Early Circulating Tumor DNA Shedding Kinetics for Prediction of Platinum Sensitivity in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by rapid progression after platinum resistance. Circulating tumor (ctDNA) dynamics early in treatment may help determine platinum sensitivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serial plasma samples were collected from patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy for SCLC on the first 3 days of cycle one and on the first days of subsequent cycles with paired samples collected both before and again after infusions. Tumor-informed plasma analysis was carried out using CAncer Personalized Profiling by deep Sequencing (CAPP-Seq). The mean variant allele frequency (VAF) of all pretreatment mutations was tracked in subsequent blood draws and correlated with radiologic response. RESULTS: ctDNA kinetics were assessed in 122 samples from 21 patients. Pretreatment VAF did not differ significantly between patients who did and did not respond to chemotherapy (mean 22.5% v 4.6%, P = .17). A slight increase in ctDNA on cycle 1, day 1 immediately post-treatment was seen in six of the seven patients with available draws (fold change from baseline: 1.01-1.44), half of whom achieved a response. All patients who responded had a >2-fold decrease in mean VAF on cycle 2 day 1 (C2D1). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in patients with a >2-fold decrease in mean VAF after one treatment cycle (6.8 v 2.6 months, log-rank P = .0004 and 21.7 v 6.4 months, log rank P = .04, respectively). CONCLUSION: A >2-fold decrease in ctDNA concentration was observed by C2D1 in all patients who were sensitive to platinum-based therapy and was associated with longer PFS and OS.

Combination of MDM2 and Targeted Kinase Inhibitors Results in Prolonged Tumor Control in Lung Adenocarcinomas With Oncogenic Tyrosine Kinase Drivers and MDM2 Amplification.

PURPOSE: MDM2, a negative regulator of the TP53 tumor suppressor, is oncogenic when amplified. MDM2 amplification (MDM2amp) is mutually exclusive with TP53 mutation and is seen in 6% of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), with significant enrichment in subsets with receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) driver alterations. Recent studies have shown synergistic activity of MDM2 and MEK inhibition in patient-derived LUAD models with MDM2amp and RTK driver alterations. However, the combination of MDM2 and RTK inhibitors in LUAD has not been studied. METHODS: We evaluated the combination of MDM2 and RTK inhibition in patient-derived models of LUAD. RESULTS: In a RET-fusion LUAD patient-derived model with MDM2amp, MDM2 inhibition with either milademetan or AMG232 combined with selpercatinib resulted in long-term in vivo tumor control markedly superior to either agent alone. Similarly, in an EGFR-mutated model with MDM2amp, combining either milademetan or AMG232 with osimertinib resulted in long-term in vivo tumor control, which was strikingly superior to either agent alone. CONCLUSION: These preclinical in vivo data provide a rationale for further clinical development of this combinatorial targeted therapy approach.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients with Well-Differentiated Papillary Peritoneal Mesothelial Tumors.

PURPOSE: Well-differentiated papillary peritoneal mesothelial tumors (WDPMTs) are understudied and discrete from peritoneal mesotheliomas (PMs). We report clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of a large prospective WDPMT cohort. METHODS: Patients with WDPMT identified between August 2007 and December 2020 were followed through January 2023. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were annotated. Overall survival (OS) was assessed from pathologic diagnosis. Germline variants were analyzed, and targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS; MSK-IMPACT) data were compared to PMs and diffuse pleural mesotheliomas (DPMs). RESULTS: Among 54 patients, median age at diagnosis was 55 (range 20-76), 50% were female (n = 27), and 46% were smokers (n = 25; median 8 pack/years). Most (94%, n = 51) WDPMTs were found during surgical explorations for other indications, primarily other malignancies. Two patients underwent surgical resection for WDPMT; none received systemic therapy for WDPMT. Median OS was not reached (19/54; median follow up 4.5 years). Somatic NGS was available for 35% (19/54) of patients. TRAF7 alterations were enriched in WDPMT (89%; 17/19) compared with PM (0%; 0/50; p < 0.0001) and DPM (0%; 0/74; p < 0.0001). In WDPMT compared with PM and DPM, there were less BAP1 (0% [0/0] vs. 4% [8/50] vs. 46% [34/74]; p = 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively) and NF2 (0% [0/0] vs. 24% [12/50] vs. 31% [23/74]; p = 0.03 and p = 0.001 respectively) alterations. Pathogenic germline variants were present in 23% (4/17) of WDPMTs. CONCLUSIONS: Well-differentiated papillary peritoneal mesothelial tumors were primarily incidental findings. There was no WDPMT-related mortality, so there was no distinct role for routine cytoreductive surgery or systemic therapy. Genomic profiles can help to differentiate WDPMT from DPM and PM.

