External oblique muscle plane blocks in combination with modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach for analgesia in abdominal surgery: A case report.

The costal and lateral external oblique muscle plane (EXOP) blocks anesthetize the lateral cutaneous branches, whereas the modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) anesthetizes the anterior branches of the thoracoabdominal nerves. Herein, we report two cases of successful perioperative pain management with the combination of these blocks: case 1 was a 67-year-old man who underwent open cholecystectomy and case 2 was a 38-year-old woman who underwent emergency laparoscopic surgery for strangulation ileus. Both patients were administered the costal and/or lateral EXOP blocks along with bilateral M-TAPA for perioperative analgesia. A pin-prick test performed 1 h after surgery revealed that the cutaneous sensory block covered all areas of the abdominal surgical field. Combined use of these blocks can be a new local analgesic strategy for abdominal surgery.

Novel external oblique muscle plane block for blockade of the lateral abdominal wall: a pilot study on volunteers.

PURPOSE: No reports have described techniques to efficiently anesthetize the lateral cutaneous branches of the entire abdomen. The aim of this study was to investigate an effective procedure for blocking the lateral cutaneous branches in the abdominal region. We sought to describe the sensory distribution of the previously described thoracoabdominal nerve block through perichondrial approach (TAPA) and the novel costal and lateral external oblique muscle plane (EXOP) blocks in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This was a proof-of-concept pilot study that comprised ten volunteers with an American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I. The participants underwent modified TAPA (M-TAPA), injection 2 of TAPA (injection into the anterior aspect of the 10th costal cartilage: I2-TAPA), costal EXOP, and lateral EXOP blocks with injection of 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.2% for each block. A pinprick test was performed one hour after injection and repeated at 30-min intervals until the effect of the nerve block disappeared. RESULTS: The M-TAPA injection anesthetized the anterior branches from T6/7 to T11/12, whereas the I2-TAPA injection had no effect. Costal and lateral EXOP injections anesthetized the lateral cutaneous branches of T7-10 and T11-12, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results of this pilot study in ten healthy volunteers indicate that novel EXOP blocks involving local anesthetic injection superficial to the external oblique muscle efficiently anesthetize the lateral cutaneous branches of the thoracoabdominal nerves. Our study shows that it may be anatomically plausible for the combined use of these blocks to anesthetize the entire abdominal wall.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Aucune présentation de cas n'a décrit de techniques permettant l'anesthésie efficace des branches cutanées latérales de tout l'abdomen. L'objectif de cette étude était d'évaluer une procédure efficace pour bloquer les branches cutanées latérales de la région abdominale. Nous avons cherché à décrire la distribution sensorielle du bloc nerveux thoraco-abdominal par approche périchondrale (TAPA), décrit précédemment, et des nouveaux blocs du plan musculaire oblique externe (EXOP) costal et latéral réalisés chez des volontaires sains. MéTHODE: Il s'agissait d'une étude pilote de preuve de concept qui comprenait dix volontaires avec un statut physique I selon l'American Society of Anesthesiologists. Les participants ont bénéficié d'un bloc TAPA modifié (M-TAPA), de l'injection 2 d'un bloc TAPA (injection dans l'aspect antérieur du 10e cartilage costal : I2-TAPA), d'un bloc EXOP costal et d'un bloc EXOP latéral avec injection de 20 mL de ropivacaïne 0,2 % pour chaque bloc. Un test cutané par piqûre d'épingle a été réalisé une heure après l'injection et répété à des intervalles de 30 minutes jusqu'à ce que l'effet du bloc nerveux disparaisse. RéSULTATS: L'injection de M-TAPA a anesthésié les branches antérieures de T6/7 à T11/12, tandis que l'injection d'I2-TAPA n'a eu aucun effet. Les injections costales et latérales d'EXOP ont anesthésié les branches cutanées latérales de T7­10 et T11­12, respectivement. CONCLUSION: Les résultats de cette étude pilote chez dix volontaires sains indiquent que les nouveaux blocs EXOP avec une injection superficielle d'anesthésique local au muscle oblique externe anesthésient efficacement les branches cutanées latérales des nerfs thoraco-abdominaux. Notre étude montre qu'il peut être anatomiquement plausible de combiner ces blocs pour anesthésier toute la paroi abdominale.

