Executive summary: Japanese guidelines for allergic conjunctival diseases 2021.

Allergic conjunctival disease (ACD) is an inflammatory disease of the conjunctiva that is mainly caused by type I hypersensitivity response to allergens and accompanied by subjective symptoms and other findings induced by antigens. ACD is classified as allergic conjunctivitis, atopic keratoconjunctivitis, vernal keratoconjunctivitis, and giant papillary conjunctivitis. This article summarizes the third edition of the Japanese guidelines for allergic conjunctival diseases published in 2021 and outlines the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of ACD. Since the introduction of immunosuppressive eye drops, the treatment strategies for severe ACDs have significantly changed. To clarify the recommended standard treatment protocols for ACD, the advantages and disadvantages of these treatments were assessed using clinical questions, with a focus on the use of steroids and immunosuppressive drugs. This knowledge will assist healthcare providers and patients in taking an active role in medical decision making.

Japanese guidelines for allergic conjunctival diseases 2020.

The definition, classification, pathogenesis, test methods, clinical findings, criteria for diagnosis, and therapies of allergic conjunctival disease are summarized based on the Guidelines for Clinical Management of Allergic Conjunctival Disease 2019. Allergic conjunctival disease is defined as "a conjunctival inflammatory disease associated with a Type I allergy accompanied by some subjective or objective symptoms." Allergic conjunctival disease is classified into allergic conjunctivitis, atopic keratoconjunctivitis, vernal keratoconjunctivitis, and giant papillary conjunctivitis. Representative subjective symptoms include ocular itching, hyperemia, and lacrimation, whereas objective symptoms include conjunctival hyperemia, swelling, folliculosis, and papillae. Patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis, which is characterized by conjunctival proliferative changes called giant papilla accompanied by varying extents of corneal lesion, such as corneal erosion and shield ulcer, complain of foreign body sensation, ocular pain, and photophobia. In the diagnosis of allergic conjunctival diseases, it is required that type I allergic diathesis is present, along with subjective and objective symptoms accompanying allergic inflammation. The diagnosis is ensured by proving a type I allergic reaction in the conjunctiva. Given that the first-line drug for the treatment of allergic conjunctival disease is an antiallergic eye drop, a steroid eye drop will be selected in accordance with the severity. In the treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis, an immunosuppressive eye drop will be concomitantly used with the abovementioned drugs.

Reduced steroid-induced intraocular pressure elevation in tacrolimus-treated refractory allergic ocular diseases.

PURPOSE: To determine whether topical tacrolimus can lessen steroid-induced intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation. STUDY DESIGN: Open cohort post hoc analysis study. METHODS: Five hundred eleven patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis or atopic keratoconjunctivitis (mean age 17.0 ± 9.2 years) were studied. All 511 patients were treated with topical tacrolimus with or without topical steroids, and the changes in IOP were measured monthly for 3 months. The elevation in IOP induced by use of topical steroids was calculated using mixed linear regression analyses. The relationship between the elevation in IOP within 4 weeks and the use or nonuse of tacrolimus reported in published data was analyzed using metaregression analysis to estimate the effects of tacrolimus on the IOP in eyes treated with topical steroids. RESULTS: The mean topical steroid-induced IOP elevation in tacrolimus-treated eyes was lower, by 5.2 mmHg (P = 0.04), than that in earlier published data without tacrolimus as the control. In the tacrolimus-treated eyes, the mean betamethasone-induced IOP elevation was 1.3 mmHg without discontinuation of the steroid. Metaregression analysis indicated that glaucoma history and younger age had significant effects on topical steroid-induced IOP elevation, by 4.0 mmHg (P = 0.002) and 3.9 mmHg (P = 0.01), respectively. In tacrolimus-treated eyes, the most significant effect on the IOP was associated with glaucoma history or medication; however, its effect on the IOP was limited to 1.7 mmHg elevation (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Topical tacrolimus may lessen the steroid-induced elevation in IOP in younger individuals and may be a good adjunctive therapy to avoid IOP elevation in refractory cases.

Epidemiological aspects of allergic conjunctivitis.

