Lived Experience of Parastomal Bulging: A Mixed Methods Study.

Aim: This United Kingdom study aimed to explore people's experiences of living with, and self-managing parastomal bulging. Methods: Seventeen people were interviewed and 61 people completed an online survey. Results: Parastomal bulging has a detrimental impact on quality of life including a negative impact on stoma function, daily activities, body image, physical intimacy, and socialising; access to specialist information and support for addressing the problem of bulging was inequitable; support garments were the most common self-management intervention; there was confusion about what exercise would be beneficial or how being active would help in terms of parastomal bulging self-management; peer support is no substitute for high quality specialist support. Conclusion: People need equitable access to information and support to self-manage and treat parastomal bulging. Research about other types of self-management interventions, for example, exercise is required so that people do not have to rely solely on support garments to self-manage parastomal bulging.

Influencing factors in surgical decision-making: a qualitative analysis of colorectal surgeons' experiences of postoperative complications.

AIM: When making anastomotic decisions in rectal cancer surgery, surgeons must consider the risk of anastomotic leakage, which bears implications for the patient's quality of life, cancer recurrence and, potentially, death. The aim of this study was to investigate the views of colorectal surgeons on how their individual attributes (e.g. experience, personality traits) may influence their decision-making and experience of complications. METHOD: This qualitative study used individual interviews for data collection. Purposive sampling was used to invite certified UK-based colorectal surgeons to participate. Participants were recruited until ongoing data review indicated no new codes were generated, suggesting data sufficiency. Data were analysed thematically following Braun and Clarke's six-step framework. RESULTS: Seventeen colorectal surgeons (eight female, nine male) participated. Two key themes with relevant subthemes were identified: (1) personal attributes influencing variation in decision-making (e.g. demographics, personality) and (2) the influence of complications on decision-making. Surgeons described variation in the management of complications based upon their personal attributes, which included factors such as gender, experience and subspeciality interests. Surgeons described the detrimental impact of anastomotic leakage on their mental and physical health. Experience of anastomotic leakage influences future decision-making and is associated with changes in practice even when a technical error is not identified. CONCLUSION: Colorectal surgeons consider anastomotic leaks to be personal 'failures', which has a negative impact on surgeon welfare. Better understanding of how surgeons make difficult decisions, and how surgeons respond to and learn from complications, is necessary to identify 'personalized' methods of supporting surgeons at all career stages, which may improve patient outcomes.

Hernia Active Living Trial (HALT): an exercise intervention in people with a parastomal hernia or bulge.

BACKGROUND: Parastomal hernias are a common consequence of stoma surgery and can occur in up to 50% of patients. They are mangaged either conservatively, through support hosiery, or surgically. A patient feasibility study called the Hernia Active Living Trial (HALT) was designed to examine if a clinical pilates-based exercise programme offers an alternative approach to managing a parastomal hernia or bulge. METHOD: Adults with an ileostomy or colostomy who perceived they had a bulge around their stoma were included in the study. The intervention included up to 12 online sessions of an exercise booklet and videos with an exercise specialist. Interviews were conducted to explore participants' experiences of the intervention. The interview data were analysed systematically and thematically. Participants were also asked to complete patient diaries every week. RESULTS: Twelve of the 13 participants who completed the intervention agreed to be interviewed. Following analysis, three main themes emerged including managing a hernia/bulge, benefits and barriers. Participants talked about the benefits of this programme including: reduction of the size of their hernia, increased abdominal control, body confidence and posture, as well as increased physical activity levels. The barriers described were generally overcome allowing participants to engage in what was perceived to be a positive and potentially life-changing experience. CONCLUSIONS: A clinical pilates-based exercise programme for people with a parastomal hernia can bring both direct and indirect improvements to a patient's hernia management, sense of wellbeing and day-to-day life. Individuals with a hernia should be informed about the need for, and value of, exercise to strengthen core muscles, as part of their non-surgical options for self-management.

Hernia Active Living Trial (HALT): a feasibility study of a physical activity intervention for people with a bowel stoma who have a parastomal hernia/bulge.

