of 5.11; 95% confidence interval: 0.29, 9.93). SD and Zigzag quartiles were no longer significantly different after Month 1 VALS was added to the regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Greater CST fluctuation as assessed by SD and Zigzag was negatively associated with Month 12 VALS. However, early post-treatment VALS is a stronger predictor of VALS outcomes than the CST fluctuation measures.

Intraocular Pressure-Related Events After Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Macular Edema Due to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion: SCORE2 Report 16 on a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections are used to treat a variety of posterior segment conditions, including some associated with glaucoma, such as macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Therefore, information regarding intraocular pressure (IOP)-related events associated with anti-VEGF therapies is important to help balance the risks and benefits over the course of therapy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate IOP-related events among participants in the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial that included 312 participants with macular edema secondary to CRVO or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO) who were not taking IOP-lowering medications at baseline. First randomization occurred on September 14, 2014, and contained data through data freeze on April 1, 2020. Analysis took place from April 2020 through December 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Study participants were initially randomized to 6 monthly intravitreal injections of aflibercept or bevacizumab. At month 6, protocol-defined good responders were rerandomized to continued monthly or treat-and-extend dosing of their originally assigned study drug, and protocol-defined poor or marginal responders were switched to alternative treatment. After month 12, participants were treated as per investigator discretion. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Three different outcomes: (1) IOP elevation more than 10 mm Hg from baseline, (2) IOP to a level higher than 35 mm Hg, and (3) IOP-lowering incisional or laser surgery. RESULTS: Of the 312 participants meeting inclusion criteria (138 [44.2%] were female; mean [SD] age, 67.8 [12.1] years), 25 (8.0%) had IOP elevation more than 10 mm Hg over baseline through month 60, and 5 (1.6%) had IOP higher than 35 mm Hg. The 60-month Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence of IOP elevation more than 10 mm Hg over baseline was 0.13 (95% CI, 0.08-0.19), and the 60-month Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence of IOP higher than 35 mm Hg was 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01-0.06), and did not differ among participants initially randomly assigned to receive aflibercept or bevacizumab. Three participants (1.0%) underwent IOP-lowering incisional surgery, and 3 participants (1.0%) underwent IOP-lowering glaucoma laser surgery. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections are used to treat some conditions associated with glaucoma, such as macular edema due to CRVO, and the rates of IOP-related events in this trial support monitoring IOP in eyes treated with anti-VEGF therapy for macular edema associated with CRVO or HRVO for up to 60 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01969708.

Cluster Analysis and Genotype-Phenotype Assessment of Geographic Atrophy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 Report 25.

PURPOSE: To explore whether phenotypes in geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration can be separated into 2 or more partially distinct subtypes and if these have different genetic associations. This is important because distinct GA subtypes associated with different genetic factors might require customized therapeutic approaches. DESIGN: Cluster analysis of participants within a controlled clinical trial, followed by assessment of phenotype-genotype associations. PARTICIPANTS: Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 participants with incident GA during study follow-up: 598 eyes of 598 participants. METHODS: Phenotypic features from reading center grading of fundus photographs were subjected to cluster analysis, by k-means and hierarchical methods, in cross-sectional analyses (using 15 phenotypic features) and longitudinal analyses (using 14 phenotypic features). The identified clusters were compared by 4 pathway-based genetic risk scores (complement, extracellular matrix, lipid, and ARMS2). The analyses were repeated in reverse (clustering by genotype and comparison by phenotype). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Characteristics and quality of cluster solutions, assessed by Calinski-Harabasz scores, unexplained variance, and consistency; and genotype-phenotype associations, assessed by t test. RESULTS: In cross-sectional phenotypic analyses, k-means identified 2 clusters (labeled A and B), whereas hierarchical clustering identified 4 clusters (C-F); cluster membership differed principally by GA configuration but in few other ways. In longitudinal phenotypic analyses, k-means identified 2 clusters (G and H) that differed principally by smoking status but in few other ways. These 3 sets of cluster divisions were not similar to each other (r ≤ 0.20). Despite adequate power, pairwise cluster comparison by the 4 genetic risk scores demonstrated no significant differences (P > 0.05 for all). In clustering by genotype, k-means identified 2 clusters (I and J). These differed principally at ARMS2, but no significant genotype-phenotype associations were observed (P > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Phenotypic clustering resulted in GA subtypes defined principally by GA configuration in cross-sectional analyses, but these were not replicated in longitudinal analyses. These negative findings, together with the absence of significant phenotype-genotype associations, indicate that GA phenotypes may vary continuously across a spectrum, rather than consisting of distinct subtypes that arise from separate genetic causes.