Chromothripsis-mediated small cell lung carcinoma.

Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is a highly aggressive malignancy that is typically associated with tobacco exposure and inactivation of RB1 and TP53 genes. Here we performed detailed clinicopathologic, genomic and transcriptomic profiling of an atypical subset of SCLC that lacked RB1 and TP53 co-inactivation and arose in never/light smokers. We found that most cases were associated with chromothripsis - massive, localized chromosome shattering - recurrently involving chromosomes 11 or 12, and resulting in extrachromosomal (ecDNA) amplification of CCND1 or co-amplification of CCND2/CDK4/MDM2, respectively. Uniquely, these clinically aggressive tumors exhibited genomic and pathologic links to pulmonary carcinoids, suggesting a previously uncharacterized mode of SCLC pathogenesis via transformation from lower-grade neuroendocrine tumors or their progenitors. Conversely, SCLC in never-smokers harboring inactivated RB1 and TP53 exhibited hallmarks of adenocarcinoma-to-SCLC derivation, supporting two distinct pathways of plasticity-mediated pathogenesis of SCLC in never-smokers.

Tumor-Agnostic Genomic and Clinical Analysis of BRAF Fusions Identifies Actionable Targets.

PURPOSE: Even though BRAF fusions are increasingly detected in standard multigene next-generation sequencing panels, few reports have explored their structure and impact on clinical course. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We collected data from patients with BRAF fusion-positive cancers identified through a genotyping protocol of 97,024 samples. Fusions were characterized and reviewed for oncogenic potential (in-frame status, non-BRAF partner gene, and intact BRAF kinase domain). RESULTS: We found 241 BRAF fusion-positive tumors from 212 patients with 82 unique 5' fusion partners spanning 52 histologies. Thirty-nine fusion partners were not previously reported, and 61 were identified once. BRAF fusion incidence was enriched in pilocytic astrocytomas, gangliogliomas, low-grade neuroepithelial tumors, and acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas. Twenty-four patients spanning multiple histologies were treated with MAPK-directed therapies, of which 20 were evaluable for RECIST. Best response was partial response (N = 2), stable disease (N = 11), and progressive disease (N = 7). The median time on therapy was 1 month with MEK plus BRAF inhibitors [(N = 11), range 0-18 months] and 8 months for MEK inhibitors [(N = 14), range 1-26 months]. Nine patients remained on treatment for longer than 6 months [pilocytic astrocytomas (N = 6), Erdheim-Chester disease (N = 1), extraventricular neurocytoma (N = 1), and melanoma (N = 1)]. Fifteen patients had acquired BRAF fusions. CONCLUSIONS: BRAF fusions are found across histologies and represent an emerging actionable target. BRAF fusions have a diverse set of fusion partners. Durable responses to MAPK therapies were seen, particularly in pilocytic astrocytomas. Acquired BRAF fusions were identified after targeted therapy, underscoring the importance of postprogression biopsies to optimize treatment at relapse in these patients.