The prevalence of ocular allergies has been increasing worldwide for the past several decades. The geographical distribution and hot spots of rhinoconjunctivitis have been documented in a global survey by the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC). ISAAC indicated that Africa, Latin America, and Japan were notable for their high prevalence of rhinoconjunctivitis. The outcomes of follow-up studies of regional differences and the characteristics of allergic conjunctivitis are summarized in this review. Currently, comorbid diseases and socioeconomic and environmental factors, including climate and air pollution, are proposed to contribute to the regional differences in the prevalence of allergic conjunctivitis. Of them, rhinitis has been shown repeatedly to be significantly associated with allergic conjunctivitis. Their mechanistic aspects on association with the prevalence of systemic allergic diseases have been reviewed by examining the birth cohort or in vitro analyses. A vision threatening form of ocular allergy, vernal keratoconjunctivitis, is prevalent in the African countries and Japan. Of the proposed associated factors, air pollution was shown to contribute not only to aggravating the symptoms but also to the increase in the incidence of its severe forms. Its mechanistic aspects are discussed in this review in the context of comorbid diseases.

Air pollution significantly associated with severe ocular allergic inflammatory diseases.

Ambient air pollution is a well-recognized risk for various diseases including asthma and heart diseases. However, it remains unclear whether air pollution may also be a risk of ocular allergic diseases. Using a web-based, nation-wide, cross-sectional study design, we examined whether the level of ambient air pollution is significantly associated with the prevalence of ocular allergic diseases. A web-based questionnaire was posted to invite the participants who are members of the Japan Ophthalmologist Association and their family members. The answers from 3004 respondents were used to determine whether there were significant associations between the level of the pollutants and the prevalence of ocular allergic diseases. The study period was between March to May 2017. The data of the air pollutants during 2012 to 2016 were obtained from the National Institute for Environmental Studies. The prevalence of allergic diseases was calculated by post stratification and examined for significant associations with the level of pollutants using multiple logistic regression analyses. The prevalence of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis, perennial allergic conjunctivitis, atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC), and vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) in Japan was 45.4%, 14.0%, 5.3%, and 1.2%, respectively. The high prevalence of the severe forms of allergic conjunctivitis, including AKC and VKC, were significantly associated with the levels of the air pollutants. The prevalence of AKC was significantly associated with the levels of NO2 with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.23 (per quintile). The prevalence of VKC was significantly associated with the levels of NOx and PM10 with ORs of 1.72 and 1.54 respectively. The significant associations between the prevalence of AKC and VKC and the levels of air pollutants indicate that clinicians need to be aware that air pollutants may pose serious risks of vision threatening severe ocular allergy.

Topical Tacrolimus for Chronic Allergic Conjunctival Disease with and without Atopic Dermatitis.

Purpose/Aim: This study evaluated the efficacy of topical 0.1% tacrolimus ophthalmic suspension for treating chronic allergic conjunctival disease with and without atopic dermatitis. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted as a prospective observational post-market survey. Our large-scale study protocol was accepted by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency in Japan and included patients who were prescribed topical tacrolimus for the treatment of chronic allergic conjunctival disease from May 2008 to Aug 2010 in Japan. Topical tacrolimus was instilled 2 times daily for 6 months. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in papillae-limbus-cornea clinical signs score (based on the presence of papillae, giant papillae, Trantas' dots, limbal swelling, and corneal epithelial signs). Remission rate following topical tacrolimus treatment was investigated using generalized estimating equations. Results: A total of 1821 subjects were included in the analyses. Six months into treatment, 83.0% and 87.7% of subjects with and without atopic dermatitis, respectively, were in remission (based on the papillae-limbus-cornea grading score). Topical tacrolimus treatment was equally effective in improving papillae-limbus-cornea grading scores from baseline in both study groups after 6 months of treatment. Additionally, the odds ratio for remission increased over time. The concomitant use of topical steroids improved papillae-limbus-cornea grading scores, including papillary signs with a statistically significant, but low odds ratio. Conclusion: Tacrolimus ophthalmic suspension is useful for treating chronic allergic conjunctival disease with and without atopic dermatitis. Clinical response to local tacrolimus therapy is dependent upon treatment duration.