BACKGROUND: Parastomal bulging/hernia is a common complication associated with a stoma. Strengthening of the abdominal muscles via exercise may be a useful self-management strategy. The aim of this feasibility work was to address uncertainties around testing a Pilates-based exercise intervention for people with parastomal bulging. METHODS: An exercise intervention was developed and tested in a single-arm trial (n = 17 recruited via social media) followed by a feasibility randomised controlled trial RCT (n = 19 recruited from hospitals). Adults with an ileostomy or colostomy with a bulge or diagnosed hernia around their stoma were eligible. The intervention involved a booklet, videos, and up to 12 online sessions with an exercise specialist. Feasibility outcomes included intervention acceptability, fidelity, adherence, and retention. Acceptability of self-report measures for quality of life, self-efficacy, and physical activity were assessed based on missing data within surveys pre- and post-intervention. Interviews (n = 12) explored participants' qualitative experiences of the intervention. RESULTS: Nineteen of 28 participants referred to the intervention completed the programme (67%) and received an average of 8 sessions, lasting a mean of 48 min. Sixteen participants completed follow-up measures (44% retention), with low levels of missing data across the different measures, apart from body image and work/social function quality of life subscales (50% and 56% missing, respectively). Themes from qualitative interviews related to the benefits of being involved, including behavioural and physical changes in addition to improved mental health. Identified barriers included time constraints and health issues. CONCLUSIONS: The exercise intervention was feasible to deliver, acceptable to participants, and potentially helpful. Qualitative data suggests physical and psycholosical benefits. Strategies to improve retention need to be included in a future study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN15207595 . Registered on 11 July 2019.

Healthcare Professional and Patient Perceptions of Changes in Colorectal Cancer Care Delivery During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Impact on Health Inequalities.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic changed the way in which people were diagnosed and treated for cancer. We explored healthcare professional and patient perceptions of the main changes to colorectal cancer delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic and how they impacted on socioeconomic inequalities in care. METHODS: In 2020, using a qualitative approach, we interviewed patients (n = 15) who accessed primary care with colorectal cancer symptoms and were referred for further investigations. In 2021, we interviewed a wide range of healthcare professionals (n = 30) across the cancer care pathway and gathered national and local documents/guidelines regarding changes in colorectal cancer care. RESULTS: Changes with the potential to exacerbate inequalities in care, included: the move to remote consultations; changes in symptomatic triage, new COVID testing procedures/ways to access healthcare, changes in visitor policies and treatment (e.g., shorter course radiotherapy). Changes that improved patient access/convenience or the diagnostic process have the potential to reduce inequalities in care. DISCUSSION: Changes in healthcare delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic have the ongoing potential to exacerbate existing health inequalities due to changes in how patients are triaged, changes to diagnostic and disease management processes, reduced social support available to patients and potential over-reliance on digital first approaches. We provide several recommendations to help mitigate these harms, whilst harnessing the gains.

Exploring variation in surgical practice: does surgeon personality influence anastomotic decision-making?

BACKGROUND: Decision-making under uncertainty may be influenced by an individual's personality. The primary aim was to explore associations between surgeon personality traits and colorectal anastomotic decision-making. METHODS: Colorectal surgeons worldwide participated in a two-part online survey. Part 1 evaluated surgeon characteristics using the Big Five Inventory to measure personality (five domains: agreeableness; conscientiousness; extraversion; emotional stability; openness) in response to scenarios presented in Part 2 involving anastomotic decisions (i.e. rejoining the bowel with/without temporary stomas, or permanent diversion with end colostomy). Anastomotic decisions were compared using repeated-measure ANOVA. Mean scores of traits domains were compared with normative data using two-tailed t tests. RESULTS: In total, 186 surgeons participated, with 127 surgeons completing both parts of the survey (68.3 per cent). One hundred and thirty-one surgeons were male (70.4 per cent) and 144 were based in Europe (77.4 per cent). Forty-one per cent (77 surgeons) had begun independent practice within the last 5 years. Surgeon personality differed from the general population, with statistically significantly higher levels of emotional stability (3.25 versus 2.97 respectively), lower levels of agreeableness (3.03 versus 3.74), extraversion (2.81 versus 3.38) and openness (3.19 versus 3.67), and similar levels of conscientiousness (3.42 versus 3.40 (all P <0.001)). Female surgeons had significantly lower levels of openness (P <0.001) than males (3.06 versus 3.25). Personality was associated with anastomotic decision-making in specific scenarios. CONCLUSION: Colorectal surgeons have different personality traits from the general population. Certain traits seem to be associated with anastomotic decision-making but only in specific scenarios. Further exploration of the association of personality, risk-taking, and decision-making in surgery is necessary.