A Phase I/II Study of Valemetostat (DS-3201b), an EZH1/2 Inhibitor, in Combination with Irinotecan in Patients with Recurrent Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Recurrent small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has few effective treatments. The EZH2-SLFN11 pathway is a driver of acquired chemoresistance that may be targeted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase I/II trial investigated valemetostat, an EZH1/2 inhibitor, with fixed-dose irinotecan in patients with recurrent SCLC. Phase I primary objectives were to assess safety, tolerability, and a recommended phase II dose (RP2D). The phase II primary objective was overall response rate (ORR), with secondary objectives of determining duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Correlative analyses included immunohistochemistry of pretreatment and on-treatment tumor biopsies and pharmacokinetics analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were enrolled (phase I, n = 12; phase II, n = 10); one withdrew consent prior to treatment. Three dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in dose-escalation resulted in valemetostat 100 mg orally daily selected as RP2D. Among 21 evaluable patients, the most frequent (≥20%) treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and rash; three patients discontinued treatment for toxicity. Three of the first 10 patients in phase II experienced DLTs triggering a stopping rule. The ORR was 4/19 or 21% [95% confidence interval (CI), 6%-46%]. The median DoR, PFS, and OS were 4.6 months, 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.3-7.6 months), and 6.6 months (95% CI, 4.3 to not reached), respectively. SLFN11/EZH2 expression and SCLC subtyping markers did not correlate with response, but MHC-I expression did increase with treatment. Two responders demonstrated subtype switching on treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Combination valemetostat and irinotecan was not tolerated but demonstrated efficacy in recurrent SCLC. Valemetostat, combined with agents without overlapping toxicity, warrants further investigation in SCLC.

Diffuse Pleural Mesotheliomas with Genomic Near-Haploidization: A Newly Recognized Subset with Distinct Clinical, Histologic, and Molecular Features.

PURPOSE: Diffuse pleural mesotheliomas (DPM) with genomic near-haploidization (GNH) represent a novel subtype first recognized by The Cancer Genome Atlas project; however, its clinicopathologic and molecular features remain poorly defined. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We analyzed clinical genomic profiling data from 290 patients with DPM using the Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT) assay. Allele-specific copy number analysis was performed using the Fraction and Allele-Specific Copy Number Estimates from Tumor Sequencing (FACETS) algorithm. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients were evaluable for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis using FACETS from MSK-IMPACT tumor:normal sequencing data. In this cohort, GNH, defined as LOH across >80% of the genome, was detected in 10 cases (4.8%). Compared with non-GNH tumors, GNH DPMs were associated with younger age and less frequent self-reported history of occupational asbestos exposure. Histologically, GNH DPMs were enriched in biphasic subtype (80% vs. 14.5%) and showed abundant tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Genomic analysis revealed a higher frequency of TP53 alterations, whereas SETDB1 mutations were present in nearly all and only in this subset. The clinicopathologic and molecular findings were further validated in a separate cohort. Despite the younger age, patients with GNH DPMs had a shorter overall survival (10.9 vs. 25.4 months, P = 0.004); the poor prognostic impact of GNH remained significant after controlling for biphasic histology. Of three patients with GNH DPMs who received immune checkpoint blockade, two achieved a clinician-assessed partial response. CONCLUSIONS: GNH defines an aggressive subtype of mainly biphasic DPMs in younger patients with recurrent alterations in SETDB1 and TP53. The enrichment in biphasic histology and TILs, together with our preliminary immune checkpoint blockade response data and anecdotal clinical trial data, suggests that further evaluation of immunotherapy may be warranted in this subset.

Safety and efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation for primary and metastatic pleural based tumors.