Japanese guidelines for allergic conjunctival diseases 2017.

The definition, classification, pathogenesis, test methods, clinical findings, criteria for diagnosis, and therapies of allergic conjunctival disease are summarized based on the Guidelines for Clinical Management of Allergic Conjunctival Disease (Second Edition) revised in 2010. Allergic conjunctival disease is defined as "a conjunctival inflammatory disease associated with a Type I allergy accompanied by some subjective or objective symptoms." Allergic conjunctival disease is classified into allergic conjunctivitis, atopic keratoconjunctivitis, vernal keratoconjunctivitis, and giant papillary conjunctivitis. Representative subjective symptoms include ocular itching, hyperemia, and lacrimation, whereas objective symptoms include conjunctival hyperemia, swelling, folliculosis, and papillae. Patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis, which is characterized by conjunctival proliferative changes called giant papilla accompanied by varying extents of corneal lesion, such as corneal erosion and shield ulcer, complain of foreign body sensation, ocular pain, and photophobia. In the diagnosis of allergic conjunctival diseases, it is required that type I allergic diathesis is present, along with subjective and objective symptoms accompanying allergic inflammation. The diagnosis is ensured by proving a type I allergic reaction in the conjunctiva. Given that the first-line drug for the treatment of allergic conjunctival disease is an antiallergic eye drop, a steroid eye drop will be selected in accordance with the severity. In the treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis, an immunosuppressive eye drop will be concomitantly used with the abovementioned drugs.

Steroid-Sparing Effect of 0.1% Tacrolimus Eye Drop for Treatment of Shield Ulcer and Corneal Epitheliopathy in Refractory Allergic Ocular Diseases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of 0.1% topical tacrolimus alone or in combination with steroids for the treatment of shield ulcers and corneal epitheliopathy in patients with refractory allergic ocular diseases. DESIGN: Open cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with refractory allergic conjunctivitis epitheliopathy, shield ulcers, or corneal plaques (N = 791). METHODS: The 791 patients were treated with topical tacrolimus alone or in combination with topical or oral steroids. The effectiveness of the treatments was determined by a corneal epitheliopathy score during the 3-month follow-up period. The clinical signs were rated on a 4-grade scale. Corneal epitheliopathy with no corneal staining was graded as 0, and shield ulcers or plaques were graded as 3, the highest grade. The effects of tacrolimus with and without topical steroids on the epitheliopathy scores were assessed after adjustments for the severity of the clinical signs and characteristics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in the corneal epitheliopathy score. RESULTS: Adjusted mean epitheliopathy score at the baseline was 1.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-1.81) for patients treated with tacrolimus alone, and this was significantly reduced by -0.93 at 1 month. The reduction of the score by topical and oral steroids was -0.02 for fluorometholone, 0.02 for betamethasone, and -0.02 for oral steroids, and these reductions were not significant compared with the reduction effect of topical tacrolimus alone at -0.93. The 238 patients with shield ulcer (score 3) were analyzed with adjustments, and the mean epitheliopathy score at 1 month was reduced to 1.38 with tacrolimus alone (95% CI, 1.24-1.51), 1.41 (95% CI, 1.26-1.56) with adjuvant fluorometholone, and 1.46 (95% CI, 1.32-1.61) with adjuvant betamethasone. No significant difference was observed in the adjunctive topical steroids. The presence of severe palpebral conjunctival symptoms, including giant papillae, was a significant resisting factor for topical tacrolimus. CONCLUSIONS: The significant effects of topical tacrolimus alone on shield ulcers and corneal epitheliopathy suggest that it may be used without the need for steroids.

Therapeutic effects of 0.1% tacrolimus eye drops for refractory allergic ocular diseases with proliferative lesion or corneal involvement.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of topical 0.1% tacrolimus in treating refractory allergic conjunctivitis with proliferative lesions and/or corneal involvement. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 1436 patients with refractory allergic conjunctivitis whose condition had responded poorly to conventional antiallergic drugs and/or topical steroids and/or topical cyclosporine. All patients received tacrolimus eye drops twice daily during the study period. Ten clinical signs and six clinical symptoms were rated on a four-grade scale. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in total clinical signs and symptoms score at the last observation or following 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: Total signs and symptoms score significantly decreased after 1 month of treatment (p<0.001). Giant papillae and corneal lesions were also reduced by tacrolimus eye drop use (p<0.001). The drug proved effective in patients whose condition did not respond well to topical cyclosporine therapy. About 50% of all patients using topical steroids were weaned. The most common adverse reaction was a transient burning sensation (3.20%). CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus eye drops are highly effective in treating refractory allergic conjunctivitis with proliferative lesions and/or corneal involvement, and may reduce or replace topical steroid use. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN 000008640.