HALT (Hernia Active Living Trial): protocol for a feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial of a physical activity intervention to improve quality of life in people with bowel stoma with a bulge/parastomal hernia.

BACKGROUND: Parastomal hernia (PSH) can be repaired surgically, but results to date have been disappointing, with reported recurrence rates of 30 to 76%. Other types of intervention are therefore needed to improve the quality of life of people with PSH. One potential intervention is physical activity. We hypothesise that the intervention will increase core activation and control across the abdominal wall at a site of potential weakness and thus reduce the risk of PSH progression. Increases in physical activity will improve body image and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: Subjects and sampleThere were approximately 20 adults with a bowel stoma and PSH. People with previous PSH repair will be excluded as well as people who already do core training.Study designThis is a feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial with 2 months follow-up, in 2 sites using mixed methods. Stage 1 involves intervention development and in stage 2, intervention and trial parameters will be assessed.InterventionA theoretically informed physical activity intervention was done, targeting people with PSH.Main outcome of feasibility studyThe main outcome is the decision by an independent Study Steering Committee whether to proceed to a full randomised controlled trial of the intervention.Other outcomesWe will evaluate 4 intervention parameters-fidelity, adherence, acceptability and safety and 3 trial parameters (eligible patients' consent rate, acceptability of study design and data availability rates for following endpoints): I.Diagnosis and classification of PSHII.Muscle activationIII.Body composition (BMI, waist circumference)IV.Patient reported outcomes: QoL, body image and physical functioningV.Physical activity;VI.Psychological determinants of physical activityOther dataIncluded are other data such as interviews with all participants about the intervention and trial procedures.Data analysis and statistical powerAs this is a feasibility study, the quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics. Audio-recorded qualitative data from interviews will be transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. DISCUSSION: The feasibility and acceptability of key intervention and trial parameters will be used to decide whether to proceed to a full trial of the intervention, which aims to improve body image, quality of life and PSH progression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN15207595.

Experiences of wearing support garments by people living with a urostomy.

BACKGROUND: support garments are commonly worn by people with a urostomy but there are no published data about their experiences of doing so. AIMS: to identify the views of people living with a urostomy on the role of support garments. METHODS: a cross-sectional survey of the stoma population's experiences of support garments was conducted in 2018. Recruitment was by social media. The free-text responses provided by a sub-sample of 58 people out of 103 respondents with a urostomy, were analysed. FINDINGS: thematic analysis revealed four themes: physical self-management; psychosocial self-management; lifestyle; and healthcare advice and support. There were mixed feelings about the value of support garments. Many cited a sense of reassurance and confidence and being able to be more sociable and active; others reported discomfort and uncertainty about their value. CONCLUSION: these findings add new understanding of experiences of support garments and provide novel theoretical insights about life with a urostomy.

Experiences of support garments following bowel stoma formation: analysis of free-text responses in a cross-sectional survey.

AIM: To explore the experiences of support garments when adjusting to bodily change following bowel stoma formation. DESIGN: Thematic analyses of free-text responses in a cross-sectional survey of the stoma population in 2018. METHODS: Free-text responses were invited so that respondents could describe their experiences in more detail. A process of induction was chosen to allow for themes to emerge directly from the data. The concept 'embodiment' was used as a theoretical framework during interpretation. RESULTS: 1425 people with a bowel stoma responded to the survey, of whom 598 provided free-text responses. Four themes about experiences of support garments in the context of changed bodily experiences following stoma formation were identified: body complications, which is about experiences of using support garments to prevent or self-manage parastomal hernia; body appearance, which is about hiding the stoma and stoma appliance; body function, which is about managing stoma appliance complications; and body sensation, which is mainly about negative experiences of ill-fitting garments. CONCLUSION: Support garments can be understood as items that are used by people during an ongoing process of adjusting to bodily changes following stoma formation and as part of an ongoing process of reconstructing new embodied selves. IMPACT: This is the first study to explore people's experiences of support garments following bowel stoma formation. Support garments are used in the self-management of body complications, appearance, function and sensations. Stoma nurses may draw on the findings of this study to advise patients about the benefits of garments for adjusting to bodily change, and garment suppliers should address people's negative experiences by improving garments.