PURPOSE: Assess safety and local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) of percutaneous cryoablation for pleural-based thoracic malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 46 patients (17 treated for palliation; 9 for oligoprogression; 20 for curative intent), with 62 pleural-based thoracic lesions, treated in 59 cryoablation sessions. Patients were treated from 9/2005-11/2021 with CryoCare CS (Varian, Irvine, CA) or IceFORCE (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) systems. For tumors treated with curative intent and/or oligoprogression, LTPFS of the treated tumor(s) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Post-operative complications were reported for all sessions, including those with palliative intent; univariate analyses were used to calculate factors associated with increased complication risk. RESULTS: Median number of tumors treated in a single treatment session was 1 (range 1-4). Largest dimension of the treated tumor was 2.1 cm [IQR:0.9-5 cm]. Of the 59 treatments, 98.3 % were technically successful. Median LTPFS was 14.4 (95 % CI: 9.4-25.6) months. Tumor size was a significant predictor of LTPFS (HR: 1.21, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.44, p = 0.023). Median OS was 52.4 (28.1-NR) months. Complications occurred in 28/59 sessions (47.5 %); 2/59 (3.4 %) were ≥ grade D by Society of Interventional Radiology adverse event criteria (death; hypoxia requiring supplemental oxygen upon discharge). Pain and pneumothorax were the most common complications. The length of lung parenchyma traversed was a significant predictor of pneumothorax: HR 0.48 (95 %CI: 0.14-0.83), p = 0.0024. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous cryoablation for pleural lesions is associated with a long duration of local control and most complications were minor and self-limited.

A plain language summary of the PHAROS study: the combination of encorafenib and binimetinib for people with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of the results of a study called PHAROS. This study looked at combination treatment with encorafenib (BRAFTOVI®) and binimetinib (MEKTOVI®). This combination of medicines was studied in people with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). NSCLC is the most common type of lung cancer. Metastatic means that the cancer has spread to other parts of the body. All people in this study had a type of NSCLC that has a change in a gene called BRAF termed a BRAF V600E mutation. A gene is a part of the DNA that has instructions for making things that your body needs to work, and the BRAF V600E mutation contributes to the growth of the lung cancer. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: In this study, 98 people with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC were treated with the combination of encorafenib and binimetinib (called encorafenib plus binimetinib in this summary). Before starting the study, 59 people had not received any treatment for their metastatic NSCLC, and 39 people had received previous anticancer treatment. At the time of this analysis, 44 (75%) out of 59 people who did not receive any treatment before taking encorafenib plus binimetinib had their tumors shrink or disappear. Eighteen (46%) out of 39 people who had received treatment before starting encorafenib plus binimetinib also had their tumors shrink or disappear. The most common side effects of encorafenib plus binimetinib were nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, and vomiting. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: These results support the use of encorafenib plus binimetinib combination treatment as a new treatment option in people with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC. The side effects of encorafenib plus binimetinib in this study were similar to the side effects seen with encorafenib plus binimetinib in people with a type of skin cancer called metastatic melanoma.

Comparison of Immunohistochemistry, Next-generation Sequencing and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Detection of MTAP Loss in Pleural Mesothelioma.

9p21 deletions involving MTAP/CDKN2A genes are detected in diffuse pleural mesotheliomas (DPM) but are absent in benign mesothelial proliferations. Loss of MTAP expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is well accepted as a surrogate for 9p21 deletion to support a diagnosis of DPM. Accurate interpretation can be critical in the diagnosis of DPM, but variations in antibody performance may impact interpretation. The objectives of this study were to compare the performance of MTAP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) EPR6893 and 1813 and to compare MTAP expression by IHC with 9p21 copy number status in DPM. Cytoplasmic expression of MTAP IHC with mAbs EPR6893 (ab126770; Abcam) and 1813 (NBP2-75730, Novus Biologicals) was evaluated in 56 DPM (47 epithelioid, 7 biphasic, and 2 sarcomatoid) profiled by targeted next-generation sequencing. 9p21 Copy number status was assessed by Fraction and Allele-Specific Copy Number Estimates from Tumor Sequencing (FACETS) analysis and also by CDKN2A fluorescence in situ hybridization in discrepant cases when material was available. MTAP mAb 1813 showed stronger immunoreactivity, more specific staining, and no equivocal interpretations compared to mAb EPR6893 which showed equivocal staining in 19 (34%) of cases due to weak or heterogenous immunoreactivity, lack of definitive internal positive control, and/or nonspecific background staining. MTAP expression with mAb 1813 showed near perfect agreement with 9p21 copy number by combined FACETS/fluorescence in situ hybridization calls (κ = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99; P < .001). MTAP IHC with mAb 1813 was 96% sensitive, 86% specific, and 93% accurate for 9p21 homozygous deletion. The findings of this study suggest that interpretation of MTAP IHC is improved with mAb 1813 because mAb EPR6893 was often limited by equivocal interpretations. We show that MTAP IHC and molecular assays are complementary in detecting 9p21 homozygous deletion. MTAP IHC may be particularly useful for low tumor purity samples and in low-resource settings.