Prospective clinical evaluation of 1.5% levofloxacin ophthalmic solution in ophthalmic perioperative disinfection.

PURPOSE: Gram-positive cocci and Propionibacterium acnes are widely reported agents of infectious postoperative endophthalmitis. This multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the eradication effectiveness and safety profile of levofloxacin 1.5% ophthalmic solution (LVFX 1.5%) for use in perioperative disinfection. METHODS: Patients who were scheduled for cataract surgery were enrolled. The perioperative regimen of LVFX 1.5% was administered 3 times daily as follows: preoperative 3 days; the day of surgery (in the morning, 1 h before surgery, and immediately after surgery); and postoperative 2 weeks. Conjunctival sac scrapings were collected 3 times in the observation period; before preoperative administration, before iodine eyewash on the day of surgery, and after completion of postoperative administration. Isolated and identified microbial strains were assessed for antibacterial susceptibility. RESULTS: One hundred patients were enrolled and data obtained from 96 patients (mean age, 72.7 ± 8.9 years). The preoperative eradication rate was 86.7% in total microbes. In the case of gram-positive cocci, the preoperative eradication rate was 100%, even though there were LVFX-registrant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, which had a high minimum inhibitory concentration against LVFX, such as 32 µg/mL. On the other hand, that of P. acnes was 78.3%. No acquired drug resistance was suspected in all strains. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 4.2% patients, and all were slight. CONCLUSIONS: For ophthalmic perioperative disinfection, the LVFX 1.5% ophthalmic solution showed a good safety profile, and critical eradication of gram-positive cocci, including the fluoroquinolone-resistant strains.

Multicentre clinical study of the herpes simplex virus immunochromatographic assay kit for the diagnosis of herpetic epithelial keratitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The novel immunochromatographic assay (ICGA) kit was recently developed to diagnose herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection. This multicentre study aimed to evaluate the value of the ICGA kit for the diagnosis of herpetic epithelial keratitis by comparing it with immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and real-time PCR. METHODS: Corneal scrapings were collected from 117 patients, including 77 with herpetic keratitis as their final clinical diagnosis as well as 40 others at 21 facilities. These samples were tested by the ICGA kit, IFA and real-time PCR. RESULTS: The positive concordance between final clinical diagnosis and ICGA was 46.7% (35/75 cases) and the negative concordance was 100% (39/39). The positive and negative concordance between real-time PCR and ICGA were 57.4% (35/61 cases) and 100% (53/53), respectively. The positive and negative concordance between IFA and ICGA were 61.1% (22/36 cases) and 83.3% (55/66), respectively. In 92 cases where anti-HSV drugs were not prescribed prior to corneal scraping, the positive and negative concordance between final clinical diagnosis and ICGA were 55.0% (33/60 cases) and 100% (32/32), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ICGA kit has moderate sensitivity and high specificity, indicating clinical utility in the diagnosis of herpetic epithelial keratitis.

[A quality of life questionnaire for Japanese allergic conjunctival disease].

PURPOSE: To establish a specific quality of life (QOL) questionnaire for Japanese allergic conjunctival disease (ACD) (Japanese allergic conjunctival disease QOL questionnaire: JACQLQ). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A multicenter study was conducted in 521 patients with ACD and 127 healthy volunteers (total 648 cases). The JACQLQ ver. 0 was developed by modifying the Japanese rhino-conjunctivitis QOL questionnaire (JRQLQ). The participants were asked to complete the questionnaire, and objective scores were determined by an ophthalmologist using a slit lamp. To confirm validity, item and factor analyses were conducted and correlation coefficients were calculated. RESULTS: The items were grouped into four subscales (Daily activity, Psychological well-being, Eye symptoms, Nasal symptoms) after factor analysis. The JACQLQ had good item-internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha: 0.846-0.934). QOL scores were correlated with eye itching, eye irritation and tearing. Objective scores were correlated with eye redness, eye itching and eye irritation. Face scores were correlated with eye itching, eye irritation and eye redness. CONCLUSION: The JACQLQ is a useful tool for assessing disease specific QOL in ACD.