Association between early and late response in eyes with central or hemiretinal vein occlusion treated with anti-VEGF agents : SCORE2 report 12: secondary analysis of the SCORE2 clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To assess whether early visual acuity letter score change from baseline (ΔVALS) and early spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) measures of center point thickness (CPT) are associated with later ΔVALS in eyes with macular edema due to central or hemiretinal vein occlusion treated with intravitreal aflibercept or bevacizumab. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of 362 participants. RESULTS: Considered separately at month 3, CPT (categorized as ≤ 300 µm, > 300 µm) and ΔVALS (categorized as < 5, 5-9, ≥ 10) are predictive of ΔVALS at month 6 (aflibercept: P = 0.02 for CPT and P < 0.0001 for ΔVALS; bevacizumab: P = 0.007 for CPT and P < 0.0001 for ΔVALS) and, except for CPT in the bevacizumab arm, also predictive of ΔVALS at month 12 (aflibercept: P = 0.03 for CPT and P < 0.0001 for ΔVALS; bevacizumab: P = 0.18 for CPT and P < 0.0001 for ΔVALS). Month 3 predictors are also associated with average ΔVALS from months 4 to 12 (CPT P = 0.01 in the aflibercept arm, P = 0.02 in the bevacizumab arm; ΔVALS > 10 versus < 5; P < 0.001 for both aflibercept and bevacizumab). When month 3 measures are considered jointly, ΔVALS effect remains significant for average ΔVALS from months 4 to 12 (aflibercept: P = 0.002; bevacizumab: P < 0.0001) but not CPT (aflibercept: P = 0.18; bevacizumab: P = 0.22). CONCLUSION: While both month 3 ΔVALS and CPT are predictive of ΔVALS after month 3 through month 12, early ΔVALS has a stronger relationship than CPT with later ΔVALS. SCORE2 registration number is NCT01969708.

SCORE2 Report 13: Intraretinal Hemorrhage Changes in Eyes With Central or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion Managed With Aflibercept, Bevacizumab or Observation. Secondary Analysis of the SCORE and SCORE2 Clinical Trials.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between intraretinal macular hemorrhage and visual acuity outcomes in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion or hemiretinal vein occlusion managed with aflibercept, bevacizumab, or observation. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data from 2 randomized clinical trials. METHODS: A total of 362 participants were randomized in the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2, and 88 participants randomized to observation in the Standard Care vs Corticosteroid in Retinal Vein Occlusion Study. Participants received monthly intravitreal aflibercept or bevacizumab through month 6 or observation through month 8. The main outcome was visual acuity letter score (VALS). RESULTS: Reduced area of hemorrhage by month 6 was observed in 70.7% (116 of 164) of aflibercept-treated eyes, 63.8% (104 of 163) of bevacizumab-treated eyes, and 42.2% (27 of 64) of observation eyes by month 8 (P < .01). Relative to eyes with hemorrhage during follow-up, aflibercept-treated eyes without hemorrhage at month 6 had a mean VALS improvement of 8.0 (99% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9, 14.2); bevacizumab-treated eyes without hemorrhage at month 6 had a mean VALS improvement of 3.2 (99% CI: -4.6, 11.0); and observation eyes without hemorrhage at month 8 had a mean VALS improvement of 13.5 (99% CI: 0.4, 26.5). At month 6, the presence of hemorrhage and the change in central subfield thickness (CST) were significantly associated with the change in VALS; however, CST was a more important predictor. CONCLUSION: Improvement in hemorrhage during follow-up was associated with visual acuity improvements and predicted visual acuity changes beyond what was explained by CST. These findings suggest that intraretinal macular hemorrhage is an important indicator of disease severity in retinal vein occlusion.