Diffuse Pleural Mesothelioma: Advances in Molecular Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Diffuse pleural mesothelioma (DPM) is a highly aggressive malignant neoplasm arising from the mesothelial cells lining the pleural surfaces. While DPM is a well-recognized disease linked to asbestos exposure, recent advances have expanded our understanding of molecular pathogenesis and transformed our clinical practice. This comprehensive review explores the current concepts and emerging trends in DPM, including risk factors, pathobiology, histologic subtyping, and therapeutic management, with an emphasis on a multidisciplinary approach to this complex disease.

Exploring published and novel pre-treatment CT and PET radiomics to stratify risk of progression among early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic radiation.

PURPOSE: Disease progression after definitive stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) occurs in 20-40% of patients. Here, we explored published and novel pre-treatment CT and PET radiomics features to identify patients at risk of progression. MATERIALS/METHODS: Published CT and PET features were identified and explored along with 15 other CT and PET features in 408 consecutively treated early-stage NSCLC patients having CT and PET < 3 months pre-SBRT (training/set-aside validation subsets: n = 286/122). Features were associated with progression-free survival (PFS) using bootstrapped Cox regression (Bonferroni-corrected univariate predictor: p ≤ 0.002) and only non-strongly correlated predictors were retained (|Rs|<0.70) in forward-stepwise multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Tumor diameter and SUVmax were the two most frequently reported features associated with progression/survival (in 6/20 and 10/20 identified studies). These two features and 12 of the 15 additional features (CT: 6; PET: 6) were candidate PFS predictors. A re-fitted model including diameter and SUVmax presented with the best performance (c-index: 0.78; log-rank p-value < 0.0001). A model built with the two best additional features (CTspiculation1 and SUVentropy) had a c-index of 0.75 (log-rank p-value < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A re-fitted pre-treatment model using the two most frequently published features - tumor diameter and SUVmax - successfully stratified early-stage NSCLC patients by PFS after receiving SBRT.

Clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to determine the outcomes and toxicities of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were extracted from an institutional tumor registry for patients diagnosed with mesothelioma and treated with SBRT. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were employed to determine local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Forty-four patients with 59 total treated tumors from December 2006 to April 2022 were identified. Fifty-one (86.4 %) cases had oligoprogressive disease (five sites or less). The median prescription dose delivered was 3000 cGy in 5 fractions (range: 2700-6000 cGy in 3-8 fractions). Fifty-one (86.4 %) tumors were in the pleura, 4 (6.8 %) spine, 2 (3.4 %) bone, 1 (1.7 %) brain, and 1 (1.7 %) pancreas. The median follow-up from SBRT completion for those alive at last follow-up was 28 months (range: 14-52 months). The most common toxicities were fatigue (50.8 %), nausea (22.0 %), pain flare (15.3 %), esophagitis (6.8 %), dermatitis (6.8 %), and pneumonitis (5.1 %). There were no grade ≥ 3 acute or late toxicities. There were 2 (3.4 %) local failures, one of the pleura and another of the spine. One-year LC was 92.9 % (95 % CI: 74.6-98.2 %) for all lesions and 96.3 % (95 % CI: 76.5-99.5 %) for pleural tumors. One-year LC was 90.9 % (95 % CI: 68.1-97.6 %) for epithelioid tumors and 92.1 % (95 % CI: 72.1-98.0 %) for oligoprogressive tumors. One-year OS from time of SBRT completion was 36.4 % (95 % CI: 22.6-50.3 %). On multivariable analysis, KPS was the lone significant predictor for OS (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Our single-institutional experience on patients with MPM suggests that SBRT is safe with a low toxicity profile and potentially achieve good local control.