[Evaluation of the efficacy of subjective symptoms, objective findings, and of a total tear IgE detection kit in diagnosis of allergic conjunctival diseases].

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of subjective symptoms, objective findings, and of a total tear IgE test kit in the diagnosis of allergic conjunctival diseases (ACD). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were 223 patients with ACD, diagnosed according to the clinical practice guidelines for allergic conjunctival diseases in 28 medical facilities in Japan. The ACD patients were divided into the following five groups: 84 patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC), 52 patients with perennial allergic conjunctivitis (PAC), 41 patients with atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC), 38 patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) and 8 patients with giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC). All cases were examined for clinical ACD, subjective symptoms, objective findings by the clinical score and by a total tear IgE test. An eosinophil examination by conjunctival smear was also performed in 87 ACD patients. RESULTS: The most prevalent subjective symptoms were itching (81.6%) and hyperemia (77.6%). The clinical scores of the objective findings in the patients with SAC, PAC, AKC, VKC and GPC were 16.3 +/- 3.8 (mean +/- SD) points, 16.2 +/- 2.8, 19.8 +/- 6.5, 23.1 +/- 5.3, and 21.4 +/- 3.9, respectively. In the total tear IgE test 72.2% of the ACD patients were positive; i.e., the ratios were 61.9% in SAC, 65.4% in PAC, 80.5% in AKC, 94.7% in VKC, and 75.0% in GPC. In the examination of eosinophils in the 87 ACD patients, 42.5% (37 eyes) were positive, i.e., the ratio was 20.0% in SAC, 36.8% in PAC, 53.3% in AKC, 75.0% in VKC and 33.3% in GPC. The rate of agreement between the total tear IgE test and the examination of eosinophils was kappa = 0.28 (Cohen kappa coefficient). CONCLUSION: Because of the high positive ratio in patients quasi-definitively diagnosed with ACD, we conclude that the total tear IgE test is useful as an auxiliary method for diagnosing ACD.

Blood level of tacrolimus in patients with severe allergic conjunctivitis treated by 0.1% tacrolimus ophthalmic suspension.

BACKGROUND: To estimate the efficacy and safety of 0.1% tacrolimus ophthalmic suspension based on the blood level of tacrolimus in patients with severe allergic conjunctivitis. METHODS: Fifty-two patients in whom topical anti-allergic agents had been ineffective were treated with 0.1% tacrolimus ophthalmic suspension twice daily for 12 weeks. Adverse drug reactions were monitored, as well as ocular symptoms and signs. The blood concentration of tacrolimus was measured before the initiation of treatment and 4 and 12 weeks later. RESULTS: About 75% of the patients without concomitant using of tacrolimus ointment had blood levels of tacrolimus below the detection limit of the assay (0.5ng/mL). On the other hand, 71% (week 4) and 57% (week 12) of patients with concomitant using of tacrolimus ointment had blood levels above the detection limit of the assay. However, the maximum blood concentration was less than 2ng/mL. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 16 patients. These were disorders of the eye such as warmness, irritation, and a burning sensation. However, all of the patients could continue treatment with tacrolimus for 12 weeks. There were no serious adverse events such as increased intraocular pressure or ocular infection during the study. All symptoms and signs improved over time. CONCLUSIONS: The good safety profile of 0.1% tacrolimus ophthalmic suspension based on the low blood concentration of tacrolimus, coupled with demonstrated efficacy, make it an important tool for treating severe allergic conjunctivitis.

Comparison of wavefront-guided aspheric laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: coaxially sighted corneal-light-reflex versus line-of-sight centration.