The tendinous septum of the semispinalis capitis muscle spatially separates the dorsal ramus between C3 and C4.

Local anesthetic injection into the medial head of the semispinalis capitis muscle can anesthetize the greater occipital nerve (GON) and third occipital nerve (TON) simultaneously (greater and third occipital nerve block: GTO block). Alternatively, inter-semispinal plane (ISP) block can anesthetize the dorsal rami of the cervical spinal nerves from C4 to T4. The GON, TON, and the dorsal rami of the inferior level cannot be blocked with a single injection. To elucidate this phenomenon from an anatomical standpoint, we performed an ISP block either alone or with a GTO block using water-based acrylic dye in three thiel-embalmed cadavers. Both dyes were clearly separated by the tendinous septum running obliquely inside the semispinalis capitis muscle (SCA). The tendinous septum of the SCA may have a relatively strong connection with the dorsal edge of the semispinalis cervicis muscle, and this structure may stem the injectate spread. Therefore, the GON and TON, running through the medial head of the SCA, and the dorsal rami of the inferior level are spatially separated by the tendinous septum, and cannot be blocked with a single injection.

Visualization of injectate spread of intercostal nerve block: a cadaveric study.

INTRODUCTION: Intercostal nerve block and neurolysis are widely used procedures, but their injectate spread has not been well understood. Previous studies have reported unexpected outcomes (paravertebral or epidural anesthesia) and spinal cord injury after intercostal nerve block and neurolysis. To investigate a possible mechanism for these complications, we aimed to visualize the flow of liquid injected near the intercostal nerve, using cadavers. METHODS: We performed a simulated intercostal nerve block study using two Thiel-embalmed cadavers. Dye was injected into the interfascial plane between the internal and innermost intercostal muscles under ultrasound guidance (blue, 10 ml) or under direct vision (green, 5 ml). RESULTS: Dye leakage began with injection of only 0.5-2 ml and occurred between the innermost intercostal muscle fibers. The dye injected around the intercostal nerve penetrated into the extrapleural space and reached the paravertebral space. CONCLUSIONS: Injectate placed around the intercostal nerve easily penetrate the extrapleural space and reach the paravertebral space. Intercostal nerve block or neurolysis has a risk of impairing at least the sympathetic chain and conceivably affecting the central nervous system.

Novel ultrasound-guided inter-semispinal plane block: a comparative pilot study in healthy volunteers.

We previously reported that a novel multifidus cervicis plane (MCP) block could anesthetize the dorsal rami of the cervical spinal nerves. While MCP sonoanatomy is easily detectable in most patients, it is sometimes difficult to recognize the MCP injection plane, especially in elderly patients. Thus, we proposed the inter-semispinal plane (ISP) block as an alternative for the MCP block. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of the ISP block by evaluating the area and duration of anesthesia, compared with that of the MCP block in eight healthy volunteers. Each participant underwent unilateral ultrasound-guided MCP block and ISP block. For each block, 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% was injected, and the area of anesthesia was determined using the pinprick test. The anesthetic area ranged from C4 to T2 (3/8; 37.5%), T3 (2/8; 25%), or T4 (3/8; 37.5%) in the MCP block, and from C4 to T1 (1/8; 12.5%), T2 (3/8; 37.5%), T3 (2/8; 25%), or T4 (1/8; 12.5%) in the ISP block. The mean (standard deviation) duration of sensory loss following MCP and ISP blocks was 329 (77) min and 349 (70) min, respectively. Thus, the ISP block may be a reliable alternative to the MCP block.