MRTX1719 Is an MTA-Cooperative PRMT5 Inhibitor That Exhibits Synthetic Lethality in Preclinical Models and Patients with MTAP-Deleted Cancer.

Previous studies implicated protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) as a synthetic lethal target for MTAP-deleted (MTAP del) cancers; however, the pharmacologic characterization of small-molecule inhibitors that recapitulate the synthetic lethal phenotype has not been described. MRTX1719 selectively inhibited PRMT5 in the presence of MTA, which is elevated in MTAP del cancers, and inhibited PRMT5-dependent activity and cell viability with >70-fold selecti-vity in HCT116 MTAP del compared with HCT116 MTAP wild-type (WT) cells. MRTX1719 demonstrated dose-dependent antitumor activity and inhibition of PRMT5-dependent SDMA modification in MTAP del tumors. In contrast, MRTX1719 demonstrated minimal effects on SDMA and viability in MTAP WT tumor xenografts or hematopoietic cells. MRTX1719 demonstrated marked antitumor activity across a panel of xenograft models at well-tolerated doses. Early signs of clinical activity were observed including objective responses in patients with MTAP del melanoma, gallbladder adenocarcinoma, mesothelioma, non-small cell lung cancer, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors from the phase I/II study. SIGNIFICANCE: PRMT5 was identified as a synthetic lethal target for MTAP del cancers; however, previous PRMT5 inhibitors do not selectively target this genotype. The differentiated binding mode of MRTX1719 leverages the elevated MTA in MTAP del cancers and represents a promising therapy for the ∼10% of patients with cancer with this biomarker. See related commentary by Mulvaney, p. 2310. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 2293.

Phase II, Open-Label Study of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib in Patients With BRAFV600-Mutant Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: The combination of encorafenib (BRAF inhibitor) plus binimetinib (MEK inhibitor) has demonstrated clinical efficacy with an acceptable safety profile in patients with BRAFV600E/K-mutant metastatic melanoma. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of encorafenib plus binimetinib in patients with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In this ongoing, open-label, single-arm, phase II study, patients with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC received oral encorafenib 450 mg once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles. The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (ORR) by independent radiology review (IRR). Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, time to response, and safety. RESULTS: At data cutoff, 98 patients (59 treatment-naïve and 39 previously treated) with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC received encorafenib plus binimetinib. Median duration of treatment was 9.2 months with encorafenib and 8.4 months with binimetinib. ORR by IRR was 75% (95% CI, 62 to 85) in treatment-naïve and 46% (95% CI, 30 to 63) in previously treated patients; median DOR was not estimable (NE; 95% CI, 23.1 to NE) and 16.7 months (95% CI, 7.4 to NE), respectively. DCR after 24 weeks was 64% in treatment-naïve and 41% in previously treated patients. Median PFS was NE (95% CI, 15.7 to NE) in treatment-naïve and 9.3 months (95% CI, 6.2 to NE) in previously treated patients. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were nausea (50%), diarrhea (43%), and fatigue (32%). TRAEs led to dose reductions in 24 (24%) and permanent discontinuation of encorafenib plus binimetinib in 15 (15%) patients. One grade 5 TRAE of intracranial hemorrhage was reported. Interactive visualization of the data presented in this article is available at the PHAROS dashboard (https://clinical-trials.dimensions.ai/pharos/). CONCLUSION: For patients with treatment-naïve and previously treated BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic NSCLC, encorafenib plus binimetinib showed a meaningful clinical benefit with a safety profile consistent with that observed in the approved indication in melanoma.