PURPOSE: To compare refractive outcomes, higher-order aberrations (HOAs), and contrast sensitivity of myopic wavefront-guided aspheric laser in situ keratomileusis centered on the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex or on the line of sight. SETTING: Okamoto Eye Clinic, Ehime, Japan. DESIGN: Comparative case series. METHODS: Data at 3 months were compared based on the distance between the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex and the line of sight (P-distance) as follows: distance greater than 0.25 mm (high-distance group), distance greater than 0.15 mm and less than 0.25 mm (intermediate-distance group), and distance less than 0.15 mm (low distance group). RESULTS: The chart review included 317 eyes in the corneal-light-reflex group and 269 eyes in the line-of-sight group. The mean postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent was +0.123 diopter (D) ± 0.378 (SD) and +0.187 ± 0.480 D, respectively (P = .07). The safety and efficacy indices were significantly higher in the corneal-light-reflex group, including the high-distance subgroup and eyes with a P-distance less than 0.25 mm (P<.05, all cases). The HOAs (P<.001) and coma (P = .001) were significantly higher in the line-of-sight group (P<.001 and P = .001, respectively). The line-of-sight group had a significantly greater change in contrast sensitivity (P = .026). CONCLUSIONS: Centration on the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex resulted in better safety, effectiveness, and contrast sensitivity than line-of-sight centration. Centration on the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex was safer for myopic eyes with P-distances greater than 0.25 mm. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosures are found in the footnotes.

[A prospective, observational, all-prescribed-patients study of cyclosporine 0.1% ophthalmic solution in the treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis].

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of topical cyclosporine 0.1% in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC). METHODS: All patients who were prescribed topical cyclosporine 0.1% during the 2 year period after market launch were registered and followed up for 6 months. We assessed the severity of 6 subjective ocular symptoms, such as itching and 10 objective signs, such as giant papillae in the tarsal conjunctiva. RESULTS: All scores for symptoms and signs in 2597 patients with VKC significantly decreased throughout a 6-month follow-up. For total symptoms scores, mean changes from baseline at 1, 3, and 6 months were -4.0, -4.8, and -5.1, respectively. Total sign scores were -4.6, -6.1, and -6.5, respectively. Thirty percent of topical steroid users were able to discontinue the steroids within 3 months. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were found in 7.44% of patients, the most common ADR being eye irritation. Ocular infections were observed in 1.44% of patients. During long-term use of topical cyclosporine 0.1%, there was no increase in the incidence of ADR and no late-onset ADRs. CONCLUSIONS: Topical cyclosporine 0.1% is an effective and safe treatment for VKC over the long term, provided care is exercised to avoid the occurrence of infection.

Japanese guideline for allergic conjunctival diseases.

The definition, classification, pathogenesis, test methods, clinical findings, criteria for diagnosis, and therapies of allergic conjunctival disease are summarized based on the Guidelines for Clinical Management of Allergic Conjunctival Disease (Second Edition) revised in 2010. Allergic conjunctival disease is defined as "a conjunctival inflammatory disease associated with a Type I allergy accompanied by some subjective or objective symptoms." Allergic conjunctival disease is classified into allergic conjunctivitis, atopic keratoconjunctivitis, vernal keratoconjunctivitis, and giant papillary conjunctivitis. Representative subjective symptoms include ocular itching, hyperemia, and lacrimation, whereas objective symptoms include conjunctival hyperemia, swelling, folliculosis, and papillae. Patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis, which is characterized by conjunctival proliferative changes called giant papilla accompanied by varying extents of corneal lesion, such as corneal erosion and shield ulcer, complain of foreign body sensation, ocular pain, and photophobia. In the diagnosis of allergic conjunctival diseases, it is required that type I allergic diathesis is present, along with subjective and objective symptoms accompanying allergic inflammation. The diagnosis is ensured by proving a type I allergic reaction in the conjunctiva. Given that the first-line drug for the treatment of allergic conjunctival disease is an antiallergic eye drop, a steroid eye drop will be selected in accordance with the severity. In the treatment of vernal keratoconjunctivitis, an immunosuppressive eye drop will be concomitantly used with the above mentioned drugs.