Month 24 Outcomes After Treatment Initiation With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Macular Edema Due to Central Retinal or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion: SCORE2 Report 10: A Secondary Analysis of the SCORE2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Two-year outcomes are reported comparing eyes originally assigned to aflibercept or bevacizumab to assess the need for continued anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy for macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO) from participants in the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2) trial. Objective: To investigate outcomes 1 year after cessation of the SCORE2 treatment schedule. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this secondary analysis of the SCORE2 randomized clinical trial, follow-up included 117 participants originally randomized to aflibercept and 119 participants originally randomized to bevacizumab between September 17, 2014, and November 18, 2015. Data for the analyses were frozen on September 13, 2018. Interventions: SCORE2 participants completed the treatment protocol at month 12, were subsequently treated at investigator discretion, and underwent assessment at month 24. Main Outcomes and Measures: Visual acuity letter score (VALS) and central subfield thickness (CST) on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Results: Among 362 participants randomized to aflibercept or bevacizumab, 65.2% (236 of 362) completed a protocol visit at month 24 (mean [SD] age, 68.5 (12.0) years; 53.8% male). The mean (SD) VALS improved from baseline to 12 months by 21.6 (14.5) in the aflibercept group compared with 21.9 (16.6) in the bevacizumab group (difference, -0.3; 99% CI, -5.6 to 4.9), then worsened from those values by a mean (SD) VALS of 7.6 (17.5) in the aflibercept group and 7.5 (14.5) in the bevacizumab group (difference, -0.1; 99% CI, -5.6 to 5.3) at month 24. The mean (SD) CST improved from baseline to 12 months by 394 (231) µm in the aflibercept group compared with 420 (274) µm in the bevacizumab group (difference, 26 µm; 99% CI, -62 to 114 µm), then worsened from those values by a mean (SD) of 58 (192) µm in the aflibercept group compared with 48 (186) µm in the bevacizumab group (difference, 10 µm; 99% CI, -58 to 78 µm) at month 24. Conclusions and Relevance: No differences in VALS or CST outcomes at month 24 were identified when participants originally assigned to aflibercept were compared with those assigned to bevacizumab. Caution in interpretation is needed because of loss to follow-up. In both groups, VALS and CST improved through month 12 and then worsened somewhat during the second year, when treatment was at investigator discretion. This analysis suggests that CRVO and HRVO warrant close monitoring and treatment as needed over at least 2 years to optimize outcomes in eyes treated with anti-VEGF therapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01969708.

Patient-Reported Visual Function Outcomes After Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Macular Edema Due to Central Retinal or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion: Preplanned Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is the standard-of-care first-line treatment for macular edema associated with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO), and information is needed to assess the effect of anti-VEGF therapy on patient-reported visual function. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of intravitreal aflibercept or bevacizumab on patient-reported visual function in patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO or HRVO. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This preplanned secondary analysis of the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2, a randomized clinical trial, included 346 participants from 66 private practice or academic centers in the United States. Participants had CRVO- or HRVO-associated macular edema and month 6 outcome information. Data were collected from September 17, 2014, through November 18, 2015, and analyzed from February 7, 2018, through February 26, 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Eyes were randomly assigned to receive an intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (1.25 mg) or aflibercept (2.0 mg) at baseline and every 4 weeks through month 5. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Difference between treatment arms at month 6 in the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) composite and subscale scores. RESULTS: Among the 346 participants (56.1% men; mean [SD] age, 69 [12] years), significant improvements occurred from baseline to month 6 in the NEI VFQ-25 composite score in the aflibercept (mean [SE] change, 7.5 [0.9]; P < .001) and bevacizumab (mean [SE], 6.1 [0.9]; P < .001) arms and in 10 of 12 subscale scores after multiplicity adjustment. No differences were observed at month 6 in NEI VFQ-25 composite or subscale scores between participants randomized to aflibercept or bevacizumab treatment. Weak positive correlations were seen between the change in the study eyes' visual acuity and the changes in the NEI VFQ-25 composite score (r = 0.22; P < .001) and the Distance Activities (r = 0.24; P < .001) and Driving (r = 0.19; P = .03) subscale scores. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Significant improvement occurred from baseline to month 6 in patient-reported visual function as assessed by the NEI VFQ-25. The lack of difference in NEI VFQ-25 scores between study participants treated with monthly intravitreal aflibercept and bevacizumab for macular edema due to CRVO or HRVO at month 6 is consistent with the primary outcome finding that showed bevacizumab was noninferior to aflibercept with respect to visual acuity improvement from baseline to month 6. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01969708.

Safety and efficacy of low-dose sirolimus in the PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum.

PURPOSE: PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS) encompasses a range of debilitating conditions defined by asymmetric overgrowth caused by mosaic activating PIK3CA variants. PIK3CA encodes the p110α catalytic subunit of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K), a critical transducer of growth factor signaling. As mTOR mediates the growth-promoting actions of PI3K, we hypothesized that the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus would slow pathological overgrowth. METHODS: Thirty-nine participants with PROS and progressive overgrowth were enrolled into open-label studies across three centers, and results were pooled. For the primary outcome, tissue volumes at affected and unaffected sites were measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry during 26 weeks of untreated run-in and 26 weeks of sirolimus therapy. RESULTS: Thirty participants completed the study. Sirolimus led to a change in mean percentage total tissue volume of -7.2% (SD 16.0, p = 0.04) at affected sites, but not at unaffected sites (+1.7%, SD 11.5, p = 0.48) (n = 23 evaluable). Twenty-eight of 39 (72%) participants had ≥1 adverse event related to sirolimus of which 37% were grade 3 or 4 in severity and 7/39 (18%) participants were withdrawn consequently. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that low-dose sirolimus can modestly reduce overgrowth, but cautions that the side-effect profile is significant, mandating individualized risk-benefit evaluations for sirolimus treatment in PROS.