Neurovasculature of high and low tie ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery.

PURPOSE: Controversy exists as to whether a high or low tie ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is the preferred technique in surgeries of the left colon and rectum. This study aims to contribute to the discussion as to which is the more beneficial technique by investigating the neurovasculature at each site. METHODS: Ten embalmed cadaveric donors underwent division of the inferior mesenteric artery at the level of the low tie. The artery was subsequently ligated at the root to render a section of tissue for histological analysis of the proximal (high tie), mid and distal (low tie) segments. RESULTS: Ganglia observed in the proximal end of seven specimens in the sample imply that there would be disruption to the innervation in a high tie procedure. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a high tie should be avoided if the low tie is oncologically viable.

Colorectal cancer in the elderly and the influence of lead time bias: better survival does not equate with improved life expectancy.

AIMS: Poorer outcomes in those aged ≥80 years who undergo colorectal cancer surgery have been previously reported. Little is known about the natural history of those managed non-operatively. We explored outcomes in all patients with colorectal cancer aged ≥80 years at time of diagnosis based on treatment received. METHODS: Patients ≥80 years diagnosed with colorectal cancer in one hospital trust between 1998 and 2011 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Primary endpoints were age at diagnosis, age at death/censor and mortality at 30, 90 and 365 days. RESULTS: Six hundred sixty-eight patients were identified. Four hundred twelve (61.7%) underwent surgery, 44 (6.6%) received endoscopic therapy and 212 (31.7%) had no active treatment. Of those who underwent surgery, 359 (87.1%) had resectional surgery, 34 (8.3%) defunctioning only, 13 (3.2%) received bypass surgery and 6 (1.5%) had an open and close laparotomy. The mean age at diagnosis was younger in those who underwent surgical resection (83.7 years) compared to those having defunctioning surgery (84.9 years, P = 0.043), endoscopic therapy (85.1 years, P = 0.008) or no surgical intervention (85.6 years, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the mean age of death or censor between groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in age at death or censor between treatment groups among patients aged ≥80 years presenting with colorectal cancer, suggesting that differences in the observed survival time are heavily influenced by lead time bias. Age at death or censor should be reported in addition to survival times in this age group to enable fair comparison of outcomes.

The Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Stoma-Related Complications After Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess stoma-related complications of colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery with curative intent who received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to those who underwent surgery alone. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained colorectal cancer clinical audit database was completed. SUBJECTS AND SETTINGS: Patients undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer with the formation of a stoma (end ileostomy, loop ileostomy, end colostomy) between 1999 and 2011 at a single hospital in Lanarkshire, United Kingdom. Patients who underwent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Two hundred twenty-two patients comprised the study sample; 130 (59%) were male. Seventy-five (34%) patients comprised the chemotherapy group and 147 (66%) made up the surgery-only group. Patients in the chemotherapy group were younger (61.6 vs 65.4 years; P = .001) and had higher stage colorectal cancer (P < .001). There was no difference in baseline (day 10) stoma scores between the chemotherapy or surgery-only groups. METHODS: Postoperative stoma-related complications were serially assessed using a stoma complication scoring tool; scores were calculated at 10 days and 3 months postoperatively. Scores of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were compared to scores of participants who underwent surgery alone. INSTRUMENT: A composite stoma function score was calculated for each patient after assessment of stoma-related complications. The overall score included a global assessment of stoma quality (stoma retraction, prolapse, stenosis, parastomal hernia, skin changes) and patient-reported stoma function (leakage, soiling, nighttime emptying, odor). RESULTS: At 3 months, the mean loop ileostomy stoma function score was poorer among the chemotherapy group when compared to the surgery-only group (4.55 vs 1.53; P = .041). No differences were found when colostomy (2.00 vs 2.62; P = .411) or end ileostomy (1.00 vs 2.00; P = .170) function scores were compared at 3 months. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer resulting in a loop ileostomy who received adjuvant chemotherapy had higher stoma complication scores at 3 months compared to those who underwent surgery with no chemotherapy. This difference was not seen in patients with colostomies or end ileostomies. Patients, WOC nurses, and medical staff must be alert to the potential of increased loop ileostomy-related complications with adjuvant chemotherapy. Fully informed patient consent coupled with timely support and advice may reduce stoma-related morbidity and improve quality of life for such patients.