Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Perinat Med ; 48(7): 694-699, 2020 Sep 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32692705

RESUMO

Objectives The purpose of this study is to compare the vacuum extractor cup application technique described by Bird vs. the technique described by Vacca on a simulation model. Methods Six obstetricians participated in the study. Each obstetrician performed eight vacuum assisted deliveries using the Bird technique and eight vacuum assisted deliveries using the Vacca 5-Steps technique. Results A total of 96 vacuum assisted deliveries were performed. The mean distance from the centre of the cup to the flexion point was 1.78±0.96 cm for the Bird technique and 1.05±0.60 cm for the Vacca technique (p<0.001). The lateral distance (over the parietal bone) was 1.16±0.69 cm for the Bird technique and 0.66±0.52 cm for the Vacca technique (p<0.001). The vertical distance (towards the frontal or occipital bone) was 1.12±1.02 cm for the Bird technique and 0.67±0.55 cm for the Vacca technique (p=0.009). In occipito anterior positions, there were no significant differences between both techniques. Conclusions The Vacca technique was better in transverse and posterior positions.


Assuntos
Obstetrícia/normas , Prática Profissional , Vácuo-Extração , Feminino , Treinamento com Simulação de Alta Fidelidade , Humanos , Posicionamento do Paciente/classificação , Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/métodos , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Vácuo-Extração/instrumentação , Vácuo-Extração/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA