Part Task and variable priority training in first-year anesthesia resident education: a combined didactic and simulation-based approach to improve management of adverse airway and respiratory events.

BACKGROUND: Part task training (PTT) focuses on dividing complex tasks into components followed by intensive concentrated training on individual components. Variable priority training (VPT) focuses on optimal distribution of attention when performing multiple tasks simultaneously with the goal of flexible allocation of attention. This study explored how principles of PTT and VPT adapted to anesthesia training would improve first-year anesthesiology residents' management of simulated adverse airway and respiratory events. The authors hypothesized that participants with PTT and VPT would perform better than those with standard training. METHODS: Twenty-two first-year anesthesia residents were randomly divided into two groups and trained over 12 months. The control group received standard didactic and simulation-based training. The experimental group received similar training but with emphasis on PTT and VPT techniques. Participant ability to manage seven adverse airway and respiratory events were assessed before and after the training period. Performance was measured by the number of correct tasks, making a correct diagnosis, assessment of perceived workload, and an assessment of scenario comprehension. RESULTS: Participants in both groups exhibited significant improvement in all metrics after a year of training. Participants in the experimental group were able to complete more tasks and answered more comprehension questions correctly. There was no difference in perceived workload or the number of correct diagnoses between groups. CONCLUSION: This study in part confirmed the study hypotheses. The results suggest that VPT and PTT are promising adjuncts to didactic and simulation-based training for management of adverse airway and respiratory events.

The pharmacokinetics of transdermal fentanyl delivered with and without controlled heat.

Preliminary reports have demonstrated that the application of local heat to the transdermal fentanyl patch significantly increased systemic delivery of fentanyl. The objective of this study was to further evaluate the pharmacokinetic effect of local heat administration on fentanyl drug delivery through the transdermal fentanyl patch delivery system in volunteers. In addition, the study was intended to document the effect of heat on steady-state transdermal fentanyl delivery. This was an open, 3-period, crossover study that evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of 25 microg/h transdermal fentanyl administered with and without local heat. During Sessions A and B, subjects received transdermal fentanyl for a 30-hour period. During Session A, heat was applied for 1 hour at the 24-hour time point during the 30-hour period. During Session B, heat was applied for the first 4 hours and then again for 1 hour at the 24-hour time point during the 30-hour period. The order of Sessions A and B was randomized, and a minimum of 2 weeks separated the sessions. Five of the 10 subjects returned to participate in Session C. During Session C, subjects received transdermal fentanyl 25 microg/h for 18 hours. Heat was applied during the first 4 hours of administration and then again for 15-minute periods at the 12- and 16-hour time points. Arterial blood samples for determination of serum fentanyl concentration were collected. Maximum concentration (C(max)), time to maximum concentration (t(max)), and area under the curve (AUC) were determined for each treatment period. Sedation, vital signs, oxygen saturation, and adverse events were recorded. During a period of 36 hours, there were no significant differences in C(max), AUC, or T(max) between transdermal fentanyl delivery with no heat and heat. However, significant differences were seen during the first 4 hours, with C(max) and AUC values almost 3 times higher for the heated administrations than for the administrations without heat. With heat, the mean C(max) was 0.63 ng/mL compared with a C(max) of 0.24 ng/mL without heat (P =.007). With early heat, the mean AUC was 1.22 ng/mL. h compared with 0.42 ng/mL. h without heat (P =.003). There was no statistically significant difference between the median times to achieve peak values (T(max)) during the first 4 hours. The addition of heat at 24 hours resulted in rapid increases in serum fentanyl concentrations for both groups and higher serum fentanyl concentrations for the administration that did not receive heat previously. Applying heat for 15 minutes at the 12-hour and 16-hour time points produced a rapid but short duration increase in serum fentanyl concentrations. The results suggest controlled heat might be used to significantly shorten the time needed to reach clinically important fentanyl concentrations. Controlled heat might be useful to produce rapid increases in serum concentrations for the rapid treatment of breakthrough pain.

Clinical evaluation of the Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT) platform.

INTRODUCTION: The Life Support for Trauma and Transport (LSTAT trade mark ) is a self-contained, stretcher-based miniature intensive care unit designed by the United States Army to provide care for critically injured patients during transport and in remote settings where resources are limited. The LSTAT contains conventional medical equipment that has been integrated into one platform and reduced in size to fit within the dimensional envelope of a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) stretcher. This study evaluated the clinical utility of the LSTAT in simulated and real clinical environments. Our hypothesis was that the LSTAT would be equivalent to conventional equipment in detecting and treating life-threatening problems. METHODS: Thirty-one anesthesiologists and recovery room nurses compared the LSTAT with conventional monitors while managing four simulated critical events. The time required to reach a diagnosis and treatment was recorded for each simulation. Subsequently, 10 consenting adult patients were placed on the LSTAT after surgery for postoperative care in the recovery room. Questionnaires about aspects of LSTAT functionality were completed by nine nurses who cared for the patients placed on the LSTAT. RESULTS: In all of the simulations, there was no clinically significant difference in the time to diagnosis or treatment between the LSTAT and conventional equipment. All clinicians reported that they were able to manage the simulated patients properly with the LSTAT. Nursing staff reported that the LSTAT provided adequate equipment to care for the patients monitored during recovery from surgery and were able to detect critical changes in vital signs in a timely manner. DISCUSSION: Preliminary evaluation of the LSTAT in simulated and postoperative environments demonstrated that the LSTAT provided appropriate equipment to detect and manage critical events in patient care. Further work in assessing LSTAT functionality in a higher-acuity environment is warranted.

Evaluation of an electronic esophageal detector device in patients with morbid obesity and pulmonary failure.

OBJECTIVE: Undetected esophageal intubation can result in permanent injury or death. Clinical confirmation of tube location may be misleading. Adjunctive methods should be used to supplement clinical judgment. Unfortunately, end-tidal carbon dioxide may misidentify properly placed tracheal tubes in low perfusion situations, while esophageal detector devices (EDDs) may misidentify properly placed tracheal tubes in situations where little airway dead space exists (morbid obesity, pulmonary failure). This study evaluated a modified EDD (the electronic esophageal detector device, or EEDD) designed to eliminate the problem of misidentified tracheal intubations. METHODS: Intubated morbidly obese or pulmonary failure patients were eligible for study entry. All endotracheal tubes (ETTs) were confirmed to be tracheal by waveform capnography and clinical judgment prior to study entry. Following consent, all patients were attached to the EEDD and a "measurement" was made to determine the "location" of their ETTs. Probability of misidentifying a tracheal intubation in these high-risk populations was calculated using a log-normal distribution method. RESULTS: Twenty-seven morbidly obese patients and 37 pulmonary failure patients were entered. The EEDD correctly identified all tracheal intubations in these patients, giving a false-negative rate of zero. The probability of misidentifying a tracheal intubation in the combined group was 0.06%. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the EEDD reliably identifies tracheal intubations in situations where standard EDDs may fail. However, future studies must determine the reliability of this device for identification of esophageal intubations and the reliability of this device in the less controlled emergency department and prehospital settings.