Reliability of assessing morphologic features with prognostic significance in cytology specimens of epithelioid diffuse pleural mesothelioma and implications for cytopathology reporting.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization incorporates morphologic features with prognostic significance in the 2021 classification of epithelioid diffuse pleural mesothelioma (E-DPM). Although cytology specimens are often the first and occasionally the only specimen available for patients with DPM, these features have not yet been investigated in cytology. METHODS: Nuclear atypia, pleomorphic features, necrosis, and architectural patterns were retrospectively assessed in 35 paired cytology and concurrent/consecutive surgical pathology specimens of E-DPM. Agreement between pairs was determined via unweighted κ scores. Discordant cases were re-reviewed to determine the reasons for disagreement. RESULTS: Interpretation of nuclear atypia in cytology was concordant with histology in all cases (κ = 1.000; p < .001). The presence of pleomorphic features and necrosis was concordant in 97.1% (κ = 0.842; p < .001) and 85.7% (κ = 0.481; p = .001) of paired cases, respectively. Assessment of architectural patterns in cytology showed only slight agreement with histology (κ = 0.127; p = .037). In cytology cases (n = 23) with cell block material available, assessment of nuclear atypia and the presence of pleomorphic features showed perfect agreement (κ = 1.000; p < .001, each), the presence of necrosis showed moderate agreement (κ = 0.465; p = .008), and assessment of architectural patterns showed slight agreement (κ = 0.162; p = .15) in paired specimens. Most disagreements were due to sampling differences between cytology and histology specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Although complete nuclear grading of E-DPM is not possible given the unreliability of mitotic counts in cytology, assessment of nuclear atypia in cytology specimens is shown to be reliable. Identification of pleomorphic features and necrosis is also reliable despite occasional sampling issues. Assessment of architectural patterns is more limited in cytology.

Clinical Outcomes Associated With Pembrolizumab Monotherapy Among Adults With Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma.

Importance: Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) represents a rare and clinically distinct entity among malignant mesotheliomas. Pembrolizumab has activity in diffuse pleural mesothelioma but limited data are available for DMPM; thus, DMPM-specific outcome data are needed. Objective: To evaluate outcomes after the initiation of pembrolizumab monotherapy in the treatment of adults with DMPM. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 2 tertiary care academic cancer centers (University of Pennsylvania Hospital Abramson Cancer Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center). All patients with DMPM treated between January 1, 2015, and September 1, 2019, were retrospectively identified and followed until January 1, 2021. Statistical analysis was performed between September 2021 and February 2022. Exposures: Pembrolizumab (200 mg or 2 mg/kg every 21 days). Main Outcomes and Measures: Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. The best overall response was determined using RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria, version 1.1. The association of disease characteristics with partial response was evaluated using the Fisher exact test. Results: This study included 24 patients with DMPM who received pembrolizumab monotherapy. Patients had a median age of 62 years (IQR, 52.4-70.6 years); 14 (58.3%) were women, 18 (75.0%) had epithelioid histology, and most (19 [79.2%]) were White. A total of 23 patients (95.8%) received systemic chemotherapy prior to pembrolizumab, and the median number of lines of prior therapy was 2 (range, 0-6 lines). Of the 17 patients who underwent programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) testing, 6 (35.3%) had positive tumor PD-L1 expression (range, 1.0%-80.0%). Of the 19 evaluable patients, 4 (21.0%) had a partial response (overall response rate, 21.1% [95% CI, 6.1%-46.6%]), 10 (52.6%) had stable disease, and 5 (26.3%) had progressive disease (5 of 24 patients [20.8%] were lost to follow-up). There was no association between a partial response and the presence of a BAP1 alteration, PD-L1 positivity, or nonepithelioid histology. With a median follow-up of 29.2 (95% CI, 19.3 to not available [NA]) months, the median PFS was 4.9 (95% CI, 2.8-13.3) months and the median OS was 20.9 (95% CI, 10.0 to NA) months from pembrolizumab initiation. Three patients (12.5%) experienced PFS of more than 2 years. Among patients with nonepithelioid vs epithelioid histology, there was a numeric advantage in median PFS (11.5 [95% CI, 2.8 to NA] vs 4.0 [95% CI, 2.8-8.8] months) and median OS (31.8 [95% CI, 8.3 to NA] vs 17.5 [95% CI, 10.0 to NA] months); however, this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this retrospective dual-center cohort study of patients with DMPM suggest that pembrolizumab had clinical activity regardless of PD-L1 status or histology, although patients with nonepithelioid histology may have experienced additional clinical benefit. The partial response rate of 21.0% and median OS of 20.9 months in this cohort with 75.0% epithelioid histology warrants further investigation to identify those most likely to respond to immunotherapy.

Neurofibromatosis Type 2-Yes-Associated Protein and Transcriptional Coactivator With PDZ-Binding Motif Dual Immunohistochemistry Is a Reliable Marker for the Detection of Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Alterations in Diffuse Pleural Mesothelioma.

Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) loss occurs in approximately 30% to 50% of diffuse pleural mesothelioma (DPM) with accumulation of yes-associated protein (YAP) 1 and transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) in tumor nuclei. NF2 and YAP/TAZ represent potential therapeutic targets. We investigated the performance of NF2-YAP/TAZ dual immunohistochemistry (IHC) in identifying DPM that harbors NF2 alterations and in distinguishing DPM from benign mesothelial proliferations. NF2-YAP/TAZ IHC was subsequently performed in a Discovery cohort of DPMs with (n = 10) or without (n = 10) NF2 alterations detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and 9 benign cases. The cutoff values for loss of NF2 expression and YAP/TAZ overexpression using IHC were determined in the Discovery cohort. The performance characteristics of NF2-YAP/TAZ IHC were investigated in a Validation cohort (20 DPMs and 10 benign cases). In the Discovery cohort, all DPMs with NF2 alterations using NGS showed NF2 IHC scores of <2, whereas all NF2-wild-type DPMs showed scores of ≥2. NF2-altered DPMs had significantly higher YAP/TAZ H-scores (P < .001) than NF2-wild-type DPM and benign pleura (median H-scores: 237.5 [range, 185-275], 130.0 [range, 40-225], and 10.0 [range, 0-75], respectively). NF2-YAP/TAZ IHC demonstrated 95.2% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value, and 95% negative predictive value for detecting NF2 alterations in DPM (n = 40) with NGS as the gold standard and 87.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity for distinguishing DPM (n = 40) from benign mesothelial proliferations (n = 19). NF2-YAP/TAZ IHC has a high sensitivity and specificity for detecting NF2 alterations in DPM and a high specificity for malignancy, highlighting potential utility for guiding NF2-targeted therapies and distinguishing DPM from benign mimics.

A Phase 1 Safety Study of Avelumab Plus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Introduction: Single-agent monoclonal antibody therapy against programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has modest effects in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Radiation therapy can enhance the antitumor effects of immunotherapy. Nevertheless, the safety of combining anti-PD-L1 therapy with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is unknown. We present the results of a phase 1 trial to evaluate the safety of the anti-PD-L1 antibody avelumab plus SBRT in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Methods: This was a single-arm, investigator-initiated trial in patients who progressed on prior chemotherapy. Avelumab was delivered every other week, and SBRT was delivered to one lesion in three to five fractions (minimum of 30 Gy) followed by continuation of avelumab up to 24 months or until disease progression. The primary end point of the study was safety on the basis of grade 3+ nonhematologic adverse events (AEs) within 3 months of SBRT. Results: Thirteen assessable patients received a median of seven cycles (range: 2-26 cycles) of avelumab. There were 27 grade 1, 17 grade 2, four grade 3, and no grade 4 or 5 avelumab-related AEs. The most common were infusion-related allergic reactions (n = 6), anorexia or weight loss (n = 6), fatigue (n = 6), thyroid disorders (n = 5), diarrhea (n = 3), and myalgia or arthralgias (n = 3). There were 10 grade 1, four grade 2, one grade 3, and no grade 4 or 5 SBRT-related AEs. The most common were diarrhea (n = 3), chest pain/myalgia (n = 2), fatigue (n = 2), cough (n = 2), dyspnea (n = 2), and nausea/vomiting (n = 2). Conclusions: Combination avelumab plus SBRT seems tolerable on the basis of the prespecified toxicity end points of the first stage of this Simon two-stage design phase 1 study.