Epidemiological and virological features of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis due to new human adenovirus type 54 in Japan.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: New human adenovirus (HAdV)-54 causes epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) and is virologically close to and has occasionally been detected as HAdV-8. Taking HAdV-54 into account, we re-determined HAdV type in EKC samples to determine its epidemiology in Japan, and examined the virological features of HAdV-54. METHODS: HAdV type was re-determined in 776 conjunctival swabs from Japan and 174 from six other countries, obtained between 2000 and 2009. Using 115 HAdV strains obtained before 1999, trends regarding HAdV-8 and HAdV-54 were also determined. In addition, immunochromatography (IC) kit features, DNA copy numbers and viral isolation of HAdV-54 in samples were evaluated. RESULTS: Recently, HAdV-37 and HAdV-54 have been the major causative types of EKC in Japan. HAdV-54 has been isolated each year since 1995, whereas HAdV-8 has become less common since 1997, although it remains the most common cause of EKC in the six other countries investigated where HAdV-54 is yet to be detected. HAdV-54 is comparable to other EKC-related HAdV types in terms of IC kit sensitivity and DNA copy numbers, although HAdV-54 grows more slowly on viral isolation. CONCLUSIONS: EKC due to HAdV-54 can result in epidemics; therefore, it should be accurately diagnosed and monitored as an emerging infection worldwide.

A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of tacrolimus ophthalmic suspension 0.1% in severe allergic conjunctivitis.

AIMS: To examine the efficacy of tacrolimus ophthalmic suspension 0.1% in treating severe allergic conjunctivitis. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Fifty-six patients with severe allergic conjunctivitis in whom topical antiallergic agents and corticosteroids had been ineffective were randomized to tacrolimus or placebo treatment. Patients were treated either with tacrolimus or placebo twice-daily for 4 weeks. Severity of objective signs in palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva, limbus, and corneal involvement was assessed using 4 grades. Seven subjective symptoms were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) assessment. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in the total score of objective signs at the end of treatment. The secondary efficacy endpoints included change in the score for each objective sign and change in the VAS for each subjective symptom. Safety was assessed based on the severity and the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Mean change from baseline in total score for objective signs was significantly greater in the tacrolimus (-5.6 + or - 5.1) than in the placebo group (-0.1 + or - 4.5; P < 0.001). Tacrolimus significantly improved giant papillae (P = 0.001) and corneal involvement (P = 0.005). Five subjective symptoms (itching, discharge, hyperemia, lacrimation, and foreign body sensation) were significantly better in the tacrolimus than in the placebo group. The most frequent treatment-related adverse event in the tacrolimus group was mild ocular irritation upon topical instillation, which was well-tolerated. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus ophthalmic suspension 0.1% is effective in treating severe allergic conjunctivitis.

Comparison of myopic LASIK centered on the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex or line of sight.

PURPOSE: To compare refractive outcomes of myopic LASIK with centration on the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex (CSCLR) to centration on the center of the pupil (line of sight [LOS]). METHODS: The NIDEK CXIII excimer laser was used to treat 268 eyes with centration on the CSCLR (CSCLR group) and 288 eyes with centration on the LOS (LOS group). For the CSCLR group, the laser ablation was delivered 80% closer to the visual axis. One-month postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was -4.88+/-1.55 diopters (D) (range: -8.50 to -1.25 D) in the CSCLR group and -5.05+/-1.63 D (range: -9.75 to -1.50 D) in the LOS group. The postoperative MRSE was 0.17+/-0.39 D (range: -1.38 to -1.25 D) in the CSCLR group and 0.19+/-0.48 D (range: -1.63 to +1.88 D) in the LOS group. Safety (1.18) and efficacy (1.047) indices were statistically significantly higher in the CSCLR group compared to the LOS group (1.138 and 0.997, respectively) (P<.05). This trend was accentuated in a subgroup analysis of patients with >0.25-mm difference between the CSCLR and LOS, favoring the CSCLR group. A statistically significantly greater induction of higher order aberrations (P=.04) and coma (P<.01) was noted in the LOS group postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Myopic LASIK centered on the CSCLR was significantly safer and more effective than LASIK centered on the pupil (LOS), with significantly lower induction of coma and total higher order aberrations.